Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: HIV testing services (HTS) are the first steps in reaching the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals to achieve and maintain low HIV incidence. Evaluating the effectiveness of different demand creation interventions to increase uptake of efficient and effective HTS is useful to prioritize limited programmatic resources. This review was undertaken to inform World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 HIV testing guidelines and assessed the research question, "Which demand creation strategies are effective for enhancing uptake of HTS?" focused on populations globally. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The following electronic databases were searched through September 28, 2021: PubMed, PsycInfo, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, and Global Health Database; we searched IAS and AIDS conferences. We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any demand creation intervention (incentives, mobilization, counseling, tailoring, and digital interventions) to either a control or other demand creation intervention and reported HTS uptake. We pooled trials to evaluate categories of demand creation interventions using random-effects models for meta-analysis and assessed study quality with Cochrane's risk of bias 1 tool. This study was funded by the WHO and registered in Prospero with ID CRD42022296947. We screened 10,583 records and 507 conference abstracts, reviewed 952 full texts, and included 124 RCTs for data extraction. The majority of studies were from the African (N = 53) and Americas (N = 54) regions. We found that mobilization (relative risk [RR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.30, 3.09], p < 0.05; risk difference [RD]: 0.29, 95% CI [0.16, 0.43], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), couple-oriented counseling (RR: 1.98, 95% CI [1.02, 3.86], p < 0.05; RD: 0.12, 95% CI [0.03, 0.21], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), peer-led interventions (RR: 1.57, 95% CI [1.15, 2.15], p < 0.05; RD: 0.18, 95% CI [0.06, 0.31], p < 0.05, N = 10 RCTs), motivation-oriented counseling (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.07, 2.20], p < 0.05; RD: 0.17, 95% CI [0.00, 0.34], p < 0.05, N = 4 RCTs), short message service (SMS) (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.09, 2.16], p < 0.05; RD: 0.11, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19], p < 0.05, N = 5 RCTs), and conditional fixed value incentives (RR: 1.52, 95% CI [1.21, 1.91], p < 0.05; RD: 0.15, 95% CI [0.07, 0.22], p < 0.05, N = 11 RCTs) all significantly and importantly (≥50% relative increase) increased HTS uptake and had medium risk of bias. Lottery-based incentives and audio-based interventions less importantly (25% to 49% increase) but not significantly increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Personal invitation letters and personalized message content significantly but not importantly (<25% increase) increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Reduced duration counseling had comparable performance to standard duration counseling (low risk of bias) and video-based interventions were comparable or better than in-person counseling (medium risk of bias). Heterogeneity of effect among pooled studies was high. This study was limited in that we restricted to randomized trials, which may be systematically less readily available for key populations; additionally, we compare only pooled estimates for interventions with multiple studies rather than single study estimates, and there was evidence of publication bias for several interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Mobilization, couple- and motivation-oriented counseling, peer-led interventions, conditional fixed value incentives, and SMS are high-impact demand creation interventions and should be prioritized for programmatic consideration. Reduced duration counseling and video-based interventions are an efficient and effective alternative to address staffing shortages. Investment in demand creation activities should prioritize those with undiagnosed HIV or ongoing HIV exposure. Selection of demand creation interventions must consider risks and benefits, context-specific factors, feasibility and sustainability, country ownership, and universal health coverage across disease areas.

"When they are all grown, I will tell them": Experience and perceptions of parental self-disclosure of HIV status to children in Nairobi, Kenya.

BACKGROUND: There is mixed evidence on the influence of self-disclosure of one's HIV status on mental health, health behaviours and clinical outcomes. We studied the patterns of self-disclosure among parents living with HIV, and factors that influence parental disclosure. METHODS: This mixed-methods study was among adults in HIV care participating in a study assessing the uptake of pediatric index-case testing. They completed a survey to provide demographic and HIV-related health information, and assess self-disclosure to partners, children and others. We ran generalized linear models to determine factors associated with disclosure and reported prevalence ratios (PR). Eighteen participants also participated in in-depth interviews to explore perceived barriers and facilitators of self-disclosure to one's child. A content analysis approach was used to analyze interview transcripts. RESULTS: Of 493 caregivers, 238 (48%) had a child ≥ 6 years old who could potentially be disclosed to about their parent's HIV status. Of 238 participants, 205 (86%) were female, median age was 35 years, and 132 (55%) were in a stable relationship. Among those in a stable relationship, 96 (73%) knew their partner's HIV status, with 79 (60%) reporting that their partner was living with HIV. Caregivers had known their HIV status for a median 2 years, and the median age of their oldest child was 11 years old. Older caregiver age and older first born child's age were each associated with 10% higher likelihood of having disclosed to a child (PR: 1.10 [1.06-1.13] and PR: 1.10 [1.06-1.15], per year of age, respectively). The child's age or perceived maturity and fear of causing anxiety to the child inhibited disclosure. Child's sexual activity was a motivator for disclosure, as well as the belief that disclosing was the "right thing to do". Caregivers advocated for peer and counseling support to gain insight on appropriate ways to disclose their status. CONCLUSIONS: Child's age is a key consideration for parents to disclose their own HIV status to their children. While parents were open to disclosing their HIV status to their children, there is a need to address barriers including anticipated stigma, and fear that disclosure will cause distress to their children.

Home-based HIV Testing for Children: A Useful Complement for Caregivers with More Children, Who are Male, and with an HIV Negative Partner.

Expanding index and family-based testing (HBT) is a priority for identifying children living with HIV. Our study characterizes predictors that drive testing location choice for children of parents living with HIV. Kenyan adults living with HIV were offered a choice of HBT or clinic-based testing (CBT) for any of their children (0-12 years) of unknown HIV status. Multilevel generalized linear models were used to identify correlates of choosing HBT or CBT for children and testing all versus some children within a family, including caregiver demographics, HIV history, social support, cost, and child demographics and HIV prevention history. Among 244 caregivers living with HIV and their children of unknown HIV status, most (72%) caregivers tested children using CBT. In multivariate analysis, female caregivers [aRR 0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.80)] were less likely to choose HBT than male caregivers. Caregivers with more children requiring testing [aRR 1.23 (95% CI 1.05-1.44)] were more likely to choose HBT than those with fewer children requiring testing. In subgroup univariate analysis, female caregivers with a known HIV negative spouse were significantly more likely to choose HBT over CBT than those with a known HIV positive spouse [RR 2.57 (95% CI 1.28-5.14), p = 0.008], no association was found for male caregivers. Child demographics and clinical history was not associated with study outcomes. Caregiver-specific factors were more influential than child-specific factors in caregiver choice of pediatric HIV testing location. Home-based testing may be preferable to families with higher child care needs and may encourage pediatric HIV testing if offered as an alternative to clinic testing.

Pediatric HIV Pre-test Informational Video is Associated with Higher Knowledge Scores Compared to Counselor-Delivered Information.

Video-based pre-test information is used in high resource settings to increase HIV testing coverage but remains untested in resource-limited settings. We conducted formative and evaluative focus group discussions with healthcare workers (HCWs) and caregivers of children in Kenya to develop and refine a pediatric HIV pre-test informational video. We then assessed HIV knowledge among caregivers sequentially enrolled in one of three pre-test information groups: (1) individual HCW-led (N = 50), (2) individual video-based (N = 50), and (3) group video-based (N = 50) sessions. A brief video incorporating information on national pediatric testing, modes of HIV transmission, and dramatized testimonials of caregivers who tested children was produced in three languages. Compared to individual HCW-led sessions (mean: 7.2/9; standard deviation [SD]: 1.3), both the group video-based (mean: 7.7; SD: 0.9) and individual video-based (mean: 7.6; SD: 0.9) sessions had higher mean knowledge scores. Video-based pre-test information could enhance existing pediatric HIV testing services.

Financial Incentives for Pediatric HIV Testing (FIT): Caregiver Insights on Incentive Mechanisms, Focus Populations, and Acceptability for Programmatic Scale Up.

Children living with HIV experience gaps in HIV testing globally; scaling up evidence-based testing strategies is critical for preventing HIV-related mortality. Financial incentives (FI) were recently demonstrated to increase uptake of pediatric HIV testing. As part of this qualitative follow-up study to the FIT trial (NCT03049917) conducted in Kenya, 54 caregivers participated in individual interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed to identify considerations for scaling up FI for pediatric testing. Caregivers reported that FI function by directly offsetting costs or nudging caregivers to take action sooner. Caregivers found FI to be feasible and acceptable for broader programmatic implementation, and supported use for a variety of populations. Some concerns were raised about unintended consequences of FI, including caregivers bringing ineligible children to collect incentives and fears about the impact on linkage to care and retention if caregivers become dependent on FI.

Newly diagnosed HIV positive children: a unique index case to improve HIV diagnosis and linkage to care of parents.

Newly diagnosed HIV positive children may be unique index cases to identify undiagnosed parents. Data was used from the Pediatric Urgent Start of HAART (NCT02063880) trial, which enrolled hospitalized, ART-naïve, HIV positive children ages 0-12 years in Kenya. Exact McNemar's tests were used to compare proportions of mothers and fathers tested for HIV, linked to care, and on ART at baseline and 6 months. This analysis included 87 newly diagnosed children with HIV who completed 6 months of follow-up. Among 83 children with living mothers, there were improvements in maternal linkage to care and treatment comparing baseline to 6 months (36% vs. 78%; p < 0.0001 and 22% vs. 52%; p < 0.0001). Among 80 children with living fathers, there were increases from baseline to 6 months in the number of fathers who knew the child's HIV status (34% vs. 78%; p < 0.0001), fathers ever tested for HIV (43% vs. 65%; p < 0.0001), fathers ever tested HIV positive (21% vs. 43%; p < 0.0001), fathers ever linked to care (15% vs. 35%; p < 0.0001), and fathers ever initiated on ART (11% vs. 23%; p = 0.0039). Newly diagnosed HIV positive children can be important index cases to identify parents with undiagnosed HIV or poor engagement in care.

Urine Tuberculosis Lipoarabinomannan Predicts Mortality in Hospitalized Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Children.

Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02063880.

Cohort profile: longitudinal and population comparison of children who are HIV-exposed uninfected and children who are HIV unexposed in Kenya (HOPE study).

PURPOSE: Globally, the number of children/adolescents exposed to HIV but uninfected (HIV-exposed uninfected, HEU) is growing. The HEU outcomes: population-evaluation and screening strategies study was designed to provide population-level evidence of the impact of HIV and recent antiretroviral therapy regimen exposure on neurodevelopmental, hearing and mental health outcomes from infancy to adolescence. PARTICIPANTS: The study includes a prospective mother-infant cohort and cross-sectional child/youth-caregiver cohorts conducted in Kenya.Between 2021 and 2022, the study enrolled 2000 mother-infant pairs (1000 HEU and 1000 HIV-unexposed uninfected (HUU)) for longitudinal follow-up. Infants were eligible if they were aged 4-10 weeks and healthy. Mothers were eligible if their HIV status was known and were ≥18 years. Study visits are 6 monthly until the child reaches age 3 years.Cross-sectional cohorts spanning ages 3-18 years started enrolment in 2022. Target enrolment is 4400 children/youth (4000 HEU and 400 HUU). Children and youth are eligible if they are HIV negative, maternal HIV status and timing of diagnosis is known, and caregivers are ≥18 years.Data on infant/child/youth growth, neurodevelopment, mental health, morbidity and hearing are collected at enrolment using standardised tools. Dry blood spots samples are collected for telomere length assessment at baseline and yearly for the longitudinal cohort. Growth z-scores, neurodevelopmental scores, telomere length and prevalence of developmental and hearing problems will be compared between HEU/HUU populations. FINDINGS TO DATE: Full cohort enrolment for the longitudinal cohort is complete and participants are in follow-up. At 1 year of age, comparing HEU to HUU neurodevelopment using the Malawi developmental assessment tool, we found that HEU infants had higher language scores and comparable scores in fine motor, gross motor and social scores. The cross-sectional cohort has enrolled over 2000 participants and recruitment is ongoing. FUTURE PLANS: Longitudinal cohort follow-up and enrolment to the cross-sectional study will be completed in June 2024.

Tuberculosis Preventative Therapy Initiation and Completion Among Adolescents and Young Adults Living With HIV in Kenya.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is the leading cause of death among adolescents and young adults living with HIV (YWHIV) and their heightened risk warrants deeper understanding of utilization of tuberculosis-prevention measures within HIV care. SETTING: Retrospective study using clinic surveys and medical record data from 86 Kenyan HIV clinics. METHODS: Clinic surveys obtained information on tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) services. Medical records of YWHIV were abstracted. Bivariate and multivariate analyses used generalized linear models to determine individual-level and clinic-level cofactors of TPT initiation and completion. RESULTS: Among 10,328 eligible YWHIV, 4337 (42.0%) initiated TPT. Of 3295 with ≥6 months follow-up, 1774 (53.8%) completed TPT. A lower patient-to-staff ratio was a clinic-level cofactor of TPT initiation ( P = 0.044) and completion ( P = 0.004); designated adolescent areas were associated with TPT initiation {prevalence ratio 2.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.46 to -2.88]}. Individual cofactors of TPT initiation included younger age at HIV-care enrollment [relative risk (RR) 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.90)] and antiretroviral therapy (ART) duration [1-2 vs. <1 year RR 1.31 (95% CI: 1.18 to 1.45)]. TPT completion was associated with younger age [RR 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98)] and ART duration [2-5 vs. <1 year RR 1.27 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.57)]. In multivariate models, TPT initiation was associated with younger age and ART duration [1-2 vs. 1 year; adjusted RR 1.30 (95% CI: 1.16 to 1.46)] and TPT completion with ART duration [2-5 vs. 1 year adjusted RR 1.23 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.52)]. CONCLUSION: Over half of YWHIV did not initiate and >40% did not complete TPT, with distinct clinic-level and individual-level cofactors. Approaches to enhance adolescent-friendly infrastructure and support older YWHIV are necessary to improve TPT use.

Adolescent experiences, perceptions, and preferences for the process of HIV status disclosure in Kenya.

Introduction: Disclosure of HIV status to adolescents living with HIV has been associated with improved treatment outcomes. However, there are limited data regarding the experiences of, perceptions of, and preferences for the process of disclosure of HIV status among adolescents and young adults living with HIV (AYLH), especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: Young adults living with HIV from 20 HIV clinics in Kenya who participated in a clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a disclosure and transition package completed an anonymous survey in 2019. We described their experiences and preferences using counts and proportions and assessed factors associated with satisfaction with the disclosure process using linear regression, reporting age-adjusted mean differences (aMD), and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Results: Of the 375 enrolled AYLH, 265 (71%) had perinatally acquired HIV, of whom 162 (61%) were female. The median age of the enrolled AYLH was 16 years (IQR: 14-19 years), and all of them were on antiretroviral therapy (ART). For over half (55%) of the participants, caregivers disclosed their HIV status, and 57% preferred that their caregivers disclose the status to them. Most (78%) of the participants preferred full disclosure by 12 years of age. The majority (69%) believed the disclosure was planned, and 11% suspected being HIV positive before the disclosure. Overall, 198 (75%) AYLH reported that they were ready for disclosure when it happened, and 86% were satisfied with the process. During both pre-disclosure (67 and 70%, respectively) and post-disclosure (>75% for each), AYLH felt supported by the clinic and caregivers. Factors associated with higher satisfaction with the disclosure process were pre-disclosure clinic support (aMD: 0.19 [95%CI: 0.05-0.33]) and pre-disclosure (aMD: 0.19 [0.06-0.31]) and post-disclosure (aMD: 0.17 [0.03-0.31]) caregiver support. AYLH who suspected they were HIV positive before they were disclosed to tended to have lower satisfaction when compared to those who never suspected (aMD: -0.37 [-0.74-(-0.01)]). Overall, they reported that disclosure positively influenced their ART adherence (78%), clinic attendance (45%), and communication with caregivers (20%), and 40% reported being happier after disclosure. Conclusion: Young adults living with HIV advocated for an appropriately timed disclosure process with the involvement of caregivers and healthcare workers (HCWs). Support from caregivers and HCWs before and during disclosure is key to improving their disclosure experience.

The Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach: specifying core components of an implementation strategy to optimize care cascades in public health.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems in low-resource settings need simple, low-cost interventions to improve services and address gaps in care. Though routine data provide opportunities to guide these efforts, frontline providers are rarely engaged in analyzing them for facility-level decision making. The Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA) is an evidence-based, multi-component implementation strategy that engages providers in use of facility-level data to promote systems-level thinking and quality improvement (QI) efforts within multi-step care cascades. SAIA was originally developed to address HIV care in resource-limited settings but has since been adapted to a variety of clinical care systems including cervical cancer screening, mental health treatment, and hypertension management, among others; and across a variety of settings in sub-Saharan Africa and the USA. We aimed to extend the growing body of SAIA research by defining the core elements of SAIA using established specification approaches and thus improve reproducibility, guide future adaptations, and lay the groundwork to define its mechanisms of action. METHODS: Specification of the SAIA strategy was undertaken over 12 months by an expert panel of SAIA-researchers, implementing agents and stakeholders using a three-round, modified nominal group technique approach to match core SAIA components to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) list of distinct implementation strategies. Core implementation strategies were then specified according to Proctor's recommendations for specifying and reporting, followed by synthesis of data on related implementation outcomes linked to the SAIA strategy across projects. RESULTS: Based on this review and clarification of the operational definitions of the components of the SAIA, the four components of SAIA were mapped to 13 ERIC strategies. SAIA strategy meetings encompassed external facilitation, organization of provider implementation meetings, and provision of ongoing consultation. Cascade analysis mapped to three ERIC strategies: facilitating relay of clinical data to providers, use of audit and feedback of routine data with healthcare teams, and modeling and simulation of change. Process mapping matched to local needs assessment, local consensus discussions and assessment of readiness and identification of barriers and facilitators. Finally, continuous quality improvement encompassed tailoring strategies, developing a formal implementation blueprint, cyclical tests of change, and purposefully re-examining the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: Specifying the components of SAIA provides improved conceptual clarity to enhance reproducibility for other researchers and practitioners interested in applying the SAIA across novel settings.

Impact of major disease outbreaks in the third millennium on adolescent and youth sexual and reproductive health and rights in low and/or middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) of young people continue to present a high burden and remain underinvested. This is more so in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), where empirical evidence reveals disruption of SRHR maintenance, need for enhancement of programmes, resources and services during pandemics. Despite the importance of the subject, there is no published review yet combining recent disease outbreaks such as (H1N1/09, Zika, Ebola and SARS-COV-2) to assess their impact on adolescents and youth SRHR in LMICs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will adopt a four-step search to reach the maximum possible number of studies. In the first step, we will carry out a limitedpreliminary search in databases for getting relevant keywords (appendix 1). Second, we will search in four databases: Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycINFO. The search would begin from the inception of the first major outbreak in 2009 (H1N1/09) up to the date of publication of the protocol in early 2022. We will search databases using related keywords, screen title & abstract and review full texts of the selected titles to arrive at the list of eligible studies. In the third stage, we will check their eligibility to the included article's reference list. In the fourth stage, we will check the citations of included papers in phase 2 to complete our study selection. We will include all types of original studies and without any language restriction in our final synthesis. Our review results will be charted for each pandemic separately and include details pertaining to authors, year, country, region of the study, study design, participants (disaggregated by age and gender), purpose and report associated SRHR outcomes. The review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guideline (PRISMA-ScR). PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: Patients or public were not involved in this study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical assessment is not required for this study. The results of the study will be presented in peer-reviewed publications and conferences on adolescent SRHR.

Data-informed stepped care to improve youth engagement in HIV care in Kenya: a protocol for a cluster randomised trial of a health service intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Adolescents and youth living with HIV (AYLHIV) have lower retention in care, adherence to treatment, and viral suppression compared with adults. Stepped care is a process by which clients are assigned to increasingly intensive services or 'steps' according to level of need. Differentiated care, in which stable clients access less frequent services, can be combined with stepped care to align needs and preferences of youth to promote optimal engagement in care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This hybrid type I effectiveness implementation cluster randomised trial aims to evaluate a data-informed stepped care (DiSC) intervention for AYLHIV. AYLHIV ages 10-24 receiving care at 24 HIV treatment facilities in Kisumu, Homabay and Migori counties in Kenya will be enrolled. Twelve facilities will be randomised to the DiSC intervention, and 12 will provide standard care. A clinical assignment tool developed by the study team will be used at intervention sites to assign AYLHIV to one of four steps based on risk for loss to follow-up: differentiated care, standard care, counselling services or intensive support services. The primary clinical outcome is retention in care, specifically missed visits (failure to return within 30 days for any visit) and 12-month loss to follow-up. Implementation outcomes are based on the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework. Proportions of missed visits will be compared using mixed effect models clustered by facility and participant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (STUDY00011096), Maseno University Ethical Review Committee (MUERC/00917/20) and the Kenya National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (444824). AYLHIV provide written informed consent when legally permitted, or assent with caregiver permission for minors. Study staff will work with a Community Advisory Board, including youth members, to disseminate results via discussions, presentations, journal publications and local or international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05007717.

Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach to optimize the pediatric and adolescent HIV Cascade (SAIA-PEDS): a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Children and adolescents lag behind adults in achieving UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets for HIV testing, treatment, and viral suppression. The Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA) is a multi-component implementation strategy previously shown to improve the HIV care cascade for pregnant women and infants. SAIA merits adaptation and testing to reduce gaps in the pediatric and adolescent HIV cascade. METHODS: We adapted the SAIA strategy components to be applicable to the pediatric and adolescent HIV care cascade (SAIA-PEDS) in Nairobi and western Kenya. We tested whether this SAIA-PEDS strategy improved HIV testing, linkage to care, antiretroviral treatment (ART), viral load (VL) testing, and viral load suppression for children and adolescents ages 0-24 years at 5 facilities. We conducted a pre-post analysis with 6 months pre- and 6 months post-implementation strategy (coupled with an interrupted time series sensitivity analysis) using abstracted routine program data to determine changes attributable to SAIA-PEDS. RESULTS: Baseline levels of HIV testing and care cascade indicators were heterogeneous between facilities. Per facility, the monthly average number of children/adolescents attending outpatient and inpatient services eligible for HIV testing was 842; on average, 253 received HIV testing services, 6 tested positive, 6 were linked to care, and 5 initiated ART. Among those on treatment at the facility, an average of 15 had a VL sample taken and 13 had suppressed VL results returned. Following the SAIA-PEDS training and mentorship, there was no substantial or significant change in the ratio of HIV testing (RR: 0.803 [95% CI: 0.420, 1.532]) and linkage to care (RR: 0.831 [95% CI: 0.546, 1.266]). The ratio of ART initiation increased substantially and trended towards significance (RR: 1.412 [95% CI: 0.999, 1.996]). There were significant and substantial improvements in the ratio of VL tests ordered (RR: 1.939 [95% CI: 1.230, 3.055]) but no substantial or significant change in the ratio of VL results suppressed (RR: 0.851 [95% CI: 0.554, 1.306]). CONCLUSIONS: The piloted SAIA-PEDS implementation strategy was associated with increases in health system performance for indicators later in the HIV care cascade, but not for HIV testing and treatment indicators. This strategy merits further rigorous testing for effectiveness and sustainment.

Transition to independent care for youth living with HIV: a cluster randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Transitioning youth living with HIV to adult care is a crucial step in the HIV care continuum; however, tools to support transition in sub-Saharan Africa are insufficient. We assessed the effectiveness of an adolescent transition package (ATP) to improve youth readiness for transition to independent HIV care. METHODS: In this hybrid type 1, multicentre, cluster randomised clinical trial, we assessed the effectiveness of an ATP (administered by routine clinic staff, which included standardised assessments and chapter books to guide discussions at scheduled clinic visits) in four counties in Kenya, with HIV clinics randomly assigned 1:1 to ATP or control (standard-of-care practice). Clinics were eligible to participate if they had at least 50 youth (aged 10-24 years) living with HIV enrolled in care. We used restricted randomisation to achieve cluster balance and an independent biostatistician used computer-generated random numbers to assign clinics. We excluded very large clinics with more than 1000 youth, clinics with fewer than 50 youth, paediatric-only clinics, clinics with logistical challenges, and the smallest clinics in Homa Bay county. Youth were eligible for the transition intervention if they were enrolled in participating clinics, were aged 15-24 years, and were aware of their positive HIV diagnosis. Study staff assessed transition readiness scores overall and by four domains (HIV literacy, self-management, communication, and support) in youth with HIV, which were then compared between groups by use of mixed-effects linear regression models. Analysis was by intention-to-treat and was adjusted for multiple comparisons. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574129. FINDINGS: We identified 35 clinics in four counties; of these, ten were assigned to the intervention group and ten to the control group. Of 1066 youth with HIV enrolled between Nov 1, 2019, and March 18, 2020, 578 (54%) were in intervention and 488 (46%) in control sites. Mean baseline transition readiness score was 12·1 (SD 3·4) in ATP sites and 11·4 (3·7) in control sites. At 1 year, adjusting for baseline scores, age, and months since HIV disclosure, participants in the ATP group had significantly higher overall transition readiness scores (adjusted mean difference 1·7, 95% CI 0·3-3·1, p=0·024), and higher scores in HIV literacy domain (adjusted mean difference 1·0, 0·2-1·7, p=0·011). At 12 months, 15 serious adverse events were recorded, none of which were thought to be related to study participation. INTERPRETATION: Integrating ATP approaches could enhance long-term HIV care in youth with HIV as they age into adulthood. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.

Brief Report: Performance of Tuberculosis Symptom Screening Among Hospitalized ART-Naive Children With HIV in Kenya.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic evaluation for children with HIV (CHIV) who have history of TB contact, poor weight gain, cough, or fever. These screening criteria were developed based on studies of symptomatic CHIV with incomplete microbiologic confirmation. We performed routine TB microbiologic evaluation of hospitalized CHIV with and without symptoms to develop a data-driven TB symptom screen. METHODS: Among hospitalized antiretroviral therapy-naive Kenyan CHIV enrolled in the Pediatric Urgent Start of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (PUSH) trial, we performed Xpert MTB/RIF and mycobacterial culture of respiratory and stool specimens independent of TB symptoms. We evaluated performance of WHO and other published pediatric TB screening criteria and derived optimized criteria using a combination of symptoms. RESULTS: Of 168 CHIV who underwent TB microbiologic evaluation, 13 (8%) had confirmed TB. WHO TB symptom screening had 100% sensitivity and 4% specificity to detect confirmed TB. Published TB screening criteria that relied on prolonged symptoms missed cases of confirmed TB (sensitivity 85%-92%). An optimized symptom screen including weight loss, cough, anorexia, or TB contact had 100% sensitivity and improved specificity (31%) compared with the WHO pediatric TB symptom screen. CONCLUSIONS: The WHO TB symptom screen was highly sensitive but resulted in a high proportion of hospitalized CHIV who would require TB diagnostic evaluation. Other published TB screening criteria missed CHIV with confirmed TB. Our optimized screening tool increased specificity while preserving sensitivity. Future multicenter studies are needed to improve TB screening tools for CHIV in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Development of a Clinical Prediction Score Including Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio to Inform Tuberculosis Treatment Among Children With HIV: A Multicountry Study.

Background: Clinical pediatric tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis may lead to overdiagnosis particularly among children with human immunodeficiency virus (CHIV). We assessed the performance of monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) as a diagnostic biomarker and constructed a clinical prediction score to improve specificity of TB diagnosis in CHIV with limited access to microbiologic testing. Methods: We pooled data from cohorts of children aged ≤13 years from Vietnam, Cameroon, and South Africa to validate the use of MLR ≥0.378, previously found as a TB diagnostic marker among CHIV. Using multivariable logistic regression, we created an internally validated prediction score for diagnosis of TB disease in CHIV. Results: The combined cohort had 601 children (median age, 1.9 [interquartile range, 0.9-5.3] years); 300 (50%) children were male, and 283 (47%) had HIV. Elevated MLR ≥0.378 had sensitivity of 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23%-51%) and specificity of 79% (95% CI, 71%-86%) among CHIV in the validation cohort. A model using MLR ≥0.28, age ≥4 years, tuberculin skin testing ≥5 mm, TB contact history, fever >2 weeks, and chest radiograph suggestive of TB predicted active TB disease in CHIV with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85. A prediction score of ≥5 points had a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 48% to identify confirmed TB, and a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 48% to identify confirmed and unconfirmed TB groups combined. Conclusions: Our score has comparable sensitivity and specificity to algorithms including microbiological testing and should enable clinicians to rapidly initiate TB treatment among CHIV when microbiological testing is unavailable.

Providing "a beam of light to see the gaps": determinants of implementation of the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach applied to the pediatric and adolescent HIV cascade in Kenya.

BACKGROUND: Children and adolescents living with HIV have poorer rates of HIV testing, treatment, and virologic suppression than adults. Strategies that use a systems approach to optimize these multiple, linked steps simultaneously are critical to close these gaps. METHODS: The Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA) was adapted and piloted for the pediatric and adolescent HIV care and treatment cascade (SAIA-PEDS) at 6 facilities in Kenya. SAIA-PEDS includes three tools: continuous quality improvement (CQI), flow mapping, and pediatric cascade analysis (PedCAT). A predominately qualitative evaluation utilizing focus group discussions (N = 6) and in-depth interviews (N = 19) was conducted with healthcare workers after implementation to identify determinants of implementation. Data collection and analysis were grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS: Overall, the adapted SAIA-PEDS strategy was acceptable, and the three tools complemented one another and provided a relative advantage over existing processes. The flow mapping and CQI tools were compatible with existing workflows and resonated with team priorities and goals while providing a structure for group problem solving that transcended a single department's focus. The PedCAT was overly complex, making it difficult to use. Leadership and hierarchy were complex determinants. All teams reported supportive leadership, with some describing in detail how their leadership was engaged and enthusiastic about the SAIA-PEDS process, by providing recognition, time, and resources. Hierarchy was similarly complex: in some facilities, leadership stifled rapid innovation by insisting on approving each change, while at other facilities, leadership had strong and supportive oversight of processes, checking on the progress frequently and empowering teams to test innovative ideas. CONCLUSION: CQI and flow mapping were core components of SAIA-PEDS, with high acceptability and consistent use, but the PedCAT was too complex. Leadership and hierarchy had a nuanced role in implementation. Future SAIA-PEDS testing should address PedCAT complexity and further explore the modifiability of leadership engagement to maximize implementation.

Brief Report: Pediatric Saliva-Based HIV Testing: Health care Worker and Caregiver Acceptability.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric HIV testing remains suboptimal. The OraQuick test [saliva-based test (SBT)] is validated in pediatric populations ≥18 months. Understanding caregiver and health care worker (HCW) acceptability of pediatric SBT is critical for implementation. METHODS: A trained qualitative interviewer conducted 8 focus group discussions (FGDs): 4 with HCWs and 4 with caregivers of children seeking health services in western Kenya. FGDs explored acceptability of pediatric SBT and home- and facility-based SBT use. Two reviewers conducted consensus coding and thematic analyses of transcripts using Dedoose. RESULTS: Most HCWs but few caregivers had heard of SBT. Before seeing SBT instructions, both had concerns about potential HIV transmission through saliva, which were mostly alleviated after kit demonstration. Noted benefits of SBT included usability and avoiding finger pricks. Benefits of facility-based pediatric SBT included shorter client waiting and service time, higher testing coverage, and access to HCWs, while noted challenges included ensuring confidentiality. Benefits of caregivers using home-based SBT included convenience, privacy, decreased travel costs, increased testing, easier administration, and child comfort. Perceived challenges included not receiving counseling, disagreements with partners, child neglect, and negative emotional response to a positive test result. Overall, HCWs felt that SBT could be used for pediatric HIV testing but saw limited utility for caregivers performing SBT without an HCW present. Caregivers saw utility in home-based SBT but wanted easy access to counseling in case of a positive test result. CONCLUSIONS: SBT was generally acceptable to HCWs and caregivers and is a promising strategy to expand testing coverage.

Financial incentives to increase pediatric HIV testing: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Financial incentives can motivate desirable health behaviors, including adult HIV testing. Data regarding the effectiveness of financial incentives for HIV testing in children, who require urgent testing to prevent mortality, are lacking. METHODS: In a five-arm unblinded randomized controlled trial, adults living with HIV attending 19 HIV clinics in Western Kenya, with children 0-12 years of unknown HIV status, were randomized with equal allocation to $0, $1.25, $2.50, $5 or $10. Payment was conditional on child HIV testing within 2 months. Block randomization with fixed block sizes was used; participants and study staff were unblinded at randomization. Primary analysis was intent-to-treat, with predefined primary outcomes of completing child HIV testing and time to testing. RESULTS: Of 452 caregivers, 90, 89, 93, 92 and 88 were randomized to $0, $1.25, $2.50, $5.00, and $10.00, respectively. Of those, 31 (34%), 31 (35%), 44 (47%), 51 (55%), and 54 (61%) in the $0, $1.25, $2.50, $5.00, and $10.00 arms, respectively, completed child testing. Compared with the $0 arm, and adjusted for site, caregivers in the $10.00 arm had significantly higher uptake of testing [relative risk: 1.80 (95% CI 1.15--2.80), P = 0.010]. Compared with the $0 arm, and adjusted for site, time to testing was significantly faster in the $5.00 and $10.00 arms [hazard ratio: 1.95 (95% CI 1.24--3.07) P = 0.004, 2.42 (95% CI 1.55--3.79), P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Financial incentives are effective in improving pediatric HIV testing among caregivers living with HIV. REGISTRATION: NCT03049917.