Preprocedure hyperglycemia is more strongly associated with restenosis in diabetic patients after percutaneous coronary intervention than is hemoglobin A1C.

BACKGROUND: Although more frequent in diabetic patients, restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is less common in those with good glycemic control. High circulating insulin levels may also be associated with more frequent restenosis. METHODS: Fasting blood samples were obtained from 162 diabetic patients immediately prior to the PCI and analyzed for glucose, hemoglobin A1C, and insulin. Nine-month follow-up information was obtained in 145 (89.5%) patients. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) was the surrogate for restenosis. RESULTS: Patients were divided into quartiles with regard to their blood levels. Insulin, calculated insulin resistance, and hemoglobin A1C were not associated with increased TVR rates. Glucose level was significantly associated (P=.02). Patients in the two lower quartiles (glucose < or = 128 mg/dl) had a 9-month TVR rate of 12.7% while those in the two higher quartiles (>128 mg/dl) had a rate of 33.8% (P=.005). Level of glucose was independent of hemoglobin A1C. In patients whose A1C level was < or = 7%, the TVR rate was greater in those with a glucose level >128 mg/dl (39.1% vs. 10.6%, P=.009). Similarly, in patients with a hemoglobin A1C level >7%, the TVR rate was lower in patients with a glucose level < or = 128 mg/dl, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (16.6% vs. 31.3%, P=.3). CONCLUSIONS: Hemoglobin A1C, insulin, and insulin resistance at the time of the PCI are not associated with restenosis. Periprocedural hyperglycemia may promote restenosis in diabetics.

Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to conduct an evidence-based evaluation of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Stress cardiac MRI has recently emerged as a noninvasive method in the detection of CAD, with 2 main techniques in use: 1) perfusion imaging; and 2) stress-induced wall motion abnormalities imaging. METHODS: We examined studies from January 1990 to January 2007 using MEDLINE and EMBASE. A study was included if it: 1) used stress MRI as a diagnostic test for CAD (> or =50% diameter stenosis); and 2) used catheter X-ray angiography as the reference standard. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies (2,191 patients) met the inclusion criteria, with 14 datasets (754 patients) using stress-induced wall motion abnormalities imaging and 24 datasets (1,516 patients) using perfusion imaging. Stress-induced wall motion abnormalities imaging demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 0.88) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.91) on a patient level (disease prevalence = 70.5%). Perfusion imaging demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.94) and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.85) on a patient level (disease prevalence = 57.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In studies with high disease prevalence, stress cardiac MRI, using either technique, demonstrates overall good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of CAD. However, limited data are available regarding use of either technique in populations with low disease prevalence.

Vasopressor use in the critical care unit for treatment of persistent post-carotid artery stent induced hypotension.

INTRODUCTION: Hypotension is common following carotid artery stenting (CAS), and may be mediated by vagal stimulation and/or suppression of spinal sympathetic outflow. Both mixed alpha/beta agonists (dopamine (DA)), and more selective alpha- agonists (norepinephrine (NE) and phenylephrine (PE)), have been used, but the most effective treatment of post-CAS hypotension is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data for consecutive patients requiring vasopressor treatment of post-CAS hypotension. The treating physician made choice of vasopressor. Endpoints included infusion duration, coronary care unit (CCU) length of stay (LOS), and any major adverse events (death, stroke, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia). RESULTS: During the study period, CAS stenting was performed in 623 patients. CCU admission in atropine non-responders for vasopressor treatment was required in 42 patients (6.7%). DA was used in 20 patients (48%), NE in 13 patients (31%), and PE in nine patients (21%). Vasopressor infusion time was 31.8 +/- 10.6 h for DA, compared with 23.8 +/- 8.1 h for NE (P = 0.052) and 22.1 +/- 6.1 h (P = 0.028) for PE. CCU LOS was 46.5 +/- 14.1 h for DA compared with 36.9 +/- 9.1 h for the NE and PE groups combined (P = 0.056). Major adverse events were more common in patients receiving DA than among patients receiving NE or PE (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DA, treatment of post-CAS hypotension with a selective alpha-agonist (NE or PE) is associated with shorter drug infusion time, shorter CCU LOS, and fewer major adverse events.