Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Epidemiology ; 25(5): 636-47, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25036432

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence from laboratory animal and human studies suggests that air pollution exposure during pregnancy affects cognitive and psychomotor development in childhood. METHODS: We analyzed data from 6 European population-based birth cohorts-GENERATION R (The Netherlands), DUISBURG (Germany), EDEN (France), GASPII (Italy), RHEA (Greece), and INMA (Spain)-that recruited mother-infant pairs from 1997 to 2008. Air pollution levels-nitrogen oxides (NO2, NOx) in all regions and particulate matter (PM) with diameters of <2.5, <10, and 2.5-10 µm (PM2.5, PM10, and PMcoarse, respectively) and PM2.5 absorbance in a subgroup-at birth addresses were estimated by land-use regression models, based on monitoring campaigns performed primarily between 2008 and 2011. Levels were back-extrapolated to exact pregnancy periods using background monitoring sites. Cognitive and psychomotor development was assessed between 1 and 6 years of age. Adjusted region-specific effect estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 9482 children were included. Air pollution exposure during pregnancy, particularly NO2, was associated with reduced psychomotor development (global psychomotor development score decreased by 0.68 points [95% confidence interval = -1.25 to -0.11] per increase of 10 µg/m in NO2). Similar trends were observed in most regions. No associations were found between any air pollutant and cognitive development. CONCLUSIONS: Air pollution exposure during pregnancy, particularly NO2 (for which motorized traffic is a major source), was associated with delayed psychomotor development during childhood. Due to the widespread nature of air pollution exposure, the public health impact of the small changes observed at an individual level could be considerable.


Assuntos
Poluentes Atmosféricos/toxicidade , Poluição do Ar/efeitos adversos , Desenvolvimento Infantil/efeitos dos fármacos , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Exposição Materna/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Desempenho Psicomotor/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Poluentes Atmosféricos/análise , Poluição do Ar/análise , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/induzido quimicamente , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/diagnóstico , Monitoramento Ambiental , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Modelos Teóricos , Óxidos de Nitrogênio/análise , Óxidos de Nitrogênio/toxicidade , Material Particulado/análise , Material Particulado/toxicidade , Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Environ Int ; 66: 165-73, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24598283

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Spatially resolved exposure models are increasingly used in epidemiology. We previously reported that, although exhibiting a moderate correlation, pregnancy nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels estimated by the nearest air quality monitoring station (AQMS) model and a geostatistical model, showed similar associations with infant birth weight. OBJECTIVES: We extended this study by comparing a total of four exposure models, including two highly spatially resolved models: a land-use regression (LUR) model and a dispersion model. Comparisons were made in terms of predicted NO2 and particle (aerodynamic diameter<10 µm, PM10) exposure and adjusted association with birth weight. METHODS: The four exposure models were implemented in two French metropolitan areas where 1026 pregnant women were followed as part of the EDEN mother-child cohort. RESULTS: Correlations between model predictions were high (≥ 0.70), except for NO2 between the AQMS and both the LUR (r = 0.54) and dispersion models (r = 0.63). Spatial variations as estimated by the AQMS model were greater for NO2 (95%) than for PM10 (22%). The direction of effect estimates of NO2 on birth weight varied according to the exposure model, while PM10 effect estimates were more consistent across exposure models. CONCLUSIONS: For PM10, highly spatially resolved exposure model agreed with the poor spatial resolution AQMS model in terms of estimated pollutant levels and health effects. For more spatially heterogeneous pollutants like NO2, although predicted levels from spatially resolved models (all but AQMS) agreed with each other, our results suggest that some may disagree with each other as well as with the AQMS regarding the direction of the estimated health effects.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental/análise , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Modelos Teóricos , Material Particulado/análise , Adulto , Peso ao Nascer/efeitos dos fármacos , Exposição Ambiental/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/análise , Tamanho da Partícula , Material Particulado/toxicidade , Gravidez , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA