Functional improvement after successful catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Identifying patients who benefit from restored sinus rhythm (SR) would optimize the selection of candidates for ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF). This prospective study sought to identify the hitherto unknown factors associated with global functional improvement after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of LSPAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 171 LSPAF patients (84% of the total consecutive 203 patients) who were examined in SR 12 months after ablation, the individual per cent change from baseline value in maximum oxygen consumption at exercise test (VO2 max), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and five-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D) of quality-of-life questionnaire were classified in quartiles by 0 (worse) to 3 (best) grades. The individual grades were summed into a composite score (SCORE, 0 … 12) reflecting global functional improvement. Significant improvement in VO2 max (3.4 ± 4.7 mL/kg/min), LVEF (7.5 ± 9.1%), NT-proBNP (-861 ± 809 pg/mL), and EQ-5D (0.7 ± 0.12) was observed (all P < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, younger age (P = 0.001), male gender (P = 0.02), timely post-ablation left atrial appendage (LAA) outflow (P = 0.005) with improvement in outflow velocity (P = 0.0002), and withdrawal of Class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs (P < 0.05) were positively and independently correlated with the SCORE. CONCLUSIONS: Younger male patients benefited most from catheter ablation of LSPAF. Delayed or non-improved LAA outflow and inability to discontinue Class I/III antiarrhythmic medication reduced the post-ablation functional improvement.

A prospective evaluation of haemodynamics, functional status, and quality of life after radiofrequency catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Clinical benefit from ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation has remained unknown. We hypothesized that successful ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation would improve haemodynamics, functional status, and quality of life. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 160 patients (aged 59 ± 9 years, 23% females) undergoing ablation of long-standing (median of 28 months) persistent atrial were enrolled in this prospective study. Morphological and functional echocardiographic parameters, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), maximum oxygen consumption during exercise test (VO2 max), and quality of life were assessed at baseline and 1 year after the ablation.  At the 1-year follow-up visit, 81% patients were examined in sinus rhythm (after repeat ablation in 38% patients). Left atrial appendage outflow velocity increased from 44 ± 20 to 58 ± 23 cm/s, left ventricular ejection fraction from 54 ± 9 to 59 ± 5%, and VO2 max from 20.4 ± 6.4 to 23.7 ± 8.1 mL/kg/min; NT-proBNP decreased from median 897 (interquartile range 603-1424) to 230 (interquartile range 120-420) pg/mL (all P < 0.0001). These beneficial effects of ablation were predominantly associated with the presence of sinus rhythm. Quality of life (range 0-100) increased significantly (EQ-5D index: from 68.8 ± 12.5 to 75.4 ± 14.4; EQ-VAS score: from 62.8 ± 13.2 to 70.6 ± 13.8; both P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation was associated with significant recovery of haemodynamics and exercise capacity that projected onto the long-term improvement in quality of life.

Left atrial voltage during atrial fibrillation in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation patients.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) endocardial voltage characteristics assessed during atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been previously compared in different AF types. This study was aimed at investigating the LA voltages and volumes in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. METHODS: LA electroanatomic voltage maps acquired during AF were compared between consecutive patients without major structural heart disease undergoing first catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF (n = 100) or persistent AF (n = 100). The groups were comparable in baseline clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Patients with persistent AF presented with lower median LA voltage (median 0.41, interquartile range [IQR] 0.31-0.51 mV versus median 0.99, IQR 0.47-1.56 mV; P < 0.001), and maximum LA voltage (4.07 +/- 1.76 vs 6.42 +/- 2.16 mV; P < 0.001). They also had a higher proportion of the LA points exhibiting voltage <0.2 mV (30 +/- 20 vs 12 +/- 11%; P < 0.001) and voltage 0.2-1.0 mV (55 +/- 15 vs 42 +/- 19%; P < 0.001). They further displayed higher LA volume/body surface area (75 +/- 16 vs 58 +/- 13 mL/m(2); P < 0.001). In the multivariate regression model, both LA voltage (P < 10(-9)) and LA volume (P < 10(-5)) were significant determinants of AF type. CONCLUSION: Patients with persistent AF had significantly lower LA voltage compared with patients with paroxysmal AF even after adjustment for differences in indexed LA volume. LA voltage represents an independent covariate of clinical manifestation of AF.

Termination of long-lasting persistent versus short-lasting persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by ablation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) structures for the maintenance of different atrial fibrillation (AF) forms are not uniform. The incidence, electrophysiological patterns, and LA sites of sinus rhythm (SR) restoration during ablation of different AF forms were evaluated. METHODS: One hundred patients with long-lasting persistent AF were retrospectively compared to 35 patients with short-lasting persistent AF and 59 patients with a sustained episode of paroxysmal AF. All patients underwent a first ablation using a stepwise ablation approach with the endpoint of SR restoration by ablation. RESULTS: SR was restored in 38%, 83%, and 97% of patients with long-lasting persistent, short-lasting persistent, and paroxysmal AF, respectively (P <0.001 for long-lasting persistent vs paroxysmal AF; P = 0.02 for long-lasting persistent vs short-lasting persistent AF). When modes and sites of SR restoration were evaluated among the patients with long-lasting persistent, short-lasting persistent, and paroxysmal AF, SR was restored via conversion into LA tachycardia in 79%, 52%, and 4% of patients (P <0.001 for long-lasting persistent vs paroxysmal AF); by the pulmonary vein encircling in 8%, 24%, and 93% patients (P <0.001 for long-lasting persistent vs paroxysmal AF); and by ablation at the LA anterior wall or inside the coronary sinus in 66%, 45%, and 2% patients (P <0.001 for long-lasting persistent and paroxysmal AF). During the 31 +/- 14 month follow-up since the first ablation, of the 50 patients with long-term SR maintenance (38 patients free of class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs), SR was restored by ablation in 29 (58%) patients versus nine (18%) patients out of 50 patients with unsuccessful clinical outcome (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Ablation of long-lasting persistent AF was characterized by more frequent failure to restore SR, and predominant conversion into LA tachycardia prior to SR restoration, and SR restoration by ablation outside the LA posterior wall. SR restoration by ablation was associated with better clinical outcome in these patients.

Pulmonary vein isolation using segmental versus electroanatomical circumferential ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: over 3-year results of a prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that electroanatomic pulmonary vein (PV) antra encircling for the PV isolation will improve the outcome in treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), compared with segmental PV isolation. METHODS: Fifty-four patients underwent segmental PV isolation (group 1) and 56 patients circumferential PV isolation (group 2) for symptomatic PAF in a randomized study. RESULTS: Following single ablation procedure, at the 48 +/- 8 month follow-up, 30 (56%) and 32 (57%) patients in groups 1 and 2 remained free of arrhythmia (P = 0.41). After repeat ablation, 43 (80%) and 45 (80%) patients in groups 1 and 2 were free of arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs); 48 (89%) and 51 (91%) patients in groups 1 and 2 did not have arrhythmia recurrences without or with AADs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates no advantage in long-term arrhythmia-free clinical outcome after circumferential PV isolation in patients with frequent PAF.

Results of complex left atrial ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to identify variables associated with successful long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) after a single ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Complex left atrial (LA) ablation was performed in 100 patients. Restoration of SR by ablation was the desired procedure endpoint. RESULTS: SR was restored by ablation in 38 patients during the first procedure. Following one ablation, 50 patients remained in SR for 31 +/- 14 months. SR maintenance was associated with shorter duration of the persistent AF (median 14 vs. 22 months; P = 0.05), lower proportion of the LA points exhibiting voltage <0.2 mV (median 20% vs. 33%; P = 0.006), and higher proportion of LA points showing voltage >1 mV (median 15% vs. 11%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Among clinical variables, shorter duration of persistent AF and higher voltage recorded around the LA predicted long-term maintenance of SR after single ablation.

Atrial macroreentry tachycardia in patients without obvious structural heart disease or previous cardiac surgical or catheter intervention: characterization of arrhythmogenic substrates, reentry circuits, and results of catheter ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial macroreentry tachycardia (AMRT) in patients without obvious structural heart disease or previous surgical or catheter intervention has not been characterized in detail. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electroanatomical mapping and ablation of right or left AMRT were performed in 33 patients. Right atrial central conduction obstacle was formed by an electrically silent area (ESA) in 15 (68%) patients and by a line of double potentials (DPs) in seven (32%) patients. Left atrial ESAs were found in all 11 patients with the left AMRT. Reentry circuit was reconstructed in 19 (86%) patients with right AMRT and seven (64%) patients with left AMRT. Of the ESA-related right AMRT, eight (50%) were double-loop reentry circuits utilizing a narrow critical isthmus within the ESA and eight (50%) were single-loop reentry circuits with a critical isthmus bounded by ESA and either ostium of the vena cava. Single-loop DP-related AMRTs had the critical isthmus between the DP line and the ostium of the inferior vena cava (IVC). Left AMRTs included a variety of single-, double-, or triple-loop reentry circuits and their critical isthmuses. During the 37 +/- 15 month follow-up, atrial tachyarrhythmia-free clinical outcome was achieved in 21 (95%) patients (18 patients, 82%, without antiarrhythmic drugs) with the right AMRT and in nine (82%) patients (six patients, 55%, without antiarrhythmic drugs) with the left AMRT. CONCLUSION: The majority of right and left AMRTs were related to the presence of ESA. Ablation can be successful with a favorable risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.

Sinus rhythm restoration and arrhythmia noninducibility are major predictors of arrhythmia-free outcome after ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of restoring sinus rhythm (SR) by initial ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) is not fully established. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of SR restoration at the initial procedure and arrhythmia noninducibility at the final repeat procedure for long-term outcome. METHODS: A total of 203 patients (22% female; age 59 ± 9 years) underwent stepwise catheter ablation for LSPAF. RESULTS: The procedural end-point of SR restoration was achieved in 50% of patients. During follow-up (median 48 months) and after 1.7 procedures per patient, 72% of patients were free from arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs. Failure to restore SR was independently predicted by left atrial (LA) long-axis diameter ≥68 mm (relative risk [RR] 1.55, P = .03], proportion of high-voltage LA sites <20% (RR 1.62, P = .02), and left atrial appendage (LAA) atrial fibrillation cycle length (AFCL) <155 ms (RR 1.5, P = .05). Arrhythmia recurrence after the initial procedure was predicted by SR nonrestoration (RR 2.99, P <.000001) and LAA AFCL ≥155 ms (RR 1.90, P = .0002). Arrhythmia recurrence after the final procedure was predicted by SR nonrestoration at the initial procedure (RR 2.83, P = .0007), persistent AF duration ≥24 months (RR 2.74, P = .002), LAA outflow velocity <40 cm/s (RR 2.21, P = .006), and LAA AFCL ≥155 ms (RR 1.92, P = .02). In 115 patients with repeat procedure(s), failure to achieve arrhythmia noninducibility at the final procedure (19% of patients) was associated with arrhythmia recurrence (RR 8.9, P < .000001). CONCLUSION: SR restoration at the initial procedure and arrhythmia noninducibility at the last repeat procedure were major predictors of arrhythmia-free outcome after ablation for LSPAF.