Acute phase response in amputated tail stumps and neural tissue-preferential expression in tail bud embryos of the Xenopus neuronal pentraxin I gene.

Regeneration of lost organs involves complex processes, including host defense from infection and rebuilding of lost tissues. We previously reported that Xenopus neuronal pentraxin I (xNP1) is expressed preferentially in regenerating Xenopus laevis tadpole tails. To evaluate xNP1 function in tail regeneration, and also in tail development, we analyzed xNP1 expression in tailbud embryos and regenerating/healing tails following tail amputation in the 'regeneration' period, as well as in the 'refractory' period, when tadpoles lose their tail regenerative ability. Within 10 h after tail amputation, xNP1 was induced at the amputation site regardless of the tail regenerative ability, suggesting that xNP1 functions in acute phase responses. xNP1 was widely expressed in regenerating tails, but not in the tail buds of tailbud embryos, suggesting its possible role in the immune response/healing after an injury. xNP1 expression was also observed in neural tissues/primordia in tailbud embryos and in the spinal cord in regenerating/healing tails in both periods, implying its possible roles in neural development or function. Moreover, during the first 48 h after amputation, xNP1 expression was sustained at the spinal cord of tails in the 'regeneration' period tadpoles, but not in the 'refractory' period tadpoles, suggesting that xNP1 expression at the spinal cord correlates with regeneration. Our findings suggest that xNP1 is involved in both acute phase responses and neural development/functions, which is unique compared to mammalian pentraxins whose family members are specialized in either acute phase responses or neural functions.

Expression analysis of XPhyH-like during development and tail regeneration in Xenopus tadpoles: possible role of XPhyH-like expressing immune cells in impaired tail regenerative ability.

Xenopus tadpoles have high regenerative ability of amputated tails except during the 'refractory period', when the ability is transiently lost. We previously demonstrated that distinct immune responses occur in tail stumps between the refractory and pre/post-refractory regeneration periods. Furthermore, treatment with an immunosuppressant, FK506, restores the tail regenerative ability during the refractory period. Based on these findings, we previously proposed that autoreactive immune cells infiltrate the tail stumps to attack blastema cells as 'non-self' during the refractory period, resulting in the impaired regenerative ability. The immune cells that attack the blastema cells, however, remained unclear. Here we screened for genes whose expression in the tail stumps was altered by FK506 treatment during the refractory period and identified a Xenopus homolog of phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase (PhyH)-like. XPhyH-like expression transiently increased in tail stumps after amputation during the refractory period, and was reduced by FK506 treatment. XPhyH-like expression in the whole tadpole body specifically increased during the refractory period and was enriched in the blood cell fraction. These findings suggest that XPhyH-like is expressed in autoreactive immune cells that are distributed in the whole body during the refractory period and transiently infiltrate the tail stumps to attack the blastema cells as 'non-self'.

Suppression of the immune response potentiates tadpole tail regeneration during the refractory period.

Regenerative ability varies depending on animal species and developmental stage, but the factors that determine this variability remain unclear. Although Xenopus laevis tadpole tails possess high regenerative ability, this is transiently lost during the ;refractory period'. Here, we show that tail amputation evokes different immune responses in wound tail stumps between the ;refractory' and ;regeneration' periods: there was delayed or prolonged expression of some immune-related genes in the refractory period, whereas there was no obvious or transient expression of other immune-related genes in the regeneration periods. In addition, immune suppression induced by either immunosuppressant treatment or immune cell depletion by knockdown of PU.1 significantly restored regenerative ability during the refractory period. These findings indicate that immune responses have a crucial role in determining regenerative ability in Xenopus tadpole tails.