Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: A common concern associated with elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is the amount of time required for recovery and rehabilitation. For example, for Major League Baseball pitchers, the average time to return to competition ranges from 13.8 to 20.5 months. Suture tape augmentation has shown the ability to provide additional soft tissue stability across other joints in the body. By providing an additional checkrein to the UCL reconstruction while the graft is healing, it may be possible to accelerate the rehabilitation process in overhead athletes and thus effect a quicker return to sports. PURPOSE: To compare elbow valgus stability and load to failure between UCL reconstruction with and without suture tape augmentation. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows (N = 24) were dissected to expose the UCL. Medial elbow stability was tested with the UCL intact, deficient, and reconstructed utilizing the 3-strand docking technique with or without suture augmentation. A 3-N·m valgus torque was applied to the elbow, and valgus rotation of the ulna was recorded via motion-tracking cameras as the elbow was cycled through a full range of motion. After kinematic testing, reconstructed specimens were loaded to failure at 70° of elbow flexion. RESULTS: UCL-deficient elbows demonstrated significantly greater valgus rotation when compared with intact and internally braced reconstructed elbows at every angle of flexion tested and when compared with unbraced UCL-reconstructed elbows at 50° to 120° of flexion (P < .05). There were no significant differences between intact and UCL-reconstructed elbows with and without suture augmentation at any flexion angle tested. When loaded to failure, unbraced reconstructed elbows failed at a significantly lower torque as compared with elbows with UCL reconstruction with suture tape augmentation (P < .01). CONCLUSION: In this cadaveric model, 3-strand UCL reconstruction with suture augmentation did not overconstrain the elbow throughout all flexion angles when compared with the native state and UCL reconstruction alone, while providing greater load to failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suture tape augmentation may provide the additional strength necessary to accelerate rehabilitation after UCL reconstruction.

Outside-In Capsulotomy of the Hip for Arthroscopic Pincer Resection.

Hip surgical techniques have evolved significantly, transitioning from open techniques to arthroscopic techniques. Hip arthroscopy has many advantages over open techniques, including reduced trauma to surrounding tissues, reduced risk of infection, and improved patient-reported outcome measures. Hip arthroscopic techniques are now commonly used for pathologies such as femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). FAI can include cam, pincer, or mixed impingement. Through hip arthroscopy, FAI may be treated with a femoroplasty and acetabuloplasty along with addressing any labral pathology that may exist. Owing to the capsule playing an integral role in hip stability, surgeons are now mindful of the initial approach and closure on completion of the intra-articular procedure. The most common approach for capsulotomy is the inside-out approach. However, this approach can be difficult in patients with a large pincer deformity. The authors describe an outside-in approach to arthroscopic hip capsulotomy. This capsular approach helps protect the labrum and articular cartilage while preserving capsular tissue.

Lack of Agreement on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Variation in clinical practice resulting from the absence of evidence-based treatment protocols has negative implications on both the cost and the quality of medical care. The objective of this study was to assess whether a standard of care for the treatment of extra-articular nondisplaced distal radius fracture has developed despite the lack of a conclusive recommendation from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. METHODS: A case-vignette survey was conducted. Treatment type and duration of casting selections were analyzed. The cost implications of responses were assessed. Participants were practicing orthopedists primarily in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Orthopedists (n = 494) were recruited via E-mail and at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting held in Chicago in March 2013. Inclusion criteria required that participants be graduates of an accredited medical school and be practicing orthopedists at the time of survey distribution. The main outcome measure was surgical or nonsurgical intervention. RESULTS: Nonsurgical treatment was selected by 60% of respondents, with surgery preferred by 37%. Duration of casting responses varied from 2 to 12 weeks. Among nonsurgical responses, 69% indicated 6 weeks as their preferred duration of casting (95% confidence interval, 64.9-73.1%). Surgery imposes a 76% greater total cost to society than nonsurgical treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the absence of a consensus strategy for the treatment of extra-articular nondisplaced distal radius fractures. Implications of variance in treatment on cost and quality support the need for established, evidence-based guidelines or further clinical trials to assist in the management of this common fracture.