Ciprofloxacin exposure and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A Danish nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between maternal exposure to ciprofloxacin and the risk of miscarriage and major malformations. DESIGN: A nationwide register-based cohort study. SETTING: Data were obtained from the Medical Birth Registry, the National Hospital Registry, the Danish National Prescription Registry and Statistics Denmark. POPULATION: Data were collected in the period between 1997 and 2016 and included all registered pregnancies that ended in an elective termination, miscarriage, stillbirth or a live birth. Exposure was defined as redeeming one or more prescriptions of ciprofloxacin. METHODS: Miscarriage was defined as a diagnosis given before 22 weeks without any medical intervention. Major malformations were classified according to EUROCAT 1.4. We matched ciprofloxacin-exposed pregnancies to unexposed pregnancies on the propensity score in a ratio 1:4. To estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of miscarriage a Cox proportional hazard regression model was used. A log binomial model was used to estimate the relative risk ratio (RR) of major malformations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HR of miscarriage and the RR of major malformations. RESULTS: A total of 1 650 649 pregnancies were identified. Of these, 10 250 (2050 ciprofloxacin-exposed) and 6100 (1220 ciprofloxacin-exposed) were included in the miscarriage and major malformation analysis, respectively. The HR of miscarriage was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.17). For major malformation, the RR was 1.01 (95% CI 0.72-1.40). For the organ-specific major malformations and the sensitivity analyses, no significant increased risks were identified. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated no association between miscarriage and maternal ciprofloxacin exposure within the first 22 weeks of pregnancy, or between major malformations and maternal exposure during the first trimester. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: No association between maternal ciprofloxacin exposure and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Therapeutic concentration of ciprofloxacin and transfer across the human term placenta.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women have an increased risk of infections, and early and decisive treatment is preferred to prevent complications. Although ciprofloxacin is very commonly used, safety aspects of maternal treatment during pregnancy are limited, and avoidance of its use during late pregnancy is recommended. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to estimate maternal-to-fetal transfer clearance of ciprofloxacin at a therapeutic concentration and to determine fetal exposure to maternally administered ciprofloxacin. STUDY DESIGN: Transplacental pharmacokinetics were determined with an ex vivo placental model, which is a reliable experimental model for estimating fetal drug exposure. Human placentas from uncomplicated term pregnancies were collected after delivery and a suitable cotyledon was cannulated. Ciprofloxacin was added at a therapeutic concentration (1.6 µg/mL) to the maternal compartment, and antipyrine was included as a reference drug (10.0 µg/mL). Samples were collected from the maternal and fetal compartment at 12 time points (-2 to 180 minutes), and the integrity and metabolic parameters were measured consecutively. Drug concentrations were determined using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A total of 5 human placentas from healthy term pregnancies were collected after delivery and cannulated with success. Ciprofloxacin crossed the placenta; its mean concentration in the fetal compartment was 0.3 µg/mL, accounting for 22% (0.29/1.30; range, 15%-31%) of the maternal concentration after 3 hours. The fetal/maternal ciprofloxacin concentration ratio increased gradually over time and reached 0.53. The transfer clearance for ciprofloxacin was 0.28 mL/min (range, 0.21-0.41 mL/min) during the first hour and 0.21 mL/min (range, 0.14-0.26 mL/min) during the following 2 hours. After end perfusion, the mean tissue concentration and proportion of ciprofloxacin were 0.7 µg/g and 11% (14/130; range, 7%-14%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin crossed the placenta at a slow, constant rate, indicating moderate fetal exposure. This study verifies an accumulation of ciprofloxacin in the placenta that may lengthen the duration of fetal exposure. These results are an essential element of fetal risk assessment, but further studies are needed to estimate fetal safety.

Long term treatment with stimulant laxatives - clinical evidence for effectiveness and safety?

OBJECTIVES: Bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate are classified both as stimulant laxatives, approved for short-term treatment of constipation and sold without prescription (OTC). Stimulant laxatives are associated with harmful long-term colonic effects and possible carcinogenic risk - and evidence support that these agents are used for longer periods. We aimed to compile and review the clinical trial evidence describing the effectiveness and safety of long-term treatment (>14 continuous days) with stimulant laxatives. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) examining the effect of bisacodyl or sodium picosulfate in adult patients diagnosed with constipation. RESULTS: Five RCTs (one open-label and four double-blinded) with intervention periods of four weeks duration were eligible. These included 1008 patients, whereof 26% dropped out. A positive global assessment of efficacy was obtained in 78-99% of the patients treated with bisacodyl or sodium picosulfate. Notably, the same global assessment was obtained in 46-54% of the placebo-treated patients. Compared to placebo, an improvement in stool consistency and a significant increase in number of bowel movements peer week were seen in favor of bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate. However, for pyridostigmine, a significant difference was seen compared to bisacodyl. AEs were generally mild, but frequent (up to 72%) mostly diarrhea and abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: The evidence base does not support use of stimulant laxatives for more than four weeks. Due to the substantial use of stimulant laxatives including sold OTC, longer term RCTs and epidemiological studies investigating effects and safety on the longer term are warranted.

Brodalumab Versus Guselkumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis with an Inadequate Response to Ustekinumab: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Phase 4 Trial (COBRA).

INTRODUCTION: Despite improved treatment options for plaque psoriasis within the last decades, some patients still have an inadequate response to treatment. Direct clinical evaluation between therapies used after biologic failure could facilitate physicians' choice of treatment. METHODS: COBRA (NCT04533737) was a randomized (1:1), blinded (patient and assessor), 28-week, active-comparator trial conducted in Europe from December 2020 to December 2022. The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of brodalumab versus guselkumab in adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and inadequate response to ustekinumab. Patients received either brodalumab 210 mg or guselkumab 100 mg. The primary [having Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-100 response at week 16] and key secondary (time to PASI-100 response) endpoints were tested in a fixed sequence. RESULTS: Due to delays and enrollment challenges, recruitment was terminated with 113 patients enrolled of 240 planned. The proportion of patients having PASI-100 at week 16 for brodalumab was 53.4% compared with 35.9% for guselkumab [odds ratio (OR) 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95, 4.44; p = 0.069]. As this was not statistically significant, the hierarchical testing procedure was stopped. All other secondary PASI endpoints had nominal p-values below 0.05 in favor of brodalumab. In the time to PASI response analyses, brodalumab separated from guselkumab in estimated cumulative incidence of patients achieving a response from week 2 onward, suggesting fast onset of action with brodalumab. Quality of life measures improved in both treatment groups. The safety findings were consistent with the known safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Brodalumab showed a tendency toward better and earlier effect than guselkumab in patients who had failed ustekinumab. Thus, this trial provides important information in assisting physicians in their choice of therapy for patients who have failed their prior anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04533737.

Exposure to Tramadol During Early Pregnancy and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion or Major Congenital Malformations.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether exposure to tramadol during early pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion or major congenital malformations. METHODS: The study is a nationwide cohort study including all registered pregnancies in Denmark between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2016. The Danish National Prescription Register was used to identify maternal exposure to tramadol. Pregnancies with maternal exposure to tramadol were matched with pregnancies without maternal exposure to tramadol in a ratio of up to 1:4 using propensity scoring. The primary outcomes were spontaneous abortion and major congenital malformations. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) of spontaneous abortion, and log binominal models were used to estimate the relative risk ratios (RRs) of major congenital malformations. RESULTS: A total of 36,467 (tramadol exposure n=7,310) and 18,907 (tramadol exposure n=3,796) pregnancies were included in the analyses of spontaneous abortion and major congenital malformations, respectively. Spontaneous abortion occurred in 893 (12.2%) pregnancies with maternal exposure to tramadol and in 3,471 (11.9%) pregnancies without maternal exposure to tramadol (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.14). A major congenital malformation occurred in the offspring of 151 (4.0%) pregnancies with maternal exposure to tramadol, compared with 579 (3.8%) in pregnancies without maternal exposure to tramadol (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.87-1.24). CONCLUSION: Exposure to tramadol during early pregnancy does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion or major congenital malformations.

Disseminated lung cancer presenting as a rectal mass.

Primary lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, and approximately 50% had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. A rectal mass and unintended weight loss are common manifestations of rectal cancer. Our case presented with a rectal mass, but workup revealed a metastatic lesion from lung cancer. Lung cancer metastases to the lower gastrointestinal tract imply reduced survival compared with the already poor mean survival of stage IV lung cancer. Despite relevant therapy, the patient died 5 months after referral.