Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 88
Filtrar
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 5, 2023 Jan 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36597063

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is widely considered a key element of comprehensive patient treatment, evidence focusing on its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is inconclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between employee-rated IPC and PROs in a clinical inpatient setting. METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the entire patient and employee reported data collected by the Picker Institute Germany in cross-sectional surveys between 2003 and 2016. Individual patient data from departments within hospitals was matched with employee survey data from within 2 years of treatment at the department-level. Items assessing employee-rated IPC (independent variables) were included in Principal Component Analysis (PCA). All questions assessing PROs (overall satisfaction, less discomforts, complications, treatment success, willingness to recommend) served as main dependent variables in ordered logistic regression analyses. Results were adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing as well as patients' and employees' gender, age, and education. RESULTS: The data set resulted in 6154 patients from 19 hospitals respective 103 unique departments. The PCA revealed three principal components (department-specific IPC, interprofessional organization, and overall IPC), explaining 67% of the total variance. The KMO measure of sampling adequacy was .830 and Bartlett's test of sphericity highly significant (p < 0.001). An increase of 1 SD in department-specific IPC was associated with a statistically significant chance of a higher (i.e., better) PRO-rating about complications after discharge (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.13, p = 0.029). However, no further associations were found. Exploratory analyses revealed positive coefficients of department-specific IPC on all PROs for patients which were treated in surgical or internal medicine departments, whereas results were ambiguous for pediatric patients. CONCLUSIONS: The association between department-level IPC and patient-level PROs remains - as documented in previous literature - unclear and results are of marginal effect sizes. Future studies should keep in mind the different types of IPC, their specific characteristics and possible effect mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study registration: Open Science Framework (DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2NYAX ); Date of registration: 09 November 2021.


Assuntos
Relações Interprofissionais , Análise de Dados Secundários , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Comportamento Cooperativo , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 395, 2020 Jul 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641019

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The rate of caesarean sections (CS) has increased in the last decades to about 30% of births in high income countries. Many CSs are electively planned without an urgent medical reason for mother or child. An early CS though may harm the newborn. Our aim was to evaluate the gestational time point after the 37 + 0 week of gestation (WG) (after prematurity = term) of performing an elective CS with the lowest morbidity for mother and child by assessing the time course from 37 + 0 to 42+ 6 WG. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and CINAHL in November 2018. We included studies that compared different time points of elective CS at term no matter the reason for elective CS. Our primary outcomes were the rate of admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), neonatal death and maternal death in early versus late term elective CS. Various binary and dose response random effects meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: We identified 35 studies including 982,749 women. Except one randomised controlled trial, all studies were cohort studies. We performed a linear time-response meta-analysis on the primary outcome NICU admission on 14 studies resulting in a decrease of the relative risk (RR) to 0.63 (95% CI 0.56, 0.71) from 37 + 0 to 39 + 6 WG. RR for neonatal death showed a decrease to 39 + (0-6) WG (RR 0.59 95% CI 0.43 to 0.83) and increase from then on (RR 2.09 95% CI 1.18 to 3.70) assuming a U-shape course and using a cubic spline model for meta-analysis of four studies. We only identified one study analyzing maternal death resulting in RR of 0.38 (95% CI 0.04 to 3.40) for 37 + 0 + 38 + 6 WG versus ≥39 + 0 WG. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review showed that elective CS (primary and repeated) before the 39 + 0 WG lead to more NICU admissions and neonatal deaths, although death is rare and increases again after 39 + 6 WG. We did not find enough evidence on maternal outcomes. There is a need for more research, considering maternal outcomes to provide a balanced decision between neonatal and maternal health. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017078231).


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Materna , Mortalidade Perinatal , Gravidez
3.
Schmerz ; 33(4): 320-328, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267168

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the perspectives of patients and family caregivers on outpatient palliative care networks. It contrasts primary palliative care (AAPV) and specialized outpatient care (SAPV) services, particularly in regard to pain management. METHODS: The study is based on 27 semi-structured, problem-focussed interviews with 21 patients and 19 informal caregivers. Recruitment was based on purposive sampling in two regions of Brandenburg, Germany. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: In AAPV, the general practitioner (GP) is both the central point of contact as well as the coordinator of the care network. In SAPV, the GP plays a less important role. This can lead to conflicts between GPs and health care professionals of the palliative care team. Compared to AAPV, palliative care teams are attributed greater intervention capacities in acute situations as well as expertise in pain therapy. Thus, the option of parenteral administration of opioids is considered a benefit of specialized care. The use of nursing services varies considerably depending on the individual care network-in some cases care is completely taken over by relatives. Relatives are the closest to the patient within the care network and perform key tasks. CONCLUSION: The personal and professional composition of networks of outpatient palliative care varies individually according to care situation and form. Care networks of AAPV and SAPV differ with regard to the accessibility of health care professionals and pain therapy. Home-based palliative care is often made possible by informal care givers in the first place.


Assuntos
Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Cuidados Paliativos , Assistência Ambulatorial , Cuidadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Alemanha , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Pain Med ; 19(8): 1674-1682, 2018 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29121211

RESUMO

Objective: The development of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is influenced by several factors. The risk index for chronic pain (RICP) was developed to identify patients at high risk for CPSP. The aim of this study was the external validation and update of the RICP. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Two German hospitals. Subjects: Participants who underwent orthopedic surgery, general surgery, visceral surgery, and neurosurgery. Methods: The predicted outcome was CPSP at six months. We validated the original RICP externally and performed a model update. Analysis was performed using logistic regression. We analyzed the discrimination and calibration of the model. Furthermore, the updated model was internally validated. Results: We included 205 patients. The mean age of participants was 51 years. CPSP was reported by 53.9% of participants. In our population, the original RICP (preoperative pain in the operating field, other preoperative pain, postoperative acute pain, capacity overload, and comorbid stress symptoms) showed a sensitivity of 0.708 and a specificity of 0.727 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.766, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.688-0.843). The updated RICP (preoperative pain in the operating field, other preoperative pain, postoperative acute pain, sex, marital status) yielded a sensitivity of 0.746 and a specificity of 0.726 (AUC = 0.813, 95% CI = 0.740-0.886). The results were confirmed by cross-validation. Pre- and postoperative pain measures showed the highest predictive ability. Discussion: The study indicates external validity of the original RICP. The updated RICP also showed good predictive ability. The results are limited by the small sample size and the amount of missing outcome data.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Análise Multivariada , Dor Pós-Operatória , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 143, 2018 02 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29482555

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The AGREE II instrument is the most commonly used guideline appraisal tool. It includes 23 appraisal criteria (items) organized within six domains. AGREE II also includes two overall assessments (overall guideline quality, recommendation for use). Our aim was to investigate how strongly the 23 AGREE II items influence the two overall assessments. METHODS: An online survey of authors of publications on guideline appraisals with AGREE II and guideline users from a German scientific network was conducted between 10th February 2015 and 30th March 2015. Participants were asked to rate the influence of the AGREE II items on a Likert scale (0 = no influence to 5 = very strong influence). The frequencies of responses and their dispersion were presented descriptively. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of the 376 persons contacted (15.4%) participated in the survey and the data of the 51 respondents with prior knowledge of AGREE II were analysed. Items 7-12 of Domain 3 (rigour of development) and both items of Domain 6 (editorial independence) had the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. In addition, Items 15-17 (clarity of presentation) had a strong influence on the recommendation for use. Great variations were shown for the other items. The main limitation of the survey is the low response rate. CONCLUSIONS: In guideline appraisals using AGREE II, items representing rigour of guideline development and editorial independence seem to have the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. In order to ensure a transparent approach to reaching the overall assessments, we suggest the inclusion of a recommendation in the AGREE II user manual on how to consider item and domain scores. For instance, the manual could include an a-priori weighting of those items and domains that should have the strongest influence on the two overall assessments. The relevance of these assessments within AGREE II could thereby be further specified.


Assuntos
Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Humanos , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto
6.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 34(6): 537-546, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30345948

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: When making decisions in health care, it is essential to consider economic evidence about an intervention. The objective of this study was to analyze the methods applied for systematic reviews of health economic evaluations (SR-HEs) in HTA and to identify common challenges. METHODS: We manually searched the Web pages of HTA organizations and included HTA-reports published since 2015. Prerequisites for inclusion were the conduct of an SR-HE in at least one electronic database and the use of the English, German, French, or Spanish language. Methodological features were extracted in standardized tables. We prepared descriptive statistical (e.g., median, range) measures to describe the applied methods. Data were synthesized in a structured narrative way. RESULTS: Eighty-three reports were included in the analysis. We identified inexplicable heterogeneity, particularly concerning literature search strategy, data extraction, assessment of quality, and applicability. Furthermore, process steps were often missing or reported in a nontransparent way. The use of a standardized data extraction form was indicated in one-third of reports (32 percent). Fifty-four percent of authors systematically appraised included studies. In 10 percent of reports, the applicability of included studies was assessed. Involvement of two reviewers was rarely reported for the study selection (43 percent), data extraction (28 percent), and quality assessment (39 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The methods applied for SR-HEs in HTA and their reporting quality are very heterogeneous. Efforts toward a detailed, standardized guidance for the preparation of SR-HEs definitely seem necessary. A general harmonization and improvement of the applied methodology would increase the value of SR-HE for decision makers.


Assuntos
Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo
7.
Gesundheitswesen ; 80(10): 882-887, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28586941

RESUMO

AIM OF THE STUDY: Patient-centeredness as an essential aspect of quality of patient care is becoming increasingly important. The aim of the pilot study is to gain insight into the physician-patient communication from the patient's perspective. A German questionnaire in a maximum care hospital was tested. METHODS: The German "Individual Clinician Feedback" questionnaire (ICF) was tested in a pilot study in the special consultation in a voluntary cohort of surgeons. In the survey period from June to August 2015, the questionnaire was given to the patient. The physicians received their assessment results as a compressed score. They were rated on a scale of 1-10 on which 10 is "very good". RESULTS: 12 physicians were recruited from five departments. There was a high response rate of 46% (n=219). The patients evaluated the communication as very good (on average over all items and physicians 8.5 to 9.5 points). 89% of the patients had the feeling that the doctor took adequate time for them, while 50% of the patients had a consultation time of 11-20 min. 12% of the patients had still open questions after treatment that they did not ask. 19% and 21% of patients reported that the physician has not asked them if they had any questions, or that they just forgot about it at the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: The results of the pilot study are associated with a good response rate and patients were mostly very satisfied with the physician-patient communication. However, a selection bias among participating physicians is likely.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Satisfação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Alemanha , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
Crit Care ; 20: 100, 2016 Apr 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27072503

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe trauma continues to represent a global public health issue and mortality and morbidity in trauma patients remains substantial. A number of initiatives have aimed to provide guidance on the management of trauma patients. This document focuses on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma and encourages adaptation of the guiding principles to each local situation and implementation within each institution. METHODS: The pan-European, multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was founded in 2004 and included representatives of six relevant European professional societies. The group used a structured, evidence-based consensus approach to address scientific queries that served as the basis for each recommendation and supporting rationale. Expert opinion and current clinical practice were also considered, particularly in areas in which randomised clinical trials have not or cannot be performed. Existing recommendations were reconsidered and revised based on new scientific evidence and observed shifts in clinical practice; new recommendations were formulated to reflect current clinical concerns and areas in which new research data have been generated. This guideline represents the fourth edition of a document first published in 2007 and updated in 2010 and 2013. RESULTS: The guideline now recommends that patients be transferred directly to an appropriate trauma treatment centre and encourages use of a restricted volume replacement strategy during initial resuscitation. Best-practice use of blood products during further resuscitation continues to evolve and should be guided by a goal-directed strategy. The identification and management of patients pre-treated with anticoagulant agents continues to pose a real challenge, despite accumulating experience and awareness. The present guideline should be viewed as an educational aid to improve and standardise the care of the bleeding trauma patients across Europe and beyond. This document may also serve as a basis for local implementation. Furthermore, local quality and safety management systems need to be established to specifically assess key measures of bleeding control and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach and adherence to evidence-based guidance are key to improving patient outcomes. The implementation of locally adapted treatment algorithms should strive to achieve measureable improvements in patient outcome.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Guias como Assunto , Hemorragia , Europa (Continente) , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Humanos , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia
9.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 15: 48, 2015 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25884671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several systematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic versus open appendectomy have been published, but there has been no overview of SRs of these two interventions. This overview (review of review) aims to summarise the results of such SRs in order to provide the most up to date evidence, and to highlight discordant results. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cinahl, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for SRs published up to August 2014. Study selection and quality assessment using the AMSTAR tool were carried out independently by two reviewers. We used standardised forms to extract data that were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Nine SRs met the inclusion criteria. All were of moderate to high quality. The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) they included ranged from eight to 67. The duration of surgery pooled by eight reviews was 7.6 to 18.3 minutes shorter using the open approach. Pain scores on the first postoperative day were lower after laparoscopic appendectomy in two out of three reviews. The risk of abdominal abscesses was higher for laparoscopic surgery in half of six meta-analyses. The occurrence of wound infections pooled by all reviews was lower after laparoscopic appendectomy. One review showed no difference in mortality. The laparoscopic approach shortened hospital stay from 0.16 to 1.13 days in seven out of eight meta-analyses, though the strength of the evidence was affected by strong heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic and open appendectomy are both safe and effective procedures for the treatment of acute appendicitis. This overview shows discordant results with respect to the magnitude of the effect but not to the direction of the effect. The evidence from this overview may prove useful for the development of clinical guidelines and protocols.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Abscesso Abdominal/etiologia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Metanálise como Assunto , Duração da Cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
10.
Wien Med Wochenschr ; 165(21-22): 445-57, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26483215

RESUMO

Ludwig van Beethoven is nowadays considered to be one of the greatest composers in the history of music and his myth-like reputation is enhanced by his deafness; however, deafness was not the only condition which affected his genius. Due to the many lamentations contained in his letters about continuously recurring health problems, various attempts at an interpretation of Beethoven's personality have been undertaken. These included psychoanalytical considerations with respect to his father-mother relationship and also diagnostic attempts with reference to the symptoms of a possible borderline personality syndrome. The aim of this article is to comprehensively analyze the diseases of the patient Beethoven from the perspective of specialized medical disciplines based on new research results, to summarize various discipline-specific considerations and to make a contemporary assessment from the viewpoint of current scientific results.


Assuntos
Transtorno da Personalidade Borderline/história , Maus-Tratos Infantis/história , Surdez/história , Pessoas Famosas , Cirrose Hepática Alcoólica/história , Música/história , Interpretação Psicanalítica , Adulto , Criança , Comorbidade , Alemanha , História do Século XVIII , História do Século XIX , Humanos , Masculino
11.
Int Wound J ; 12(2): 143-9, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23517467

RESUMO

Wound healing requires a proper functioning of keratinocytes that migrate, proliferate and lead to a competent wound closure. Impaired wound healing might be due to a disturbed keratinocyte function caused by the wound environment. Basically, chronic wound fluid (CWF) differs from acute wound fluid (AWF). The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of AWF and CWF on keratinocyte function. We therefore investigated keratinocyte migration and proliferation under the influence of AWF and CWF using MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] test and scratch assay. We further measured the gene expression by qRT-PCR regarding growth factors and matrixmetalloproteinases (MMPs) involved in regeneration processes. AWF had a positive impact on keratinocyte proliferation over time, whereas CWF had an anti-proliferative effect. Keratinocyte migration was significantly impaired by CWF in contrast to an undisturbed wound closure under the influence of AWF. MMP-9 expression was strongly upregulated by CWF compared with AWF. Keratinocyte function was significantly impaired by CWF. An excessive induction of MMP-9 by CWF might lead to a permanent degradation of extracellular matrix and thereby prevent wounds from healing.


Assuntos
Exsudatos e Transudatos/metabolismo , Queratinócitos/fisiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/metabolismo , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/metabolismo , Abdominoplastia , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Técnicas de Cultura de Células , Movimento Celular/fisiologia , Proliferação de Células/fisiologia , Células Cultivadas , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Fatores de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Metaloproteinase 3 da Matriz/metabolismo , Metaloproteinase 9 da Matriz/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/metabolismo
12.
Pain Med ; 15(7): 1222-9, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24716774

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the incidence and determinants of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in a general surgical patient population. DESIGN: This is a prospective cross-sectional study at a university-affiliated clinic/level 1 trauma center. Patients were followed at least 1 year postoperatively. By surgical discipline, procedures were 50% orthopedic/trauma, 33% general (abdominal/visceral), and 17% vascular. SETTING: All patients admitted during one year (N = 3020) were eligible. Exclusion criteria were cognitive impairment, communication/language barrier, nonoperative treatment, and refusal to participate. A CPSP questionnaire was completed. Step-by-step analysis followed with a 2(nd) questionnaire to detect CPSP with numeric rating scale (NRS) pain intensity ≥3. Finally, individual follow-up examinations were performed. RESULTS: 911 patients responded (30.2%). 522 complained of pain intensity ≥3 on NRS (scale 0-10). The second step identified 214 patients with chronic pain (NRS ≥3, mean 29 months postoperatively). On final examination, 83 CPSP patients (14.8%) were identified. By surgical discipline, 28% were general, 15% vascular, and 57% trauma/orthopedic surgery. Most oftenly cited pain sites were joint (49.4%), incisional/scar (37.7%), and nerve pain (33.7%). By procedure, patients underwent pelvic surgery, colon surgery, laparoscopies, inguinal herniorrhaphies, arthroscopies, and hardware extractions. All patients in the "laborer" and "unemployed" categories reported chronic pain. CONCLUSION: Bias due to study design and/or heterogeneity of patients is possible, but there was a high CPSP rate after 2 years both generally and particularly in orthopedic/trauma (57%) patients. Both "major" and "minor" surgical procedures led to CPSP.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 156(6): 1251-8, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24633986

RESUMO

George Gershwin, the famous American composer, died in 1937 of a temporal lobe glioma. An emergency surgery was performed by R. Nafziger and W. E. Dandy. The case of George Gershwin indicates the beginning of a new era in music history as well as in the history of neurosurgery.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/história , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Pessoas Famosas , Glioma/história , Música/história , Neurocirurgia/história , Lobo Temporal , Glioma/cirurgia , História do Século XIX , História do Século XX , Lobo Temporal/cirurgia
14.
Children (Basel) ; 11(6)2024 May 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38929228

RESUMO

We examined the prevalence of obesity in two types of schools-a comprehensive school and a grammar school-in a rural German region of Brandenburg. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, BMI values were measured in 114 students in grades 5, 7, and 10. In addition to the demographic data, data on nutrition, physical activity, and mental well-being were collected using a questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 44% (11/25) of the comprehensive school students and 15% (13/89) of the high school students are overweight, and 24% (6/25) of the comprehensive school pupils and 6% (5/89) of the grammar school pupils (p = 0.009) are obese. In addition, 91% (10/11) of the students with obesity, 36% (4/11) of the students with pre-obesity, and 31% (26/84) of the normal-weight students (p = 0.001) are concerned about their weight. Among the children with obesity, 82% (9/11) are afraid of gaining weight. In addition, 6% (5/82) of the normal-weight students, 25% (3/12) of the students with pre-obesity, and 70% (7/10) of the students with obesity feel restricted by their weight when exercising. CONCLUSION: School attendance and parental socioeconomic status appear to correlate with students' weight statuses. There is a high level of suffering, and they feel uncomfortable with their bodies and worry about weight regulation.

17.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(12): 763-785, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35459541

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Newborns with gastroschisis need surgery to reduce intestines into the abdominal cavity and to close the abdominal wall. Due to an existing volume-outcome relationship for other high-risk, low-volume procedures, we aimed at examining the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes for gastroschisis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Biosis Previews in June 2021 and searched for additional literature. We included (cluster-) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or retrospective cohort studies analyzing the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and mortality, morbidity or quality of life. We assessed risk of bias of included studies using ROBINS-I and performed a systematic synthesis without meta-analysis and used GRADE for assessing the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: We included 12 cohort studies on hospital volume. Higher hospital volume may reduce in-hospital mortality of neonates with gastroschisis, while the evidence is very uncertain for other outcomes. Findings are based on a low certainty of the evidence for in-hospital mortality and a very low certainty of the evidence for all other analyzed outcomes, mainly due to risk of bias and imprecision. We did not identify any study on surgeon volume. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that higher hospital volume reduces in-hospital mortality of newborns with gastroschisis. However, the magnitude of this effect seems to be heterogeneous and results should be interpreted with caution. There is no evidence on the relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes.


Assuntos
Gastrosquise , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gastrosquise/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais , Morbidade , Qualidade de Vida
18.
Syst Rev ; 11(1): 169, 2022 08 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35964148

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is seen as the "gold standard" of comprehensive care, but credible evidence concerning the effects on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) is lacking. The aim of this systematic review is to study the effect of IPC on PRO in inpatient care. METHODS: We systematically searched six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science/Social Science Citation Index, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), Current Contents (LIVIVO), CINAHL, and Embase) for studies published between 1997 and 2021. Additional studies were identified through citation tracking, manually searching the Internet and Google Scholar, and consultation of experts. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies (NRS). The included controlled before-and-after study (CBA) was assessed using both the ROBINS-I and the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) quality criteria. Results were synthesized through narrative description, grouping, and thematic analysis of extracted data. RESULTS: The search yielded 10,213 records, from which 22 studies (16 RCTs, five NRS, and one CBA) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In all but five studies, RoB was assessed as being high (RoB 2) resp. critical or serious (ROBINS-I). Within these 22 studies, nine inductively derived outcomes were assessed: (i) quality of life, (ii) coping, (iii) functional ability and health status, (iv) psychiatric morbidity, (v) pain, (vi) managing one's own health care, (vii) treatment success, (viii) satisfaction, and (ix) therapeutic relationship. While some studies do not report effect estimates, and some of the reported effects appear to be imprecisely estimated, the overall results indicate that IPC may affect PRO positively across all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Due to high clinical heterogeneity and high RoB, the question whether IPC affects PRO cannot be answered conclusively. Methodically rigorous studies are needed in order to answer the question of effectiveness of IPC. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017073900.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Viés , Hospitalização , Humanos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde
19.
J Trauma ; 70(2): 433-41, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21057336

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inpatient psychotherapeutic support has been shown to reduce mental health problems in severely injured patients. However, this effect mostly disappears after discharge. The aim of this study was to compare short-term inpatient versus continued long-term outpatient psychotherapeutic support. METHODS: Patients with at least two injuries of a combined Abbreviated Injury Scale Severity Score Index≥5 were included in the study. Of 862 screened patients, 113 met all inclusion criteria. They were randomly assigned to a short-term group (n=59), where only inpatient support was given, and a long-term group (n=54), with additional outpatient sessions. The cognitive behavioral treatment was standardized by a manual. Psychological assessment for depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was performed in written form at the time of inclusion, discharge, and 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months after trauma. RESULTS: Forty-one percent (n=46) of all patients completed follow-up visits. The results show that symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD disappeared more often in the long-term group than in the short-term group 1 year after trauma. Differences nearly reach significance for anxiety (p=0.051) and PTSD (p=0.059). Twenty-one percent of the short-term group patients showed at least one mental health disorder compared with no patients in the long-term group 1 year after trauma (p=0.035). CONCLUSION: Psychotherapeutic support of severely injured patients seems to be more effective in reducing depression, anxiety, and PTSD if extended further into outpatient care. This conclusion should be considered preliminary because of the small number of study patients.


Assuntos
Psicoterapia/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Ansiedade/etiologia , Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Depressão/etiologia , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/etiologia , Transtornos Mentais/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Psicoterapia Breve/métodos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/etiologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Adulto Jovem
20.
Syst Rev ; 10(1): 176, 2021 06 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34127077

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Caesarean sections often have no urgent indication and are electively planned. Research showed that elective caesarean section should not be performed until 39 + (0-6) weeks of gestation to ensure best neonatal and maternal health if there are no contraindications. This was recommended by various guidelines published in the last two decades. With this systematic review, we are looking for implementation strategies trying to implement these recommendations to reduce elective caesarean section before 39 + (0-6) weeks of gestation. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL on 3rd of March 2021. We included studies that assessed implementation strategies aiming to postpone elective caesarean section to ≥ 39 + (0-6) weeks of gestation. There were no restrictions regarding the type of implementation strategy or reasons for elective caesarean section. Our primary outcome was the rate of elective caesarean sections before 39 + (0-6) weeks of gestation. We used the ROBINS-I Tool for the assessment of risk of bias. We did a narrative analysis of the results. RESULTS: We included 10 studies, of which were 2 interrupted time series and 8 before-after studies, covering 205,954 elective caesarean births. All studies included various types of implementation strategies. All implementation strategies showed success in decreasing the rate of elective caesarean sections performed < 39 + (0-6) weeks of gestation. Risk difference differed from - 7 (95% CI - 8; - 7) to - 45 (95% CI - 51; - 31). Three studies reported the rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission and showed little reduction. CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows that all presented implementation strategies to reduce elective caesarean section before 39 + (0-6) weeks of gestation are effective. Reduction rates differ widely and it remains unclear which strategy is most successful. Strategies used locally in one hospital seem a little more effective. Included studies are either before-after studies (8) or interrupted time series (2) and the overall quality of the evidence is rather low. However, most of the studies identified specific barriers in the implementation process. For planning an implementation strategy to reduce elective caesarean section before 39 + (0-6) weeks of gestation, it is necessary to consider specific barriers and facilitators and take all obstetric personal into account. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017078231.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA