Are breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy younger now than ten years ago?

AIM: The aim of the present study was to analyze the age of breast cancer patients managed with curative approach at the time of treatment with radiotherapy. BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most frequent neoplasm in women. Little is known with regard to the age of patients at diagnosis, and some authors have suggested that breast cancer is now affecting women who are younger than before. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a descriptive study of our series of breast cancer patients from 1998 to 2011. The age of patients, city of residence, year of treatment and uni- or bilateral location were extracted from the administrative database of the Radiation Oncology Department. The demographical and reference populational data were extracted from the Catalan Institute of Statistics. RESULTS: 3382 patients were obtained. The mean age was 57.79 years. No statistical differences were observed in the mean age during the period of study (p > 0.05), nor in patients with bilateral neoplasias with regard to unilateral tumours (p > 0.5). Patients aged less than 30, 40, 50 and 65 years were 0.3%, 6.3%, 27.0% and 69.1%, respectively. The proportion of patients aged less, equal or more than 40 and 50 years was not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy after radical surgery have not experienced significant changes in their mean age at treatment. The subgroups of patients that remain out of the mammographic screening programmes were unchanged as well. The observed differences can be explained by demographical disparities and by a probable increase in the indications for adjuvant radiotherapy.

Hypofractionated high-dose-rate plesiotherapy in nonmelanoma skin cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the commonest cancer in humans. NMSC treatment currently includes surgery, radiation therapy, and topical approaches. The objective was to analyze and compare the outcomes, toxicity, and cosmesis of NMSC treated by two hypofractionated high-dose-rate (HDR) plesiotherapy techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective institutional clinical study of 134 basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinomas treated at Radiation Oncology Department. Lesions were treated from November 2006 to December 2011 with a moderate hypofractionated HDR plesiotherapy using a fixed applicator or a customized mold. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 33 months, overall disease-free survival at 3 and 5 years was 95.12% and 93.36%, respectively. For Leipzig applicator, disease-free survival at 3 years was 94.9% and 94.9% at 5 years, for customized mold was 93.1% at 3 years and 88% at 5 years. Complete regression was achieved in 98% of lesions. Two lesions persisted after treatment; both had been treated by a Leipzig applicator. Six lesions suffered local recurrence (five Leipzig applicators and three molds, p = 0.404). Grade <2 acute toxicity noted in 57.3% of patients. Only 2.2% of lesions had Grade 4 acute toxicity. Borderline significant increase of toxicity was associated with customized molds (p = 0.067). Larger tumors were associated with higher acute skin toxicity. The cosmesis outcomes were excellent or good in 82% of patients, fair in 13%, and not available in 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated HDR plesiotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for NMSC with different toxicity levels depending on the plesiotherapy technique used.

Predicting compliance and survival in palliative whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Brain radiotherapy is the main treatment for patients with brain metastases but its goal is just symptom control. Our aim was to study if different performance tools, used in geriatric practice, could improve patient selection for decision-making in the palliative brain radiotherapy setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 61 consecutive patients were analysed. In addition to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) their physical activity was assessed by means of the activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL) scales. A neurocognitive evaluation was performed with the Pfeiffer Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) and with the Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE). Radiotherapy compliance and short survival were the endpoints of the study. RESULTS: High rates of cognitive impairment were found by both neurocognitive tools (Pfeiffer: 19.7% of patients; MMSE: 30%). Dependence was also highly prevalent, either measured by the ADL (50.8%) or by the IADL (43.3%). Nearly one third (27.9%) of patients died soon after radiotherapy evaluation. Longer survival was related to female, younger than 60 years, breast cancer primary tumour, steroid response, RPA class, and higher performance and neurocognitive score tools. A premature death was associated with neurocognitive tools, IADL and longer interval from brain metastatic diagnosis to radiotherapy. Twenty-three percent of patients were not able to finish the WBRT course due to clinical deterioration. The only variable related to compliance was a low MMSE score. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the geriatric tools analysed could offer information on brain palliative radiotherapy complementary to that offered by the more usual tools. It will be interesting to study if our data could be extrapolated to the general palliative oncological field.

Use of an electron spoiler for radiation treatment of surface skin diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Low-energy electron beams are characterised by low surface doses with a pronounced dose build-up and penetration of several centimetres, but often a higher surface dose and a lower penetration range is desired. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of an electron spoiler to modify these beams for treating surface skin diseases and evaluate the feasibility of this method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An aluminium foil 4-mm thick covering the end of the electron applicator was used as a spoiler for a 6 MeV electron beam. The dosimetric characteristics of this beam were measured, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed. RESULTS: The spoiler reduced the practical range and increased surface and build-up doses, but it also significantly broadened the penumbra and increased peripheral doses. Nevertheless, the beam was clinically acceptable when skin collimation with lead was employed. Monte Carlo simulations agreed well with all the experimental measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of using a low-energy electron beam with a spoiler for treating surface skin diseases was demonstrated. The method is hygienic and avoids some of the disadvantages associated with the bolus technique, but it is valid only for flat surfaces and perpendicular incidence. As a consequence, it can be an alternative to bolus and other reported methods in certain cases, especially when a particular sterility assurance level is required.