Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Perinat Med ; 45(2): 193-198, 2017 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27416616

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis with respect to their total fetal loss rates. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated procedures of invasive prenatal testing performed during a 14-year period (2001-2014) including 936 amniocentesis procedures and 1051 chorionic villus samplings, of which 405 cases were executed transabdominally and 646 transcervically. Only singleton pregnancies before 24 weeks and 0 days of gestation where the pregnancy outcome was known were included. Fetal loss was defined as an abortion occurring either before 24 weeks and 0 days of gestation or <2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: The total fetal loss rates were determined to be 1.73% for transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, 2.01% for transcervical chorionic villus sampling and 1.18% for amniocentesis. No statistically noticeable differences between the total fetal loss rates of all three procedures were found (P=0.399). CONCLUSION: Our study has shown that chorionic villus sampling (either transabdominal or transcervical) and amniocentesis are equal methods for invasive prenatal testing with respect to their abortion risk.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo/etiologia , Amniocentese/efeitos adversos , Amostra da Vilosidade Coriônica/efeitos adversos , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Adulto , Amniocentese/métodos , Amniocentese/estatística & dados numéricos , Amostra da Vilosidade Coriônica/métodos , Amostra da Vilosidade Coriônica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA