Perceptions of and Experiences with the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increased feelings of emotional distress and disruptions in care across diverse patients subgroups, including those with chronic medical conditions such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We sought to understand the impact of the pandemic on the physical and emotional well-being of individuals with IBD and concurrent depression and/or anxiety symptoms. We conducted qualitative interviews after the beginning of the pandemic with 46 adults with IBD. Participants reported increased levels of emotional distress, feelings of social isolation, and uncertainty over whether IBD medications put them at increased risk. Young adults discussed feeling as if their lives had been disrupted. In addition, several individuals demonstrated resiliency and emphasized positives about the pandemic, including increased connectivity with family and friends, the convenience of being able to work from home despite their IBD symptoms, and lessened feelings of "missing out." Our findings highlight several opportunities to improve the health and well-being of individuals with IBD and beyond including increased support for combatting social isolation, enhanced counseling about medication risks and benefits, and the incorporation of resiliency skills building.

Staff Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Behavioral Health Homes at Community Mental Health Provider Settings.

Individuals living with a serious mental illness are disproportionately affected by preventable and/or manageable chronic conditions. Integrated care and support for behavioral and physical health within community mental health provider (CMHP) settings, also known as behavioral health homes (BHH), can lead to improvements in care and cost outcomes. This study explored staff perceptions of barriers and facilitators to BHH implementation. We conducted semi-structured interviews with CMHP staff at baseline, 1, and 2 years after the start of implementation. We analyzed interviews to identify major themes. We conducted 65 total interviews with 30 unique staff members. Common barriers included staff turnover, hesitation to change care processes, and acute service user needs. Facilitators included agency-wide culture change, intervention champions, and integration of intervention processes into daily workflows. Despite common barriers, CMHP staff identified several elements related to successful BHH implementation, including the CMHP-wide cultural shift to comprehensively address health/wellness that benefitted service users and staff alike.

Implementing a Learning Collaborative for Population-Based Physical and Behavioral Health Integration.

Behavioral health home models are increasingly being utilized to provide physical-behavioral health integration for individuals with mental illness. The Behavioral Health Home Plus model (BHHP) is a phased approach designed to instill a culture of wellness, provide wellness coaching, and offer care coordination for individuals with serious mental illness. The present study utilized a 12-month Learning Collaborative to implement scaling of BHHP in two cohorts totaling 24 community mental health provider organizations in Pennsylvania to include population-wide screening and intervention for tobacco use and hypertension. Providers reported increases in screening rates and wellness goals related to tobacco use and hypertension, as well as reductions in tobacco use and blood pressure readings among participating individuals. Evidence presented indicates that a Learning Collaborative of community mental health providers is a feasible quality improvement approach to scale integration of physical and behavioral health care for individuals with serious mental illness.

Challenges encountered in the conduct of Optimal Health: A patient-centered comparative effectiveness study of interventions for adults with serious mental illness.

BACKGROUND: The aim of patient-centered comparative effectiveness research is to conduct stakeholder-driven investigations that identify which interventions are most effective for which patients under specific circumstances. Conducting this research in real-world settings comes with unique experiences and challenges. We provide the study design, challenges confronted, and the solutions we devised for Optimal Health, a stakeholder-informed patient-centered comparative effectiveness study focused on the needs of seriously mentally ill individuals receiving case management services in community mental health centers across Pennsylvania. METHODS: Optimal Health, supported by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, is a cluster-randomized trial of two evidence-based interventions for improving health and wellness across 11 provider sites. Participants were followed for 18-24 months, with repeated measurements of self-reported health status and activation in care and administrative measurements of primary and specialty health service utilization. Health-related quality of life, engagement in care, and service utilization are to be compared via random effects mixed models. Stakeholders were, and continue to be, engaged via focus groups, interviews, and stakeholder advisory board meetings. A learning collaborative model was used to support shared learning and implementation fidelity across provider sites. RESULTS: From 1 November 2013 through 15 July 2014, we recruited 1229 adults with serious mental illness, representing 85.1% of those eligible for study participation. Of these, 713 are in the Provider-Supported arm of the study and 516 in Patient Self-Directed Care. Across five data collection time points, we retained 86% and 83% of the participants in the Provider-Supported and Self-Directed arms, respectively. LESSONS LEARNED: Lessons learned relate to estimation of the size of our study population, the value of multiple data sources, and intervention training and implementation. The use of historical claims data can lead to an overestimation of eligible participants and, subsequently, a reduced study sample and an imbalance between intervention arms. Disruptions in continuity of care in real-world settings can pose challenges to on-site self-report data collection, although the inclusion of multiple data sources in study design can improve data completeness. Geographic dispersion of rural provider sites and staff turnover can lead to training and intervention fidelity challenges that can be overcome with the use of a "train-the-trainer" model, "wellness champions," and the use of a Learning Collaborative approach. Stakeholder engagement in mitigating these challenges proved to be critical to study progress. CONCLUSION: Conducting real-world patient-centered comparative effectiveness research in healthcare systems that care for seriously mentally ill persons is an important yet challenging undertaking, one which requires flexibility in identifying potential adaptations within all major study phases. Advice from a wide range of stakeholders is critical in development of successful strategies.

Using Health Information Technology to Foster Engagement: Patients' Experiences with an Active Patient Health Record.

Personal health records (PHRs) typically employ "passive" communication strategies, such as non-personalized medical text, rather than direct patient engagement in care. Currently there is a call for more active PHRs that directly engage patients in an effort to improve their health by offering elements such as personalized medical information, health coaches, and secure messaging with primary care providers. As part of a randomized clinical trial comparing "passive" with "active" PHRs, we explore patients' experiences with using an "active" PHR known as HealthTrak. The "passive" elements of this PHR included problem lists, medication lists, information about patient allergies and immunizations, medical and surgical histories, lab test results, health reminders, and secure messaging. The active arm included all of these elements and added personalized alerts delivered through the secure messaging platform to patients for services coming due based on various demographic features (including age and sex) and chronic medical conditions. Our participants were part of the larger clinical trial and were eligible if they had been randomized to the active PHR arm, one that included regular personalized alerts. We conducted focus group discussions on the benefits of this active PHR for patients who are at risk for cardiovascular disease. Forty-one patients agreed to participate and were organized into five separate focus group sessions. Three main themes emerged from the qualitatively analyzed focus groups: participants reported that the active PHR promoted better communication with providers; enabled them to more effectively partner with their providers; and helped them become more proactive about tracking their health information. In conclusion, patients reported improved communication, partnership with their providers, and a sense of self-management, thus adding insights for PHR designers hoping to address low adoption rates and other patient barriers to the development and use of the technology.

Tailoring a Digital Mental Health Program for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Depression and other mental health disorders are prevalent among people living with chronic health conditions. Although digital cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is considered an effective treatment, African American individuals are less likely to engage in and adhere to digital therapies for mental health disorders compared with White individuals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to understand digital CBT mental health treatment perceptions and preferences of African American individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). METHODS: African American individuals with SCD from various US locations were invited to participate in a series of focus groups. Participants were introduced to a health coach-supported mental health app and then asked a series of questions about the usability and appeal of the program as well as, more generally, what would make a digital mental health program effective for them. The authors reviewed the focus group transcripts and conducted a qualitative analysis of the results. RESULTS: A total of 25 people participated in 5 focus groups. Overall, 5 primary themes emerged regarding how app content and related coaching could be modified to enhance digital CBT engagement. These themes included connection with others living with SCD, the personalization of app content and coaching, characteristics of coaches, journaling and pain tracking, and considerations for optimal engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing the user experience by making digital CBT tools relevant to patient populations is critical for optimizing program engagement and its uptake. Our findings highlight potential strategies to modify and design digital CBT tools for users with SCD and may also be applicable to patients with other chronic conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04587661; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04587661.

Bias-corrected and doubly robust inference for the three-level longitudinal cluster-randomized trials with missing continuous outcomes and small number of clusters: Simulation study and application to a study for adults with serious mental illnesses.

Longitudinal cluster-randomized designs have been popular tools for comparative effective research in clinical trials. The methodologies for the three-level hierarchical design with longitudinal outcomes need to be better understood under more pragmatic settings; that is, with a small number of clusters, heterogeneous cluster sizes, and missing outcomes. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) have been frequently used when the distribution of data and the correlation model are unknown. Standard GEEs lead to bias and an inflated type I error rate due to the small number of available clinics and non-completely random missing data in longitudinal outcomes. We evaluate the performance of inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimating equations, with and without augmentation, for two types of missing data in continuous outcomes and individual-level treatment allocation mechanisms combined with two bias-corrected variance estimators. Our intensive simulation results suggest that the proposed augmented IPW method with bias-corrected variance estimation successfully prevents the inflation of false positive findings and improves efficiency when the number of clinics is small, with moderate to severe missing outcomes. Our findings are expected to aid researchers in choosing appropriate analysis methods for three-level longitudinal cluster-randomized designs. The proposed approaches were applied to analyze data from a longitudinal cluster-randomized clinical trial involving adults with serious mental illnesses.

The Effect of an Adapted Digital Mental Health Intervention for Sickle Cell Disease on Engagement: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Despite promising outcomes, lack of engagement and poor adherence are barriers to treating mental health using digital CBT, particularly in minority groups. After conducting guided focus groups, a current mental health app was adapted to be more inclusive for minorities living with SCD. METHODS: Patients between the ages of 16-35 with SCD who reported experiencing anxiety or depression symptoms were eligible for this study. Once enrolled, participants were randomly assigned to receive one of two versions of a mental health app 1) the current version designed for the general population and 2) the adapted version. Baseline measures for depression, anxiety, pain and self-efficacy were completed at the start of the study and again at postintervention (minimum 4 weeks). RESULTS: Compared to baseline, pain (p = 0.03), self-efficacy (p = 0.007) and depression symptoms (p = 0.016) improved for the group that received the adapted app. Regardless of group assignment, a positive relationship (r = 0.47) was shown between app engagement and a change in depression symptoms (p = 0.042). DISCUSSION: Target enrollment for this study sought to enroll 40 participants. However, after difficulties locating qualified participants, enrollment criteria were adjusted to expand the population pool. Regardless of these efforts, the sample size for this study was still smaller than anticipated (n = 21). Additionally, irrespective of group approximately 40% of participants did not engage with the app. However, despite a small sample size and poor engagement, participants in the intervention group displayed better outcomes and showed trends for greater app interaction. CONCLUSION: These promising results should encourage future researchers to continue exploring ideal adaptations for implementing digital CBT in minority populations. Future studies should also consider implementing post-intervention surveys to help identify common factors relating to a lack of engagement.

Body image perceptions in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe perceptions of prolapse-specific body image in women with symptomatic prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage ≥ II prolapse participated in semistructured focus groups or self-report questionnaire. Transcripts were independently reviewed and body image themes were identified and confirmed by consensus. RESULTS: Twenty-five women participated in focus groups and 27 in online questionnaires. Transcript analysis revealed 3 central themes and 25 body-image related subthemes. Women living with prolapse were more likely to feel self-conscious, isolated, "different," less feminine, and less attractive. Women often changed sexual intimacy practices because of embarrassment or discomfort, and many avoided intimacy all together. Prolapse greatly affected women's personal and professional activities causing some women to adjust routines or stop activities. Women reported loss of interest in activities, distraction while performing daily/work-related tasks, and embarrassment when asking for help with activities. CONCLUSION: Themes identified in this qualitative study demonstrate the profound effect of prolapse on a woman's body image.

Health Care Provider Perspectives on the Use of a Digital Behavioral Health App to Support Patients: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing evidence indicating the efficacy of digital cognitive behavioral interventions (dCBIs) for behavioral health (BH) treatment, broad and consistent use of such interventions has been limited by knowledge obtained in real-world settings, including factors that impact provider uptake/referral. Engaging providers early in the implementation process offers an opportunity to explore their needs and behaviors, integrate interventions into workflows, and better understand provider setting capabilities. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed providers' views on the feasibility and acceptability of delivering a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based mobile app in multiple care settings. METHODS: Participating providers included BH and physical health (PH) providers from a women's health center, an outpatient BH clinic, and both rural/urban primary care settings. All participating providers cocreated workflows through facilitated workshops, including establishing feedback loops between the project team and providers and identifying clinical champions at each site. Over a 12-week period, the providers referred adult patients experiencing anxiety or depression to a mobile app-based dCBI, RxWell, and provided other indicated treatments as part of usual care. Referrals were completed by the providers through the electronic medical record. To better understand facilitators of and challenges in integrating RxWell into routine practice and perceptions of sustainability, a series of qualitative interviews was conducted. Interview data were analyzed to identify major themes using an inductive content analysis approach. RESULTS: A total of 19 provider interviews were conducted to discover motivators and barriers for referring RxWell. The providers benefited from a focused discussion on how to incorporate the referral process into their workflow, and knowing the app content was rooted in evidence. Although the providers believed engaging in experiential learning was important, they indicated that more education on the digital health coach role and how to monitor patient progress is needed. The providers thought patient engagement may be impacted by motivation, a lack of comfort using a smartphone, or preference for in-person therapy. The providers also expressed enthusiasm in continuing to refer the app. They liked the ability to provide patients with support between sessions, to have an extra treatment option that teaches BH exercises, and to have a CBT treatment option that overcomes barriers (eg, wait times, copays, travel) to traditional therapy modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Digital intervention success in health care settings relies heavily on engagement of key stakeholders, such as providers, in both design and implementation of the intervention and focused evaluation within intended care setting(s). Scaling digital interventions to meet the mental health needs of patients in usual care settings leans on thoughtfully constructed and streamlined workflows to enable seamless referral of patients by providers. Our findings strongly suggest that providers are supportive of digital tool integration to support the mental health of patients and endorse its use within their routine workflow.

Stakeholder impact on the implementation of integrated care: Opportunities to consider for patient-centered outcomes research.

Nearly half of Americans live with chronic disease. Many have multiple chronic conditions that often present as a combination of physical and mental health conditions. Aligning stakeholder-driven, patient-centered outcomes research with population health strategies such as innovative ways to deliver care management can reduce the burden of multiple chronic conditions. In addition, successfully creating meaningful, inclusive research requires actively engaging stakeholders throughout the lifecycle of a study. This study integrates stakeholder engagement, using a large health plan in western Pennsylvania, to conduct a randomized controlled trial. Three care management strategies, High-Touch, High-Tech, and Usual Care, are compared for effectiveness among members with multiple chronic conditions. Care strategies are delivered via the Community Team, a multidisciplinary community-based team, offering in-person (High-Touch) and digital (High-Tech) care management in 14 counties across Pennsylvania. Participants are followed for 12months, with repeated measurements of self-reported health status and activation in care, while tracking administrative measurements of primary and specialty health service utilization. Quality of life, care satisfaction, engagement in care, and service utilization will be compared using generalized mixed models. Additionally, semi-structured interviews are conducted for both participants and care managers over the course of the study to evaluate feasibility. This manuscript presents implementation strategies, while noting that the implementation of patient-centered outcomes research in a real-world setting requires rapid evaluation, redesign of workflow, and tailored approaches for success.

Promoting collaborative psychiatric care decision-making in community mental health centers: Insights from a patient-centered comparative effectiveness trial.

OBJECTIVE: Mental health service-users face important medication decisions; yet not all are active participants in the decision-making process. Little is known about which technology-supported interventions might effectively promote collaborative decision-making in psychiatric care. We compared the effectiveness of two technology-supported collaborative care decision-making approaches. METHOD: We used a cluster-randomized design with a mixed-methods approach. Participants were Medicaid-enrolled adults receiving psychiatric care in participating community mental health centers. Measurement-based care used computerized systematic symptom and medication screenings to inform provider decision-making. Person-centered care supported participants in completing computerized Health Reports and preparing to work with providers on collaborative decision-making about psychiatric care. Primary study outcomes included the patient experience of medication management and shared decision-making during psychiatric care. Analyses examined the impact of both approaches and explored moderating variables. We used qualitative methods to understand participation and implementation experiences. RESULTS: Across 14 sites 2,363 participants enrolled (1,162 in measurement-based care, 1,201 in person-centered care). We observed statistically significant improvements in patient experience of medication management scores for both study arms; however, the clinical significance of this change was minor. We found no significant changes for shared decision-making. Qualitative interviews revealed a range of factors associated usefulness of intervention assessment, provider-service-user communication, and site-level logistics. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We observed modest positive findings related to our patient-centered outcomes. We identified important implementation facilitators and barriers that can inform the implementation of future comparative effectiveness patient-centered research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Impact of Behavioral Health Homes on Cost and Utilization Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the impact of two behavioral health home (BHH) approaches, provider-supported care and self-directed care, on health care utilization and cost outcomes among adult Medicaid recipients with serious mental illness. METHODS: Eleven community mental health provider sites were randomly assigned to one of the BHH approaches, which each site implemented over a 2-year period. In both approaches, staff were trained in wellness coaching to support patients' progress toward general health and wellness goals. Provider-supported sites employed a full-time on-site registered nurse, who provided consultation to patients and wellness coaches. Each approach had a consistently enrolled treatment group (combined N=859) with a matched comparison cohort that was identified for analysis. Approaches were compared with each other and with baseline, and differences between each approach and its comparison cohort were examined by using analysis of covariance to determine impact on total health care cost, prescription costs, and use and cost of general medical and behavioral health services. RESULTS: Relative to its comparison cohort, each approach achieved significant reductions in total cost (15% for provider-supported care and 26% for self-directed care) and increases in use of outpatient general medical services (43% for provider-supported care and 29% for self-directed care). Compared with self-directed care, provider-supported care resulted in approximately 28% lower use of general medical inpatient services and 26% lower related costs. CONCLUSIONS: BHH approaches in community mental health settings can produce health care savings and decrease use of inpatient health care.

"Everything I know I learned from my mother...Or not": perspectives of African-American and white women on decisions about tubal sterilization.

BACKGROUND: African-American women have had higher rates of female sterilization compared to white women since its emergence as a contraceptive method. The reasons underlying this observed racial difference are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to (1) explore what factors shape black and white women's decisions about tubal sterilization as a contraceptive method and (2) generate hypotheses about the relationship of race to the decision-making process. DESIGN: We conducted six focus groups stratified by tubal sterilization status and race. During each of the audio-recorded sessions, participants were asked to discuss reasons that women choose sterilization as a contraceptive method. PARTICIPANTS: The participants of the study were 24 African-American women and 14 white women. APPROACH: Transcripts of the sessions were qualitatively analyzed with particular attention to factors that might be unique to each of the two racial groups. RESULTS: Personal factors shaped black and white women's decisions regarding tubal sterilization. Preference for a convenient, highly effective contraceptive method was the main reason to get a tubal sterilization for women of both racial groups. We also identified socio-cultural differences that might explain why black women are more likely than white women to choose tubal sterilization over other contraceptive methods. An unanticipated, but clinically important, finding was that women often reported feeling that their doctors and the health-care system served as barriers to obtaining the desired procedure. CONCLUSION: Socio-cultural differences may help explain why black and white women choose different contraceptive methods.

Perspectives of primary care clinicians on teratogenic risk counseling.

BACKGROUND: Women of childbearing age are commonly prescribed medications by primary care providers (PCPs) that may cause birth defects if used during pregnancy. METHODS: To identify what PCPs perceive as barriers to and potential facilitators of providing counseling to women of childbearing age when teratogenic medications are prescribed, we conducted eight focus groups with 48 PCPs recruited from four clinical settings in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. We explored PCPs' experiences counseling women about teratogenic medications. Each focus group was audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using a grounded theory approach by three independent coders. RESULTS: PCPs feel responsible for counseling women when they prescribe medications that may cause birth defects, but note difficulties identifying clinically relevant sources of information on teratogenicity. Other barriers to providing counseling include limited visit times and lack of reimbursement for preconception or teratogenic risk counseling. PCPs find it challenging to identify patients who may become pregnant and who therefore need contraceptive and/or teratogenic risk counseling. PCPs expressed a desire for online resources that could be used when explaining medication risks to patients. PCPs feel that the development of patient information materials, electronic decision support tools, clinical care systems that routinely assess patients' pregnancy risk, and changes in the reimbursement structure may facilitate counseling patients about teratogenic risks. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs perceive themselves as playing an important role in providing their patients information on risk of medication-induced birth defects. To ensure safe prescription of teratogenic medications, PCPs suggest interventions at both the clinic and healthcare system levels.

A Payer-Guided Approach To Widespread Diffusion Of Behavioral Health Homes In Real-World Settings.

People with serious mental illness experience decreased life expectancy related to co-occurring medical conditions. A nonprofit behavioral health managed care organization implemented an innovative behavioral health home, in partnership with community mental health providers, to build a culture of wellness among all staff members, with a focus on prevention and holistic (that is, behavioral, social, and physical) health. The behavioral health home added one of two distinct care approaches, one patient driven and the other provider driven. The innovative approaches were implemented at eleven community mental health providers: Six delivered patient-driven care, and five delivered provider-driven care. We studied outcomes in the period October 2013-January 2016. Multiple diffusion strategies were utilized to encourage uptake. Our results revealed that both approaches significantly increased patient activation in care (more quickly in provider-supported care), engagement in primary and specialty care, and perceived mental health status. The success of this behavioral health home in improving important outcomes and the use of novel diffusion strategies led to its dissemination to forty-three additional providers across Pennsylvania.

First-Person Perspectives on Prescriber-Service User Relationships in Community Mental Health Centers.

OBJECTIVE: Because of changes in health care, there is a greater focus on brief medication management visits as the primary method of providing psychiatric care in community mental health settings. Research on the first-person perspectives of service users and prescribers in these settings is limited. The objective of this study was to describe first-person perspectives on medication management visits and the service user-prescriber relationship. METHODS: Researchers conducted qualitative interviews as part of a larger comparative effectiveness trial at 15 community mental health centers, researchers interviewed service users (N=44) and prescribers (N=25) about their perspectives on the typical elements of a medication management visit and asked service users about their relationship with their prescriber. RESULTS: Both service users and prescribers described medication management visits as very brief encounters focused on medication and symptoms. Most service users reflected on the service user-prescriber relationship in positive or neutral terms; they did not describe the development of a strong therapeutic relationship or a meaningful clinical encounter with prescribing clinicians. CONCLUSIONS: Service users described the service user-prescriber relationship and medication management visit as largely transactional. Despite the transactional nature of these encounters, most service users described relationships with prescribing clinicians in positive or neutral terms. Their satisfaction with the visit did not necessarily mean that they were receiving high-quality care. Satisfaction may instead suggest service users' disengagement from care. They may need more support to fully participate in their own care.

Abortion Stigma Among Low-Income Women Obtaining Abortions in Western Pennsylvania: A Qualitative Assessment.

CONTEXT: Abortion stigma may cause psychological distress in women who are considering having an abortion or have had one. This phenomenon has been relatively underexplored in low-income women, who may already be at an increased risk for poor abortion-related outcomes because of difficulties accessing timely and safe abortion services. METHODS: A qualitative study conducted between 2010 and 2013 used semistructured interviews to explore pregnancy intentions among low-income women recruited from six reproductive health clinics in Western Pennsylvania. Transcripts from interviews with 19 participants who were planning to terminate a pregnancy or had had an abortion in the last two weeks were examined through content analysis to identify the range of attitudes they encountered that could contribute to or reflect abortion stigma, the sources of these attitudes and women's responses to them. RESULTS: Women commonly reported that partners, family members and they themselves held antiabortion attitudes. Such attitudes communicated that abortion is morally reprehensible, a rejection of motherhood, rare and thus potentially deviant, detrimental to future fertility and an irresponsible choice. Women reacted to external and internal negative attitudes by distinguishing themselves from other women who obtain abortions, experiencing negative emotions, and concealing or delaying their abortions. CONCLUSIONS: Women's reactions to antiabortion attitudes may perpetuate abortion stigma. Further research is needed to inform interventions to address abortion stigma and improve women's abortion experiences.

Connected Care: improving outcomes for adults with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of Connected Care-a care coordination effort of physical and behavioral health managed care partners in Pennsylvania-on acute service use among adult Medicaid beneficiaries with serious mental illness (SMI). STUDY DESIGN: We examined changes in service utilization using a difference-in-differences model, comparing study group with a comparison group, and conducted key informant interviews to better understand aspects of program implementation. METHODS: We compared the difference in service use rates between baseline year and 2-year intervention period for the Connected Care group (n = 8633) with the difference in rates for the comparison group (n = 10,514), confirming results using a regression adjustment. RESULTS: Mental health hospitalizations (per 1000 members per month) decreased for the Connected Care group from 41.1 to 39.6, while increasing for the comparison group from 33.8 to 37.2 (P = .04). All-cause readmissions within 30 days decreased nearly 10% for Connected Care while increasing slightly for the comparison group (P < .01), with a similar pattern observed for 60- and 90-day all-cause readmissions. No differences were observed in physical health hospitalizations, drug and alcohol admissions, or ED use. Data from qualitative stakeholder interviews illuminated facilitators and barriers of implementing Connected Care. CONCLUSIONS: Payer-level healthcare information sharing can help identify members who could benefit from care coordination services, inform care management activities, and assist with pharmacy management. Results can inform state, health plan, and provider efforts around integration of care for individuals with SMI and improve care efficiencies and quality, which is especially important in this time of Medicaid expansion.