Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in massive amlodipine overdose.

Calcium-channel blocker overdose can result in profound vasoplegia and cardiogenic shock, which can quickly spiral into multi-organ failure and death. In this case report, we discuss two separate cases of massive amlodipine overdose with polydrug intoxication (Patient A: amlodipine and quetiapine; Patient B: amlodipine, fluoxetine and zopiclone), both of which were complicated by life-threatening vasoplegic shock refractory to supportive therapy (endotracheal intubation, fluid resuscitation, activated charcoal, vasopressors and inotropes), multimodal antidotes (calcium and hyper-insulinemic euglycemic therapy) and even second-line treatment (methylene blue and therapeutic plasma exchange). Despite exhausting all therapeutic options, resuscitation remained futile with no clinical response elicited until veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) salvage therapy was initiated in both cases as a bridge-to-recovery. Albumin dialysis was also commenced to further enhance elimination of amlodipine given its high plasma protein-binding properties. Both patients improved drastically once perfusion to vital organs was maintained by ECMO and eventually survived with good neurological outcomes and preserved cardiac contractility on discharge. This case report supports the growing evidence that although ECMO support represents a potentially life-saving salvage therapy for refractory poisoning-induced shock, escalation to ECMO must be considered and instituted early before irreversible multi-organ failure sets in to ensure good clinical outcomes.

Randomized controlled trial of internal and external targeted temperature management methods in post- cardiac arrest patients.

BACKGROUND: Targeted temperature management post-cardiac arrest is currently implemented using various methods, broadly categorized as internal and external. This study aimed to evaluate survival-to-hospital discharge and neurological outcomes (Glasgow-Pittsburgh Score) of post-cardiac arrest patients undergoing internal cooling verses external cooling. METHODOLOGY: A randomized controlled trial of post-resuscitation cardiac arrest patients was conducted from October 2008-September 2014. Patients were randomized to either internal or external cooling methods. Historical controls were selected matched by age and gender. Analysis using SPSS version 21.0 presented descriptive statistics and frequencies while univariate logistic regression was done using R 3.1.3. RESULTS: 23 patients were randomized to internal cooling and 22 patients to external cooling and 42 matched controls were selected. No significant difference was seen between internal and external cooling in terms of survival, neurological outcomes and complications. However in the internal cooling arm, there was lower risk of developing overcooling (p=0.01) and rebound hyperthermia (p=0.02). Compared to normothermia, internal cooling had higher survival (OR=3.36, 95% CI=(1.130, 10.412), and lower risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias (OR=0.18, 95% CI=(0.04, 0.63)). Subgroup analysis showed those with cardiac cause of arrest (OR=4.29, 95% CI=(1.26, 15.80)) and sustained ROSC (OR=5.50, 95% CI=(1.64, 20.39)) had better survival with internal cooling compared to normothermia. Cooling curves showed tighter temperature control for internal compared to external cooling. CONCLUSION: Internal cooling showed tighter temperature control compared to external cooling. Internal cooling can potentially provide better survival-to-hospital discharge outcomes and reduce cardiac arrhythmia complications in carefully selected patients as compared to normothermia.

Extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in poisoning: A scoping review article.

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) represents last-line salvage therapy for poisoning-induced cardiac arrest but no review has focused on this specific area. Objective: This scoping review sought to evaluate the survival outcomes and characteristics of published cases of ECPR for toxicological arrest, with the aim of highlighting the potential and limitations of ECPR in toxicology.Eligibility Criteria.We searched PubMed and Cochrane for eligible papers from database inception to October 1, 2022 using the keywords "toxicology", "ECLS" and "CPR". References of included publications were searched to identify additional relevant articles. Qualitative synthesis was used to summarize the evidence. Results: 85 articles were chosen: 15 case series, 58 individual cases and 12 other publications that were analyzed separately due to ambiguity. ECPR may improve survival outcomes in selected poisoned patients, although the extent of benefit is unclear. As ECPR for poisoning-induced arrest may have better prognosis compared to from other aetiologies, it is likely reasonable to apply ELSO ECPR consensus guideline recommendations to toxicological arrest.Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest alone may not be sufficient grounds to deny ECPR if effective resuscitation had been promptly instituted. Poisonings involving membrane-stabilizing agents and cardio-depressive drugs, and cardiac arrests with shockable rhythms appear to have better outcomes. ECPR may permit excellent neurologically-intact recovery despite prolonged low-flow time of up to four hours. Early ECLS activation and pre-emptive catheter placement can significantly shorten time-to-ECPR and possibly improve survival. Conclusion: As effects of poisoning may be reversible, ECPR can potentially support poisoned patients through the critical peri-arrest state.

Performance of the paracetamol-aminotransferase multiplication product in risk stratification after paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification in paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning is crucial because hepatotoxicity is common and can be mitigated with treatment. However, current risk stratification tools have limitations. AIMS: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the paracetamol concentration × aminotransferase multiplication product, for predicting hepatotoxicity after paracetamol overdose. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched for eligible papers. We used random effects models to obtain pooled estimates of the likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios, from which sensitivity and specificity were computed. We assessed two commonly used cut-off values of paracetamol × aminotransferase, 1500 mg/L × IU/L and 10,000 mg/L × IU/L. Using the confusion matrices of these two cut-offs, area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve and optimal cut-off values in different clinical scenarios were established. RESULTS: Six studies comprising 5036 participants were included. In 4051 patients, using the cut-off of 1500 mg/L × IU/L, a diagnostic odds ratio of 31.90 (95%CI: 9.52-106.90), sensitivity of 0.98 (95%CI: 0.94-1.00) and specificity of 0.66 (95%CI: 0.49-0.89) were obtained. In 3983 patients, using the cut-off of 10,000 mg/L × IU/L, a diagnostic odds ratio of 99.34 (95%CI: 12.26-804.87), sensitivity of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.51-0.82) and specificity of 0.97 (95%CI: 0.95-1.00) were obtained. For staggered ingestions, the 1500 mg/L × IU/L cut-off yielded a diagnostic odds ratio of 69.53 (95%CI: 4.03-1199.75), sensitivity of 1.00 (95%CI: 0.87-1.00) and specificity of 0.74 (95%CI: 0.43-1.00). Next, using the 10,000 mg/L × IU/L cut-off in this scenario yielded a diagnostic odds ratio of 254.58 (95%CI: 11.12-5827.60), sensitivity of 0.79 (95%CI: 0.59-1.00) and specificity of 0.98 (95%CI: 0.94-1.00). The overall summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.91 (95%CI: 0.75-0.97), and the optimal cut-off value was 3840 mg/L × IU/L. The summary receiver operator characteristic curve in patients with staggered ingestions was 0.96 (95%CI: 0.85-0.99). The summary receiver operator characteristic curve in patients with staggered ingestions and whose paracetamol concentration was below the detectable limit of 10 mg/L at presentation was 0.97 (95%CI: 0.94-0.99). CONCLUSION: In this first meta-analysis, paracetamol × aminotransferase demonstrates its use in prognosticating hepatotoxicity in patients with paracetamol poisoning. It complements the Rumack-Matthew nomogram as it has shown promise in addressing two key limitations of the nomogram: it is usable after more than 24 h between overdose and acetylcysteine treatment, and it is applicable in staggered ingestions.

Management of difficult intravenous access: a qualitative review.

BACKGROUND: A perennial challenge faced by clinicians and made even more relevant with the global obesity epidemic, difficult intravenous access (DIVA) adversely impacts patient outcomes by causing significant downstream delays with many aspects of diagnoses and therapy. As most published DIVA strategies are limited to various point-of-care ultrasound techniques while other "tricks-of-the-trade" and pearls for overcoming DIVA are mostly relegated to informal nonpublished material, this article seeks to provide a narrative qualitative review of the iterature on DIVA and consolidate these strategies into a practical algorithm. METHODS: We conducted a literature search on PubMed using the keywords "difficult intravenous access", "peripheral vascular access" and "peripheral venous access" and searched emergency medicine and anaesthesiology resources for relevant material. These strategies were then categorized and incorporated into a DIVA algorithm. RESULTS: We propose a Vortex approach to DIVA that is modelled after the Difficult Airway Vortex concept starting off with standard peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) techniques, progressing sequentially on to ultrasound-guided cannulation and central venous cannulation and finally escalating to the most invasive intraosseous access should the patient be in extremis or should best efforts with the other lifelines fail. CONCLUSION: DIVA is a perennial problem that healthcare providers across various disciplines will be increasingly challenged with. It is crucial to have a systematic stepwise approach such as the DIVA Vortex when managing such patients and have at hand a wide repertoire of techniques to draw upon.

Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound for upper extremity deep venous thrombosis ED POCUS for upper extremity DVT.

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) is an uncommon disease but has to be carefully considered in patients with isolated unilateral upper limb swelling due to its potential to cause devastating complications and sequelae such as pulmonary embolism and septic thrombophlebitis. Given the extreme rarity of this condition, it is not surprising that point-of-care ultrasonographic evaluation of the upper limb for deep venous thrombosis is hardly ever performed in the emergency department. This case report serves to highlight how point-of-care ultrasonographic evaluation of the upper extremity venous system could be incorporated as a tool in the diagnostic armamentarium of the emergency physician. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old Chinese gentleman presented to the emergency department with a 1-day duration of progressive right upper extremity swelling and pain. On examination, his hemodynamic parameters were stable with no tachycardia. He was noted to have a hyperaemic and grossly swollen but non-tender right upper limb. Distal pulses remained strong. Point-of-care ultrasonography of his right upper limb venous system with Doppler colour flow and single-point augmentation with the arm squeeze manoeuvre immediately confirmed the diagnosis of right upper extremity deep venous thrombosis, which in turn permitted anticoagulation to be instituted promptly whilst in the emergency department. CONCLUSION: The use of point-of-care ultrasonography of the upper limb venous system can prove invaluable as a rapid, non-invasive technique to facilitate expedient diagnosis of and early intervention for UEDVT in the emergency department.

Comparison of self-reported EDACS versus physician-reported EDACS for the triage of chest pain patients in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Currently, there are no guidelines to help triage nurses identify high-risk emergency department chest pain patients. Patient self-reporting of Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS) could facilitate more reliable triage compared to nursing gestalt, but this novel concept is untested. This study hypothesizes that because EDACS requires minimal clinical gestalt to derive, self-reported EDACS (S-EDACS) at triage is likely to correlate well with traditional physician-reported EDACS (P-EDACS) and have potential application as a triage tool. METHODS: This single-center pilot prospective cohort study analyzed 60 patients who completed a self-reported questionnaire upon triage to determine their S-EDACS. This was matched against P-EDACS, derived from an identical questionnaire completed by the blinded treating physician. Secondary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 30 days (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization) was assessed by 2 blinded emergency physicians who independently reviewed the electronic medical records. S/P-EDACS also were benchmarked against nursing gestalt (based on triage to low/high-acuity areas) and emergency physician gestalt (disposition and admitting/discharge diagnoses). RESULTS: There was perfect agreement between S/P-EDACS in this study (K = 1.00). Fifteen patients (25.0%) had minor discordances in their absolute S/P-EDACS that did not affect risk stratification. Of these, 11/15 (73.3%) had higher S-EDACS, suggesting S-EDACS is more likely to safely overcall MACE risk. S-EDACS outperformed nursing gestalt, triaging a greater proportion of patients (71.7% vs 35.0%) as low risk without compromising patient safety, and demonstrated similar accuracy as emergency physician gestalt. CONCLUSION: S-EDACS strongly correlates with P-EDACS with perfect agreement and has potential to be used as a triage tool.

Mobile technology: Usage and perspective of patients and caregivers presenting to a tertiary care emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Developments in information technology (IT) have driven a push in healthcare innovation in the emergency department (ED). Many of these applications rely on mobile technology (MT) such as smartphones but not everyone is comfortable with MT usage. Our study aims to characterize the technology usage behavior of users in the ED so as to guide the implementation of IT interventions in the ED. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital. Patients and their caregivers aged 21 and above were recruited. The survey collected demographic information, technology usage patterns, and participant reported comfort level in the usage of MT. We performed descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors differentially associated with comfort in usage of MT. RESULTS: A total of 498 participants were recruited, and 299 (60%) were patients. English was the most commonly written and read language (66.9%) and 64.2% reported a comfort level of 3/5 or more in using MT. Factors that were associated with being comfortable in using MT include having a tertiary education, being able to read and write English, as well as being a frequent user of IT. Caregivers were more likely to display these characteristics. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of ED patients are not comfortable in the usage of MT. Factors that predicted comfort level in the usage of MT were common amongst caregivers. Future interventions should take this into consideration in the design of MT interventions.

Comparative prospective study of the performance of chest pain scores and clinical assessment in an emergency department cohort in Singapore.

OBJECTIVE: Chest pain scores allow emergency department (ED) physicians to identify low-risk patients for whom discharge can be safely expedited. Although these have been extensively validated in Western cohorts, data in patients of Asian heritage are lacking. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of HEART, ED Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS), and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) in risk-stratifying which chest pain patients are at risk of major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days (composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization). METHODS: This single-center prospective cohort-study that enrolled 1200 patients was conducted by a large urban tertiary center in Singapore. Chest pain scores were reported before disposition by research assistants blinded to the physician's clinical assessment. Outcomes were assessed independently by a blinded cardiologist and emergency physician, while another cardiologist adjudicated in the case of discrepancies. RESULTS: Of the 1195 patients analyzed, 135 (11.3%) suffered major adverse cardiovascular events within 30 days. HEART, which ruled out major adverse cardiovascular events in 52.8% of patients with 88.1% sensitivity, and EDACS, which ruled out major adverse cardiovascular events in 57.5% of patients with 83.7% sensitivity, proved comparable to clinical judgment that ruled out major adverse cardiovascular events in 73.0% of patients with 85.5% sensitivity. GRACE was weaker-ruling out major adverse cardiovascular events in 79.2% of patients with a dismal sensitivity of 45.0%. The correlation-statistic for HEART (79.4%) was superior to EDACS (69.9%) and GRACE (69.2%). CONCLUSIONS: HEART more accurately identified low-risk chest pain patients in an Asian ED, demonstrating comparable performance characteristics to clinical judgment. This has major implications on the use of chest pain scores to safely expedite disposition decisions for low-risk chest pain patients.