RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) patients have higher risks of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. Cardio-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in HD patients. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of arterial stiffness in Thai HD patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted at 4 HD centers in Bangkok, Thailand. cfPWV and peripheral blood pressure were assessed using SphygmoCor XCEL Model EM4C (AtCor medical Inc., Sydney, Australia). Significant arterial stiffness was defined by cfPWV > 10 m/s. Univariate and multivariable regression models were used to identify factors associated with arterial stiffness. RESULTS: 144 HD patients were assessed for arterial stiffness by cfPWV measurement. The mean age of the patients was 57.8 ± 12.8 years, with 50% male and a mean dialysis vintage of 7.6 years. The mean cfPWV was 11.7 ± 3.0 m/s. The prevalence of increased arterial stiffness was 73.6%. Multivariable analysis showed that older age, hypertension, lower HD adequacy, and higher fasting plasma glucose were independently associated with arterial stiffness. CONCLUSION: There was a high prevalence of arterial stiffness among HD patients. Some modifiable factors found to be independently associated, including dialysis adequacy and glycemic control, should be further investigated to identify approaches to retard vascular stiffness.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Rigidez Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Tailândia/epidemiologia , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Prevalência , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a primary immunosuppressive agent used in the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). While therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of MPA is well established in organ transplantation, its role in LN treatment remains uncertain. Our objective was to review and summarise current knowledge on TDM of MPA in the LN treatment. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in the online databases, specifically targeted patients diagnosed with LN receiving MPA treatment. The included studies had to report both MPA pharmacokinetic parameters and renal outcomes. A random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between clinical responses and MPA pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: A total of 1507 studies were initially screened, resulting in the inclusion of 16 studies for meta-analysis, encompassing 433 patients. The response group exhibited significantly higher MPA area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with the non-response group (51.44±21.73 mg·h/L vs 30.30±16.24 mg·h/L). The weighted mean difference (WMD) of MPA-AUC between responders and non-responders was 16.83 mg·h/L (95% CI 10.59 to 23.06; p<0.001). Similarly, trough concentration (C0) of MPA showed a strong association with renal response, evidenced by C0 values of 2.50±1.73 mg/L in the response group vs 1.51±1.33 mg/L in the non-response group (WMD 1.37 mg/L; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.97; p<0.001). There was no significant relationship identified between MPA-AUC and adverse events. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis emphasised the meaningful correlation between MPA AUC and C0 with renal response in LN treatment. Randomised controlled trials are necessary to validate this approach and determine its superiority over fixed dosing in the context of LN treatment.