Brain magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla using BLADE compared with standard rectilinear data sampling.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction (PROPELLER; BLADE) data acquisition in comparison with standard k-space sampling techniques for axial and sagittal brain imaging at 3 T regarding imaging artifacts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients who gave consent were included in a prospective comparison of standard and PROPELLER (BLADE) k-space sampling techniques. All examinations were performed at 3 T with comparison of standard T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) to PROPELLER T2-weighted FLAIR in the axial image orientation and standard T1-weighted gradient echo to PROPELLER T1-weighted FLAIR in the sagittal image orientation. Imaging protocols were matched for spatial resolution, with data evaluation performed by 2 experienced neuroradiologists. Image data were compared regarding various image artifacts and overall image quality. Reader agreement was assessed by Cohen's kappa statistics. RESULTS: PROPELLER T2-weighted axial data acquisition showed significantly less pulsation and Gibb's artifacts than the standard T2-weighted scan. Even without motion correction, the frequency of ghosting (motion) artifacts was substantially lower in the PROPELLER T2-weighted data and readers concordantly (kappa = 1) rated PROPELLER as better than or equal to the standard T2-weighted scan in the majority of cases (95%; P < 0.0001). In the comparison of sagittal T1-weighted data sets, readers showed only fair agreement (kappa = 0.24) and noted consistent wrap artifacts in PROPELLER T1-weighted FLAIR. CONCLUSION: PROPELLER (BLADE) brain magnetic resonance imaging is also applicable at 3 T. In addition to minimizing motion artifacts, the PROPELLER acquisition scheme reduces other magnetic resonance artifacts that would otherwise degrade scan quality.

Brain tumor enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at 1.5 versus 3 tesla.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the difference in lesion enhancement between 1.5 and 3 T using an extracellular gadolinium chelate in a rat brain glioma model. METHODS: Five rats (CDF Fischer 344) with implanted C6/LacZ brain gliomas were evaluated using matched T1-weighted spin echo techniques and hardware configurations at 1.5 and 3 T. Serial imaging over 10 minutes after gadoteridol (ProHance) administration was performed. Contrast enhancement (CE), signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) for brain and tumor, as well as contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were evaluated using region-of-interest (ROI) analysis at both field strengths. All gliomas were also evaluated by histopathology. RESULTS: CE at 3 T increased by 106% to 137% (all P<0.05) with maximum CE occurring at 5 minutes for both 1.5 and 3 T (9.8+/-2.2 vs 21.1+/-3.5; P=0.0004). At 3 T, SNR increased for normal brain by 66% to 76% (P<0.01) and SNR for tumor increased by 70% to 89% (P<0.01). CNR increased by 101% to 137% (P<0.05) depending on the time postcontrast. The highest CNR for both 1.5 T and 3 T occurred 5 minutes after contrast (1.5 T: 9.4+/-1.1 vs 3 T: 20.3+/-2.4; P<0.0004). CONCLUSION: Using a standardized animal model and matched scan techniques, this study shows a significant benefit of 3 T compared with 1.5 T in contrast-enhanced brain tumor magnetic resonance imaging.