Differences in the difficulty of subtasks comprising the toileting task among patients with subacute stroke: A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Toileting comprises multiple subtasks, and the difficulty of each is critical to determining the target and priority of intervention. The study aimed to examine the difficulty of subtasks that comprise toileting upon admission and the reacquisition of skills of subtasks during hospitalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center prospective cohort study. We enrolled 101 consecutive stroke patients (mean age: 69.3 years) admitted to subacute rehabilitation wards. The independence in each of the 24 toileting subtasks was assessed using the Toileting Tasks Assessment Form (TTAF) every two or four weeks. The number of patients who were independent upon admission, as well as those who were not independent upon admission but became independent during hospitalization, was examined in each subtask. RESULTS: The most difficult subtask upon admission was "Lock the wheelchair brakes" (16.8% of patients were independent), followed by "Turn while standing (before urination/defecation)" (17.8%), "Pull the lower garments down" (18.0%), "Turn while standing (after urination/defecation)" (18.8%), "Pull the lower garments up and adjust them" (18.8%), and "Maintain a standing position (before urination/defecation)" (18.8%). The most difficult subtask for those who were not independent but became independent was "Dispose of incontinence pad/sanitary items" (19.3%), followed by "Press the nurse call button (after urination/defecation)" (28.3%), "Take the foot off the footrest and place it on the ground" (28.6%), and "Clean up after urination/defecation" (29.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The difficult subtasks upon admission and those for reacquired skills were different. The most difficult subtasks upon admission were main tasks, and the difficult subtasks in reacquiring skills were preparatory tasks.

Difficulty of the subtasks comprising bed-wheelchair transfer in patients with subacute strokes: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Bed-wheelchair transfer comprises multiple subtasks; hence, it is important to know the difficulty of each subtask to identify and prioritize subtasks that must be practiced. This study aimed to investigate the difficulty of the subtasks that comprise bed-wheelchair transfer upon admission and reacquiring subtask skills during hospitalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center prospective cohort study. We enrolled 137 consecutive stroke patients (mean age: 69.8 years) admitted to subacute rehabilitation wards who used wheelchairs upon admission. The degree of independence in each of the 25 subtasks that comprised transferring was assessed using the Bed-wheelchair transfer Tasks Assessment Form every 2 weeks. The number of patients who were independent in the subtasks upon admission and those who were not but became independent during hospitalization were examined. RESULTS: The most difficult subtask for independent patients upon admission was "Manipulate the handrail for the bed" (18.3%), followed by "Ready the wheelchair for transfer" (19.3%), "Maneuver the wheelchair toward the appropriate place for transfer to the bed" (20.6%), "Wear shoes/brace" (24.8%), and "Turn while standing" (25.5%). The most difficult subtask for those who were not independent but became independent was "Ready the wheelchair for transfer" (32.1%), followed by "Manipulate the handrail for the bed" (32.9%), "Press the nurse call button" (36.4%), "Press the nurse call button (wheelchair-to-bed)" (36.7%), and "Lock the wheelchair brakes" (37.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Subtasks related to preparation for transfer were difficult upon admission, and this tendency became more pronounced during the skill acquisition process.

Reliability and Validity of a New Toileting Assessment Form for Patients with Hemiparetic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Acquiring toileting independence is an important target of stroke rehabilitation. In planning an intervention for acquiring toileting independence, developing an assessment for individual subtasks that comprise toileting would assist in identifying specific tasks that prevent independence in patients and would facilitate interventions to improve toileting independence. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of a newly developed toileting assessment form, the Toileting Tasks Assessment Form (TTAF), for assessing toileting subtasks in hemiparetic stroke. DESIGN: Validation and test-retest study. SETTING: Subacute rehabilitation wards in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two therapists verified the form's content validity; 30 stroke patients who were using a wheelchair participated in the validation and test-retest study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The content validity of the assessment form was initially assessed based on a questionnaire. Subsequently, four occupational therapists used the form to evaluate video-recorded toileting performances simulated by participants with hemiparetic stroke. Two assessors evaluated each video-recorded performance once and repeated the evaluation of the same performance at 2 weeks later. The interrater reliability, intrarater reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity of the form were examined. RESULTS: Fleiss' κ coefficient for interrater reliability for each form item was 0.61 or more. Cohen's κ coefficient for intrarater reliability for each item was 0.60 or more. Cronbach's coefficient alpha ranged from 0.94 to 0.95. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for the mean score on the form and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score for "toileting" ranged from 0.88 to 0.93 (P < .001). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for the mean score on the form and the FIM score for "toilet transfer" ranged from 0.91 to 0.93 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The TTAF demonstrated good reliability and validity. Further multicenter studies involving patients at different stroke phases are required to verify the reliability and validity of TTAF and confirm the generalizability of these findings.

Reliability and Validity of a New Transfer Assessment Form for Stroke Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Transferring is a basic skill that is essential for mobility independence and indispensable for expanding activities of daily living of stroke patients using a wheelchair. Therefore, transfer independence is an important issue that greatly affects daily life in the hospital and at home. To offer an effective intervention to acquire a skill, developing an assessment for individual subtasks that comprise transferring would assist the identification of specific tasks that prevent independence in patients and facilitate interventions to improve transferring independence. OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability and validity of a newly developed transfer assessment form, the Bed-wheelchair transfer Tasks Assessment Form (BTAF), for stroke patients to evaluate subtasks required for transferring. DESIGN: Validation and test-retest studies. SETTING: Subacute rehabilitation wards in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 82 therapists for verifying content validity; 30 patients for validation and test-retest study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The content validity was initially assessed based on a questionnaire. Subsequently, four occupational therapists used the form to evaluate the video-recorded transferring performances of stroke participants. Two assessors evaluated each performance once and then 2 weeks later. The inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability, internal consistency, and concurrent validity were examined. RESULTS: Fleiss's κ coefficient for inter-rater reliability for each item of the form was 0.66 or more. Cohen's κ coefficient for intra-rater reliability for each item was 0.73 or more. Cronbach's coefficient alpha ranged from 0.90 to 0.93. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between the mean scores of our form and scores of the functional independence measure item "transfer to bed/chair/wheelchair" ranged from 0.53 to 0.78 (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The form demonstrated good reliability and validity. Its usefulness and efficacy should be further investigated in stroke patients to facilitate rehabilitation.