Long-term results of ProACT primary and repeat implantation for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary incontinence in men after radical prostatectomy affects strongly quality of life. If conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment consists of implantable devices. If the requirement of manual dexterity in the artificial sphincter is to be avoided, the ProACT system offers a readjustable system, which shows good continence, but also high revision rates. Aim of our single-centre, single-surgeon study was to evaluate the success and revision rates of ProACT over long-term follow-up and if repeat ProACT implantation after failure would be a reasonable strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In May 2017, follow-up of all patients who underwent ProACT implantation between 2003 and 2013 was obtained. Parameters were numbers of pads used, filling volume of balloons, and patient-reported satisfaction. Furthermore, revisions were noted. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2013, 134 patients were implanted a ProACT system. Median age was 71 years; median follow-up was 118 months. 112 implantations were successful (82.6%) and the number of pads used decreased significantly (p < 0.005). 63 patients were revised and 49 were successful (77.8%). No differences in success rate, pads used, or filling volume were seen (all p > 0.8). In a second revision, again, no differences in success rate or pads used were noted (all p > 0.7). Patients' personal satisfaction was high despite the high revision rate. CONCLUSION: In the hands of an experienced surgeon, ProACT is a safe and effective therapy for post-prostatectomy incontinence especially if mayor surgery is to be avoided. Revision rates are high, but the results of ProACT reimplantation are comparable to the results after the first implantation.

Surgical treatment of large volume prostates: a matched pair analysis comparing the open, endoscopic (ThuVEP) and robotic approach.

OBJECTIVE: To compare open simple prostatectomy, endoscopic enucleation and laparoscopic, robot-assisted enucleation of high-volume prostate in terms of operation time, blood loss, transfusion and complication rates and early continence rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with BPH treated endoscopically (ThuVEP, Hamburg and Hannover) or robotically (Mainz) were evaluated prospectively for prostate size, free flow and validated questionnaires (IPSS, QoL). 35 patients were matched to patients after open prostatectomy (Mainz) for age, prostate size, IPSS and QoL scores. Operation time was noted from the first cut to the last suture; blood loss was estimated by the drop of haemoglobin preoperatively and one day after surgery. Transfusion rates were documented. Early continence was estimated by pad use over the first 24 h after catheter removal. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0. RESULTS: No significant differences in prostate size, age and preoperative questionnaires were found (p > 0.3). Postoperative flow and the results of the questionnaires were significantly improved (all p < 0.05), without difference between the approaches (p > 0.8). Endoscopic surgery showed superiority in operation time (both p < 0.05); blood loss and transfusion rates were significantly lower compared to open surgery (both p < 0.01) and lower than in robotic surgery without reaching significance (p = 0.18, p = 0.36). Similar results were seen in early continence rates. CONCLUSION: Due to our results, endoscopic surgery should be considered as first-line therapy unless there are comorbidities like diverticula and/or bladder calculi that can be easily treated simultaneously by robotic surgery. Against the background of these findings, indications favouring open surgery are getting sparse.

Prospective multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group study on the efficacy and tolerability of StroVac® in patients with recurrent symptomatic uncomplicated bacterial urinary tract infections.

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of vaccination with StroVac compared to placebo in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study in patients with uncomplicated rUTI. Patients received three single intramuscular injections with StroVac every two weeks. Primary endpoint was the number of bacterial urinary tract infections (UTI) over 13.5 months after randomization and adjusted by the respective "baseline" value when comparing verum and placebo group. Secondary endpoints were the number of patients with non-recurrence, time to first recurrence, frequency of recurrences, and patients' self-assessment of quality of life using a validated questionnaire. RESULTS: 376 patients were randomized to both groups between January 2012 and March 2015. Mean age was 44.4 years. Patients were mainly female (98.4%). In the StroVac group (n = 188), the number of UTIs was reduced from 5.5 to 1.2, in the placebo group (n = 188) from 5.4 to 1.3 (p = 0.63). In patients with ≥ 7 UTIs prior to study inclusion, StroVac was statistically significantly superior to placebo (p = 0.048). However, in all other secondary endpoints, no statistical differences between the two groups could be seen (all p > 0.3). CONCLUSION: StroVac reduced the number of clinically relevant UTIs like in former studies but did not show statistically significant better results than the chosen placebo. Most likely, that was due to a, since confirmed, prophylactic effect of the chosen placebo itself. Therefore, placebo-controlled and double-blinded studies using a different ineffective placebo preparation are needed to determine the importance of StroVac in prophylaxis of rUTI.

Treatment outcomes of bladder stones in children with intact bladders in developing countries: A systematic review of >1000 cases on behalf of the European Association of Urology Bladder Stones Guideline panel.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder stones (BS) are still endemic in children in developing nations and account for a high volume of paediatric urology workload in these areas. The aim of this systematic review is to comparatively assess the benefits and risks of minimally invasive and open surgical interventions for the treatment of bladder stones in children. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Guidance. Database searches (January 1970- March 2021) were screened, abstracted, and assessed for risk of bias for comparative randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies (NRSs) with >10 patients per group. Open cystolithotomy (CL), transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL), percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and laparoscopic cystolithotomy (LapCL) were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 3040 abstracts were screened, and 8 studies were included. There were 7 retrospective non-randomised studies (NRS's) and 1 quasi-RCT with 1034 eligible patients (CL: n=637, TUCL: n=196, PCCL: n=138, ESWL: n=63, LapCL n=0). Stone free rate (SFR) was given in 7 studies and measured 100%, 86.6%-100%, and 100% for CL, TUCL and PCCL respectively. CL was associated with a longer duration of inpatient stay than PCCL and TUCL (p<0.05). One NRS showed that SFR was significantly lower after 1 session with outpatient ESWL (47.6%) compared to TUCL (93.5%) and CL (100%) (p<0.01 and p<0.01 respectively). One RCT compared TUCL with laser versus TUCL with pneumatic lithotripsy and found that procedure duration was shorter with laser for stones <1.5cm (n=25, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, CL, TUCL and PCCL have comparable SFRs but ESWL is less effective for treating stones in paediatric patients. CL has the longest duration of inpatient stay. Information gathered from this systematic review will enable paediatric urologists to comparatively assess the risks and benefits of all urological modalities when considering surgical intervention for bladder stones.

[Stone therapy-use and limitations of the guidelines]. / Steintherapie ­ Anwendung und Limitation medizinischer Leitlinien.

Increase of medical knowledge, technical innovation together with a demographic change, and increase of stone incidence in daily practice challenges guideline preparation and clinical studies. Increasing interdisciplinary collaboration in stone treatment can also be demonstrated in the number of affiliated professional and working groups in the current guideline update. The following case illustrates treatment options in a symptomatic patient harbouring bilateral stones and metabolic risk factors. Decision guidance for treatment and recurrence prevention measures are presented on the basis of expert opinion and available published evidence.

[Current concepts on the pathogenesis of urinary stones]. / Aktuelle Konzepte zur Pathogenese von Harnsteinen.

The process of kidney stone formation is complex and still not completely understood. Supersaturation and crystallization are the main drivers for the etiopathogenesis of uric acid, xanthine and cystine stones but this physicochemical concept fails to adequately explain the formation of calcium-based nephrolithiasis, which represents the majority of kidney stones. Contemporary concepts of the pathogenesis of calcium-based nephrolithiasis focus on a nidus-associated stone formation of calcium-based nephrolithiasis on Randall's plaques or on plugs of Bellini's duct. Randall's plaques originate from the interaction of interstitial calcium supersaturation in the renal papilla, vascular and interstitial inflammatory processes and mineral deposits of calcifying nanoparticles on the basal membrane of the thin ascending branch of the loop of Henle; however, plugs of Bellini's duct are assumed to be caused by mineral deposits on the wall of the collecting ducts. Aggregation and overgrowth are influenced by the interaction of matrix proteins with calcium supersaturated urine, by an imbalance between promoters and inhibitors of stone formation in the calyceal urine. Current research has elucidated many factors contributing to stone formation by revealing novel insights into the physiology of nephron and papilla, by analyzing vascular, inflammatory and calcifying processes in the renal medulla, by examining the proteome, the microbiome, promoters and inhibitors of stone formation in the urine and by conducting the first genome-wide association studies; however, more future research is mandatory to fill the gap of knowledge and hopefully, to obtain novel prophylactic, therapeutic and metaphylactic tools beyond the current state of knowledge.

Trend analysis and regional tumor incidence in Germany for testicular cancer between 2003 and 2014.

BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) is one the most common solid tumors in men between the age of 15 and 35 with an overall incidence rate of 1-1.5 %. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated different incidence patterns in western civilized countries with overall rising incidence trends. OBJECTIVE: To analyze differences in regional tumor incidence rates for TGCT and perform a trend analysis for TGCT between 2003 and 2014 in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: TGCT cases in Germany which were diagnosed between 2003 and 2014 were provided by the Robert-Koch-Institute, Berlin. For statistical analysis, cluster and spatial scan tests according to Kulldorff were used for cases with seminoma and non-seminoma. Results are presented in administrative districts and graphically illustrated. We performed a trend-analysis in order to evaluate age-adjusted incidence trends in Germany. Tests were two-sided with a level of significance of α=0.05. RESULTS: In total we included 35,066 patients. Overall, 22,634 cases had newly diagnosed seminoma and 12,432 were diagnosed as non-seminoma. Maximum incidence of seminoma and non-seminoma was observed for age-group 38-40 years and 26-28 years, respectively. No second peak for the incidences of seminoma and non-seminoma with respect to age were observed. Cluster analysis revealed areas with high and low incidence rates as well as slightly different spatial distribution in Germany between seminoma and nonseminoma. Furthermore, there was no significant increase in age-adjusted incidence rates over the reviewed time period in both cohorts. DISCUSSION: In this study differences in reginal tumor incidence rates for seminoma and non-seminoma are reported with both tumor entities revealing distinct clusters. Furthermore, tumor incidence trends for seminoma and nonseminoma between 2003 and 2014 were stable which might indicate the beginning of a plateau phase for TGCT incidence rates in Germany. CONCLUSION: In this analysis we were able to identify regions with significantly higher tumor incidence rates for both seminoma and non-seminoma which were specific for these two subtypes. Furthermore, trend analysis revealed a steady incidence rate for testicular cancer in Germany.

[Update of the 2Sk guidelines on the diagnostics, treatment and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF register number 043-025) : What is new?] / Aktualisierung der S2k-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik, Therapie und Metaphylaxe der Urolithiasis (AWMF Registernummer 043-025) : Was ist neu?

The increase of medical knowledge and technical innovations together with the demographic change represent a challenge for the new conception of guidelines and clinical studies. The present S2k guidelines, which are exclusively concerned with kidney and ureteral stones, should support the treatment of urolithiasis in hospitals and private practices and provide information on urolithiasis for patients. Increasing interdisciplinary collaboration in stone treatment is also demonstrated in the number of professional and working groups participating in the update of the new guidelines. The present S2k guidelines emerged from a consensus process and demonstrate the current recommendations in step with actual practice. They provide decision-making guidance for diagnostics, treatment and metaphylactic measures based on expert opinions and available published fundamental evidence from the literature.

[Ureter triplex with non-functioning upper pole due to ectopic ureterocele and refluxive third ureter bud : case report and review of the literature]. / Ureter triplex mit afunktionellem Oberpol bei ektoper Ureterozele und refluxiver dritter Ureterknospe : Fallbericht und Literaturübersicht.

We present the case of an 8-month-old boy with ureter triplication on the left side with non-functional upper pole due to ectopic ureterocele and a refluxive third ureter bud. We performed an upper pole heminephroureterectomy with resection of the ureterocele and of the refluxive third ureter bud and reimplantation of the lower pole ureter using the psoas hitch technique.

Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study.

The purpose of this study is to analyze clinical outcomes and costs of single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes in comparison with reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes in a tertiary referral center. Prospectively, 68 flexible ureterorenoscopies utilizing reusable (Flex-X2S, Flex-XC, Karl Storz) and 68 applying single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes (LithoVue, Boston Scientific) were collected. Clinical outcome parameters such as overall success rate, complication rates according to Clavien-Dindo, operation time and radiation exposure time were measured. Cost analysis was based on purchase costs and recurrent costs for repair and reprocessing divided by number of procedures. In each group 68 procedures were available for evaluation. In 91% of reusable and 88% of single-use ureterorenoscopies stone disease was treated with a mean stone burden of 101 ± 226 and 90 ± 244 mm2 and lower pole involvement in 47 and 41%, respectively (p > 0.05). Comparing clinical outcomes of reusable vs. single-use instruments revealed no significant difference for overall success rates (81 vs. 87%), stone-free rates (82 vs. 85%), operation time (76.2 ± 46.8 vs. 76.8 ± 40.2 min), radiation exposure time (3.83 ± 3.15 vs. 3.93 ± 4.43 min) and complication rates (7 vs. 17%) (p > 0.05). A wide range of repair and purchase costs resulted in total to $1212-$1743 per procedure for reusable ureterorenoscopy whereas price of single-use ureterorenoscopy was $1300-$3180 per procedure. The current work provided evidence for equal clinical effectiveness of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes. Partially overlapping ranges of costs for single-use and reusable scopes stress the importance to precisely know the expenses and caseload when negotiating purchase prices, repair prices and warranty conditions.

Survival outcomes in patients with large (≥7cm) clear cell renal cell carcinomas treated with nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: Results of a multicenter cohort with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Does the dogma of nephron sparing surgery (NSS) still stand for large renal masses? Available studies dealing with that issue are considerably biased often mixing imperative with elective indications for NSS and also including less malignant variants or even benign renal tumors. Here, we analyzed the oncological long-term outcomes of patients undergoing elective NSS or radical tumor nephrectomy (RN) for non-endophytic, large (≥7cm) clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS: Prospectively acquired, clinical databases from two academic high-volume centers were screened for patients from 1980 to 2010. The query was strictly limited to patients with elective indications. Surgical complications were retrospectively assessed and classified using the Clavien-Dindo-classification system (CDS). Overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier-method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Out of in total 8664 patients in the databases, 123 patients were identified (elective NSS (n = 18) or elective RN (n = 105)) for ≥7cm ccRCC. The median follow-up over all was 102 months (range 3-367 months). Compared to the RN group, the NSS group had a significantly longer median OS (p = 0.014) and median CSS (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In large renal masses, NSS can be performed safely with acceptable complication rates. In terms of long-term OS and CSS, NSS was at least not inferior to RN. Our findings suggest that NSS should also be performed in patients presenting with renal tumors ≥7cm whenever technically feasible. Limitations include its retrospective nature and the limited availability of data concerning long-term development of renal function in the two groups.

[What is the current status of shock wave lithotripsy?] / Hat die extrakorporale Stoßwellenlithotripsie noch einen Stellenwert?

BACKGROUND: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) became the therapy of choice for the majority of patients with urolithiasis early after its introduction in the early 1980s. Since then, SWL remains the only noninvasive therapy modality for the treatment of urinary stones. Although lithotripters became more versatile and affordable-making them available worldwide-indications for SWL have shifted as well. In most western countries, endoscopic techniques took the lead in stone therapy due to high (early) stone-free and better reimbursement rates. Notwithstanding SWL remains the first-line therapy for most intrarenal and many ureteral stones. PURPOSE: This contemporary review illuminates technical aspects and improvements of lithotripsy over recent years in context with the current guideline recommendations. RESULTS: Technical advances in lithotripsy such as shock wave generation, focusing, coupling, stone localization and modifications in therapy regimens are reviewed and presented. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists are recommended to carefully select the appropriate therapy modality for a patient with urolithiasis. A more comprehensive understanding of the physics of shock waves could lead to much better results, thus, endorsing SWL as first-line therapy for urolithiasis instead of contemporary endourology treatment options.

[S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium]. / S2k-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik, Therapie und Metaphylaxe der Urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Kurzfassung.

Every tenth German citizen will suffer from at least one urinary calculus during the lifetime. The diagnostics, treatment and follow-up treatment of urolithiasis are, therefore, part of the daily routine practice for all urologists in hospitals and private practices as well as in many other disciplines, such as general practitioners, internists, nephrologists and pediatricians. Although the diagnostics and therapy have experienced substantial alterations over the last 10 years, the possibilities of metabolic diagnostics and secondary prevention for patients at risk are, unfortunately and unjustly, in many places very poorly represented. The present S2k guidelines, which for the first time were established in an interdisciplinary consensus process, represent the current practical recommendations and, whenever possible, use tables and algorithms in order to facilitate easy reference in the routine daily work. Last but not least, this greatly simplifies the measures for metaphylaxis.

[Urolithiasis 2016 : Reliable, effective and low radiation exposure]. / Steindiagnostik 2016 : Zuverlässig, effektiv und strahlungsarm.

BACKGROUND: Urolithiasis is a widespread disease. Diagnostic imaging plays an important role in the evaluation and management of patients with suspected urolithiasis. Furthermore, modern imaging methods may provide information on stone location, size, fragility and composition aiding the urologist to determine the appropriate treatment modality. PURPOSE: Based on the current literature and guidelines, this review reports on the various new and established diagnostic imaging modalities. RESULTS: Ultrasound should always be the initial imaging modality. Following ultrasound, noncontrast CT-principally using a low-dose protocol-is the imaging modality of choice in the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain and suspected urolithiasis. New imaging modalities like dual energy CT, Uro Dyna CT and digital tomosynthesis are currently under investigation but not yet part of daily clinical practice. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to detect obstruction caused by urinary stones but is not a first-line imaging modality.

[Vesicovaginal fistula. Incidence, etiology and phenomenology in Germany]. / Urogenitalfistel. Inzidenz, Ätiologie und Phänomenologie in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Vesicovaginal fistulae are much more common in developing countries along the equatorial fistula belt than in industrialized countries. However, although the classical obstetric fistula caused by lack of medical support through pregnancy and delivery in adolescent primiparae has almost vanished in Germany, we are now facing new and predominantly iatrogenic variants. Increasing frequency of gynecological surgery as well as pelvic radiation, forgotten vaginal foreign bodies, or uninhibited cancer growth are the modern causes for vesicovaginal fistula in elderly patients. Comorbidities and genital atrophy impair surgical therapy in view of a limited success rate of conservative transient transurethral catheterization. METHODS: Diagnostics should start early and should be initially limited to vaginal inspection, cystourethroscopy, and the blue dye test. Radiological investigations including CT and MRI are only indicated in patients suspicious for ureterovaginal fistula or with inconclusive findings or malignant fistula. The surgical armamentarium comprises vaginal, abdominal, and combined approaches, which all underlie basic principles of fistula repair: protection of the ureteral orifices, complete excision of the fistula canal, accurate separation of the organs connected to the fistula, sufficient tissue mobilization for tension-free suturing, interposition of padding material for prevention of recurrency. CONCLUSION: Depending on the degree of sphincter damage, stress urinary incontinence might persist despite successful fistula repair, requiring further incontinence surgery or ultimate urinary diversion in recurrent cases that are hopeless.

[Gap between postulated and real outcome quality of radical prostatectomy]. / Kluft zwischen postulierter und realitätsbezogener Ergebnisqualität nach radikaler Prostatektomie.

BACKGROUND: Certified Prostate Centers proclaim congruent process and outcome quality results for treatment of prostate carcinoma. Therapy in accordance with the guidelines after presentation of the patient in an interdisciplinary conference and regular documented follow up are not in themselves a guarantee for good quality results (complication free, continence, erectile function, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence free), and are significantly influenced by factors not contained within the certification framework. DISCUSSION: An association between exceeding the minimum number of operations and quality assurance exists, if at all, only vaguely and on no account justifies the absolute numbers necessary for certification. Although good measuring instruments for a Pentafecta analysis are available, the gathering of quality results for a center are limited to questionnaires for functional quality results and in the non-differentiated request for a pT2R1 rate of under 10 % for oncological quality results. CONCLUSIONS: The reasons for this systematic ignoring of the for the patient so important quality results with a simultaneous excessive regard for standardizing organizational procedure processes are manifold. They comprise valid verifiability of process quality, the unclear effects of standardized treatment pathways on actual operation quality and the capitulation to statistical and patient determined problems with sufficient acquisition of comparable functional OP results. Whereas the outcome quality is more important than the process quality for patients with prostate carcinoma, the certified centers conduct themselves in exactly the opposite manner, thus creating a virtually insoluble dilemma.

[Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy]. / Robotisch assistierte radikale Prostatektomie.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has been rapidly adopted as a standard approach for surgical treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer. Despite additional costs, RALP seems to provide better functional and oncological outcomes and less blood loss compared to open radical prostatectomy (ORP). However, prospective randomized studies are still missing. PURPOSE: Based on the current literature, this review reports about the role of RALP in prostate cancer treatment. Its functional and oncologic outcomes as well as complication rates are compared to ORP. Particularly, the role of RALP in nonorgan-confined tumors will be discussed. RESULTS: Based on the current literature, RALP provides better continence and potency rates as compared to ORP. Moreover, the incidence of positive surgical margins seems to be reduced. However, there is conflicting data regarding the role of RALP in nonorgan-confined prostate cancer. Regarding long-term oncologic outcomes, RALP seems to be comparable to ORP.

[Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: functional and oncological outcomes]. / Robotisch assistierte laparoskopische partielle Nephrektomie : Funktionelle und onkologische Ergebnisse.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, small renal masses (SRM) have been increasingly detected as an incidental finding of radiological or ultrasound studies for other indications. Organ-sparing renal tumor resection as open partial nephrectomy (OPN) is the international standard for renal tumors <7 cm. RESULTS: Due to technical developments, minimally invasive procedures have emerged as an alternative to OPN. In experienced hands, conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has achieved good functional and oncological results comparable to OPN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has been performed since 2004. Compared to LPN, RAPN provides a faster learning curve, better visualization and more versatile instrumentation due to the degrees of freedom of the articulated instruments. After about 30 procedures, a level of experience is reached, which is characterized by good functional results, less blood loss, and shorter warm ischemia time of the kidney as compared to LPN. This can relate to a shorter hospital stay and faster recovery. Complications according to the Clavien classification are mostly grade I and II and are mainly treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: Oncological long-term results are not available yet; so that RAPN cannot be considered as an equivalent treatment to LPN and OPN. Until long-term evidence is available, decisions regarding the surgical technique for organ-sparing renal tumor resection will be determined by patient's wishes and surgeon's preference.

[Perioperative Outcomes in Correlation to the Learning Curve for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: The First 109 Cases of our Clinic]. / Perioperatives Outcome in Korrelation zur Lernkurve bei robotisch assistierter partieller Nephrektomie: Die ersten 109 Fälle unserer Klinik.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, the approach of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) shows a steep learning curve with shorter warm ischaemia times (WIT) and comparable postoperative outcomes. Therefore RAPN is considered a good minimally-invasive surgical procedure for patients presenting with a renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT1a. The aim of the presented study was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of our patients after RAPN and to illustrate the learning curve based on characteristic perioperative parameters such as WIT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 109 patients treated by RAPN in our clinic between January 2010 and April 2015 were retrospectively analysed regarding perioperative, laboratory and oncological outcomes. Postoperative complications until 30 days after surgery were documented. We analysed the data of the largest patient population treated by a single urologist, comparing WIT, operating time, blood loss and decline of the glomerular filtration rate between the first and the second 30 consecutive cases. RESULTS: Mean WIT was 18.4 min (SD±10.2), mean operating time was 199 min (SD±20), and mean estimated blood loss was 657 millilitres (SD±715 ml). Mean loss of GFR was reported to be 4.99 mg/dl/1.73 m (2) (SD±15.44). 83 (76%) malignant lesions were removed. 11 patients (10%) had a R1 resection, one patient had a R2 resection and in 2 cases the resection status was Rx. 22% of patients developed postoperative complications. Intraoperative complications were documented in 2 cases. According to the Clavien-Dindo Classification, 6% of patients had grade 1 and 2 complications and 13% developed grade 3 and 4 complications. WIT was significantly lower after 30 consecutive cases treated by one urologist. Regarding operating time, GFR or blood loss no significant correlation was found. CONCLUSION: Our data is in line with the surgical outcomes described in the literature. RAPN is a safe surgical technique with a steep learning curve. In our experience, 30 surgical cases provide a urologist with sufficient expertise to achieve good perioperative results. Weaknesses of this report include the retrospective design and insufficient documentation in some cases.