Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Pediatr ; 178(9): 1369-1377, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31312938

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to evaluate the interoperator agreement of lung ultrasonography (LUS) on specific thoracic regions in children diagnosed with pneumonia and to compare the findings of the LUS with the chest X-ray. Participants admitted to the ward or PICU underwent LUS examinations performed by an expert and a novice operator. A total of 261 thoracic regions in 23 patients were evaluated. Median age and weight of participants were 30 months and 11.6 kg, respectively. A substantial overall agreement between operators was found for normal lung tissue (κ = 0.615, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.516-0.715) and for consolidations (κ = 0.635, 95% CI = 0.532-0.738). For B-lines, a moderate agreement was observed (κ = 0.573, 95% CI = 0.475-0.671). An almost perfect agreement was found for pleural effusion (κ = 0.868, 95% CI = 0.754-0.982). The diagnosis of consolidations by LUS showed a high sensitivity (93% for both operators) but a low specificity (14% for expert and 25% for novice operator). While intubated patients presented significantly more consolidations, nonintubated patients presented more normal ultrasound patterns.Conclusion: Even when performed by operators with very distinct degrees of experience, LUS had a good interoperator reliability for detecting sonographic patterns on specific thoracic regions. What is Known: • Lung ultrasound is feasible, safe, and highly accurate for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children; however, it does not allow global visualization of the thorax in a single moment as in chest X-rays, and, similar to the stethoscope, partial thorax assessments must be performed sequentially. What is New: • This is the first study evaluating the agreement of LUS on specific thoracic regions between operators with distinct degrees of experience performing the sonograms. • There is a good agreement between an expert operator and a novice operator who underwent a brief theoretical-practical training program on LUS.


Assuntos
Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagem , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Competência Clínica , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia
2.
Pediatrics ; 142(5)2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30361397

RESUMO

: media-1vid110.1542/5828324804001PEDS-VA_2018-1719Video Abstract CONTEXT: Central venous catheterization is routinely required in patients who are critically ill, and it carries an associated morbidity. In pediatric patients, the procedures can be difficult and challenging, predominantly because of their anatomic characteristics. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ultrasound-guided techniques are associated with a reduced incidence of failures and complications when compared with the anatomic landmark technique. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and Embase. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies in which researchers compare ultrasound guidance with the anatomic landmark technique in children who underwent central venous catheterization. DATA EXTRACTION: Study characteristics, sample sizes, participant characteristics, settings, descriptions of the ultrasound technique, puncture sites, and outcomes were analyzed. Pooled analyses were performed by using random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 23 studies (3995 procedures) were included. Meta-analysis revealed that ultrasound guidance significantly reduced the risk of cannulation failure (odds ratio = 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.43), with significant heterogeneity seen among the studies. Ultrasound guidance also significantly reduced the incidence of arterial punctures (odds ratio = 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.55), without significant heterogeneity seen among the studies. Similar results were observed for femoral and internal jugular veins. LIMITATIONS: Potential publication bias for cannulation failure and arterial puncture was detected among the studies. However, no publication bias was observed when analyzing only the subgroup of randomized clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided techniques are associated with a reduced incidence of failures and inadvertent arterial punctures in pediatric central venous catheterization when compared with the anatomic landmark technique.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Pontos de Referência Anatômicos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Criança , Estado Terminal/terapia , Humanos , Incidência , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA