Mitigation of the inhibitory effects of co-existing substances on the Fenton process by UV light irradiation.

Co-existing substances (substances not targeted for degradation) can negatively affect wastewater treatment process performance. Here, we quantitatively evaluated the effects of propanal, a common co-existing substance, on the degradation of the azo-dye Orange II, a common pollutant, by the Fenton process to provide data for the development of measures to reduce the effects of co-existing substances on this wastewater treatment process. Inhibition rate (IR; ratio of the reaction rate constants obtained in the absence and presence of propanal) was calculated to examine the effects of propanal on the degradation of Orange II. The IRs for the Fenton process in the first phase and the second phase were 1.6 and 4.2, respectively. However, addition of ultraviolet irradiation to the Fenton process (i.e., the photo-Fenton process) resulted in a comparable IR for the first phase but a markedly lower IR for the second phase. We attributed this to the improvement of the photo-reduction reaction rate due to complexation of propanal with ferric ions, which compensated for the scavenger effects (the trapping of OH radicals) of propanal. Thus, ultraviolet irradiation reduced the inhibitory effects of propanal on the degradation of Orange II by the Fenton process.

Comparison of rates of direct and indirect migration of phosphorus flame retardants from flame-retardant-treated polyester curtains to indoor dust.

In this study, the pathways for migration of phosphorus flame retardants (PFRs), tris(1,3-dichloroisopropyl) phosphate (TDCPP) and tricresyl phosphate (TCsP) which were detected from curtains often, from flame-retardant-treated polyester curtains to indoor dust were investigated. Two possible migration pathways were compared quantitatively: (1) an indirect pathway in which the PFRs in the curtains first evaporate from the curtains and are then adsorbed onto indoor dust and (2) a direct pathway in which the PFRs are directly transferred to dust placed on the curtains. The contribution of the indirect pathway was evaluated by means of emission cell tests, which showed that the area-specific emission rates from curtains treated with PFRs were 0.044 (TDCPP, Curtain 5), 0.17 (TDCPP, Curtain 8), and 0.060 (TCsP, Curtain 12) µg m-2 h-1 at 20 °C (averaged during 24 h). The contribution of the direct pathway was evaluated by measurement of the time dependence of PFR concentrations on the indoor dust placed on the curtains. These measurements indicated that PFR concentrations on the dust increased with time and that the direct migration rates of PFRs from curtains treated with PFRs were 4.4 (TDCPP, Curtain 5), 12 (TDCPP, Curtain 8), and 7.0 (TCsP, Curtain 12) µg m-2 h-1 at 20 °C (averaged during 24 h), or 71-120 times the indirect migration rate. This result suggests that the direct pathway can be expected to predominate.