Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mod Pathol ; 35(12): 1829-1836, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36075957

RESUMO

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine (NE) carcinoma arising from integration of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) DNA into a host cell or from ultraviolet light-induced genetic damage (proportions vary geographically). Tumors in the latter group include those with "pure" NE phenotype and those "combined" with other elements, most often squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We performed comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of MCPyV+ and MCPyV- (pure and combined) tumors, to better understand their mutational profiles and shed light on their pathogenesis. Supplemental immunohistochemistry for Rb expression was also undertaken. After eliminating low quality samples, 37 tumors were successfully analyzed (14 MCPyV+, 8 pure MCPyV- and 15 combined MCPyV-). The SCC and NE components were sequenced separately in 5 combined tumors. Tumor mutational burden was lower in MCPyV+ tumors (mean 1.66 vs. 29.9/Mb, P < 0.0001). MCPyV- tumors featured frequent mutations in TP53 (95.6%), RB1 (87%), and NOTCH family genes (95.6%). No recurrently mutated genes were identified in MCPyV+ tumors. Mutational overlap in the NE and SCC components of combined tumors was substantial ('similarity index' >24% in 4/5 cases). Loss of Rb expression correlated with RB1 mutational (P < 0.0001) and MCPyV- status (P < 0.0001) in MCCs and it was observed more frequently in the SCC component of combined MCC than in a control group of conventional cutaneous SCC (P = 0.0002). Our results (i) support existing evidence that MCPyV+ and MCPyV- MCCs are pathogenetically distinct entities (ii) concur with earlier studies linking the NE and SCC components of combined MCCs via shared genetic profiles and (iii) lend credence to the proposal that an Rb-deficient subset of SCC's is the source of phenotypically divergent combined MCCs.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Poliomavírus das Células de Merkel , Infecções por Polyomavirus , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus , Humanos , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Poliomavírus das Células de Merkel/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Imuno-Histoquímica , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligases/genética , Proteínas de Ligação a Retinoblastoma/genética
2.
Phytomedicine ; 23(12): 1494-1503, 2016 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27765370

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many plant-derived chemicals have been studied for their potential benefits in ailments including inflammation, cancer, neurodegeneration, and cardiovascular disease. The health benefits of phytochemicals are often attributed to the targeting of reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, it is not always clear whether these agents act directly as antioxidants to remove ROS, or whether they act indirectly by blocking ROS production by enzymes such as NADPH oxidase (NOX) enzymes, or by influencing the expression of cellular pro- and anti- oxidants. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: Here we evaluate the pro- and anti-oxidant and NOX-inhibiting qualities of four phytochemicals: celastrol, resveratrol, apigenin, and piperine. STUDY DESIGN: This work was done using the H661 cell line expressing little or no NOX, modified H661 cells expressing NOX1 and its subunits, and an EBV-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell line expressing endogenous NOX2. ROS were measured using Amplex Red and nitroblue tetrazolium assays. In addition, direct ROS scavenging of hydrogen peroxide or superoxide generated were measured using Amplex Red and methyl cypridina luciferin analog (MCLA). RESULTS: Of the four plant-derived compounds evaluated, only celastrol displayed NOX inhibitory activities, while celastrol and resveratrol both displayed ROS scavenging activity. Very little impact on ROS was observed with apigenin, or piperine. CONCLUSION: The results of this study reveal the differences that exist between cell-free and intracellular pro-oxidant and antioxidant activities of several plant-derived compounds.


Assuntos
Alcaloides/farmacologia , Antioxidantes/farmacologia , Apigenina/farmacologia , Benzodioxóis/farmacologia , NADPH Oxidases/antagonistas & inibidores , Piperidinas/farmacologia , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Alcamidas Poli-Insaturadas/farmacologia , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo , Estilbenos/farmacologia , Linhagem Celular , Humanos , Peróxido de Hidrogênio , NADP/antagonistas & inibidores , Oxirredução , Triterpenos Pentacíclicos , Resveratrol , Triterpenos/metabolismo , Triterpenos/farmacologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA