Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(4): 1919-1928, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31367917

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Physical activity has been shown to decline over the course of chemotherapy in breast cancer survivors; yet it may reduce treatment-related side effects and emerging evidence indicates it may improve disease outcomes. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may be an effective, scalable strategy to increase physical activity during treatment. However, little is known about breast cancer patients' interests and preferences for these interventions. It is important to understand patients' interests and preferences prior to development of mHealth physical activity interventions to increase their relevance and efficacy. METHODS: Breast cancer survivors (n = 30) participated in a semi-structured phone interview and were asked about barriers and facilitators to physical activity during chemotherapy as well as their preferences on a range of potential mHealth intervention features. Transcribed interviews were coded and key themes were analyzed using an iterative, inductive approach. RESULTS: Five key themes were extracted from the interviews: (1) need for education about physical activity during chemotherapy; (2) treatment side effects inhibit physical activity; (3) a structured, home-based, tech-supported program with in-person elements is most feasible; (4) need for a personalized, highly tailored intervention; and (5) importance of social support from other breast cancer survivors, friends, and family. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors are interested in mHealth physical activity interventions during chemotherapy, but preferences for intervention content and delivery varied. Future work should engage patients and survivors in intervention development and testing.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Exercício Físico , Telemedicina/métodos , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Estudos Transversais , Coleta de Dados , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Apoio Social
2.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 21(7): 1652-1660, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30869183

RESUMO

AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) twice daily, both ± metformin, in Chinese adults (N = 543) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on premixed/self-mixed or basal insulin ± metformin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 26-week, phase III, open-label, treat-to-target, 2:1 randomized trial. Hierarchical testing was used with non-inferiority of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline to week 26 as the primary endpoint and superiority for the confirmatory secondary endpoints which were as follows: change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG); nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes (12:01-5:59 am, inclusive); total confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes (severe or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L with/without symptoms); body weight; and percentage of responders (HbA1c <53 mmol/mol [<7.0%]) without confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes. RESULTS: Non-inferiority for change from baseline to week 26 in HbA1c and superiority of IDegAsp twice daily versus BIAsp 30 twice daily for change in FPG, nocturnal confirmed and total confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes, was demonstrated. Estimated rates of nocturnal confirmed and total confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were 47% and 43% lower, respectively, with IDegAsp twice daily versus BIAsp 30 twice daily. Superiority for change in body weight was not confirmed. Participants were more likely to reach the HbA1c goal of <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%) without confirmed hypoglycaemia with IDegAsp twice daily versus BIAsp 30 twice daily by trial end. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of IDegAsp in Chinese patients with T2D was demonstrated, confirming results from international trials.


Assuntos
Insulinas Bifásicas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes , Insulina Aspart , Insulina Isófana , Insulina de Ação Prolongada , Idoso , Insulinas Bifásicas/efeitos adversos , Insulinas Bifásicas/uso terapêutico , Glicemia/análise , Peso Corporal , China , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemia/epidemiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina Aspart/efeitos adversos , Insulina Aspart/uso terapêutico , Insulina Isófana/efeitos adversos , Insulina Isófana/uso terapêutico , Insulina de Ação Prolongada/efeitos adversos , Insulina de Ação Prolongada/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 168(4): 367-72, 2006 Jan 23.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16436237

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to report the prevalence and nature of long-term diseases and their consequences in children under the age of 16 in Denmark, and to identify the socio-demographic determinants of disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parents and stepparents participating in the Danish Health and Morbidity Survey, 2000, were interviewed at home about long-term diseases, including impairments and sequelae after injury and disease, in children under the age of 16 living at home. Answers were given for 7,670 children, and diseases were coded according to ICD-10 by two doctors. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the determinants and consequences of disease. RESULTS: A total of 16.2% of children had one or more long-term diseases, boys (17.5%) more frequently than girls (14.8%). The prevalence increased through the first six years of life. A social gradient was seen: children of parents with low socioeconomic status or with little education had a higher prevalence. The most frequent disease was asthma (4.9%). Also frequent were congenital disorders (1.6%), otitis media (1.4%) and hearing impairment (0.6%). Children with long-term disease suffered more frequently than others from poor health in general, recent sick leave and poor thriving. DISCUSSION: The figures for long-term disease reported by the parents participating in the study were in accordance with what was found in earlier studies, but stigmatising and less severe diseases, as well as periodically recurring diseases, were probably underreported. Attention should be paid to the high prevalence of asthma, to the poorer thriving and to the general health status of children with long-term disease, and to the social inequality in children's health.


Assuntos
Desenvolvimento Infantil , Proteção da Criança , Morbidade , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pais , Prevalência , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores Socioeconômicos
5.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 168(4): 373-8, 2006 Jan 23.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16436238

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to describe the prevalence, types and seasonal variation of recent illnesses in Danish children in 1994 and 2000, and to identify their determinants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants in the Danish Health and Morbidity Survey, 1994 and 2000, were interviewed about the illnesses during the previous 14 days of the children under age 16 living at home. Answers were given for 2,136 children in 1994 and 7,670 in 2000. The data were weighted to provide a nationally representative sample. The illnesses were grouped into ten categories. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify determinants. RESULTS: The prevalence rate for recent illness did not differ significantly between 1994 and 2000 (13.4-14.0%), but for fever and influenza it increased from 1994 to 2000 (from 1.9% to 3.0%), and in boys from 1 to 2 years of age the total illness rate increased significantly (from 26.7% to 31.9%). Attendance at day care increased the prevalence of recent illness in those 0-2 years old. In 2000, the age-specific prevalence rates were: 0 years: 21.2%, 1-2 years: 29.0%, 3-5 years: 15.7%, 6-8 years: 9.3%, 9-12 years: 9.3% and 13-15 years: 11.5%. The prevalence rates were highest in the January-March quarter: 18.9%. The specific illness rates were: cold/sore throat: 4.5%; fever/influenza: 3.0%; gastrointestinal infection: 1.9%; middle ear infection: 1.3%, lower respiratory infection/asthma: 1.1%; skin disease: 0.6%; conjunctivitis: 0.4%; headache: 0.4%; injury: 0.3%; other: 0.9%. DISCUSSION: The rising trend is due in particular to an influenza epidemic in 2000. The high prevalence of infections in 1-to-2-year-olds underscores the need to decrease the spread of infections in day care and to avoid the most vulnerable infants' being cared for along with many other children.


Assuntos
Proteção da Criança , Morbidade , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pais , Prevalência , Estações do Ano , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA