Posaconazole-ibrutinib interaction cannot be avoided by staggered dosing: How to optimize ibrutinib dose during posaconazole treatment.

AIMS: Ibrutinib is used in the treatment of certain B-cell malignancies. Due to its CYP3A4-mediated metabolism and highly variable pharmacokinetics, it is prone to potentially harmful drug-drug interactions. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, three-phase crossover study, we examined the effect of the CYP3A4-inhibiting antifungal posaconazole on ibrutinib pharmacokinetics. Eleven healthy participants ingested repeated doses of 300 mg of posaconazole either in the morning or in the evening, or placebo. A single dose of ibrutinib (30, 70 or 140 mg, respectively) was administered at 9 AM, 1 or 12 h after the preceding posaconazole/placebo dose. RESULTS: On average, morning posaconazole increased the dose-adjusted geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) of ibrutinib 9.5-fold (90% confidence interval [CI] 6.3-14.3, P < 0.001) and 8.5-fold (90% CI 5.7-12.8, P < 0.001), respectively, while evening posaconazole increased those 10.3-fold (90% CI 6.7-16.0, P < 0.001) and 8.2-fold (90% CI 5.2-13.2, P < 0.001), respectively. Posaconazole had no significant effect on the half-life of ibrutinib, but substantially reduced the metabolite PCI-45227 to ibrutinib AUC0-∞ ratio. There were no significant differences in ibrutinib pharmacokinetics between morning and evening posaconazole phases. CONCLUSIONS: Posaconazole increases ibrutinib exposure substantially, by about 10-fold. This interaction cannot be avoided by dosing the drugs 12 h apart. In general, a 70-mg daily dose of ibrutinib should not be exceeded during posaconazole treatment to avoid potentially toxic systemic ibrutinib concentrations.

Clopidogrel and Gemfibrozil Strongly Inhibit the CYP2C8-Dependent Formation of 3-Hydroxydesloratadine and Increase Desloratadine Exposure In Humans.

A recent in vitro study suggested that CYP2C8 is essential in the metabolism of desloratadine, an H1 receptor antagonist. If the proposed biotransformation mechanism takes place in vivo in humans, desloratadine could serve as a selective CYP2C8 probe substrate in drug-drug interaction studies. Glucuronide metabolites of clopidogrel and gemfibrozil act as time-dependent inhibitors of CYP2C8, but they have not been compared clinically. We conducted a randomized crossover study in 11 healthy subjects to characterize the involvement of CYP2C8 in desloratadine metabolism and to compare the CYP2C8 inhibitory strength of clopidogrel (300 and 75 mg on two following days) with that of gemfibrozil (600 mg BID for 5 days). Compared with placebo (control), clopidogrel increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) and peak plasma concentration (C max) of desloratadine to 280% (P = 3 × 10-7) and 165% (P = 0.0006), respectively. The corresponding increases by gemfibrozil were to 462% (P = 4 × 10-7) and 174% (P = 0.0006). Compared with placebo, clopidogrel and gemfibrozil decreased 3-hydroxyloratadine AUC0-71h to 52% (P = 5 × 10-5) and 6% (P = 2 × 10-8), respectively. Moreover, the 3-hydroxydesloratadine:desloratadine AUC0-71 h ratios were 21% (P = 7 × 10-10) and 1.7% (P = 8 × 10-11) of control during the clopidogrel and gemfibrozil phases. Our results confirm that CYP2C8 plays a critical role in the formation of 3-hydroxydesloratadine in humans, making desloratadine a potential CYP2C8 probe substrate. Furthermore, the findings corroborate the previous estimates that clinically relevant doses of clopidogrel cause strong CYP2C8 inhibition, whereas those of gemfibrozil almost completely inactivate the enzyme in humans.

Role of Cytochrome P450 2C8 in Drug Metabolism and Interactions.

During the last 10-15 years, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 has emerged as an important drug-metabolizing enzyme. CYP2C8 is highly expressed in human liver and is known to metabolize more than 100 drugs. CYP2C8 substrate drugs include amodiaquine, cerivastatin, dasabuvir, enzalutamide, imatinib, loperamide, montelukast, paclitaxel, pioglitazone, repaglinide, and rosiglitazone, and the number is increasing. Similarly, many drugs have been identified as CYP2C8 inhibitors or inducers. In vivo, already a small dose of gemfibrozil, i.e., 10% of its therapeutic dose, is a strong, irreversible inhibitor of CYP2C8. Interestingly, recent findings indicate that the acyl-ß-glucuronides of gemfibrozil and clopidogrel cause metabolism-dependent inactivation of CYP2C8, leading to a strong potential for drug interactions. Also several other glucuronide metabolites interact with CYP2C8 as substrates or inhibitors, suggesting that an interplay between CYP2C8 and glucuronides is common. Lack of fully selective and safe probe substrates, inhibitors, and inducers challenges execution and interpretation of drug-drug interaction studies in humans. Apart from drug-drug interactions, some CYP2C8 genetic variants are associated with altered CYP2C8 activity and exhibit significant interethnic frequency differences. Herein, we review the current knowledge on substrates, inhibitors, inducers, and pharmacogenetics of CYP2C8, as well as its role in clinically relevant drug interactions. In addition, implications for selection of CYP2C8 marker and perpetrator drugs to investigate CYP2C8-mediated drug metabolism and interactions in preclinical and clinical studies are discussed.

Clopidogrel Carboxylic Acid Glucuronidation is Mediated Mainly by UGT2B7, UGT2B4, and UGT2B17: Implications for Pharmacogenetics and Drug-Drug Interactions .

The antiplatelet drug clopidogrel is metabolized to an acyl-ß-d-glucuronide, which causes time-dependent inactivation of CYP2C8. Our aim was to characterize the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes that are responsible for the formation of clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide. Kinetic analyses and targeted inhibition experiments were performed using pooled human liver and intestine microsomes (HLMs and HIMs, respectively) and selected human recombinant UGTs based on preliminary screening. The effects of relevant UGT polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel were evaluated in 106 healthy volunteers. UGT2B7 and UGT2B17 exhibited the greatest level of clopidogrel carboxylic acid glucuronidation activities, with a CLint,u of 2.42 and 2.82 µl⋅min-1⋅mg-1, respectively. Of other enzymes displaying activity (UGT1A3, UGT1A9, UGT1A10-H, and UGT2B4), UGT2B4 (CLint,u 0.51 µl⋅min-1⋅mg-1) was estimated to contribute significantly to the hepatic clearance. Nonselective UGT2B inhibitors strongly inhibited clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide formation in HLMs and HIMs. The UGT2B17 inhibitor imatinib and the UGT2B7 and UGT1A9 inhibitor mefenamic acid inhibited clopidogrel carboxylic acid glucuronidation in HIMs and HLMs, respectively. Incubation of clopidogrel carboxylic acid in HLMs with UDPGA and NADPH resulted in strong inhibition of CYP2C8 activity. In healthy volunteers, the UGT2B17*2 deletion allele was associated with a 10% decrease per copy in the plasma clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide to clopidogrel carboxylic acid area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC0-4) ratio (P < 0.05). To conclude, clopidogrel carboxylic acid is metabolized mainly by UGT2B7 and UGT2B4 in the liver and by UGT2B17 in the small intestinal wall. The formation of clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide is impaired in carriers of the UGT2B17 deletion. These findings may have implications regarding the intracellular mechanisms leading to CYP2C8 inactivation by clopidogrel.

Voriconazole greatly increases the exposure to oral buprenorphine.

PURPOSE: Buprenorphine has low oral bioavailability. Regardless of sublingual administration, a notable part of buprenorphine is exposed to extensive first-pass metabolism by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. As drug interaction studies with buprenorphine are limited, we wanted to investigate the effect of voriconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral buprenorphine. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers were given either placebo or voriconazole (orally, 400 mg twice on day 1 and 200 mg twice on days 2-5) for 5 days in a randomized, cross-over study. On day 5, they ingested 0.2 mg (3.6 mg during placebo phase) oral buprenorphine. We measured plasma and urine concentrations of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine and monitored their pharmacological effects. Pharmacokinetic parameters were normalized for a buprenorphine dose of 1.0 mg. RESULTS: Voriconazole greatly increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-18) of buprenorphine (4.3-fold, P < 0.001), its peak concentration (Cmax) (3.9-fold), half-life (P < 0.05), and excretion into urine (Ae; P < 0.001). Voriconazole also markedly enhanced the Cmax (P < 0.001), AUC0-18 (P < 0.001), and Ae (P < 0.05) of unconjugated norbuprenorphine but decreased its renal clearance (P < 0.001). Mild dizziness and nausea occurred during both study phases. CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole greatly increases exposure to oral buprenorphine, mainly by inhibiting intestinal and liver CYP3A4. Effect on some transporters may explain elevated norbuprenorphine concentrations. Although oral buprenorphine is not commonly used, this interaction may become relevant in patients receiving sublingual buprenorphine together with voriconazole or other CYP3A4 or transporter inhibitors.

Long-term persistence of withdrawal of temazepam, zopiclone, and zolpidem in older adults: a 3-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Studies on persistence of benzodiazepine agonist (BZDA) withdrawal in older outpatients are few, and few studies on long-term persistence over years have yet been published. To describe the persistence of temazepam, zolpidem, and zopiclone (BZDA) withdrawal among older outpatients at 3 years from the beginning of withdrawal, as well as any changes in use of other medications. METHODS: 92 outpatients (≥55 years) with primary insomnia, long-term BZDA use as hypnotics (mean duration of BZDA use 9.9 ± 6.2 years), and willingness to withdraw from BZDAs each received either melatonin or a placebo nightly for one month. During this period, BZDAs were meant to be gradually withdrawn. Sleep hygiene counselling and psychosocial support were provided. Three years later, use of BZDAs and other medications was determined by interview and confirmed from medical records. RESULTS: Of the original 92 outpatients, 83 (90%) participated in the 3-year survey (mean follow-up 3.3 ± 0.2 years). The number of BZDA-free participants decreased from 34 (37%) at 6 months to 26 (28%; intention-to-treat) at 3 years, that of irregular BZDA users decreased from 44 (48%) at 6 months to 27 (29%) at 3 years, while that of regular users increased from 11 (12%) at 6 months to 30 (33%) at 3 years (P = 0.001). Those who were regular BZDA users at 3 years had at baseline (before withdrawal) higher BMI (P = 0.001) than did other participants. At 3 years, the total number of medications remained unchanged for non-users (P = 0.432), but increased for the irregular (P = 0.011) and regular users (P = 0.026) compared to baseline. At 3 years, compared to baseline, use of antidepressants, dopamine agonists, melatonin, and NSAIDs/paracetamol was significantly more common in the whole cohort, but their use did not differ between the BZDA-user subgroups. Randomization to melatonin or placebo during BZDA withdrawal was unrelated to BZDA-withdrawal result. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years after withdrawal, the number of BZDA-free participants had decreased, but still one-third of the subjects remained BZDA-free, and one-third had reduced their use. Successful BZDA withdrawal did not lead to any increase in total number of medications; use of symptomatic medications in the whole cohort, however, did increase.

Clopidogrel Markedly Increases Plasma Concentrations of CYP2C8 Substrate Pioglitazone.

The glucose-lowering drug pioglitazone undergoes hepatic CYP2C8-mediated biotransformation to its main metabolites. The antiplatelet drug clopidogrel is metabolized to clopidogrel acyl-ß-d-glucuronide, which was recently found to be a strong time-dependent inhibitor of CYP2C8 in humans. Therefore, we studied the effect of clopidogrel on the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone. In a randomized crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers ingested either 300 mg of clopidogrel on day 1, and 75 mg on days 2 and 3, or placebo. Pioglitazone 15 mg was administered 1 hour after placebo and clopidogrel on day 1. Plasma concentrations of pioglitazone, clopidogrel, and their main metabolites were measured up to 72 hours. Clopidogrel increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) of pioglitazone 2.1-fold [P < 0.001, 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-2.6] and prolonged its half-life from 6.7 to 11 hours (P = 0.002). The peak concentration of pioglitazone was unaffected but the concentration at 24 hours was increased 4.5-fold (range 1.6-9.8; P < 0.001, 90% CI 3.17-6.45) by clopidogrel. The M-IV-to-pioglitazone AUC0-∞ ratio was 49% (P < 0.001, 90% CI 0.40-0.59) of that during the control phase, indicating that clopidogrel inhibited the CYP2C8-mediated biotransformation of pioglitazone. Clopidogrel increases the exposure to pioglitazone by inhibiting its CYP2C8-mediated biotransformation. In consequence, use of clopidogrel may increase the risk of fluid retention and other concentration-related adverse effects of pioglitazone.

Voriconazole more likely than posaconazole increases plasma exposure to sublingual buprenorphine causing a risk of a clinically important interaction.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine possible effects of voriconazole and posaconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacological effects of sublingual buprenorphine. METHODS: We used a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study design with 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects were given a dose of 0.4 mg (0.6 mg during placebo phase) sublingual buprenorphine after a 5-day oral pretreatment with either (i) placebo, (ii) voriconazole 400 mg twice daily on the first day and 200 mg twice daily thereafter or (iii) posaconazole 400 mg twice daily. Plasma and urine concentrations of buprenorphine and its primary active metabolite norbuprenorphine were monitored over 18 h and pharmacological effects were measured. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, voriconazole increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) of buprenorphine 1.80-fold (90 % confidence interval 1.45-2.24; P < 0.001), its peak concentration (Cmax) 1.37-fold (P < 0.013) and half-life (t ½ ) 1.37-fold (P < 0.001). Posaconazole increased the AUC00-∞ of buprenorphine 1.25-fold (P < 0.001). Most of the plasma norbuprenorphine concentrations were below the limit of quantification (0.05 ng/ml). Voriconazole, unlike posaconazole, increased the urinary excretion of norbuprenorphine 1.58-fold (90 % confidence interval 1.18-2.12; P < 0.001) but there was no quantifiable parent buprenorphine in urine. Plasma buprenorphine concentrations correlated with the pharmacological effects, but the effects did not differ significantly between the phases. CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole, and to a minor extent posaconazole, increase plasma exposure to sublingual buprenorphine, probably via inhibition of cytochrome P450 3 A and/or P-glycoprotein. Care should be exercised in the combined use of buprenorphine with triazole antimycotics, particularly with voriconazole, because their interaction can be of clinical importance.

SLCO1B1 polymorphism markedly affects the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin acid.

OBJECTIVE: Organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1, encoded by SLCO1B1 gene) is a hepatic uptake transporter, and its genetic variability is associated with pharmacokinetics and muscle toxicity risk of simvastatin. We examined the possible effects of variations in the SLCO1B1 gene on the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin in a prospective genotype panel study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers with the SLCO1B1*1B/*1B genotype, five with the SLCO1B1*5/*15 or *15/*15 genotype, and 15 with the SLCO1B1*1A/*1A genotype (controls) were recruited. Each study participant ingested a single 40-mg dose of lovastatin. Plasma concentrations of lovastatin (inactive lactone) and its active metabolite lovastatin acid were measured up to 24 h. RESULTS: In the SLCO1B1*5/*15 or *15/*15 genotype group, the geometric mean Cmax and AUC0-24 of lovastatin acid were 340 and 286% of the corresponding values in the SLCO1B1*1A/*1A (reference) genotype group (P<0.005). In contrast, the AUC0-24 of lovastatin acid in the SLCO1B1*1B/*1B genotype group was only 68% of that in the reference genotype group (P=0.03). No statistically significant association was observed between the SLCO1B1 genotype and the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin lactone. CONCLUSION: SLCO1B1*5/*15 and *15/*15 genotypes markedly increase the exposure to active lovastatin acid, but have no significant effect on lovastatin lactone, similar to their effects on simvastatin and simvastatin acid. Accordingly, it is probable that the risk of muscle toxicity during lovastatin treatment is increased in individuals carrying the SLCO1B1*5 or *15 allele. The SLCO1B1*1B/*1B genotype is associated with reduced lovastatin acid concentrations, consistent with enhanced hepatic uptake.

Clopidogrel Has No Clinically Meaningful Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of the Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B1 and Cytochrome P450 3A4 Substrate Simvastatin.

Simvastatin and clopidogrel are commonly used together in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 activity markedly affects the hepatic uptake of simvastatin acid, whereas both simvastatin and simvastatin acid are sensitive to changes in cytochrome P450 3A4 activity. Clopidogrel and its metabolites inhibit OATP1B1 and CYP3A4 in vitro. We studied the effect of clopidogrel on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin in a randomized crossover study. Twelve healthy volunteers ingested either a dose of placebo (control) or 300 mg of clopidogrel on day 1 and 75 mg on days 2 and 3. Simvastatin 40 mg was administered 1 hour after placebo and after clopidogrel on days 1 and 3. Plasma drug concentrations were measured for up to 12 hours. Clopidogrel 300 mg (day 1) increased the concentrations of simvastatin and simvastatin acid during the absorption phase. After clopidogrel 300 mg, the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of simvastatin from 0 to 2 hours was 156% (P = 0.02) and its AUC(0-12 hours) was 132% (P = 0.08) of that during placebo, whereas the AUC(0-2 hours) and the AUC(0-12 hours) of simvastatin acid were 148% (P = 0.04) and 112% (P = 0.52) of control. Clopidogrel 75 mg (day 3) had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic variables of simvastatin or simvastatin acid compared with placebo. The effect of clopidogrel seemed independent of the SLCO1B1 c.521T>C genotype. In conclusion, as clopidogrel did not have significant effects on the total exposure to simvastatin or simvastatin acid, clopidogrel does not seem to inhibit OATP1B1 or CYP3A4 to a clinically relevant extent.

Effect of grapefruit juice on the bioactivation of prasugrel.

AIMS: The P2Y12 inhibitor prasugrel is a prodrug, which is activated after its initial hydrolysis partly by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Grapefruit juice, a strong inactivator of intestinal CYP3A4, greatly reduces the activation and antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of grapefruit juice on prasugrel. METHODS: In a randomized crossover study, seven healthy volunteers ingested 200 ml of grapefruit juice or water three times daily for 4 days. On day 3, they ingested a single 10 mg dose of prasugrel with an additional 200 ml of grapefruit juice or water. Plasma concentrations of prasugrel metabolites and the antiplatelet effect were measured. RESULTS: Grapefruit juice increased the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-∞)) of the primary, inactive metabolite of prasugrel to 164% of the control value (95% confidence interval 122-220%, P = 0.008), without a significant effect on its peak plasma concentration (C(max)). The C(max) and AUC(0-∞) of the secondary, active metabolite were decreased to 51% (95% confidence interval 32-84%, P = 0.017) and 74% of the control value (95% confidence interval 60-91%, P = 0.014) by grapefruit juice (P < 0.05). The average platelet inhibition, assessed with the VerifyNow® method at 0-24 h after prasugrel intake, was 5 percentage points (95% confidence interval 1-10 percentage points) lower in the grapefruit juice phase than in the water phase (P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Grapefruit juice reduces the bioactivation of prasugrel, but this has only a limited effect on the antiplatelet effect of prasugrel.

Effect of carboxylesterase 1 c.428G > A single nucleotide variation on the pharmacokinetics of quinapril and enalapril.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of the carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) c.428G > A (p.G143E, rs71647871) single nucleotide variation (SNV) on the pharmacokinetics of quinapril and enalapril in a prospective genotype panel study in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In a fixed-order crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers with the CES1 c.428G/A genotype and 12 with the c.428G/G genotype ingested a single 10 mg dose of quinapril and enalapril with a washout period of at least 1 week. Plasma concentrations of quinapril and quinaprilat were measured for up to 24 h and those of enalapril and enalaprilat for up to 48 h. Their excretion into the urine was measured from 0 h to 12 h. RESULTS: The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-∞) of active enalaprilat was 20% lower in subjects with the CES1 c.428G/A genotype than in those with the c.428G/G genotype (95% confidence interval of geometric mean ratio 0.64, 1.00; P = 0.049). The amount of enalaprilat excreted into the urine was 35% smaller in subjects with the CES1 c.428G/A genotype than in those with the c.428G/G genotype (P = 0.044). The CES1 genotype had no significant effect on the enalaprilat to enalapril AUC0-∞ ratio or on any other pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters of enalapril or enalaprilat. The CES1 genotype had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters of quinapril. CONCLUSIONS: The CES1 c.428G > A SNV decreased enalaprilat concentrations, probably by reducing the hydrolysis of enalapril, but had no observable effect on the pharmacokinetics of quinapril.

Effects of terbinafine and itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered tramadol.

BACKGROUND: Tramadol is widely used for acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain. Its primary active metabolite is O-desmethyltramadol (M1), which is mainly accountable for the µ-opioid receptor-related analgesic effect. Tramadol is metabolized to M1 mainly by cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6 enzyme and to other metabolites by CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. We investigated the possible interaction of tramadol with the antifungal agents terbinafine (CYP2D6 inhibitor) and itraconazole (CYP3A4 inhibitor). METHODS: We used a randomized placebo-controlled crossover study design with 12 healthy subjects, of which 8 were extensive and 4 were ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolizers. On the pretreatment day 4 with terbinafine (250 mg once daily), itraconazole (200 mg once daily) or placebo, subjects were given tramadol 50 mg orally. Plasma concentrations of tramadol and M1 were determined over 48 h and some pharmacodynamic effects over 12 h. Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated using standard non-compartmental methods. RESULTS: Terbinafine increased the area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) of tramadol by 115 % and decreased the AUC0-∞ of M1 by 64 % (P < 0.001). Terbinafine increased the peak concentration (C max) of tramadol by 53 % (P < 0.001) and decreased the C max of M1 by 79 % (P < 0.001). After terbinafine pretreatment the elimination half-life of tramadol and M1 were increased by 48 and 50 %, respectively (P < 0.001). Terbinafine reduced subjective drug effect of tramadol (P < 0.001). Itraconazole had minor effects on tramadol pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: Terbinafine may reduce the opioid effect of tramadol and increase the risk of its monoaminergic adverse effects. Itraconazole has no meaningful interaction with tramadol in subjects who have functional CYP2D6 enzyme.

In vitro assessment of time-dependent inhibitory effects on CYP2C8 and CYP3A activity by fourteen protein kinase inhibitors.

Previous studies have shown that several protein kinase inhibitors are time-dependent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. We screened 14 kinase inhibitors for time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C8 and CYP3A. Amodiaquine N-deethylation and midazolam 1'-hydroxylation were used as marker reactions for CYP2C8 and CYP3A activity, respectively. A screening, IC50 shift, and mechanism-based inhibition were assessed with human liver microsomes. In the screening, bosutinib isomer 1, crizotinib, dasatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, lestaurtinib, nilotinib, pazopanib, saracatinib, sorafenib, and sunitinib exhibited an increased inhibition of CYP3A after a 30-min preincubation with NADPH, as compared with no preincubation. Axitinib and vandetanib tested negative for time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A and CYP2C8, and bosutinib was the only inhibitor causing time-dependent inhibition of CYP2C8. The inhibitory mechanism by bosutinib was consistent with weak mechanism-based inhibition, and its inactivation variables, inhibitor concentration that supports half-maximal rate of inactivation (KI) and maximal inactivation rate (kinact), were 54.8 µM and 0.018 1/min. As several of the tested inhibitors were reported to cause mechanism-based inactivation of CYP3A4 during the progress of this work, detailed experiments with these were not completed. However, lestaurtinib and saracatinib were identified as mechanism-based inhibitors of CYP3A. The KI and kinact of lestaurtinib and saracatinib were 30.7 µM and 0.040 1/min, and 12.6 µM and 0.096 1/min, respectively. Inhibition of CYP2C8 by bosutinib was predicted to have no clinical relevance, whereas therapeutic lestaurtinib and saracatinib concentrations were predicted to increase the plasma exposure to CYP3A-dependent substrates by ≥2.7-fold. The liability of kinase inhibitors to affect CYP enzymes by time-dependent inhibition may have long-lasting consequences and result in clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

Paroxetine markedly increases plasma concentrations of ophthalmic timolol; CYP2D6 inhibitors may increase the risk of cardiovascular adverse effects of 0.5% timolol eye drops.

Although ophthalmic timolol is generally well tolerated, a significant fraction of topically administered timolol can be systemically absorbed. We investigated the effect of the strong CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine on the pharmacokinetics of timolol after ophthalmic administration. In a four-phase crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers ingested either paroxetine (20 mg) or placebo daily for 3 days. In phases 1-2, timolol 0.1% gel, and in phases 3-4, timolol 0.5% drops were administered to both eyes. Paroxetine increased the plasma concentrations of timolol with both timolol formulations to a similar degree. The geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) of timolol peak concentration was 1.53-fold (1.23-1.91) with 0.1% timolol and 1.49-fold (0.94-2.36) with 0.5% timolol, and that of timolol area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 12 hours was 1.61-fold (1.26- to 2.06-fold) and 1.78-fold (1.21-2.62), respectively. During paroxetine administration, six subjects on 0.5% timolol drops, but none on 0.1% timolol gel, had plasma timolol concentrations exceeding 0.7 ng/ml, which can cause systemic adverse effects in patients at risk. There was a positive correlation between the AUC from time 0 to 13 hours of paroxetine and the placebo phase AUC from time 0 to infinity of timolol after timolol 0.5% drops (P < 0.05), and a nonsignificant trend after timolol 0.1% gel, consistent with the role of CYP2D6 in the metabolism of both agents. In the orthostatic test, heart rate immediately after upright standing was significantly lower (P < 0.05) during the paroxetine phase than during the placebo phase at 1 and 3 hours after 0.5% timolol dosing. In conclusion, paroxetine and other CYP2D6 inhibitors can have a clinically important interaction with ophthalmic timolol, particularly when patients are using 0.5% timolol formulations.

Melatonin for sedative withdrawal in older patients with primary insomnia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

AIM: We compared the efficacy of melatonin and placebo as adjuvants in the withdrawal of patients from long term temazepam, zopiclone or zolpidem (here 'BZD') use. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted in a primary health care outpatient clinic. Ninety-two men or women (≥55 years) with primary insomnia and chronic BZD use received controlled release melatonin 2 mg (CRM) (n = 46) or placebo (n = 46) during the 1 month withdrawal from BZDs. Psychosocial support was provided. Follow-up continued for up to 6 months. Successful BZD withdrawal by the end of 1 month was confirmed by BZD plasma determinations, while reduction in BZD use and abstinence continuing for 6 months were noted. RESULTS: There were two drop-outs on CRM and one on placebo. After a 1 month withdrawal, 31 participants (67%; 95% CI 54, 81) on CRM and 39 (85%; 74, 95) on placebo had withdrawn completely (intention-to-treat analysis between groups, P = 0.051; per protocol P = 0.043). Reduction in BZD use was similar or even more rare in the CRM than in the placebo group (P = 0.052 per protocol). After 6 months, 14 participants in the CRM group and 20 in the placebo group remained non-users of BZD (NS between groups). BZD doses were higher in the CRM than in the placebo group at the end of the 6 month follow-up (P = 0.025). Withdrawal symptoms did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gradual dose reduction of BZDs combined with CRM or placebo, and psychosocial support produced high short term and moderate long term BZD abstinence. CRM showed no withdrawal benefit compared with placebo.

Effect of withdrawal from long-term use of temazepam, zopiclone or zolpidem as hypnotic agents on cognition in older adults.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of withdrawal from the long-term use of temazepam, zopiclone or zolpidem as hypnotics drugs (here referred to as BZD) on cognitive performance. METHODS: Ninety-two adults (age ≥55 years) with primary insomnia and who were long-term daily users of BZD volunteered to participate in a 1-month medically supported withdrawal attempt from BZD use, with a subsequent 5-month follow-up. Withdrawal was based on plasma BZD measurements at baseline, at 1 month and during subsequent regular clinical appointments. Attention and psychomotor performance were measured using the CogniSpeed® at baseline and at 1, 2 and 6 months. Reaction times were determined in the Simple Reaction Time (SRT), Two-Choice Reaction Time (2-CRT) and Vigilance tests, and errors were measured by the 2-CRT and Vigilance tests. The cognition data of the withdrawal group were also compared with a cohort of BZD non-users. RESULTS: Eighty-nine (97 %) participants (59 women, 30 men) were followed-up for a maximum of 6 months. During the follow-up period, changes in reaction times and errors did not differ between short-term withdrawers (no residual BZD at 1 month; N = 69), non-withdrawers (residual BZD at 1 month; N = 20) or long-term withdrawers (N = 34). Compared to the reaction times of the BZD-free cohort, those of BZD users were slower at baseline. The reaction times of BZD withdrawers based on the results of the SRT or 2-CRT tests during follow-up did not reach those of the BZD-free cohort, but there was no difference between these groups in the Vigilance test. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of BDZ as hypnotic drugs by older adults is related to prolonged impairment of attentional and psychomotor cognitive functioning that persists for at least 6 months after withdrawal.

Handgrip strength and balance in older adults following withdrawal from long-term use of temazepam, zopiclone or zolpidem as hypnotics.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines and related drugs affect physical functioning negatively and increase fall and fracture risk. As impaired muscle strength and balance are risk factors for falls, we examined the effects of hypnotic withdrawal on handgrip strength and balance in older adult outpatients during and after long-term use of temazepam, zopiclone and zolpidem (here collectively referred to as "benzodiazepines"). METHODS: Eighty-nine chronic users (59 women, 30 men) of temazepam, zopiclone or zolpidem aged ≥55 years participated in a benzodiazepine withdrawal study. Individual physician-directed withdrawal was performed gradually over a one-month period and participants were followed up to six months. Handgrip strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer, and balance using the Short Berg's Balance Scale during the period of benzodiazepine use (baseline), and at 1, 2, 3 weeks, and 1, 2 and 6 months after initiating withdrawal. Withdrawal outcome and persistence were determined by plasma benzodiazepine-determinations at baseline and at four weeks ("short-term withdrawers", n = 69; "short-term non-withdrawers", n = 20), and by interviews at six months ("long-term withdrawers", n = 34; "long-term non-withdrawers", n = 55). Also most of the non-withdrawers markedly reduced their benzodiazepine use. RESULTS: Within three weeks after initiating withdrawal, handgrip strength improved significantly (P ≤ 0.005) compared to baseline values. Among women, long-term withdrawers improved their handgrip strength both when compared to their baseline values (P = 0.001) or to non-withdrawers (P =0.004). In men, improvement of handgrip strength from baseline was not significantly better in withdrawers than in non-withdrawers. However, men did improve their handgrip strength values compared to baseline (P = 0.002). Compared to balance test results at baseline, withdrawers improved starting from the first week after withdrawal initiation. There was, however, only a borderline difference (P = 0.054) in balance improvement between the long-term withdrawers and long-term non-withdrawers. Of note, the non-withdrawers tended to improve their handgrip strength and balance compared to baseline values, in parallel with their reduced benzodiazepine use. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal from long-term use of benzodiazepines can rapidly improve muscle strength and balance. Our results encourage discontinuing benzodiazepine hypnotics, particularly in older women who are at a high risk of falling and sustaining fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT2008000679530. Registered 31 October 2008.

Organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1: a genetically polymorphic transporter of major importance for hepatic drug uptake.

The importance of membrane transporters for drug pharmacokinetics has been increasingly recognized during the last decade. Organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) is a genetically polymorphic influx transporter expressed on the sinusoidal membrane of human hepatocytes, and it mediates the hepatic uptake of many endogenous compounds and xenobiotics. Recent studies have demonstrated that OATP1B1 plays a major, clinically important role in the hepatic uptake of many drugs. A common single-nucleotide variation (coding DNA c.521T>C, protein p.V174A, rs4149056) in the SLCO1B1 gene encoding OATP1B1 decreases the transporting activity of OATP1B1, resulting in markedly increased plasma concentrations of, for example, many statins, particularly of active simvastatin acid. The variant thereby enhances the risk of statin-induced myopathy and decreases the therapeutic indexes of statins. However, the effect of the SLCO1B1 c.521T>C variant is different on different statins. The same variant also markedly affects the pharmacokinetics of several other drugs. Furthermore, certain SLCO1B1 variants associated with an enhanced clearance of methotrexate increase the risk of gastrointestinal toxicity by methotrexate in the treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Certain drugs (e.g., cyclosporine) potently inhibit OATP1B1, causing clinically significant drug interactions. Thus, OATP1B1 plays a major role in the hepatic uptake of drugs, and genetic variants and drug interactions affecting OATP1B1 activity are important determinants of individual drug responses. In this article, we review the current knowledge about the expression, function, substrate characteristics, and pharmacogenetics of OATP1B1 as well as its role in drug interactions, in parts comparing with those of other hepatocyte-expressed organic anion transporting polypeptides, OATP1B3 and OATP2B1.

SLCO2B1 c.935G>A single nucleotide polymorphism has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of montelukast and aliskiren.

OBJECTIVE: A nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the SLCO2B1 gene encoding organic anion transporting polypeptide 2B1 (OATP2B1), c.935G>A (p.R312Q; rs12422149), has been associated with reduced plasma concentrations of montelukast in patients with asthma. Our aim was to examine the possible effects of the SLCO2B1 c.935G>A SNP on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of the suggested OATP2B1 substrates montelukast and aliskiren. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers with the SLCO2B1 c.935GG genotype, 12 with the c.935GA genotype, and five with the c.935AA genotype ingested a single 10 mg dose of montelukast or a 150 mg dose of aliskiren, with a washout period of 1 week. Plasma montelukast concentrations were measured up to 24 h. Plasma and urine aliskiren concentrations were measured up to 72 and 12 h, respectively, and plasma renin activity up to 24 h after aliskiren intake. RESULTS: The SLCO2B1 genotypes had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of montelukast or aliskiren. The geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals of montelukast area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) in participants with the c.935GA or the c.935AA genotype to those with the c.935GG genotype were 1.02 (0.87, 1.21) or 0.88 (0.71, 1.10), respectively (P=0.557). The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of aliskiren AUC(0-∞) in participants with the c.935GA or the c.935AA genotype to those with the c.935GG genotype were 0.98 (0.74, 1.30) or 1.24 (0.85, 1.80), respectively (P=0.576). CONCLUSION: These data do not support the suggested functional significance of the SLCO2B1 c.935G>A SNP on OATP2B1 activity in vivo.