MSX1 Gene Polymorphisms in Patients with non-Syndromic Cleft lip and Palate: A Tertiary Care Centre Based Case-Control Study from Central Kerala.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of MSX1 gene polymorphisms to the risk of developing NSCLP. DESIGN: Case-Control Study. SETTING: A tertiary care centre. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of 200 subjects (100 cases and 100 controls). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Genotyping was performed by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Allele and genotype frequencies were calculated between patients and controls and analyzed using online Web Tools such as SISA and SNPstats. The MSX1 gene polymorphisms c. 799 GT, c.458 CA can be risk factors in the development of orofacial clefts. RESULTS: In the cases, an association was found between NSCLP and c.799 and c.458 of the MSX1 gene when compared with the control. The dominant and overdominant models, c. 799 GT, c.458 CA genotypes and c. 799 T, c.458 A alleles in the population are said to be the main risk factors to develop the NSCLP in our study population. The genotype variation of c 799 G/T and c.458 C/A are revealed to be specifically contributing to an NSCLP-type Cleft lip and Palate. It is worth noting that NSCLP females in the study population showed a stronger association with heterozygous genotypes of c.799 and c.458. However, further investigation with a larger cohort is necessary to confirm these findings. CONCLUSION: Overall the results of the study revealed that MSX1 c 799 G > T and c.458 C > A can be considered as one of the genetic risk factors in the formation of Non-Syndromic Cleft Lip and Palate in the study population.

A case report of acampomelic campomelic dysplasia and operative difficulties in cleft palate reconstruction.

Acampomelic campomelic dysplasia (CD) is a type of CD (CD; OMIM #114290), a rare form of congenital short-limbed dwarfism and is due to mutations in SOX9 gene family. Characteristic phenotypes of CD include bowing of the lower limbs, a narrow thoracic cage, 11 pairs of ribs, hypoplastic scapulae, macrocephaly, flattened supraorbital ridges and nasal bridge, cleft palate and micrognathia. The bending of the long bones is not an obligatory feature and is absent in about 10% of cases, referred to as acampomelic CD. A child previously diagnosed with acampomelic CD was brought to our outpatient clinic for cleft palate reconstruction. Our neurosurgeon cautioned us against performing surgery with extension of the neck in view of the possibility of producing quadriparesis, due to narrowing of the spinal canal as part of the osseous anomaly noted in the magnetic resonance imaging study of the spine, thus making the anaesthesia, surgical and post-operative procedures difficult. The cleft palate reconstruction was performed with all precautions and was uneventful.

A report of 2 patients with transient blindness following Le Fort I osteotomy and a review of past reported cases.

Blindness following a LeFort I osteotomy is a rare but extremely serious complication. Ten cases have been reported to date. None of these patients recovered vision. Optic neuropathy is believed to be the cause but the exact mechanism has not been settled. We report the first, and the only two, documented cases of complete loss of vision that recovered subsequently. The first patient was a 19-year-old male with repaired bilateral cleft lip and palate. He developed loss of vision in the right eye on the second postoperative day. The second patient was a 22-year-old male with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate. He developed complete loss of vision in the left eye on the day of surgery. Both these patients underwent ongoing studies, which did not show any abnormalities. Both were treated with methylprednisolone. Both the patients gradually showed improvement in their vision. The first patient recovered normal vision several months postoperatively. The second patient's vision improved to 4/60 by 4 months postoperatively. We discuss the probable mechanisms of optic nerve injury and also the possible reasons why sight was restored in these patients. This is a rare but serious complication following a fairly common procedure. Through this article we wish to create an awareness of this complication and also a possible way of avoiding such a disaster.

Unfavourable results in the repair of the cleft lip.

INTRODUCTION: Unfavorable results in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip repair are often easy to spot but not always easy to prevent as to treat. We have tried to deal with the more common problems and explain possible causes and the best possible management options from our experience. UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP REPAIR: Unfavorable results immediately after repair involve Dehiscence and Scaring. Delayed blemishes include vermillion notching, a short lip, deficiency in the height of the lateral vermillion on the cleft side, white roll malalignment, oro-vestibular fistula, the cleft lip nose deformity, a narrow nostril and a "high-riding" nostril. We analyze the causes of these blemishes and outline our views regarding the treatment of these. BILATERAL CLEFT LIP: Immediate problems again include dehiscence as also loss of prolabium or premaxilla. Delayed unfavorable results are central vermillion deficiency, a lip that is too tight, bilateral cleft lip nose deformity, problems with the premaxilla and maxillary growth disturbances. Here again we discuss the causation of these problems and our preferred methods of treatment. CONCLUSION: We have detailed the significant unfavorable results after unilateral and bilateral cleft lip surgery. The methods of treatment advocated have been layer from our own experience.