The effects of relative timing of sirolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion formulation coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of each agent.

INTRODUCTION: Sirolimus and cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) share the same cytochrome P4503A metabolic pathways, and both drugs are substrates for p-glycoprotein countertransport. These factors most likely affect the bioavailability of both drugs. This study served to examine whether the timing of the administration of cyclosporine and sirolimus might significantly affect the relative bioavailability of one or both of these drugs. METHODS: In this randomized crossover trial, 24 stable kidney transplant recipients who were treated after transplant with a combination of sirolimus, cyclosporine, and prednisone for at least 3 months before study initiation, received individualized doses of sirolimus once daily and cyclosporine in the microemulsion formulation twice a day. A total of 20 patients completed the full crossover design. Patients were randomized to one of two dosing schedules: 10 of the patients who completed the study received the morning doses of sirolimus and cyclosporine concomitantly for the first 7 days (schedule I), and from days 8 to 14 the sirolimus dose was administered 4 hours after the morning cyclosporine dose. Ten of the patients received the sirolimus dose 4 hours after the morning cyclosporine dose for the first 7 days (schedule II), and from days 8 to 14 they received concomitant morning doses of cyclosporine and sirolimus. Pharmacokinetic profiles of sirolimus and cyclosporine performed on all patients on days 7, 14, and 15 yielded the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), peak concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), trough cyclosporine concentration (Co), and trough sirolimus concentration (Co) values. RESULTS: Sirolimus AUC and sirolimus trough levels were consistently and significantly higher when both cyclosporine and sirolimus were administered concomitantly than when they were administered 4 hours apart. No effect attributable to timing of drug administration could be found on cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the relative timing of administration of cyclosporine and sirolimus significantly affects the blood concentrations of sirolimus.

Effect of low dose cyclosporine and sirolimus on hepatic drug metabolism in the rat1.

BACKGROUND: We examined the effect cyclosporine (CsA) and sirolimus (SRL) alone and in combination on hepatic cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism in rats. METHODS: Rats were given 1 mg/kg of CsA or 0.4 mg/kg of SRL alone or in combination via constant intravenous infusion. Renal function was evaluated at the end of treatment. Blood samples were obtained to estimate CsA and SRL concentrations. Hepatic microsomes were prepared for immunoblotting and catalytic assays. RESULTS: CsA alone did not alter serum creatinine levels. SRL given alone or in combination with CsA produced a significant increase in urine output without changes in fluid balance. Although CsA and SRL administered alone caused damage to renal proximal tubules, the two-drug combination dramatically increased the renal structural damage. CsA alone suppressed cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A2 protein levels by 39% (P=0.012) and catalytic activity by 30% (P=0.042). SRL alone reduced catalytic activity by 38% (P=0.012). Combination therapy reduced both CYP3A2 levels by 55% (P<0.001) and catalytic activity by 55% (P=0.001). CYP2C11 protein expression or catalytic activity were not changed in any group. CYP2A1 protein expression and catalytic activity were both significantly reduced in rats given CsA or/and SRL. Steady-state CsA levels were increased during concurrent SRL dosing, however, SRL concentrations were not changed by CsA coadministration. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent SRL dosing increases CsA concentrations due to inhibition of hepatic CYP3A2 protein expression. Nephrotoxicity caused by combination therapy is due to CsA elevating levels of SRL or by SRL itself. Concurrent administration of CsA and SRL in transplant patients should be performed with caution.

Effects of the pharmacokinetic interaction between orally administered sirolimus and cyclosporine on the synergistic prolongation of heart allograft survival in rats.

Oral administration, but not continuous intravenous infusion, of sirolimus (SRL) in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) produces a pharmacokinetic interaction, namely increases in the whole blood trough concentrations of SRL ([SRL(WB)]) and CsA ([CsA(WB)]). The effects of this pharmacokinetic interaction on the synergism between SRL and CsA was examined in Wistar Furth (RT1u) recipients of Buffalo (RT1b) heart allografts. A 14-day course of oral SRL produced dose-dependent prolongation of heart allografts: in untreated controls, 0.5 mg/kg SRL per day extended the mean survival time (MST) from 6.4+/-0.5 days to 12.3+/-3.8 days (P<0.05); SRL at 1.0 mg/kg per day prolonged the MST to 18.0+/-5.5 days (P<0.01); at 2.0 mg/kg SRL per day, MST was extended to 52.5+/-13.2 days (P<0.01); and 4.0 mg/kg SRL per day prolonged MST to 90.0+/-41.1 days (P<0.01). Comparison of the in vivo effects after oral versus continuous intravenous SRL administration suggested that the oral bioavailability of SRL is less than 10%. Combinations of oral SRL and CsA synergistically prolonged heart allograft survival, as documented by combination index values of 0.01-0.64 (combination index <1 indicates synergistic interaction). In rats treated with dual drug combinations, CsA increased the bioavailability of SRL by two- to elevenfold, and SRL increased the bioavailability of CsA by two- to threefold, thereby significantly decreasing the oral effective dose (ED) values for each drug. The ED50 for SRL alone is 2.4 mg/kg per day, which produces an average [SRL(WB)] of 13.2 ng/ml. The ED50 for CsA alone is 8.0 mg/kg per day, which produces an average [CsA(WB)] of 1642 ng/ml. However, when the two drugs are combined, the ED50 effect is achieved with only 0.34 mg/kg SRL per day ([SRL(WB)]=1.1 ng/ml) and 2.1 mg/kg CsA per day ([CsA(WB)] =326 ng/ml). Individually, 0.34 mg/kg SRL per day produces an ED9 with an average [SRL(WB)] of 0.6 ng/ml, and 2.1 mg/kg CsA per day produces an ED22 with an average [CsA(WB)] of 174 ng/ml. Thus, the pharmacokinetic interaction between oral SRL and CsA contributes to the in vivo synergism between the two drugs.

Immunosuppressive effects and safety of a sirolimus/cyclosporine combination regimen for renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus, a novel immunosuppressant that inhibits cytokine-driven cell proliferation and maturation, prolongs allograft survival in animal models. After a phase I trial in stable renal transplant recipients documented that cyclosporine and sirolimus have few overlapping toxicities, we conducted an open-label, single-center, phase I/II dose-escalation trial to examine the safety and efficacy of this drug combination. METHODS: Forty mismatched living-donor renal transplant recipients were sequentially assigned to receive escalating initial doses of sirolimus (0.5-7.0 mg/m2/day), in addition to courses of prednisone and a concentration-controlled regimen of cyclosporine. We conducted surveillance for drug-induced side effects among sirolimus-treated patients and compared their incidence of acute rejection episodes as well as mean laboratory values with those of a historical cohort of 65 consecutive, immediately precedent, demographically similar recipients treated with the same concentration-controlled regimen of cyclosporine and tapering doses of prednisone. RESULTS: The addition of sirolimus reduced the overall incidence of acute allograft rejection episodes to 7.5% from 32% in the immediately precedent cyclosporine/prednisone-treated patients. At 18- to 47-month follow-up periods, both treatment groups displayed similar rates of patient and graft survival, as well as morbid complications. Although sirolimus-treated patients displayed comparatively lower platelet and white blood cell counts and higher levels of serum cholesterol and triglycerides, sirolimus did not augment the nephrotoxic or hypertensive proclivities of cyclosporine. The degree of change in the laboratory values was more directly associated with whole blood trough drug concentrations than with doses of sirolimus. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus potentiates the immunosuppressive effects of a cyclosporine-based regimen by reducing the rate of acute rejection episodes.

A practical guide to the analysis of sirolimus using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus, a new immunosuppressive agent, has recently been approved in the United States for use in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids in renal allograft transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of sirolimus is advocated by the drug's manufacturer in certain patient populations. Given the known pharmacokinetic interaction of sirolimus with cyclosporine and the requirement for patient compliance, physicians may wish to monitor steady-state trough levels of this agent. Several types of analytical methods have been investigated for use in TDM of sirolimus: immunoassay, high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV), and HPLC with mass-spectrometric detection (HPLC-MS or HPLC/MS/MS). OBJECTIVE: This review identifies analytical parameters that are critical to clinical TDM of sirolimus when HPLC-UV is used. METHODS: Extraction of sirolimus from whole blood was performed using either liquid-liquid or solid phase techniques, whereas liquid chromatography was performed on reverse-phase analytical columns. The drug was detected at its UV extinction maximum. Calculated analytical parameters were evaluated according to current industry standards. RESULTS: HPLC-UV methods for the quantification of sirolimus meet or exceed industry standards of performance for clinical TDM. Comparison of the sirolimus levels in clinical samples analyzed by both HPLC-UV and HPLC/MS/MS indicated that the methods provided similar results. CONCLUSION: HPLC-UV methods, although they use a less-sophisticated mode of detection than HPLC-MS or HPLC/MS/MS methods, provide an alternative means of performing TDM without sacrificing the analytical performance required for clinical monitoring of sirolimus.

Simultaneous simple and fast quantification of three major immunosuppressants by liquid chromatography--tandem mass-spectrometry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to develop a simple, fast and universal method for quantification of any combination of the three major immunosuppressants sirolimus, tacrolimus and cyclosporin in whole blood, using a LC-tandem mass spectrometer (API-2000, SCIEX, Toronto, Canada). METHODS: 250 microL whole blood was spiked with internal standard (ritonavir), and protein precipitated with 350 microL acetonitrile. The sample was centrifuged and 30 microL aliquot was injected onto the HPLC column, where it underwent an online extraction with ammonium acetate. After that the automatic switching valve was activated, changing the mobile phase to methanol and thereby eluting the analytes into the tandem mass spectrometer. The high selectivity of a tandem mass analyzer allows determination of any combination of the three drugs within a 5 min run. RESULTS: Between-day precision was between 2.4% and 9.7% for all analytes at the concentrations tested. Accuracy ranged between 98.8% and 103.2% (n = 20). The method was linear over the measuring ranges of all analytes. Within-run precision was below %CV = 6% for all analytes. Good correlation with other analytical methods was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The simplicity, universality and high throughput of the method make it suitable for application in a clinical laboratory. The method has been implemented in our laboratory for a routine use.

Radioreceptor assay for sirolimus.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a radioreceptor assay (RRA) for sirolimus (rapamycin, RAPA). METHODS: A direct methanol extraction was used to prepare 45 patient samples for the RRA. Results were compared to the results obtained previously using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Between-run precision, recovery, and drug interference studies were also performed. RESULTS: The RRA is sensitive to 1.0 microgram/L RAPA equivalents in whole blood. Comparison with HPLC yielded a correlation coefficient for 45 patient samples of 0.977. Between-run precision at 2.5, 7.5, 12.5, and 20 micrograms/L showed coefficients of variation (CVs) of 12.9, 9.2, 8.5, and 5.9%, respectively. Recoveries from the extraction procedure were 93% at 7.5 micrograms/L and 103% at 12.5 micrograms/L. Drug interference studies showed no interference in the RRA by cyclosporine (CsA), dexamethasone, prednisone, or methotrexate. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that the RRA for RAPA correlates well with HPLC, and has excellent precision and recovery. The procedure is far less time-consuming and complex than HPLC and has potential for automation.

Radioreceptor assay for sirolimus in patients with decreased platelet counts.

OBJECTIVE: Sirolimus (RAPA) is a new immunosuppressive drug currently in Phase III clinical trials in combination with cyclosporine A (CsA). The toxicity profiles for CsA and RAPA are only partially overlapping, with RAPA toxicity consisting primarily of hyperlipidemia and myelodepression but without the nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity, which are seen with CsA. Patients in the clinical trial are being monitored using HPLC or LC/MS/MS assays; there is no immunoassay for RAPA reported to date. We have previously reported a radioreceptor assay (RRA) for RAPA, which has an excellent correlation with the HPLC assay (r = 0.997). The RRA has several advantages including excellent precision, sensitivity, rapid turnaround time, and a one-step extraction procedure. We report the evaluation of blood samples from patients who were exhibiting RAPA toxicity and comparison of the RRA results with the HPLC results. METHODS: EDTA whole blood specimens (n = 42) were obtained from six renal transplant recipients taking RAPA and CsA and exhibiting decreased platelet counts. Thirty-two samples from patients without decreased platelet counts were also received. The samples were analyzed with the RRA and the results were compared to those obtained with the HPLC assay. RESULTS: By HPLC, the results ranged from 3.2-72.6 micrograms/L RAPA with 43% of the results > or = 30 micrograms/L. With the RRA, the range was 7.7-83.0 micrograms/L RAPA equivalents, with 60% of the results > or = 30 micrograms/L. The RRA results are distinctly higher than the HPLC results all along the range. The correlation between the two assays was 0.861, with a slope of 0.966 and a Y-intercept of 11.1. CONCLUSION: Since the RRA is consistently higher than HPLC concentration in patients with decreased platelet counts, but correlates well in patients with no signs of toxicity, the RRA may be useful for monitoring patients for toxicity, by giving a better indication of increasing degree of immunosuppression than the HPLC assay.

Distribution of sirolimus in rat tissue.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the distribution of sirolimus (SRL, rapamycin), an immunosuppressive macrolide antibiotic, in the tissues of adult male Wistar-Furth rats following continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) and repeated daily peroral gavage (PO). DESIGN AND METHODS: Animals received 14-day courses of SRL by either CIVI (0.04-0.4 mg/kg/day) or PO (0.4-1.6 mg/kg/day) administration. Samples of whole blood and homogenates of five solid organs (heart, kidney, liver, lung and spleen), and portions of intestinal, muscle and testicular tissues were prepared on day 13 of CIVI treatment or 24 hours after administration of the 14th PO dose. SRL concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography with reference to calibration curves produced from SRL-spiked whole blood or tissue homogenates prepared from drug-free animals. RESULTS: Following PO but not CIVI administration, SRL concentrations in whole blood and all tissues increased linearly in relation to dose. SRL was extensively distributed among most tissues tested (tissue partitions coefficients of > 40 were observed in some cases). Comparatively, SRL whole blood concentrations were low. The ratio between the SRL whole blood concentrations after PO versus after CIVI administration (at like doses of 0.4 mg/kg/day) was 0.04. Therefore, we inferred that the oral bioavailability of SRL was low. CONCLUSIONS: The linear relationships between PO dose and SRL concentrations in whole blood and tissues may be attributed to the low oral bioavailability of SRL, which is indicated by the low levels of SRL observed in whole blood and tissues after PO administration. The nonlinear relationships between CIVI dose and SRL concentrations in whole blood and tissues may result because although whole blood depots may be saturated with SRL, the tissues continue to absorb SRL as the dose of SRL increases. Thus, because a high percentage of SRL is widely distributed into tissues stores, caution must be used when administering this drug in humans.

Comparison of steady-state trough sirolimus samples by HPLC and a radioreceptor assay.

OBJECTIVES: We have previously identified a minor immunophilin of 52 kDa molecular weight capable of binding tacrolimus and sirolimus. Because immunophilins are capable of binding both parent drug and metabolites and HPLC assays are typically used to assess parent drug in clinical situations, we used this immunophilin in a radioreceptor assay (RRA) to determine if any metabolites not included in the HPLC measurement would bind to the immunophilin and be associated with thrombocytopenia in patients receiving sirolimus. DESIGN AND METHODS: We tested 51 steady-state trough whole blood samples from non-thrombocytopenic patients and 51 steady-state trough samples from thrombocytopenic patients and compared them to HPLC measurements of parent drug in the same samples. We also tested whole blood samples spiked with authentic sirolimus metabolites using RRA to ascertain the effect these metabolites have on the technique. RESULTS: We found minimal cross-reactivity in this assay for sirolimus metabolites (binding ranged from <10% to 26%), and good correlation of the radioreceptor assay with HPLC (linear regression slope 0.92, y-intercept 0.79). There was no statistically significant difference between the RRA and HPLC results in two patient groups-thrombocytopenic and non-thrombocytopenic-using the paired t-test (p<0.005) and Bland-Altman analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that although the RRA could be substituted for HPLC in therapeutic drug monitoring, the 52 kDa immunophilin does not offer an advantage in terms of detecting metabolites associated with thrombocytopenia. However, the RRA offers the advantages of shorter turnaround time, smaller sample volume and potential for automation.

Considerations for monitoring cyclosporine in transplant recipients.

Cyclosporine (CsA) monitoring has remained controversial since the advent of the use of CsA in organ transplantation in the early 1980s. This article attempts to clarify for the clinical laboratory worker many of the vagaries associated with CsA monitoring by considering choice of sample matrix, the nature of metabolites, the technical specifications of the assay techniques used for therapeutic monitoring of CsA, comparison of results assessed by the various assays, and the pharmacokinetic considerations associated with choice of sampling time. Expectations for the degree of clinical usefulness achievable for CsA levels through further improvement in assay methodologies are also discussed.

Nonselective measurement of cyclosporine for therapeutic drug monitoring by fluorescence polarization immunoassay with a rabbit polyclonal antibody: I. Evaluation of the serum methodology and comparison with a sheep polyclonal antibody in an 3H-tracer mediated radioimmunoassay.

Among the new techniques available for CyA monitoring, the FPIA offers the advantages of rapidity and simplicity. The present communication assesses the technical performance of this test in comparison with a 3H tracer-based PC-RIA for serum CyA levels using 971 samples obtained during the first 6 posttransplant months from 14 kidney transplant recipients. The FPIA evaluation included verification of CyA concentrations in manufacturer-supplied calibrators and controls by reference methods, determination of intraassay/interassay precision and accuracy, feasibility of specimen dilution and assessed assay sensitivity, and range of linearity. Comparison of FPIA with PC-RIA indicated that trough samples, when assessed by FPIA, averaged 1.3-fold greater than the PC-RIA, whereas non-trough FPIA measurements indicated similarity between the two methods. Although the two assays showed similar trends in most renal transplant recipients, two subjects demonstrated discrepancies, presumably reflecting the differing specificities of the polyclonal antibodies used in each assay. Thus, the FPIA appears to be a useful addition to CyA monitoring technology.

Metabolism of cyclosporine by cytochromes P450 3A9 and 3A4.

The ability of P450 3A9 to transform cyclosporine was studied and compared to that of human P450 3A4. Purified P450 3A4 and P450 3A9 proteins were reconstituted in a system containing potassium phosphate buffer, lipids, NADPH-P450 reductase, and glutathione with NADPH added to initiate the reaction. Cyclosporine was added alone and with or without the inhibitors, ketoconazole or troleandomycin. High performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (HPLC/UV) techniques were used to analyze for cyclosporine metabolites. Both P450 3A4 and P450 3A9 transformed cyclosporine to three metabolites: AM1, AM9, and AM4n. P450 3A4 predominantly formed AM1 (63% of metabolites formed) while P450 3A9 formed AM4n (59% of metabolites formed). Ketoconazole (0.5 microM) completely inhibited P450 3A9 catalyzed formation of AM1 and AM9 and reduced AM4n formation to 28% of control. AM4n, AM1, and AM9 formation catalyzed by P450 3A4 was reduced to 50%, 30%, and 10% of control, respectively, by 0.5 microM ketoconazole. Troleandomycin (> 10 microM) inhibited the formation of AM4n by P450 3A4 and P450 3A9 to 60-70% of control, while the production of AM1 by P450 3A4 was increased to 120% of control and the production of AM1 by P450 3A9 was inhibited to 50% of control. Inhibition of P450 3A4 by troleandomycin (> 10 microM) reduced the formation of AM9 to 40% of control, but only reduced P450 3A9 formation of AM9 to 80% of control. This study shows that rat P450 3A9 is capable of transforming cyclosporine to multiple metabolites similar to those generated by human P450 3A4.