Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 40(2): 171-179, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28838706

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess change in knowledge and preference for epidural use associated with use of an information pamphlet and to explore women's decision-making and information needs regarding pain relief in labour. METHODS: Six focus groups with women who were pregnant or had given birth during the past 12 months were conducted in three northern communities in British Columbia. Following completion of a 10-item knowledge pretest, women were randomly assigned to read either a short version or a detailed version of the pamphlet and then complete a post-test. After reading the alternate pamphlet they participated in a moderated discussion. Pretest and post-test knowledge scores were compared, and a thematic analysis of focus group data was conducted. RESULTS: Knowledge scores increased (2.12 points out of a possible total of 10; standard deviation 2.38; 95% CI 1.38 to 2.87). There was no difference in knowledge change or epidural preferences according to which version participants read first. Women preferred the detailed version and indicated that its information was more balanced. Four themes related to decision-making and information needs arose from the focus groups: making an informed choice, being open-minded, wanting comprehensive information, and experiencing pressure to have/not have an epidural. CONCLUSION: An illustrated information pamphlet can significantly increase women's knowledge of benefits and risks of epidural analgesia, but it is not associated with change of preference. Women prefer to receive comprehensive information prenatally to support informed choices in labour.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Adulto , Colúmbia Britânica , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto/fisiologia , Folhetos , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
2.
Semin Reprod Med ; 40(5-06): 268-276, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36746159

RESUMO

Mifepristone medication abortion was first approved in China and France more than 30 years ago and is now used in more than 60 countries worldwide. It is a highly safe and effective method that has the potential to increase population access to abortion in early pregnancy, closer to home. In both Canada and the United States, the initial regulations for distribution, prescribing, and dispensing of mifepristone were highly restricted. However, in Canada, where mifepristone was made available in 2017, most restrictions on the medication were removed in the first year of its availability. The Canadian regulation of mifepristone as a normal prescription makes access possible in community primary care through a physician or nurse practitioner prescription, which any pharmacist can dispense. In this approach, people decide when and where to take their medication. We explore how policy-maker-engaged research advanced reproductive health policy and facilitated this rapid change in Canada. We discuss the implications of these policy advances for self-management of abortion and demonstrate how in Canada patients "self-manage" components of the abortion process within a supportive health care system.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo , Misoprostol , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Mifepristona/uso terapêutico , Canadá , Saúde Reprodutiva , Política de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA