RESUMO
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a difficult-to-manage ulcero-necrotizing dermatosis associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this article, we report a refractory PG in a patient with severe ulcerative colitis (UC) that responded to tofacitinib 10 mg/12 h.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Pioderma Gangrenoso , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Piperidinas , Pioderma Gangrenoso/tratamento farmacológico , Pioderma Gangrenoso/etiologia , PirimidinasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is a non-invasive diagnostic technique whose use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has spread. A panenteric capsule, PillCam Crohn's (PCC), has recently been developed. We lack information on the availability and use of the CEID and PCC in our environment. METHODS: We conducted an electronic and anonymous survey among the members of the Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) [Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis] and the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG) [Spanish Association of Gastroenterology], consisting of 37 multiple-choice questions. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty members participated, the majority dedicated to IBD (69.3%). 72.8% worked at centres with an IBD unit. 79% had SBCE available at their hospital, 14% referred patients to another centre; 22% had a PCC available, 9% referred patients to another centre. 79.3% of respondents with available SBCE used it in a small percentage of patients with IBD and 15.6% in the majority. The most frequent scenarios were suspicion of Crohn's disease (76.3%), assessment of inflammatory activity (54.7%) and assessment of the extent of the disease (54.7%). More than half (59.7%) preferentially used the Patency capsule to assess intestinal patency. Almost all respondents (99.3%) considered that training resources should be implemented in this technique. CONCLUSIONS: SBCE is widely available in Spanish hospitals for the management of IBD, although its use is still limited. There is an opportunity to increase training in this technique, and consequently its use.
Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula/estatística & dados numéricos , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagem , Gastroenterologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Endoscopia por Cápsula/educação , Feminino , Gastroenterologia/educação , Humanos , Laxantes/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Sociedades Médicas , EspanhaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Ustekinumab (UST) is a monoclonal antibody against IL-12/23 approved in Spain (2017) to treat moderate / severe Crohn's disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety in real clinical practice in patients treated with UST in our center. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study including patients who started UST from 08/01/2017 to 02/28/2019 with follow-up up to that date. We analyze response and remission in weeks 16, 24 and 52, using "Crohn's Disease Activity Index" (response if 100 point decrease and remission if <150) and Physician's Global Assessment. RESULTS: We included 61 patients with a median duration of Crohn's disease of 14,6 years (0-36). The 83,6% of patients without steroids and 73,8% without associated immunosuppressors. Previously all patients had received anti-TNF and 14,8%, in addition, vedolizumab. We observed a good correlation between Crohn's Disease Activity Index and Physician's Global Assessment (r = 0,89, p <.001). In week 16 (n = 45) 75,6% response (57,8% remission), in week 24 (n = 35) 69,9% response (45,7% remission) and in week 52 (n = 12) 75% response (58.3% remission). There were no statistically significant differences in the response/remission rates at week 16 or 24 depending on the reason for the onset of UST or the number of previous biologics. In 2 patients it was withdrawn due to toxicity (arthralgia / myalgia). CONCLUSION: UST is an effective and safe treatment in real clinical practice with high rates of clinical remission at week 16, 24 and 52 regardless of the order of biological used and the reason for starting UST.
Assuntos
Doença de Crohn/tratamento farmacológico , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ustekinumab/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Swallowed topical corticosteroids (tC) are common therapy for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Widely heterogeneous results have occurred due to their active ingredients, formulations and doses. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of topical corticosteroid therapy for EoE in real-world practice. METHODS: Cross-sectional study analysis of the multicentre EoE CONNECT registry. Clinical remission was defined as a decrease of ≥50% in dysphagia symptom scores; histological remission was defined as a peak eosinophil count below 15 per high-power field. The effectiveness in achieving clinico-histological remission (CHR) was compared for the main tC formulations. RESULTS: Overall, data on 1456 prescriptions of tC in monotherapy used in 866 individual patients were assessed. Of those, 904 prescriptions with data on formulation were employed for the induction of remission; 234 reduced a previously effective dose for maintenance. Fluticasone propionate formulations dominated the first-line treatment, while budesonide was more common in later therapies. A swallowed nasal drop suspension was the most common formulation of fluticasone propionate. Doses ≥0.8 mg/day provided a 65% CHR rate and were superior to lower doses. Oral viscous solution prepared by a pharmacist was the most common prescription of budesonide; 4 mg/day provided no benefit over 2 mg/day (CHR rated being 72% and 80%, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed budesonide orodispersible tablets as the most effective therapy (OR 18.9, p < 0.001); use of higher doses (OR 4.3, p = 0.03) and lower symptom scores (OR 0.9, p = 0.01) were also determinants of effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Reduced symptom severity, use of high doses, and use of budesonide orodispersible tablets particularly were all independent predictors of tC effectiveness.
Assuntos
Budesonida , Esofagite Eosinofílica , Fluticasona , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Esofagite Eosinofílica/tratamento farmacológico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Fluticasona/administração & dosagem , Fluticasona/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Budesonida/administração & dosagem , Budesonida/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Administração Tópica , Indução de Remissão/métodos , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Criança , Adolescente , Transtornos de Deglutição/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Administração OralAssuntos
Neoplasias Intestinais/sangue , Neoplasias Intestinais/diagnóstico por imagem , Sarcoma Mieloide/sangue , Sarcoma Mieloide/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Colonoscopia , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinais/imunologia , Masculino , Sarcoma Mieloide/imunologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: CT-P13 is a biosimilar drug of infliximab (IFX), effective in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The monitoring of levels of IFX and anti-IFX antibodies is now considered part of the integral management. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical response according to a strictly clinical (CLN) or proactive (PRO) approach based on the monitoring of levels in week 14, in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in IBD patients starting CT-P13. In the PRO group, levels of IFX and post-induction antibodies were systematically measured (week 14) and those with infraterapeutic levels (<3µg/ml) were intensified, irrespective of the clinical response. RESULTS: We included 77 patients (23 ulcerative colitis and 54 Crohn's disease). Both PRO (n=41) and CLN (n=36) groups showed initial and long-term efficacy without significant differences. At week 14, 61% clinical remission (CR) (58.5% PRO, 63.9% CLN) and 80.5% at least partial response (PR) (80.5% PRO, 80.6% CLN). In week 54, 68.8% CR (61% PRO, 77.8% CLN) and 76.6% at least PR (73.2% PRO, 80.6% CLN). Of the patients in CR in week 14 (24 PRO, 23 CLN), 13 of the PRO group were intensified due to infra-therapeutic levels. In this subgroup no significant differences were observed in secondary loss of response (PRO 0%, CLN 8.7%). CONCLUSION: Proactive management does not improve response or remission rates in the first year. The intensification of clinical remission patients with post-induction infratherapeutic levels does not seem to significantly prevent secondary loss of response in the first year.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Colite Ulcerativa , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Indução de Remissão , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Golimumab has demonstrated its long-term efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis in clinical trials, but no data of long-term persistence has been published from real world. To estimate long-term persistence of golimumab, as well as factors associated with longer persistence, in patients with ulcerative colitis in real life. Observational multicentre study including adult patients with ulcerative colitis treated with golimumab and with at least twelve months of follow-up. We included 190 patients, 105 (55.26%) naive to anti-TNF, with mean disease duration of 9.32 ± 8.09 years. Probability of persistence was 63%, 46%, 39% and 27% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Persistence was lower in patients with primary failure to previous anti-TNF. Eighty-two (43.16%) patients needed dose intensification during follow-up, with a mean time until intensification of 8.03 ± 8.64 months. Dose intensification and lower disease duration predicted higher persistence with golimumab (p = 0.037 and p = 0.008, respectively). During a follow-up of 17.25 ± 15.83 months, 32 (16.5%) patients needed hospitalisation and 11 (6%) underwent colectomy. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Golimumab has demonstrated good persistence and safety profile for long treatment in ulcerative colitis patients.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) comprises a group of eruptions characterized by several small sterile pustules over an erythematous-edematous skin. These eruptions are usually drug induced and show some characteristics that suggest an immunologic background. Treatment is based on withdrawal of the drug causing the eruption. Prognosis is generally good and the skin lesions usually resolve in a few days with characteristic postpustular pin-point desquamation. We report three cases of AGEP induced by omeprazole, a drug with a good safety profile. Some adverse cutaneous reactions have been described as secondary effects. However, to our knowledge, no cases of omeprazole-induced AGEP have previously been reported. AGEP related to other proton pump inhibitors is exceptional.