Infants Receiving Very Early Antiretroviral Therapy Have High CD4 Counts in the First Year of Life.

We followed 54 infants with in utero HIV after initiating very early antiretroviral treatment. At weeks 24 and 48, ≥80% had CD4 ≥1500 cells/mm3 and CD4% ≥25%. Routine Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis in the first year of life may not be necessary for all very early treated infants. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02140255.

A simulation-based comparison of estimation methods for adaptive and classical group sequential clinical trials.

Statistical methods for controlling the type-I error of hypothesis tests in adaptive group sequential clinical trials are well established and well understood. However, methods for obtaining statistically valid point estimates and confidence intervals for adaptive designs are not as well established or as well understood. At the end of an adaptive trial, one may calculate the repeated confidence interval (RCI), which provides conservative coverage of δ , or the backward image confidence interval (BWCI), which provides exact coverage of δ and is an extension of the stagewise adjusted confidence interval (SWCI, used in classical group sequential designs). The BWCI can also provide a median unbiased estimate (MUE) of δ . There is a need to better understand the coverage and possible biases associated with these methods. We conducted a simulation study exploring parameter estimation following sample size reestimation based on testing methods with strong control of type-I error. Generally, the BWCI provided exact coverage, the naïve CI provided inconsistent coverage, and the RCI provided conservative coverage. Additionally, we note considerable asymmetry in the coverage from above/from below for the RCI, although we did not see any instance where the 95% RCI excluded the true parameter more than 2.5% on either side. At the end of an adaptive group sequential trial, we strongly recommend the use of the BWCI (and associated MUE), with the RCI computed during interim looks; the naïve CI should be avoided. These results and conclusions also hold true for classical group sequential designs.

Documentation status and psychological distress among New York City community college students.

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology on Dec 5 2019 (see record 2019-75302-001). In the original article "lower self-esteem" should have read "higher self-esteem" in the first sentence after the Results heading in the abstract. The correct sentence is "Participants with at risk and temporary statuses reported higher fear of deportation for self, fear of family members being deported, psychological distress, and higher self-esteem than those with stable status." All versions of this article have been corrected.] Objective: This research study examined how psychological distress, self-esteem, and academic performance differ across at-risk, temporary, and stable immigration statuses and whether fear of one's own deportation and that of family members is associated with psychological distress. METHOD: We surveyed 150 community college students (51% female; Mage = 22.7, SDage = 2.4) with 3 types of immigration statuses: stable (citizen), temporary (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals [DACA] and visa), and at-risk of deportation (undocumented). One-way analyses of covariance examined whether fear of deportation, psychological distress, self-esteem, and academic performance varied across immigration statuses. Regression analyses examined the associations among fear of deportation for self and for family members, depression, and isolation and alienation. RESULTS: Participants with at risk and temporary statuses reported higher fear of deportation for self, fear of family members being deported, psychological distress, and higher self-esteem than those with stable status. Academic performance did not differ across immigration statuses. Within the temporary status, DACA students experienced higher anxiety, isolation, and alienation than other temporary status students. Fear of deportation for self and family members predicted depression and isolation and alienation. Both regression analyses controlled for age, sex, region of origin, hours of work, hours of sleep, and socializing per day. CONCLUSION: The study provides new insights into how immigration status influences the psychological well-being of community college students and introduces a quantifiable framework to better understand the construct of fear of deportation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

"Documentation status and psychological distress among New York City community college students": Correction to Alif et al. (2019).

Reports an error in "Documentation status and psychological distress among New York City community college students" by Ahmed Alif, Bryan S. Nelson, Ana Stefancic, Riya Ahmed and Sumie Okazaki (Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, May 02, 2019, np). In the original article "lower self-esteem" should have read "higher self-esteem" in the first sentence after the Results heading in the abstract. The correct sentence is "Participants with at risk and temporary statuses reported higher fear of deportation for self, fear of family members being deported, psychological distress, and higher self-esteem than those with stable status." All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2019-23603-001.) Objective: This research study examined how psychological distress, self-esteem, and academic performance differ across at-risk, temporary, and stable immigration statuses and whether fear of one's own deportation and that of family members is associated with psychological distress. METHOD: We surveyed 150 community college students (51% female; Mage = 22.7, SDage = 2.4) with 3 types of immigration statuses: stable (citizen), temporary (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals [DACA] and visa), and at-risk of deportation (undocumented). One-way analyses of covariance examined whether fear of deportation, psychological distress, self-esteem, and academic performance varied across immigration statuses. Regression analyses examined the associations among fear of deportation for self and for family members, depression, and isolation and alienation. RESULTS: Participants with at risk and temporary statuses reported higher fear of deportation for self, fear of family members being deported, psychological distress, and higher self-esteem than those with stable status. Academic performance did not differ across immigration statuses. Within the temporary status, DACA students experienced higher anxiety, isolation, and alienation than other temporary status students. Fear of deportation for self and family members predicted depression and isolation and alienation. Both regression analyses controlled for age, sex, region of origin, hours of work, hours of sleep, and socializing per day. CONCLUSION: The study provides new insights into how immigration status influences the psychological well-being of community college students and introduces a quantifiable framework to better understand the construct of fear of deportation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

HIV-1 reservoir size after neonatal antiretroviral therapy and the potential to evaluate antiretroviral-therapy-free remission (IMPAACT P1115): a phase 1/2 proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Infants born with HIV-1 require lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART). We aimed to assess whether very early ART in neonates might restrict HIV-1 reservoirs, an important step towards ART-free remission. METHODS: IMPAACT P1115 is an ongoing, phase 1/2, proof-of-concept study in which infants were enrolled at 30 research clinics in 11 countries (Brazil, Haiti, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, Uganda, the USA, Zambia, and Zimbabwe) into two cohorts. Infants at least 34 weeks' gestational age at high risk for in-utero HIV-1 with either untreated maternal HIV-1 (cohort 1) or who were receiving pre-emptive triple antiretroviral prophylaxis outside of the study (maternal ART permissible; cohort 2) were included. All infants initiated treatment within 48 h of life. Cohort 1 initiated three-drug nevirapine-based ART, and cohort 2 initiated three-drug nevirapine-based prophylaxis then three-drug nevirapine-based ART following HIV diagnosis by age 10 days. We added twice-daily coformulated oral ritonavir 75 mg/m2 and lopinavir 300 mg/m2 from 14 days of life and 42 weeks postmenstrual age. We discontinued nevirapine 12 weeks after two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below limit of detection. We tracked virological suppression, safety outcomes, and meeting a predetermined biomarker profile at age 2 years (undetectable RNA since week 48, HIV-1 antibody-negative, HIV-1 DNA not detected, and normal CD4 count and CD4 percentage) to assess qualification for analytical treatment interruption. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02140255. FINDINGS: Between Jan 23, 2015, and Dec 14, 2017, 440 infants were included in cohort 1 and 20 were included in cohort 2. 54 of these infants (34 from cohort 1 and 20 from cohort 2) had confirmed in-utero HIV-1 and were enrolled to receive study ART. 33 (61%) of 54 infants were female and 21 (39%) were male. The estimated probability of maintaining undetectable plasma RNA through to 2 years was 33% (95% CI 17-49) in cohort 1 and 57% (28-78) in cohort 2. Among infants maintaining protocol-defined virological control criteria through to study week 108, seven of 11 (64%, 95% CI 31-89) in cohort 1 and five of seven (71%, 29-96) in cohort 2 had no detected HIV-1 DNA. Ten of 12 (83%, 52-100) in cohort 1 and all seven (100%, 59-100) in cohort 2 tested HIV-1 antibody-negative at week 108. Among 54 infants initiated on very early ART, ten (19%; six in cohort 1 and four in cohort 2) met all criteria for possible analytical treatment interruption. Reversible grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 15 (44%) of 34 infants in cohort 1 and seven (35%) of 20 infants in cohort 2. INTERPRETATION: Very early ART for in-utero HIV-1 can achieve sustained virological suppression in association with biomarkers indicating restricted HIV-1 reservoirs by age 2 years, which might enable potential ART-free remission. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the National Institute of Mental Health.

Broadly neutralizing antibody treatment maintained HIV suppression in children with favorable reservoir characteristics in Botswana.

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) may provide an alternative to standard antiretroviral treatment (ART) for controlling HIV-1 replication and may have immunotherapeutic effects against HIV-1 reservoirs. We conducted a prospective clinical trial with two HIV-1 bNAbs (VRC01LS and 10-1074) in children (n = 25) who had previously initiated small-molecule ART treatment before 7 days of age and who continued treatment for at least 96 weeks. Both bNAbs were dosed intravenously every 4 weeks, overlapping with ART for at least 8 weeks and then continued for up to 24 weeks or until detectable viremia of HIV-1 RNA rose above 400 copies per milliliter in the absence of ART. Eleven (44%) children maintained HIV-1 RNA below 400 copies per milliliter through 24 weeks of bNAb-only treatment; 14 (56%) had detectable viremia above 400 copies per milliliter at a median of 4 weeks. Archived HIV-1 provirus susceptible to 10-1074, lower birth HIV-1 DNA reservoir in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, sustained viral suppression throughout early life, and combined negative qualitative HIV-1 DNA polymerase chain reaction and negative HIV-1 serology at entry were associated with maintaining suppression on bNAbs alone. This proof-of-concept study suggests that bNAbs may represent a promising treatment modality for infants and children living with HIV-1. Future studies using newer bNAb combinations with greater breadth and potency are warranted.

Anabolic-androgenic steroid use is associated with psychopathy, risk-taking, anger, and physical problems.

Previous research has uncovered medical and psychological effects of anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS) use, but the specific relationship between AAS use and risk-taking behaviors as well as between AAS use and psychopathic tendencies remains understudied. To explore these potential relationships, we anonymously recruited 492 biologically male, self-identified bodybuilders (median age 22; range 18-47 years) from online bodybuilding fora to complete an online survey on Appearance and Performance Enhancing Drug (APED) use, psychological traits, lifestyle choices, and health behaviors. We computed odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using logistic regression, adjusting for age, race, education, exercise frequency, caloric intake, and lean BMI. Bodybuilders with a prior history of AAS use exhibited heightened odds of psychopathic traits, sexual and substance use risk-taking behaviors, anger problems, and physical problems compared to those with no prior history of AAS use. This study is among the first to directly assess psychopathy within AAS users. Our results on risk-taking, anger problems, and physical problems are consistent with prior AAS research as well as with existing frameworks of AAS use as a risk behavior. Future research should focus on ascertaining causality, specifically whether psychopathy is a risk associated with or a result of AAS use.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of early nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy for neonates at high risk for perinatal HIV infection: a phase 1/2 proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND: With increasing intention to treat HIV as early as possible, evidence to confirm the safety and therapeutic drug concentrations of a nevirapine-based antiretroviral regimen in the early neonatal period is needed. This study aims to establish dosing of nevirapine for very early treatment of HIV-exposed neonates at high risk of HIV acquisition. METHODS: IMPAACT P1115 is a multinational phase 1/2 proof-of-concept study in which presumptive treatment for in-utero HIV infection is initiated within 48 h of birth in HIV-exposed neonates at high risk of HIV acquisition. Participants were neonates who were at least 34 weeks gestational age at birth and enrolled within 48 h of birth, born to women with presumed or confirmed HIV infection who had not received antiretrovirals during this pregnancy. The regimen consisted of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus nevirapine dosed at 6 mg/kg twice daily for term neonates (≥37 weeks gestational age) or 4 mg/kg twice daily for 1 week and 6 mg/kg twice daily thereafter for preterm neonates (34 to <37 weeks gestational age). Here, we report the secondary outcomes of the study: nevirapine exposures in study weeks 1 and 2 and treatment-associated grade 3 or 4 adverse events at least possibly related to study treatment up to study week 4. A population pharmacokinetic model to assess nevirapine exposure was developed from dried blood spot and plasma nevirapine concentrations at study weeks 1 and 2. Nevirapine exposure was assessed in all patients with available blood samples and safety was assessed in all participants. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02140255). FINDINGS: Between Jan 23, 2015, and Sept 4, 2017, 438 neonates were enrolled and included in analyses; 36 had in-utero HIV infection and 389 (89%) were born at term. Neonates without confirmed in-utero HIV infection received nevirapine for a median of 13 days (IQR 7-14). Measured dried blood spot nevirapine concentrations were higher than the minimum HIV treatment target (3 µg/mL) in 314 (90%, 95% CI 86-93) of 349 neonates at week 1 and 174 (87%, 81-91) of 201 at week 2. In Monte-Carlo simulations, week 1 nevirapine concentrations exceeded 3 µg/mL in 80% of term neonates and 82% of preterm neonates. DAIDS grade 3 or 4 adverse events at least possibly related to antiretrovirals occurred in 30 (7%, 95% CI 5-10) of 438 infants but did not lead to nevirapine cessation in any neonates; neutropenia (25 [6%] neonates) and anaemia (six [1%]) were most common. INTERPRETATION: Nevirapine at the dose studied was confirmed to be safe and provides therapeutic exposure concentrations. These data support nevirapine as a component of presumptive HIV treatment in high-risk neonates. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the National Institute of Mental Health.