RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chlamydia genital infections continue to be a serious health concern globally. Previous studies have reported that Chlamydia trachomatis infection alters the vaginal microbiota of infected women. This study investigated differences in the vaginal microbiome of South African pregnant women living with HIV with and without C. trachomatis infection. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study among 385 pregnant women, recruited from the King Edward VIII Hospital in Durban, South Africa. C. trachomatis was detected using the Applied Biosystems™ TaqMan® Assays. A total of 40 samples, 20 C. trachomatis positive and 20 C. trachomatis negative, were selected for sequencing. The sequencing of the vaginal microbiome was performed using the PacBio platform. Statistical analysis was performed on IBM SPSS version 26. RESULTS: The prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was 12.2% (47/385). The genus Gardnerella (32.14% vs. 24.02%) and species in the genus Gardnerella (31.97% vs. 24.03%) were more abundant in the C. trachomatis-infected group compared to the uninfected group. Lactobacillus iners were also more abundant in the C. trachomatis-infected women (28.30%) compared to the uninfected women. However, these observed patterns did not reach statistical significance. Discriminant analysis showed that the class Alpha-Proteobacteria; order Bacillales; family Enterococcaceae; the genera Enhydrobacter, Enterococcus, and Parabacteroides; Enterococcus spp.; and Pseudomonas stutzeri significantly contributed to a model separating C. trachomatis-infected women from the uninfected group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The organisms and taxa that significantly contributed to separating the vaginal microbiota of C. trachomatis-infected women from the uninfected women in this study cohort have not been previously observed in association with C. trachomatis infection or the vaginal microbiota. Future studies in larger cohorts that will investigate the role of these microorganisms in C. trachomatis infection and the vaginal microbiota are required.
Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Chlamydia trachomatis , Infecções por HIV , Microbiota , Vagina , Humanos , Feminino , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Vagina/microbiologia , Adulto , Gravidez , Infecções por Chlamydia/epidemiologia , Infecções por Chlamydia/microbiologia , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV/microbiologia , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolamento & purificação , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Gardnerella , Lactobacillus/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma parvum have been recently linked to sexually transmitted diseases and other conditions. There are a limited number of studies conducted on South African pregnant women that have assessed the prevalence and risk factors for genital mycoplasmas. METHODOLOGY: This study included 264 HIV infected pregnant women attending the King Edward VIII antenatal clinic in eThekwini, South Africa. DNA was extracted using the PureLink Microbiome kit and pathogens were detected using the TaqMan Real-time PCR assays. The statistical data analysis was conducted in a freely available Statistical Computing Environment, R software, version 3.6.3 using the RStudio platform. RESULTS: The prevalence of M. hominis and U. parvum, was 215/264 (81.4%), and 203/264 (76.9%), respectively. In the M. hominis positive group, a significantly (p = 0.004) higher proportion, 80.5% tested positive for U. parvum infection when compared to 61.2% among the M. hominis negative. Of the U. parvum positive women, a significantly (p = 0.004) higher proportion of women (85.2%) tested positive for M. hominis when compared to 68.9% among the U. parvum negative. In the unadjusted and adjusted analysis, being M. hominis positive increased the risk for U. parvum by approximately 3 times more (p = 0.014) and 4-fold (p = 0.008), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a significant link between M. hominis and U. parvum infection. To date, there are a limited number of studies that have investigated M. hominisbeing a risk factor for U. parvum infection. Therefore, the data presented in the current study now fills in this gap in the literature.