Presence of underlying cirrhosis is associated with increased in-hospital mortality and length of stay following pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Patient- and hospital-level factors associated with outcomes following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) are well established. However, despite theoretical disruption in hepatopetal flow, the impact of cirrhosis on in-hospital mortality following PD is not well-studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and post-discharge disposition in patients with cirrhosis undergoing PD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (January 2002-August 2015) was conducted identifying patients undergoing PD. Using previously validated ICD-9-CM codes, patients were stratified into presence and absence of cirrhosis. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality following PD were analyzed adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors. Following PD were analyzed after adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors. RESULTS: In 16,344 patients that underwent PD, 203 (1.2 %) patients had underlying cirrhosis prior to resection. Overall in-hospital mortality following PD was significantly worse in the cirrhosis cohort (11.3 % vs. 3.6 %, p < 0.001). Patients with underlying cirrhosis were less likely to be discharged home (73.9 % vs. 83.2 %, p < 0.001) and had a longer median LOS (12.0 vs. 10.0 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The presence of underlying cirrhosis is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, longer LOS, and decreased likelihood of home discharge following PD. Given the prohibitive risks, PD should not be performed in patients with underlying cirrhosis.

Renal Artery Aneurysms in the Inpatient Setting.

BACKGROUND: The risk of rupture of renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) remains undefined. A recent paper from the Vascular Low-Frequency Disease Consortium (VLFDC) identified only 3 ruptures in 760 patients. However, over 80% of patients in the VLFDC study were treated at large academic centers, which may not reflect the pattern of care of RAAs nationwide. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the pattern of nonelective versus elective surgery requiring inpatient admission for RAAs, including nephrectomies, and their outcomes using a national database. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2012 to 2018 was utilized. Patients with a primary diagnosis of RAAs were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Ruptured RAAs (rRAAs) were identified utilizing surrogate ICD codes. The primary outcome variables for this study were proportion of RAAs requiring non-elective surgery and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 590 inpatient admissions for RAA were identified with 554 procedures at 467 hospitals across the country. Of the 590 inpatient admissions, 380 (64.4%) admissions were deemed nonelective. There was an increasing proportion of nonelective admissions over the study period. The overall rate of nephrectomies was 7.1% (n = 42). In-hospital mortality rate for the cohort was 1.4% (n = 8) with no differences in in-hospital mortality in the elective versus nonelective setting (1.0% vs. 1.6%; P = 0.718). In the nonelective setting, patients requiring a nephrectomy (n = 23) had significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared those not requiring a nephrectomy (8.7% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.045). rRAA (n = 50) patients had significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to the remainder of the cohort (6.0% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.024). rRAA patients were also more likely to undergo a nephrectomy compared to the remainder of the cohort (16.0% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that treatment of RAAs are primarily done in the nonelective setting with a high proportion of ruptures, which could continue to rise as the threshold for repair has decreased.

An Overview of Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Partial hepatectomy, one of a few curative therapeutic modalities, is plagued by high recurrence rate of up to 70% at 5 years. Throughout the past 3 decades, many clinical trials have attempted to improve HCC recurrence rate following partial hepatectomy using adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment modalities such as antiviral therapy, brachytherapy, systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization, and radiotherapy. The goal of this review is to discuss the clinical trials pertaining to resectable HCC including surgical technique considerations, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant treatment modalities.

Challenging the Treatment Paradigm: Selecting Patients for Surgical Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus.

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains a common presentation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Approximately 30-50% of patients newly diagnosed with HCC will present with a concomitant PVTT. Current guidelines recommend systemic therapy for treatment of HCC with PVTT. Real-world application of partial hepatectomy in HCC patients with PVTT has increased over the past two decades, as perioperative complications have declined. However, it is unclear if there is an association between the extent of PVTT and overall survival and rates of recurrence and whether the perioperative morbidity outweighs these potential benefits. Partial hepatectomy with en bloc resection of PVTT in second-order branches and distal can offer significant benefits in carefully selected patients; however, once the HCC-associated PVTT extends into first-order portal venous branches or more proximal into the superior mesenteric vein, the risks of surgical resection outweigh the benefits. The aim of this review is to determine which patients with HCC presenting with PVTT benefit from surgical resection. We will discuss the classification systems of PVTT and review both outcome and perioperative measures in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy with extirpation of HCC-related PVT.

Cefoxitin versus piperacillin-tazobactam as surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Although antibiotic prophylaxis is established in reducing postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs), the optimal antibiotic for prophylaxis in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains unclear. The study objective is to evaluate if administration of piperacillin-tazobactam as antibiotic prophylaxis results in decreased 30-day SSI rate compared with cefoxitin in patients undergoing elective PD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be a multi-institution, double-arm, non-blinded randomised controlled superiority trial. Adults ≥18 years consented to undergo PD for all indications who present to institutions participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (NSQIP HPB) Collaborative will be included. Data collection will use the NSQIP HPB Collaborative Surgical Clinical Reviewers. Patients will be randomised to either 1-2 g intravenous cefoxitin or 3.375-4.5 g intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam within 60 min of surgical incision. The primary outcome will be 30-day postoperative SSI rate following PD. Secondary outcomes will include 30-day postoperative mortality; specific postoperative complication rate; and unplanned reoperation, length of stay, and hospital readmission. A subset of patients will have bacterial isolates and sensitivities of intraoperative bile cultures and SSIs. Postoperative SSIs and secondary outcomes will be analysed using logistic regression models with the primary predictor as the randomised treatment group. Additional adjustment will be made for preoperative biliary stent presence. Additionally, bacterial cultures and isolates will be summarised by presence of bacterial species and antibiotic sensitivities. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. This trial will evaluate the effect of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with cefoxitin as antibiotic prophylaxis on the hazard of postoperative SSIs. The results will be disseminated regardless of the effect of the intervention on study outcomes. The manuscript describing the effect of the intervention will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal when data collection and analyses are complete. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03269994.