RESUMO
Most patients with advanced cancer experience debilitating pain, which significantly affects their quality of life and has both physical and psychological implications. Opioids have been the mainstay of treatment for chronic cancer pain, but some people develop serious adverse effects or may become refractory to opioid use. There is always a need and search for alternative non-opioid analgesics with an acceptable safety profile, and one such drug is ketamine. In this era of evolving analgesic therapeutics, ketamine has been noted to have favourable results. Ketamine, a phencyclidine analogue, is an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist (NMDA), and it has been shown to have an analgesic effect at sub-anaesthetic doses by blocking NMDA-induced pain sensitization and enhancing opioid receptor sensitization. This is a case report of a 46-year-old Indian female with recurrent metastatic adenocarcinoma endometrium (International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) Grade II) involving the vaginal vault, rectum, and adrenal glands, along with para-rectal, bilateral iliac, and retroperitoneal nodal metastases, in which ketamine infusion was used successfully to alleviate the pain that was initially not controlled with an incremental dose of opioids. The patient presented with progressive pain in the peri-anal region, rated 8/10 on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS), following which she was treated with escalating doses of intravenous (IV) fentanyl, but with little to no relief. In view of the patient's opioid-resistant pain, she was started on a low-dose ketamine IV infusion (50 mg in 50 ml of 0.9% NS) as "burst therapy," at infusion rates of 0.02 mg/kg/hr-0.08 mg/kg/hr, with adequate pain relief occurring at 0.08 mg/kg/hr. Literature suggests weight-based dosing of ketamine ranging from 0.06 mg/kg/hr to 0.8 mg/kg/hr was previously used to achieve satisfactory results. In this patient, even lower doses were effectively used to achieve optimum long-term analgesia, cause an upliftment in the patient's overall mood and quality of life, and cause a significant reduction in opioid usage. However, further research is required to assess the efficacy of ketamine at such doses and its effect on opioid consumption. This case report will promote further study regarding optimum IV ketamine dosing and administration in the management of opioid-refractory pain in cancer patients, especially in the Indian population.
RESUMO
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered the standard procedure for surgical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is still lingering speculation on its adequacy of lymph node (LN) dissection or sampling and the long-term survival benefits when compared to open thoracotomy. Given the above, we conducted a systematic review comparing VATS and thoracotomy in terms of their oncological effectiveness in resection. We explored major research literature databases and search engines such as MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate to find pertinent articles. After the meticulous screening, quality check, and applying relevant filters according to our eligibility criteria, we identified 16 studies relevant to our research question, out of which one was a randomized controlled trial, one meta-analysis, and 14 were observational studies. The study comprised 44,673 patients with NSCLC, out of whom 15,093 patients were operated by VATS and the remaining 29,580 patients by thoracotomy. The results indicate that VATS is equivalent to thoracotomy in total LNs (N1 + N2) and LN stations dissected. However, a thoracotomy may achieve slightly better mediastinal lymph node dissection (N2) in terms of assessing a greater number of mediastinal lymph nodes and nodal stations. This may be attributed to a better visual field during mediastinal nodal clearance by an open approach. Also, nodal upstaging was consistently more common with an open approach. In terms of long-term outcomes, both overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between the two groups, with VATS offering a slightly better survival benefit. Irrespective of the increased rates of nodal upstaging by an open approach, we conclude that VATS should be considered a highly efficient alternative to thoracotomy in both early and locally advanced NSCLC.