Tritiated thymidine labeling index and response in human breast cancer.

Tumor cell uptake of tritiated thymidine, expressed as the labeling index (Ll), was determined prior to treatment of 25 patients with disseminated breast carcinoma. All patients subsequently received combination chemotherapy with adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, and an antimetabolite (usually 5-fluorouracil), with or without vincristine. The Ll was significantly higher in responders to chemotherapy than in nonresponders (mean, 15 vs. 7.1; P less than 0.01). Other pretreatment variables examined did not show a significant association with likelihood of response. Measurements of the tumor cell Ll in patients with accessible tumor may be of benefit in selection of treatment; 0 of 9 patients with an Ll less than 9 had a response in our series in contrast to 11 of 16 patients with an Ll greater than 9 who had a response (P = 0.001).

Phase II study of taxol in patients with untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Taxol, a complex plant product (a diterpene) extracted from the bark of Taxus brevifolia, has demonstrated substantial anticancer activity in ovarian and breast cancers, malignant melanoma, and acute myelogenous leukemia. Due to allergic reactions in phase I and early phase II studies, use of a 24-hour infusion of taxol with prophylactic dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine has been recommended. PURPOSE: In this phase II study, we attempted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of taxol in patients with advanced (stage IIIB or IV) non-small-cell lung cancer who had never received chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were not excluded because of prior surgery or because of radiotherapy administered more than 4 weeks before study entry. Taxol was administered in the hospital at a dose of 200 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 24 hours and repeated every 3 weeks, provided that patients had recovered from any toxic effects. Dexamethasone, cimetidine, and diphenhydramine were given before chemotherapy to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Therapy was continued for at least two courses unless there was rapid disease progression and for at least three courses if no change was observed and no grade 3 or 4 toxic effects occurred. Treatment was continued for six more courses after maximum response or for two more courses after complete remission but was discontinued if disease progressed. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients entered in the study, 25 were assessable for toxic effects and response. One patient had an allergic reaction that was not life threatening. The overall response rate was 24% (one complete response and five partial responses). An additional seven patients (28%) had minor response. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect, and neutropenic fever occurred in eight of 118 courses. One additional patient developed neutropenic sepsis with hypotension but recovered with intensive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Taxol appears to have activity against non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. IMPLICATIONS: A phase II study combining taxol, etoposide, and cisplatin and using hematopoietic stimulating factors is now proposed. The optimal dose for combination chemotherapy has yet to be determined. An important consideration is potential cardiac effects of taxol with other drugs.

A rapid in vitro labeling index method for predicting response of human solid tumors to chemotherapy.

A rapid autoradiographic technique for measuring the [3H]thymidine-labeling index of human solid tumors has been adapted to assess the effect of anticancer drugs in vitro. The drugs tested were present unchanged or as metabolites in serum obtained from patients immediately post-treatment. In 15 patients, the drugs tested in vitro were also given in vivo. Tumor-labeling index fell significantly in 5 of 6 patients who were later found to have objective clinical response. Tumor-labeling index did not change significantly in 8 patients and rose significantly in 1 of 9 patients who lacked clinical response. If confirmed, this in vitro test may prove to be a useful method of predicting responsiveness of human solid cancers to chemotherapeutic agents.

Lethal and cytokinetic effects of anguidine on a human colon cancer cell line.

Anguidine is a fungal metabolite with antitumor activity in a murine colon cancer model. Because of disappointing results in clinical trials, we analyzed the lethal and cytokinetic effects of anguidine on cultured human colon cancer cells. The studies revealed a moderate reduction in survival only after prolonged drug exposure. Continuous incubation with anguidine for longer than 48 hr produced a moderate increase in the percentage of S-phase cells and a slight decrease in the proportion of cells in G1/0, by pulse cytophotometry. An immediate reduction in the cumulative labeling index for cells continuously exposed to tritiated thymidine and anguidine and a rapid decrease in the cumulative mitotic index for cells continuously exposed to Colcemid and anguidine indicated a block at the G1 into S and G2 into mitosis transitions. Tumoricidal activity of anguidine in a cultured human colon cancer line is poor and requires prolonged exposure. The kinetic data reflect an almost frozen state of the cell cycle.

Serial labeling index determination as a predictor of response in human solid tumors.

A rapid method for determining labeling indices in solid tumor specimens, tumor-induced effusions, and tumor-bearing bone marrows was utilized in 116 patients. Of these, 48 patients were studied pre- and postchemotherapy. The magnitude of a significant change in labeling index (LI percent) was determined statistically. Of the 48 patients studied serially, 42 were studied 17 days or less following completion of their chemotherapy. In 26 patients without a significant change in tumor LI percent, there was no subsequent clinical response to chemotherapy. Three additional patients in this group are inevaluable at present. In 11 patients, there was a significant fall in tumor LI percent following chemotherapy. Seven of these had a 50 percent or greater regression of demonstrable disease, one patient had definite tumor effect but the effect was not a partial response and three patients were not evaluable for clinical response. In two patients there was a significant increase in tumor LI percent and the patients had rapid tumor progression and death. Predictions derived from serial study of the LI percent by this method correlate significantly with subsequent behavior of the tumors tested following chemotherapy and may prove clinically useful in making decisions about when or whether to change therapy.

Phase 2 study with Baker's Antifol in solid tumors.

One hundred thirty-eight adults with advanced cancers were treated with Baker's Antifol. The complete response + partial response rate was only 10%. Best responses were obtained in 31 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (complete response + partial response, 13%), in 25 patients with colorectal carcinoma (partial response, 16%), and in 6 patients with renal cell carcinoma (partial response, 50%). Two partial responses occurred in 15 patients with squamous cancer. No significant responses were seen in 27 patients with other adenocarcinomas, 13 with sarcomas, 14 with melanomas, and 8 with miscellaneous tumors. The most frequent toxicities were dermatitis, stomatitis, gastrointestinal symptoms, and mild myelosuppression. The incidence of dermatitis was significantly decreased by shortening the schedule of Baker's Antifol administration from 5 to 3 days. Baker's Antifol has some degree of antitumor activity, and studies of combination of this agent with other effective chemotherapeutic agents are indicated.

Effects of brain irradiation and chemotherapy on myelosuppression in small-cell lung cancer.

The effect of brain irradiation on myelosuppression was studied in patients with untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) by comparing 24 patients who received brain irradiation for brain metastasis at presentation (irradiated patients) with 24 control patients who were selected by matching ages and non-CNS metastatic sites with those of irradiated patients. All patients were evaluated during the first three courses of chemotherapy. More irradiated patients than control patients had chemotherapy dose reductions from the starting dose level for the second (nine of 22 v two of 24; P = .03) and the third (nine of 18 v three of 20; P = .05) courses of chemotherapy. Overall, more irradiated patients had chemotherapy dose reductions than did control patients (11 of 22 v three of 24; P = .01). The difference was highly significant even after other variables were considered in a multivariate analysis (P less than .001). Myelosuppression was more severe in irradiated patients for WBCs (P = .01) and for platelets (P = .05). When the second course of chemotherapy was administered at the same dose levels as in the first course, irradiated patients had greater decreases in nadir counts after the second course compared with the first course than did control patients. Irradiated patients had a higher incidence of infectious complications than did control patients (14 of 24 v six of 24; P = .02), particularly after the second course of chemotherapy (seven of 22 v one of 24; P = .04). There were four treatment-related deaths due to sepsis in irradiated patients. Following brain irradiation given concurrently with intensive chemotherapy, close monitoring of myelosuppression and adjustments of chemotherapy doses are advised.

A randomized double-blind study of gallium nitrate compared with etidronate for acute control of cancer-related hypercalcemia.

Hypercalcemia is a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Gallium nitrate and the bisphosphonate, etidronate, are new agents that have recently become available for treatment of this disorder. To directly compare therapeutic effectiveness, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of gallium nitrate compared with etidronate for acute control of cancer-related hypercalcemia. Gallium nitrate was administered by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion at a dose of 200 mg/m2/d. Etidronate was administered as a 4-hour IV infusion at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg. Both drugs were given daily for 5 consecutive days. Eligible patients had persistent moderate-to-severe hypercalcemia (total serum calcium [corrected for serum albumin] greater than or equal to 12.0 mg/dL) after 2 days of hospitalization and IV hydration. Seventy-one patients were randomized and treated. Twenty-eight of 34 patients (82%) who received gallium nitrate achieved normocalcemia compared with 16 of 37 patients (43%) who received etidronate (P less than .001). Patients who received etidronate required significantly greater amounts of IV fluids (P = .04) and more hypocalcemic drug treatment (P less than .05) during the poststudy period than patients who received gallium nitrate. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly longer median duration of normocalcemia for patients treated with gallium nitrate (8 days v 0 days, P = .0005). A significantly higher proportion of patients treated with gallium nitrate developed asymptomatic hypophosphatemia compared with patients treated with etidronate (97% v 43%, P less than .001). We conclude that gallium nitrate is highly effective and superior to etidronate for acute control of moderate-to-severe cancer-related hypercalcemia.

High-dose intensification therapy with autologous bone marrow support for limited small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma.

The efficacy and toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) was studied in 32 patients with untreated limited small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma (SCBC). Ten patients received three courses of induction therapy consisting of vincristine (VCR) (1.5 mg X 2), ifosfamide (5 g/m2), and Adriamycin (Ad; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) (60 mg/m2). Patients then received two courses of intensification therapy with cyclophosphamide (CYT) (4.5 g/m2), 4' demethyl-epipodophyllotoxin-d-D-ethylidene glucoside (VP-16-213) (600 mg/m2) and VCR (2 mg) with ABMT. Another 22 patients received induction therapy with VCR, CYT (600 mg/m2), Ad (50 mg/m2), and VP-16-213 (180 mg/m2). All 22 patients also received intensification therapy of the same dose of CYT (4.5 g/m2) and VP-16-213 (600 mg/m2). Nine patients also received high-dose methotrexate (MTX), four patients received Ad (40 to 60 mg/m2), and two patients received both Ad and MTX. After intensification, patients received elective prophylactic brain irradiation (3,000 rad) and chest irradiation (5,000 rad). After induction therapy, there were 13 (41%) complete remissions (CR) and 17 (53%) partial remissions (PR). After intensification therapy, there were 22 CRs (69%) and 10 PRs (31%). Median survival for all patients was 14 months (range, 5 to 59+). Of the 13 patients who received intensification therapy in CR, five remain disease free (DF), four for 4 years or longer. Of the nine patients to achieve CR with intensification, only one is DF. No patient died during intensification. In conclusion, intensification with high-dose chemotherapy can increase the CR rate, and this approach is most likely to show long-term benefits in patients with minimal disease (CR) at the beginning of intensification therapy.

Randomized trial of three combinations of cisplatin with vindesine and/or VP-16-213 in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

One hundred sixty-seven evaluable patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive high-dose cisplatin and vindesine (PVD), or cisplatin and VP-16-213 (etoposide epipodophyllotoxin) (PVP), or cisplatin with VP-16-213 and vindesine (PVPVD). The patient distribution and characteristics were similar in all the treatment arms. The response rate differences (35% in PVD arm, 30% in PVP arm, and 22% in PVPVD arm) were not statistically significant (P = .33). Response durations were 43 weeks in the PVD arm, 20 weeks in the PVP arm, and 27 weeks in the PVPVD arm. Median survival was 29 weeks in the PVD and PVP arms and 28 weeks in the PVPVD arm. Median survival time of responding patients was 76 weeks in the PVD arm and 65 weeks in the PVP arm; 78% of patients were alive at 22+ to 87+ weeks follow-up in the PVPVD arm. Myelosuppression was similar in all three treatment arms. Significantly more azotemia occurred in the PVD arm than in the PVP and PVPVD arms (P = .002), and significantly more neuropathy in the PVD and PVPVD arms than in the PVP arm (P = .003 and .005). All the treatment arms have similar antitumor activity in non-small-cell lung cancer, but the PVP combination is slightly less toxic than the PVD and PVPVD treatment arms.

Treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer refractory to etoposide and cisplatin with the topoisomerase I poison topotecan.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the anti-tumor activity of topotecan (TPT) in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) refractory to etoposide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Refractoriness to etoposide was defined as lack of response to etoposide-containing frontline therapy, or progression during or within 3 months of the last dose of etoposide-containing frontline or second-line therapy. Other eligibility criteria were presence of measurable disease, Zubrod scale performance status (PS) < or = 2, < or = two prior chemotherapy regimens, and adequate renal and liver function. TPT was administered at a dose of 1.25 mg/m2/d for 5 days over 30 minutes every 21 days. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were registered, of whom 28 are fully assessable. All patients had been treated with frontline etoposide and cisplatin. Three patients (11%) achieved a partial remission (PR) (durations, 7, 8, and 19 weeks) and two (7%) achieved a minor response; five patients (17%) had stable disease and 18 (65%) had progressive disease. One of the three patients who achieved a PR had failed to respond to frontline cisplatin and etoposide. The overall median survival duration was 20 weeks. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred after 70% and 31% of courses administered, respectively. No grade 3 to 4 non-hematological toxicities were observed. Grade 1 or 2 nonhematological toxicities (in percentage of patients) consisted of nausea (41%, 8%) and vomiting (25%, 11%), and alopecia (100%). CONCLUSION: TPT at the dose and schedule used has modest antitumor activity in SCLC patients refractory to etoposide and cisplatin, which indicates that clinical resistance to the topoisomerase II poison etoposide does not confer cross-sensitivity to the topoisomerase I poison TPT. TPT is well tolerated, with myelosuppression of short duration being the most common and limiting toxicity.

Phase II study of docetaxel for advanced or metastatic platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II study to determine the response to and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Collegeville, PA) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to prior platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC) regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with stage IIIb or IV platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. The responses of 42 of 44 patients were assessable. Most patients had a Zubrod performance status of 1; the predominant histologic type was adenocarcinoma (61%), and 91% of patients had stage IV disease. RESULTS: Nine of 42 assessable patients (21%) achieved a partial response to treatment. The median response duration (from response to progression) was 17 weeks, and the projected median survival duration of all patients is 42 weeks (51 weeks for adenocarcinoma and 22 weeks for nonadenocarcinoma). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 85% of patients and was associated with fever that required intravenous antibiotics in 16% of patients (3% of cycles). Other acute side effects included easily treated hypersensitivity reactions and dermatitis. Cumulative side effects included fluid retention and neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel administered at 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks has notable activity against platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer, with a 21% major response rate. Primary side effects were neutropenia, hypersensitivity, and fluid retention.

Phase II study of docetaxel for recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II study to determine the response and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Collegeville, PA) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 41 chemotherapy-naive patients who had stage IIIb or IV non-small-cell lung cancer with 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Responses were assessed after every one to two treatment courses. Responses of 39 of 41 patients were assessable. The patient's median age was 63 years; 90% of patients had a Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (54%), and 90% of patients had stage IV disease. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (33%) achieved a partial response to treatment, and the median response duration was 14 weeks. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 97% of patient; this was usually of brief duration and was associated with serious infection in 17% of patients. Other acute toxic effects included easily treated hypersensitivity reactions (36% of patients) and dermatitis (74%). We also observed fluid retention (with peripheral edema or pleural effusion or both) in 54% of patients. This was a cumulative side effect that generally occurred late in treatment. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel administered at 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks has significant activity against non-small-cell lung cancer, with a 33% major response rate. Primary toxicities were neutropenia, hypersensitivity, and fluid retention.

Primary chemotherapy of brain metastasis in small-cell lung cancer.

Fourteen patients with brain metastases from previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with three courses of systemic chemotherapy as an initial mode of treatment. Whole brain irradiation was given concurrently with the fourth course of chemotherapy. The chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1; doxorubicin, 50 mg/m2 IV on day 1; vincristine, 1.5 mg IV days 1 and 5; and etoposide, 60 mg/m2 IV days 3 through 5; all repeated every 3 weeks with dosage adjustments. There were ten men and four women, with a median age of 59 years (range, 47 to 75). Six patients had multiple brain lesions, and the brain was the sole site of distant metastasis in four patients. Three patients were inevaluable for response in the brain, as two died early and the third dropped out of the trial too soon. Brain lesions responded to chemotherapy in nine (one complete remission [CR], eight partial remissions [PR]) of 11 (82%) evaluable patients, and objective responses in the extracranial lesions were documented in nine (one CR, eight PR) of 12 (75%) evaluable patients. Median survival was 34 weeks (range, 1 to 93), and two patients are still alive. Toxicity was significant, with severe granulocytopenia (less than 500/microL) and thrombocytopenia (less than 50,000/microL) observed in 85% and 15% of patients, respectively. Six patients had major infectious complications, which resulted in septic deaths in two. However, there was no deterioration of neurologic status during the initial phase of treatment with chemotherapy. We conclude that systemic chemotherapy alone can induce objective regression of metastatic brain lesions in patients with previously untreated SCLC.

GR 38032F (GR-C507/75): a novel compound effective in the prevention of acute cisplatin-induced emesis.

We evaluated, in a multi-center trial, the safety and efficacy of GR 38032F (GR-C507/75), a novel and selective serotonin antagonist, in preventing acute emesis in chemotherapy-naive patients receiving treatment with regimens containing high-dose cisplatin (greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2). Eighty-five patients were randomized to receive GR 38032F, 0.18 mg/kg, either every six or every eight hours for three doses, beginning 30 minutes before cisplatin. Patients were evaluated for emetic episodes (vomiting or retching) over a 24-hour period following cisplatin. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 83 were evaluable for efficacy. The overall antiemetic response rate was 75% (55% complete response [CR], 20% major response). No difference in antiemetic control between the two administration schedules was noted. Patients with histories of heavy ethanol use had significantly better antiemetic control (74% CR) than modest or non-drinkers (33% CR). Toxicity of GR 38032F was modest and independent of administration schedule. The most common adverse events included mild hepatic transaminase elevations, self-limited diarrhea, dry mouth, headache, and mild sedation. Our data indicate that GR 38032F is a safe and effective agent in the control of acute cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Additional trials exploring dosing, schedule, and comparison to standard antiemetic agents are indicated.

Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of two single-dose regimens with the approved three-dose regimen of ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study was a stratified, randomized, double-blind, and parallel group design. Chemotherapy-naive inpatients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg times three doses, every 4 hours or a single 8-mg or 32-mg dose followed by two saline doses that began 30 minutes before cisplatin administration. Cisplatin (high-dose > or = 100 mg/m2 or medium-dose 50 to 70 mg/m2) was given as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 699 patients (359 high-dose, 340 medium-dose) were enrolled. Of these, 618 were assessable for efficacy (15 ineligible, 66 protocol deviations). The 32-mg dose was superior to the 8-mg single dose with regard to total number of emetic episodes (high-dose, P = .015; medium-dose, P < .001), complete response (no emetic episodes: high-dose, 48% v 35%; P = .048; medium-dose, 73% v 50%; P = .001) and failure rate (> 5 emetic episodes, withdrawn or rescued: high-dose, 20% v 34%; P = .018; medium-dose, 9% v 23%; P = .005). The 32-mg single dose was also superior to the 0.15 mg/kg times three dose regimen with regard to total number of emetic episodes (medium-dose, P = .033) and failure rate (high-dose, 20% v 36%; P = .009; medium-dose, 9% v 22%; P = .011). Ondansetron was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was headache. An approximate 10-fold increase in the incidence of clinically significant transaminase elevations was observed in the high-dose versus medium-dose cisplatin strata (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 6.5% v 0.7%; serum alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 5.0% v 0.3%). CONCLUSION: A 32-mg single dose of ondansetron is more effective than a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective as the standard regimen of 0.15 mg/kg times three doses in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.

Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I trial of the novel nucleoside analog, gemcitabine, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and efficacy in this population. PATIENT AND METHODS: Eligibility requirements included stage III or IV NSCLC, performance status < or = 1, and no prior chemotherapy. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. We enrolled patients at doses that ranged from 1,000 to 2,800 mg/m2/wk (three patients per cohort). Responses were assessed after every two courses (8 weeks). RESULTS: We treated 33 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage III (n = 5) or IV (n = 28) NSCLC. Most had performance status 1, and 67% had adenocarcinoma. Eight of 32 assessable patients (25%) achieved a partial response. The projected median survival duration (all patients) is 49 weeks. The maximum-tolerated dose was 2,200 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks; dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression and reversible transaminase elevation. Other side effects were consistently mild. The maximum dose-intensity achieved with the first two cycles was 2,362 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks, which is a feasible phase II starting dose. CONCLUSION: This study estimates a phase II starting dose of gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients to be 2,400 mg/m2/wk for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks; this is much higher than that previously reported in heavily pretreated patients. Twenty-five percent of patients with advanced NSCLC achieved a partial response to gemcitabine. This significant activity in conjunction with a very favorable toxicity profile supports the further evaluation of gemcitabine in combination with other active agents.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of ondansetron alone with that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design. Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran, Cerenex Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg for three doses every 4 hours beginning 30 minutes before cisplatin administration either alone or in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg administered 45 minutes before cisplatin. Cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2) was administered as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes (EEs), adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients were enrolled. Of these, 245 were assessable for efficacy. Patients who received ondansetron plus dexamethasone had a higher complete antiemetic response rate (61% v 46%, P = .02) and less nausea (posttreatment visual analog scale mean 18.2 v 32.8, P < .001) than did those who received ondansetron alone. The time to the first EE was longer for patients in the group that received ondansetron plus dexamethasone (P = .005). Headache (12%), diarrhea (2%), and abdominal colic (1%) were the most common antiemetic-related adverse events reported. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: IV ondansetron in combination with dexamethasone is safe and more effective than ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin.

The role of adjuvant surgery in the combined modality therapy of small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma after a chemotherapy-induced partial remission.

Twenty-six patients with a limited-disease presentation of small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma (SCBC) had surgery after achieving a partial remission with three cycles of chemotherapy. Persistent SCBC was found in 15 patients (58%), non-small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma (NSCBC) in six patients (23%), and no malignancy in five patients (19%). Twelve patients have died since surgery. Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging prior to or after chemotherapy was not predictive of outcome, but an N0 status found at pathological examination of the surgical specimen was predictive of long-term survival. Median survival for this group of patients was 25 months. Adjuvant surgery is feasible and may be beneficial.

Phase II study of topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the anti-tumor activity of topotecan (TPT) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with measurable disease in nonradiated fields were eligible. Other eligibility criteria were Zubrod performance status (PS) < or = 2 and adequate renal and liver function. TPT was administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/d for 5 days over 30 minutes every 21 days. Of 48 registered patients, 40 were fully assessable. Nineteen patients had adenocarcinoma (AD), 14 squamous carcinoma (SCC), and seven poorly differentiated carcinoma. RESULTS: Six patients (15%) achieved a partial remission (PR) (durations: 8, 14, 18, 28, 56, and 61 weeks) and four patients a minor response; 10 patients had stable disease and 20 patients progressive disease. The PR rate was 36% (five of 14 patients) in patients with SCC versus 4% (one of 26 patients) in those with other histologies (P = .014). The overall median survival time was 38 weeks and 30% of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred after 76% and 10% of courses administered, respectively. No grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. Grade 1 or 2 nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea (46% and 5%), vomiting (31% and 7%), and fatigue (53% and 16%). CONCLUSION: TPT at the dose and schedule used has moderate antitumor activity in NSCLC; its activity is mostly limited to patients with SCC. TPT is well tolerated, with myelosuppression of short duration being the most common and limiting toxicity.