Sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution for hemorrhagic shock: A meta-analysis comparing crystalloid solutions.

BACKGROUND: The choice of fluid resuscitation in Traumatic Hemorrhagic shock (THS) remains a critical aspect of patient management. Bicarbonated Ringers solution (BRS) has shown promise due to its composition resembling human Extracellular Fluid and its potential benefits on hemodynamics. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, mortality rates, hemodynamic effects, and adverse outcomes of Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Solution in the treatment of hemorrhagic shock, as compared to other relevant interventions. METHOD: A comprehensive examination of the available literature was performed by conducting systematic searches in prominent databases such as Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed. The process employed predefined criteria to extract relevant data and evaluate the quality of the studies. The outcome measures considered encompassed survival rates, mortality, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and adverse events. RESULT: The meta-analysis of three studies showed that compared to the other crystalloids, the use of BRS had an odds ratio for survival of 1.86 (95% CI: 0.94, 3.71; p = 0.08; I2 = 0%), an odds ratio for total adverse events of 0.14 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.35; p < 0.0001; I2 = 22%), a mean difference in heart rate of -4.49 (95% CI: -7.55, -1.44; p = 0.004; I2 = 13%), and a mean difference in mean arterial pressure of 2.31 (95% CI: -0.85, 5.47; p = 0.15; I2 = 66%). CONCLUSION: BRS demonstrated a significant reduction in complications, including adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MODS), and Total Adverse Effects, when compared to other solutions in the treatment of THS. Additionally, THS patients resuscitated with BRS experienced a notable decrease in heart rate. The findings suggest BRS may contribute to organ stability and potential survival improvement due to its similarity to human Extracellular Fluid and minimal impact on the liver.

Assessing the impact of pre-hospital airway management on severe traumatic Brain injury: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of establishing a pre-hospital definitive airway on mortality and morbidity compared with no prehospital airway in cases of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a global health concern that is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Prehospital intubation (PHI) has been proposed as a potential life-saving intervention for patients with severe TBI to mitigate secondary insults, such as hypoxemia and hypercapnia. However, their impact on patient outcomes remains controversial. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the effects of prehospital intubation versus no prehospital intubation on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe TBI, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: 24 studies, comprising 56,543 patients, indicated no significant difference in mortality between pre-hospital and In-hospital Intubation (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65-1.23, p = 0.48), although substantial heterogeneity was noted. Morbidity analysis also showed no significant difference (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.43-1.63, p = 0.59). These findings underscore the need for cautious interpretation due to heterogeneity and the influence of specific studies on the results. CONCLUSION: In summary, an initial assessment did not reveal any apparent disparity in mortality rates between individuals who received prehospital intubation and those who did not. However, subsequent analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated that patients who underwent prehospital intubation had a reduced risk of death and morbidity. The dependence on biased observational studies and the need for further replicated RCTs to validate these findings are evident. Despite the intricacy of the matter, it is crucial to intervene during severe airway impairment.

Surgical strategies in acute subdural hematoma: a meta-analysis of decompressive craniectomy vs. craniotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) stands as a significant contributor to morbidity after severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). The primary treatment approach for patients experiencing progressive neurological deficits or notable mass effects is the surgical removal of the hematoma, which can be achieved through craniotomy (CO) or decompressive craniectomy (DC). Nevertheless, the choice between these two procedures remains a subject of ongoing debate and controversy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review, utilizing prominent online databases and manually searching references related to craniotomy and craniectomy for subdural hematoma evacuation up to November 2023. Our analysis focused on outcome variables such as the presence of residual subdural hematoma, the need for revision procedures, and overall clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We included a total of 11 comparative studies in our analysis, encompassing 4269 patients, with 2979 undergoing craniotomy and 1290 undergoing craniectomy, meeting the inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent craniectomy displayed significantly lower scores on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) during their initial presentation. Following surgery, the DC group exhibited a significantly reduced rate of residual subdural (P = 0.009). Additionally, the likelihood of a poor outcome during follow-up was lower in the CO group. Likewise, the mortality rate was lower in the CO group compared to the craniectomy group (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98, I2 = 84%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our study found that CO was associated with more favorable outcomes in terms of mortality, reoperation rate, and functional outcome while DC was associated with less likelihood of residual subdural hematoma. Upon further investigation of patient characteristics who underwent into either of these interventions, it was very clear that patients in DC cohort have more serious and low pre-op characteristics than the CO group. Nonetheless, brain herniation and advanced age act as independent factor for predicting the outcome irrespective of the intervention.

Effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic condition characterized by intense facial pain akin to electric shocks, often associated with the trigeminal nerve. It can be either idiopathic or secondary, with multiple sclerosis (Ms) being a significant contributing factor. Non-responsive patients may opt for minimally invasive procedures, such as gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), which offers precise, non-invasive treatment and is frequently chosen as a primary approach. This meta-analysis evaluates the long-term efficacy of GKRS in TN management in Ms patients. METHODS: We conducted a focused search across various databases. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies with ≥ 30 patients using GKRS for TN in Ms, reporting pertinent clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes assessed GKRS efficacy through Barrow Neurological Institute Pain scores. Secondary outcomes encompassed bothersome numbness, facial numbness, and recurrence. Data analysis employed OpenMeta, random effect models, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 752 cases of GKRS for TN were included. Regarding the outcomes, 83% of patients experienced a positive initial pain response, while the overall treatment success rate was 51%. Additionally, 19.6% of patients reported facial numbness, 4.1% experienced bothersome numbness, and 40% faced recurrence. The odds ratio for positive initial pain response was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), while for treatment success, it was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.379-0.639). Facial numbness had an odds ratio of 0.196 (95% CI, 0.130-0.262), bothersome numbness had an odds ratio of 0.041 (95% CI, 0.013-0.069), and recurrence had an odds ratio of 0.403 (95% CI, 0.254-0.551). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, treating trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis patients remains challenging. GKRS shows promise, but customized treatment approaches tailored to individual patient characteristics are urgently needed to address the unique challenges of this condition.

Analyzing and evaluating the prevalence and metabolic profile of lean NAFLD compared to obese NAFLD: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common liver condition affecting 25%-40% of the worldwide population. NAFLD is traditionally related to obesity and metabolic disorders. NAFLD can also affect non-obese individuals, termed "lean NAFLD" (LN), who exhibit a paradoxical combination of physical leanness and metabolic obesity. Factors contributing to LN remain unclear, necessitating further research. This analysis aims to understand LN's prevalence and metabolic characteristics compared to obese NAFLD (ON) populations. Methods: This meta-analysis searched various databases until August 1, 2023. Inclusion criteria involved observational studies comparing LN with overweight/obese NAFLD. Data extraction included baseline characteristics, disease occurrence, metabolic profile, and clinical parameters-statistical analysis employed calculating risk ratios (RR) and standard mean differences. Results: Twenty-five studies were analyzed. LN is associated with lower prevalence in both NAFLD (RR 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.52, p = <0.0001) and total (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.51, p < 0.0001) population. LN had lower diabetes mellitus (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.87, p < 0.00001), dyslipidemia (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.95, p = 0.002), hypertension (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87, p < 0.00001), and metabolic syndrome (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.64, p < 0.00001) compared to those with ON. The LN group's lipid profile, blood pressure, and other clinical parameters were favorable compared to ON. Conclusion: The prevalence of NAFLD among lean and non-lean individuals varies by region. Our analysis revealed that LN is associated with lower metabolic diseases, fasting blood sugar, blood pressure, and a more favorable lipid profile compared to ON.

NAFLD prevalence and its characteristics among obese vs lean population Non-alcoholic fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is a prevalent liver condition affecting a substantial portion of the global population, commonly linked to obesity and metabolic disorders. However, a subset of individuals with NAFLD, termed "lean NAFLD" (LN), challenges the conventional association by presenting with physical leanness despite metabolic obesity. The factors contributing to this condition are not well understood, prompting this meta-analysis to explore the prevalence and metabolic characteristics of LN compared to obese NAFLD (ON) populations. The study, conducted through August 1st, 2023, analyzed 25 studies meeting inclusion criteria, which involved observational studies comparing LN with Overweight/Obese NAFLD. Data extraction included baseline characteristics, disease occurrence, metabolic profiles, and clinical parameters. Statistical analysis utilized risk ratios (RR) and standard mean differences. The results indicated that LN is associated with a significantly lower prevalence in both the NAFLD and general populations. LN demonstrated lower occurrences of diabetes (DM), dyslipidemia, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome compared to ON. Additionally, the LN group exhibited a more favorable lipid profile, blood pressure, and other clinical parameters in comparison to the ON group. In conclusion, the prevalence of NAFLD varies among lean and non-lean individuals across different regions. The meta-analysis revealed that LN is linked to a lower occurrence of metabolic diseases, lower fasting blood sugar levels, lower blood pressure, and a more favorable lipid profile compared to those with ON. These findings contribute valuable insights into the distinct metabolic characteristics of LN, shedding light on potential avenues for further research and clinical considerations in the understanding and management of NAFLD.

ChatGPT in medicine: A cross-disciplinary systematic review of ChatGPT's (artificial intelligence) role in research, clinical practice, education, and patient interaction.

BACKGROUND: ChatGPT, a powerful AI language model, has gained increasing prominence in medicine, offering potential applications in healthcare, clinical decision support, patient communication, and medical research. This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the applications of ChatGPT in healthcare education, research, writing, patient communication, and practice while also delineating potential limitations and areas for improvement. METHOD: Our comprehensive database search retrieved relevant papers from PubMed, Medline and Scopus. After the screening process, 83 studies met the inclusion criteria. This review includes original studies comprising case reports, analytical studies, and editorials with original findings. RESULT: ChatGPT is useful for scientific research and academic writing, and assists with grammar, clarity, and coherence. This helps non-English speakers and improves accessibility by breaking down linguistic barriers. However, its limitations include probable inaccuracy and ethical issues, such as bias and plagiarism. ChatGPT streamlines workflows and offers diagnostic and educational potential in healthcare but exhibits biases and lacks emotional sensitivity. It is useful in inpatient communication, but requires up-to-date data and faces concerns about the accuracy of information and hallucinatory responses. CONCLUSION: Given the potential for ChatGPT to transform healthcare education, research, and practice, it is essential to approach its adoption in these areas with caution due to its inherent limitations.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception of Passive Smoking Among Medical and Dental Students of Karachi: A Survey-Based Study.

Background: Passive smoking, the involuntary inhalation of tobacco smoke, poses significant health risks; however, its prevalence and impact on medical and dental students in Karachi, Pakistan, remain understudied. Therefore, this research aims to understand the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding passive smoking among medical and dental students and will help shed light on their awareness, perceptions, and behaviours regarding this public health concern. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted over 3 months, involving 378 medical and dental students (303 medical and 75 dental students)from various universities in Karachi. Participants completed a questionnaire to gather information on demographics, awareness of passive smoking, perceptions of its health effects, and actions taken in response to exposure. Results: The majority of participants demonstrated awareness of passive smoking 320 (84.7%) and believed that it was essentially linked to active smoking 320 (84.7%). Cigarette smoke was identified as the primary contributor to passive smoking 345 (91.3%). A significant proportion of participants believed that children and pregnant women exposed to passive smoking had elevated health risks. In areas where smoking is not permissible, less than half of the participants 173 (45.8%) reminded smokers about the smoking regulations, and a few even referred smokers for counselling 141 (37.3%). Males are usually indifferent to smokers around them, whereas females are found uncomfortable with smoking in their surroundings. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study highlights the persistent prevalence of passive smoking among medical and dental students in Pakistan. Enforcing strict tobacco control policies, integrating passive smoking education into medical curricula, and improving communication strategies for smoking cessation interventions are crucial steps towards creating smoke-free environments and healthier lifestyles nationwide. Despite awareness among medical and dental students about the dangers of cigarette smoking, their reluctance to urge regular smokers to quit underscores the need for improved communication between smokers and non-smokers to foster a cleaner and hazard-free environment.

Prevalence and factors influencing anemia in women of reproductive age visiting a tertiary care hospital (Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center) in Karachi: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Anemia is a significant public health concern, primarily affecting young children, pregnant and postpartum women, and menstruating adolescent girls and women. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of anemia and associated factors in women of reproductive age visiting a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of anemia in women of reproductive age, while the secondary objective was to investigate potential causes of anemia within this demographic group. DESIGN: A prospective cross-sectional approach was employed, adhering to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. A questionnaire-based method was used to assess anemia, and data were collected from women aged 14 to 40 years. METHOD: The study was conducted at the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center from January to May 2023. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jinnah Sindh Medical University (Institutional Review Board reference number JSMU/IRB/2023/699). A sample of 397 women was included, and various demographic and lifestyle factors were assessed. RESULTS: In this study of 397 participants, 71.5% were found to have anemia, primarily microcytic anemia (48.2%). Anemia prevalence was highest among the 14-18 years age group (80.7%) and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (73.6%). Factors such as frequent tea consumption, irregular mealtimes, and pica consumption were associated with higher anemia rates. Pregnant women and those with more children were at a heightened risk of anemia. CONCLUSION: The study reveals a notable prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age with a surprising emphasis on younger individuals and lower socioeconomic groups. Dietary habits, lifestyle choices, and pregnancy status play significant roles in anemia development. Targeted interventions are essential, particularly for younger women, those from disadvantaged backgrounds, and pregnant individuals, to combat anemia effectively in this region.

Anemia is a widespread health concern, especially in young children, pregnant women, and menstruating adolescent girls. This condition, characterized by low hemoglobin levels, leads to insufficient oxygen delivery to organs. Globally, nearly 30% of women of reproductive age suffer from anemia, with a higher prevalence in certain regions such as Pakistan. This study aimed to assess anemia prevalence and associated factors among women of reproductive age in Karachi, Pakistan. Of the 397 participants, 71.5% were anemic. Microcytic anemia was more prevalent than macrocytic anemia. Various factors contributed to anemia, including age (highest prevalence in 14 to 18 years), lower socioeconomic status, irregular meal times, and frequent tea consumption. Surprisingly, individuals who consumed iron supplements exhibited a higher prevalence of anemia. Factors contributing to higher rates of anemia included frequent tea consumption, irregular mealtimes, and the consumption of non-nutritive substances (pica). Pregnant women and those with more children were identified as having an increased risk of anemia. In addition, women with hectic schedules were more prone to anemia. These results highlight the importance of lifestyle choices, dietary habits, and pregnancy status in the development of anemia. The study underscores the need for targeted interventions to address anemia effectively, with a particular focus on younger women, individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds, and pregnant women. By understanding the specific factors contributing to anemia in this population, public health strategies can be tailored to address the unique needs of these groups, ultimately improving the overall health outcomes for women of reproductive age in the region.

Effectiveness of Propranolol in Preventing Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To learn more about the effectiveness of oral propranolol as a therapeutic alternative for preterm newborns with pre-existing retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) as well as an early prevention method for ROP, one of the most common but avoidable causes of juvenile blindness. STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis of relevant literature. METHODS: A total of 3464 papers were identified, with 2873 from PubMed, 39 from Scopus, 67 from Medline, and 16 from Embase. After screening, finally, a total of 8 studies were deemed suitable for review. Following the PRISMA guidelines, published literature was systematically assessed up to May 10, 2023. Trials and observational studies were included in which beta blockage was used to prevent severe ROP (defined as stage ≥3 or requiring treatment). A total of 3646 papers were identified, with 2873 from PubMed, 39 from Scopus, 67 from Medline, and 16 from Embase. After screening, a total of 8 studies were deemed suitable for review. RESULTS: The use of propranolol is linked to a lower risk of disease development in ROP compared to other therapies or control groups, according to the overall risk ratio of 0.59 (95% CI = 0.42, 0.82; P = .002, I2 = 41%). Additionally, the overall risk ratio for plus disease is 0.42 (95% CI = 0.23, 0.78; P = .006, I2 = 0%), for laser photocoagulation is 0.48 (95% CI = 0.31, 0.74; P = .001; I2 = 2%), and for intravitreal injection of VEGF is 0.43 (95% CI = 0.24, 0.74; P = 0.003, I2 = 0%), suggesting that use of propranolol may reduce the likelihood of developing a disease such as plus disease, requiring laser photocoagulation or necessitating intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor for ROP, respectively. No statistically significant heterogeneity was found in this study (P > .10, I2 = 50%). It can be concluded from this that the results of the chosen studies were sufficiently comparable and consistent. CONCLUSION: This study showed that oral propranolol given as a preventive treatment in premature newborns successfully prevented severe ROP. Propranolol dosage and timing must now be carefully considered in the context of the study population, as these factors may have a major impact on the observed outcomes and treatment success.

Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: Iron deficiency (ID) is associated with heart failure (HF) in a considerable proportion of patients. To improve the quality of life, lower the frequency of hospitalizations, and lower mortality rates of chronic HF patients (HF), this meta-analysis will look into the role of iron supplementation using ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). Methods & results: From inception until 1 October 2023, we conducted a thorough literature search of electronic databases for peer-reviewed publications. Around 5229 HF patients were included, of which 2691 received FCM while 2538 received placebo. Conclusion: FCM reduces HF-related hospitalizations but doesn't improve overall or cardiovascular mortality in those with HF and ID. The overall results support FCM's role in managing iron deficiency in heart failure.

Heart failure (HF) patients often suffer from iron deficiency (ID), worsening their symptoms and quality of life. Intravenous iron therapy, like ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), has been studied for its benefits in HF. This meta-analysis looked at existing research and found that FCM treatment reduced hospitalizations for HF but didn't significantly impact overall mortality. Although FCM improves patients' lives, more research is needed to understand its long-term effects fully. This study highlights the importance of addressing ID in HF management and supports FCM therapy as a beneficial option for HF patients.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of weekly Insulin Icodec vs. Daily Insulin Glargine in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Various insulin therapies for Diabetes Mellitus offer different benefits while having potential risks. We aim to compare Insulin Icodec, a novel Insulin analogue with the ease of once-weekly administration, to the once-daily Insulin Glargine U100 regarding glycemic control and safety profile. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases for peer-reviewed articles from inception until September 1 2023. Results: A total of 2215 type 2 diabetic patients were included, of which 1209 received Insulin Icodec and1048 recieved Insulin Glargine U100. In terms of glycemic control, Insulin Icodec showed a significantly longer time in the target glucose range (MD: 0.304, CI: 0.069, P = 0.000) and a more significant reduction in HbA1c (MD: -0.154, CI: 0.003, P = 0.005) compared to Insulin Glargine U100. Fasting Plasma Glucose did not differ significantly. Insulin Icodec led to a more significant increase in body weight (MD: 0.161 kg, P = 0.029), while Insulin Glargine required a higher insulin dose (MD: 1.920 IU, P = 0.000). Regarding safety, the two groups had no significant differences in hypoglycemic events or adverse outcomes. Conclusion: Once-weekly Insulin Icodec demonstrates superior glycemic control with a reduced HbA1c compared to Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 while maintaining similar safety profiles. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01431-5.

Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of various Tirzepatide dosages in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Purpose: Excess body fat, insulin resistance, and abnormal lipid levels signal type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). Globally, 536.6 million people suffer from DM2, projected to rise to 783.2 million by 2045. Obesity fuels insulin resistance and DM2 development, with weight loss significantly improving glycemic control. Titrzepatide (TZP), a dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, proves highly effective in controlling hyperglycemia, stimulating insulin secretion, and promoting weight loss. TZP, holds promise as a treatment for DM2, surpassing insulin and GLP-1. The study aimed to meticulously assess the safety and efficacy of various doses, offering insights into optimal therapeutic strategies for managing DM2. Methods: This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of TZP in treating DM2. The primary focus of the inclusion criteria was on trials comparing TZP with a placebo until November 23, 2023, excluding patients with certain comorbidities. Data extraction included key parameters, and outcomes were assessed for HbA1c levels, weight changes, fasting serum glucose levels, and various adverse events. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool, and a network meta-analysis explored outcomes across different TZP dosages. Results: This meta-analysis systematically reviewed ten studies on TZP for DM2. Results revealed significant reductions in HbA1c with TZP 10 mg (19%) and TZP 15 mg (31%) compared to TZP 5 mg (MD: -0.19 and MD: -0.32, respectively). Additionally, weight reduction was notable for TZP 10 mg (MD: -1.96) and TZP 15 mg (MD: -3.31). Fasting serum glucose showed improvement with TZP 15 mg (MD:-6.71). Gastrointestinal events increased with higher doses, yet without statistical significance. Death, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, dyspepsia, decreased appetite, injection site reaction, hypoglycemia, treatment discontinuation, and serious adverse events showed no significant differences across doses. Conclusion: TZP effectively lowers HbA1c and induces weight loss across its three doses for type 2 diabetes management. The higher dose (15 mg) significantly reduces fasting serum glucose, with increased adverse events observed at higher doses. Dose-specific patterns for adverse effects emphasize the need to balance therapeutic benefits and risks. Further research is crucial for refining clinical applications and understanding TZP's role in DM2 management across doses. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01412-8.

Focus on current and emerging treatment options for glioma: A comprehensive review.

This comprehensive review delves into the current updates and challenges associated with the management of low-grade gliomas (LGG), the predominant primary tumors in the central nervous system. With a general incidence rate of 5.81 per 100000, gliomas pose a significant global concern, necessitating advancements in treatment techniques to reduce mortality and morbidity. This review places a particular focus on immunotherapies, discussing promising agents such as Zotiraciclib and Lerapolturev. Zotiraciclib, a CDK9 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in glioblastoma treatment in preclinical and clinical studies, showing its potential as a therapeutic breakthrough. Lerapolturev, a viral immunotherapy, induces inflammation in glioblastoma and displays positive outcomes in both adult and pediatric patients. Exploration of immunotherapy extends to Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, and Entrectinib, revealing the challenges and variabilities in patient responses. Despite promising preclinical data, the monoclonal antibody Depatuxizumab has proven ineffective in glioblastoma treatment, emphasizing the critical need to understand resistance mechanisms. The review also covers the success of radiation therapy in pediatric LGG, with evolving techniques, such as proton therapy, showing potential improvements in patient quality of life. Surgical treatment is discussed in the context of achieving a balance between preserving the patient's quality of life and attaining gross total resection, with the extent of surgical resection significantly influencing the survival outcomes. In addition to advancements in cancer vaccine development, this review highlights the evolving landscape of LGG treatment, emphasizing a shift toward personalized and targeted therapies. Ongoing research is essential for refining strategies and enhancing outcomes in the management of LGG.

Association between depression and stroke risk in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Stroke is a significant global health concern, and numerous studies have established a link between depression and an increased risk of stroke. While many investigations explore this link, some overlook its long-term effects. Depression may elevate stroke risk through physiological pathways involving nervous system changes and inflammation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between depression and stroke. Methodology: We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO) from inception to 9 April 2023, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. We included all articles assessing the association between different stroke types and depression, excluding post-stroke depression. Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, utilizing a random-effects model for data synthesis. The primary outcome was the association of depression with stroke, with a secondary focus on the association of antidepressants with stroke. Results: The initial search yielded 10,091 articles, and 44 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed a significant association between depression and stroke risk, with an overall hazard ratio of 1.41 (95% CI 1.32, 1.50; p < 0.00001), indicating a moderately positive effect size. Subgroup analyses showed consistent associations with ischemic stroke (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.13, 1.50; p = 0.007), fatal stroke (HR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.24, 1.55; p < 0.000001), and hemorrhagic stroke (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.01, 1.76; p = 0.04). The use of antidepressants was associated with an elevated risk of stroke (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.05, 1.55; p = 0.01). Conclusion and relevance: This meta-analysis indicates that depression moderately raises the risk of stroke. Given the severe consequences of stroke in individuals with depression, early detection and intervention should be prioritized to prevent it. Systematic review registration: Prospero (CRD42023472136).

The impact of ketogenic diet on drug-resistant epilepsy in children: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

The ketogenic diet (KD), characterized by high-fat and low-carbohydrate intake, is currently gaining widespread popularity as a treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). In addition to the traditional ketogenic diet, several variants have been introduced to enhance compliance and flexibility, such as the modified Atkins diet (MAD) and the low glycemic index diet (LGID). These adaptations aim to provide patients with more manageable and sustainable options while harnessing the potential therapeutic benefits of DRE. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the KD in pediatric patients who exhibit DRE. In this study, we conducted a thorough review of existing literature by searching Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PubMed. Our approach involved predefined criteria for data extraction and the assessment of study quality. Eleven RCTs with 788 participants were included in this study. The pooled effect estimates revealed a significant association between dietary interventions and seizure frequency reduction of > 50% (OR 6.68, 96% CI 3.52, 12.67) and > 90% (OR 4.37, 95% CI 2.04, 9.37). Dietary interventions also increased the odds of achieving seizure freedom (OR 4.13, 95% CI 1.61, 10.60). The common adverse effects included constipation (39.07%) and vomiting (10%). In conclusion, dietary interventions, notably the KD, hold promise for pediatric DRE, reducing seizures and achieving freedom. These non-pharmacological options improve the quality of life of non-responsive and non-surgical patients. The KD has emerged as a potential therapeutic approach. Further research is needed to address the limitations and investigate their long-term effects.

Meta-analysis of direct endovascular thrombectomy vs bridging therapy in the management of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Debates persist when using intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO). This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), comparing bridging therapy (BT) with MT alone. METHOD: We conducted searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 2023 to identify pertinent clinical trials and observational studies. RESULT: 76 studies, involving 37,658 patients, revealed no significant difference in 90-day functional independence between DEVT and BT. However, a trend favoring BT for achieving functional independence with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-1 was observed, having Odds ratio (OR) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.86; p < 0.001). DEVT was associated with higher postprocedural mortality (OR 1.44;95% CI 1.25-1.65; p < 0.001), but a lower risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared to BT (OR 0.855; 95% CI 0.621-1.177; p = 0.327). Successful recanalization rates favored BT, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment decisions (OR 0.759; 95% CI 0.594-0.969; p = 0.027). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify key contributors to heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis underscores the intricate equilibrium between functional efficacy and safety in the evaluation of DEVT and BT for ACS-LVO. Fundamentally, while BT appears more efficacious, concerns about safety arise due to the superior safety profile demonstrated by DEVT. Individualized treatment decisions are imperative, and further trials are warranted to enhance precision in clinical guidance.

Pregnancy outcomes in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is a superior treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), compared with hemodialysis, offering better quality of life and birth outcomes in women with ESRD and lower fertility rates. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the pregnancy, maternal, fetal, and graft outcomes following kidney transplantation in women with ESRD and evaluate the improvements in quality of life and associated risks. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: A thorough search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ATC abstracts, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, was conducted to identify studies that analyzed pregnancy outcomes in kidney transplant patients. The search was conducted from the inception of each database to January 2023. RESULTS: The study reviewed 109 studies that evaluated 7708 pregnancies in 5107 women who had undergone renal transplantation. Of these, 78.48% resulted in live births, 9.68% had induced abortion, and 68.67% had a cesarean section. Miscarriage occurred in 12.54%, preeclampsia in 20.87%, pregnancy-induced hypertension in 24.30%, gestational diabetes in 5.08%, and preterm delivery in 45.30% of cases. Of the 853 recipients, 123 had graft loss after pregnancy and 8.06% suffered acute rejection. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy after kidney transplantation is associated with risks for mother and fetus; however, live births are still possible. In addition, there are reduced overall risks of stillbirths, miscarriages, neonatal deaths, and gestational diabetes. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42024541659).

Left Atrial Septal Pouch (LASP) and cryptogenic stroke risk: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: The left atrial septal pouch (LASP) is a small anatomical septal recess in the heart that has been linked with cardioembolic events. A systematic appraisal of the existing literature is necessary to establish a better understanding of the risk as studies continue to indicate a correlation between LASPs and cryptogenic strokes. OBJECTIVES: To determine the level of association between the presence of LASP and the risk of developing cryptogenic stroke. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus for studies comparing the prevalence of LASP in patients with cryptogenic stroke against non-cryptogenic stroke control groups from inception till December, 2023. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.3 was used for data analysis with odds ratio (OR) as the effect measure. RESULTS: Our review included a total of 10 retrospective, observational studies published between 2010 to 2022. A total of 683 cases of cryptogenic strokes were identified, out of which 33.1 % (n = 271) were associated with a LASP. Among the non-cryptogenic stroke controls (n = 2641), LASP was present in 20.6 % cases (n = 476). The aggregate OR for cryptogenic stroke was 1.618 times greater than non-cryptogenic stroke (p < 0.001) among LASP cases, CONCLUSION: The presence of a septal pouch in the left atrium is significantly linked to a higher risk of developing cryptogenic strokes. As a potential site of thrombus formation and subsequent dislodgement, further large-scale studies are necessary to establish the guidelines for management and prophylaxis to prevent embolic events.

Neuroendoscopic versus Craniotomy Approach in Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a serious medical condition associated with high mortality and disability rates. Surgical interventions, including neuroendoscopic surgery (NES) and craniotomy, are employed to manage ICH and improve patient outcomes. This meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of NES versus craniotomy in treating ICH. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing NES with craniotomy for ICH. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary or secondary results from randomized controlled trials or observational studies for confirmed supratentorial ICH. Data were extracted, and methodological quality was assessed using appropriate tools. Statistical analysis was performed using meta-analysis software. RESULTS: The analysis included 26studies (N = 3237 patients). NES was associated with significantly lower mortality compared with craniotomy (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33 to 0.60, P < 0.00001). Hematoma evacuation rates were higher with NES (standardized mean difference 1.505, 95% CI 0.835 to 2.160, P < 0.00001). NES also showed better functional outcomes (odds ratio 3.31, 95% CI 1.78 to 6.17, P = 0.0002) and reduced blood loss (standardized mean difference -3.06, 95% CI -3.979 to -2.141, P = 0.000). Additionally, NES was associated with shorter hospital and intensive care unit stays, shorter operative times, and fewer complications such as infection and rebleeding. CONCLUSIONS: NES is a promising alternative to craniotomy for treating ICH, offering advantages in terms of reduced mortality, improved functional outcomes, and fewer complications. Future studies should explore advances in neuroendoscopic techniques to optimize patient outcomes further.