The use of hearing protection devices by older adults during recreational noise exposure.

A population-based study to assess the use of hearing protection devices by older adults during noisy recreational activities was performed. The population-based Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study was designed to measure the prevalence of hearing loss in adults residing in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The use of hearing protection devices during noisy recreational activities was assessed by performing three examinations over a period of 10 years (1993-1995, no. of participants (n)=3753, aged 48-92 years; 1998-2000, n=2800, aged 53-97 years; 2003-2005, n=2395, aged 58-100 years). The recreational activities included hunting, target shooting, woodworking/carpentry, metalworking, driving loud recreational vehicles, and performing yard work using either power tools or a chain saw. The prevalence of using hearing protection devices during any of these activities increased with time (9.5%, 15.0%, and 19.9% at baseline, 5 years, and 10 years, respectively). However, the use of hearing protection devices remained low for most activities. Those under the age of 65 were twice as likely to use hearing protection devices during noisy activities than were older adults. Men, those with a hearing handicap, and those with significant tinnitus were more likely to use hearing protection devices. Smokers and the less educated were less likely to use hearing protection devices. The results demonstrated that many adults expose themselves to potentially damaging recreational noise, leaving them at risk for hearing loss.

Further analysis of radiobiological parameters from the First and Second British Institute of Radiology randomized studies of larynx/pharynx radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis of 1345 patients treated for cancer of the larynx or pharynx by randomization into two groups in each center in two separate trials of fractionated radiotherapy was carried out in an attempt to extract the radiobiological parameters alpha (dose), beta (fraction size), and gamma (overall time) from the data. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Details of the trials have been published previously. In the first, 734 patients were randomized to either five or three fractions per week, in centers each using their own overall time, which varied from 3 to 7 weeks in different centers. In the second trial, 611 patients were randomized to "short" (< or = 4 weeks) or "long" (4-7 weeks) overall time. We combine the data from both studies and use the linear-quadratic formula with logistic regression and maximum-likelihood methods to obtain the radiobiological factors, taking into account other variables such as stage or age, when significant. RESULTS: The parameters calculated for local tumor control showed significant estimates of alpha, very small estimates of beta, and significant values of gamma. The derived estimates of alpha/beta were large, but very variable. The time-dose tradeoff--gamma/alpha was 0.76 Gy/day for larynx and 0.3 Gy/day for pharynx tumors (not significantly different from each other). Late complications gave indeterminate alpha/beta ratios and a time-dose factor not significantly different from zero. Acute normal-tissue effects gave alpha/beta estimates of 8-9 Gy and time factors of 0.8-0.9 Gy/day. CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with other published values with the exception that significant time factors for late complications could not be excluded.

Moderate alcohol consumption and hearing loss: a protective effect.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if moderate alcohol consumption is associated inversely with hearing loss in a large population based study of older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population based cohort study. Data are from the 1993-1995 examinations for the population based Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study (EHLS) (n = 3571) and the Beaver Dam Eye Study (BDES) (n = 3722). SETTING: Midwestern community of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. PARTICIPANTS: Residents of Beaver Dam aged 43 to 84 in 1987-1988 were eligible for the BDES (examinations in 1988-1990 and 1993-1995). During 1993-1995, this same cohort was eligible to participate in the baseline examination for the EHLS. MEASUREMENTS: Hearing thresholds were measured by pure tone air and bone conduction audiometry (250-8000 Hz.). History of alcohol consumption in the past year, heavy drinking (ever), medical history, occupation, noise exposure, and other lifestyle factors were ascertained by a questionnaire that was administered as an interview. RESULTS: In multiple logistic regression analyses controlling for potential confounders, moderate alcohol consumption (>140 grams/week) was inversely associated with hearing loss (PTA(.5,1,2,4 > 25 dB HL); odds ratio [OR] = .71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .52, .97; where PTA is pure tone average). A similar association was found for moderate hearing loss (PTA(.5,1,2,4 > 40 dB HL); OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.32, 0.74). Alcohol consumption was associated inversely with the odds of having a low frequency hearing loss (OR = 0.61) or a high frequency hearing loss (OR = 0.60). These findings did not vary significantly by age or gender. There was an increase in the odds of having a high frequency hearing loss (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.75), in those with a history of heavy drinking (> or =4 drinks/day). Including cardiovascular disease or its related factors did not significantly attenuate the protective effect. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of a modest protective association of alcohol consumption and hearing loss in these cross-sectional data. This finding is in agreement with a small body of evidence suggesting that hearing loss is not an inevitable component of the aging process.

Sunlight and the 5-year incidence of early age-related maculopathy: the beaver dam eye study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation of sunlight exposure and indicators of sun sensitivity with the 5-year incidence of early age-related maculopathy (ARM). DESIGN: Longitudinal, population-based study. Participants (aged 43-86 years at baseline) in the Beaver Dam Eye Study were reexamined from 1993 to 1995, 5 years after the baseline examination. Questionnaire data about sunlight exposure and sun sensitivity were obtained at baseline. Additional information about earlier life patterns of exposure was ascertained at follow-up. Stereoscopic color fundus photographs were graded to determine the presence of ARM at the 5-year follow-up in eyes free from signs of early ARM at the baseline examination. RESULTS: Leisure time spent outdoors while persons were teenagers (aged 13-19 years) and in their 30s (aged 30-39 years) was significantly associated with the risk of early ARM (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-3.65). There was a slight, but nonsignificant, protective effect associated with use of hats and sunglasses while persons were teenagers and in their 30s (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.03). People with red or blond hair were slightly more likely to develop early ARM than people with darker hair (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.83). There were no associations between estimated ambient UV-B exposure or markers of sun sensitivity and the incidence of early ARM. CONCLUSION: Exposure to sunlight may be associated with the development of early ARM.

The prevalence of age-related maculopathy by geographic region and ethnicity. The Colorado-Wisconsin Study of Age-Related Maculopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of age-related maculopathy (ARM) in a biethnic population and to determine if there are ethnic and/or geographic differences in the prevalence of ARM. DESIGN: Prevalence data from 2 population-based studies, the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study (n = 1541, ages 21-74 years) and the Beaver Dam Eye Study (n = 3999, ages 43-74 years), were compared. SETTING: Southern Colorado and central Wisconsin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Color stereoscopic fundus photographs were graded for ARM using the Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System. Similar questionnaire, laboratory, and clinical data on potential risk factors were available from both studies. RESULTS: Late-stage ARM was significantly less frequent among Hispanics than non-Hispanic whites (NHW) in Beaver Dam (odds ratio [OR] = 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.49; Hispanics vs Beaver Dam NHW). The prevalence of any ARM was significantly lower among San Luis Valley NHW (10.4%) than Beaver Dam NHW (14.3%) (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.50-0.91). This prevalence difference was not explained by any of the risk factors examined (smoking, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, alcohol consumption, etc). The 2 NHW groups reported different European heritages. CONCLUSIONS: Late-stage ARM appeared to be rare among Hispanics but there was no ethnic difference in prevalence of any ARM. The 33% difference in risk among NHW by geographic location was not reduced when controlling for possible risk factors or confounders, suggesting that genetic heritage may be an important determinant of risk for ARM.

Eye color changes past early childhood. The Louisville Twin Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether eye color changes after 6 years of age. DESIGN: Longitudinal data on eye color were obtained from the Louisville Twin Study, Louisville, Ky. Twins (n = 1513 [individuals]) were assessed at least once and most twins (n = 1386) were examined on 2 or more occasions. Parents of twins were also examined at the study inception, 128 of whom were assessed again from February 1989 to October 1993. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Eye color was assessed at each examination by matching the iridial coloration of the subject to 1 of 15 painted glass eye anterior segments, similar to those in artificial eyes, mounted on a circular disk. The spectrum ranged from light blue (1) to dark brown (15). RESULTS: Among whites (n = 1359), the eye color of 3.8% to 8.6% of the sample twins became 2 U or more darker or 2 U or more lighter during 3- to 9-year intervals between 6 years of age and adulthood (> 18 years, < 24 years). Among identical (monozygotic) twin pairs, there was a high degree of concordance in eye color (r = 0.98 [P < .001]), while in fraternal (dizygotic) twin pairs, the concordance was less pronounced (r = 0.49) and decreased with age (r = 0.07). Among the sample of the mothers of twins, 9% had irides that lightened by 2 U or more during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Most individuals achieve stable eye color by 6 years of age. However, a subpopulation of 10% to 15% of white subjects have changes in eye color throughout adolescence and adulthood in the eye color range that can be expected to reflect changes in iridial melanin content or distribution. These data also suggest that such changes in eye color, or the propensity to such changes, may be genetically determined.

Is age-related maculopathy related to hearing loss?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship of age-related maculopathy (ARM) to hearing loss. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: All 3397 adults (age range, 48-92 years) living in Beaver Dam, Wis, who were examined for age-related eye disease and hearing loss from March 1, 1993, to July 18, 1995, and who had analyzable hearing thresholds in at least 1 ear and fundus photographs gradable for ARM in at least 1 eye. METHODS: Characteristics of drusen and other lesions typical of ARM were determined by grading stereoscopic color fundus photographs using the Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System. We used standard protocols of pure-tone air-conduction audiometry to assess hearing loss, which was defined as the pure-tone average of hearing thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz greater than 25-dB hearing level. RESULTS: The prevalence of ARM was 25.4% and of hearing loss was 45.0% in this population. Both conditions were present in 15.1%. The relationships between early ARM lesions and hearing loss were not statistically significant. After controlling for age and sex, persons with late ARM were more likely (odds ratio, 3.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-7.42) to have hearing loss than persons without late ARM. This relation did not change when other factors related to ARM or hearing loss (eg, cigarette smoking status, history of occupational noise exposure, and history of cardiovascular disease) were entered into multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: These population-based estimates document the frequent coexistence of signs of ARM and hearing loss. As late ARM is an important cause of loss of vision, and as hearing loss is associated with difficulty in communicating, the high frequencies of sensory comorbidity may affect maintenance of independent functioning as people age. Further study is necessary to examine why late ARM and hearing loss are associated.

Treatment choice and quality of life in patients with choroidal melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if quality of life differs between patients with choroidal melanoma treated with enucleation and those treated with radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated for choroidal melanoma at 5 Midwest centers were asked to participate. There were 65 participants treated with enucleation and 82 treated with radiation therapy. Quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire and by the Time-Tradeoff interview method. RESULTS: The average length of follow-up was 4.9 years for the group treated with radiation therapy and 6.3 years for the group treated with enucleation (P = .05). After adjusting for age, sex, years of follow-up, and the number of chronic conditions, there were few differences in any of the quality-of-life measures by treatment status. Participants in the group treated with radiation therapy were more likely to have higher (better) scores on the Vitality and Mental Component subscales of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 than participants treated with enucleation. There were no differences on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire or the Time-Tradeoff measures of quality of life. CONCLUSION: Choice of treatment for choroidal melanoma does not seem to be associated with large differences in quality of life in long-term follow-up.

Cataract and hearing loss in a population-based study: the Beaver Dam studies.

PURPOSE: Cataract and hearing loss are each common at older ages and together may influence the ability to function independently and affect the sense of well-being. For these reasons, we sought to estimate the risk factors for comorbidity of age-related cataract and hearing loss. METHODS: A cross-sectional evaluation of a population-based cohort of older adults was conducted in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, for presence of age-related cataract and hearing loss. The study evaluation included taking standardized medical histories, measuring blood pressures, and obtaining blood specimens. Standardized photographs, which were graded according to well-defined protocols to assess the presence of nuclear, cortical or posterior subcapsular cataract, were taken. Audiometric testing was performed according to well-defined study protocols. RESULTS: Any type of cataract in combination with hearing loss in either ear was frequent, occurring in 27.8% of the population overall and increasing consistently with age. Nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataract in combination with hearing loss occurred more often in men. Lifestyle factors that were associated with at least one cataract-hearing loss end point in at least one sex were history of heavy drinking and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: In this community, older adults appear to be at high risk of cataract and hearing loss. Although risk is strongly associated with age, some elective exposures appear to influence risk. It is possible that modification of certain lifestyle habits may alter these risks.

Aging and high-frequency hearing sensitivity.

As part of a large population-based study of hearing and aging, ultra high-frequency (9-20 kHz) threshold measures are reported for 3396 participants grouped by age (48-59 years, n = 1233; 60-69 years, n = 1031; 70-79 years, n = 851; 80-92 years, n = 281). Ultra high-frequency (UHF) thresholds were higher for older age groups. The percentage of unmeasurable responses also was significantly higher for older age groups and for higher frequencies in the UHF range. The observed age effects remained significant after adjusting for gender. In general, UHF thresholds were significantly higher for men compared to those for women at lower UHF frequencies (9-14 kHz), but were not significantly different by gender for the highest UHF frequencies (16, 18, and 20 kHz). After accounting for hearing loss at traditional audiometric frequencies (250-8000 Hz), the age effect still remained; even for comparable degrees of sensorineural hearing loss, participants in older age groups evidenced higher UHF thresholds.

Hearing sensitivity in adults screened for selected risk factors.

As a means of partially distinguishing age effects and other risk factors in presbyacusis, hearing thresholds for 56- to 65-year-old participants screened for exclusion of selected risk factors were compared with thresholds for 48- to 55-year-old participants without the same risk factors. Hearing thresholds for both age groups were also compared with age-appropriate International Standards Organization (ISO) norms. Even after screening participants for exclusion of selected risk factors, differences in hearing sensitivity remained across age groups. Across the male and female groups, thresholds were generally better (lower) for 48 to 55 year olds than for 56 to 65 year olds. ISO norms generally underestimated the degree of hearing loss for participants of comparable age in the present study. The underestimation was small at lower test frequencies, was generally greater for men, and was largest at test frequencies above 2000 Hz.

Self-reported hearing handicap and audiometric measures in older adults.

As part of an epidemiologic study of hearing disorders in older adults, audiometric thresholds (250-20,000 Hz), word recognition performance (Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 word lists in quiet and in competing message), and Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) scores were evaluated for 3178 adults ranging in age from 48 to 92 years. Overall, higher HHIE-S scores were more prevalent for older age groups and for greater degrees of hearing loss. After adjusting for the degree of hearing loss, the probability of reporting a hearing disability (handicap) decreased with age.

Aging and middle ear resonance.

Tympanograms for probes ranging from 250 through 2000 Hz were evaluated for 467 older adults. Measures of middle ear resonant frequency were compared across age groups (48-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-90 years) and gender. No significant age group trends were observed for middle ear resonant frequency. Middle ear resonant frequencies were significantly higher for older women than for older men, but the differences were small.

Interexaminer reliability of otoscopic signs and tympanometric measures for older adults.

To accurately classify hearing loss and otic disorders among older adults, examiners must be able to consistently assess otoscopic signs and perform middle-ear screening tympanograms. As part of a population-based study of hearing loss in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, the interexaminer reliability of otoscopic examinations and screening tympanograms was evaluated using 45 replicate examinations. Data from 1941 participants 48 to 91 years of age were used to compare otoscopic and tympanometric results. Overall agreement for nine otoscopic signs ranged from 73 percent (vascularity) to 100 percent (drainage). There were small examiner differences in tympanometric measures of equivalent ear-canal volume (Vea) and tympanogram width. No significant differences were observed for peak compensated static acoustic admittance and tympanogram peak pressure. Our findings suggest that examiners can be trained to consistently and accurately assess otoscopic signs and obtain reliable tympanometric results.

Tympanometric measures in older adults.

Tympanometric measures were obtained in 1240 adults (2147 ears) ranging in age from 48 to 90 years. All subjects reported a negative history of otic disease, passed an otoscopic examination, and did not present a significant air-bone gap based on pure-tone audiometry. Relative to findings for younger adults, tympanometric measures for older adults in the present study showed greater variability, a slightly lower mean peak compensated static acoustic admittance (peak Ytm), and a significantly higher mean equivalent ear-canal volume (Vea). Across age in the present study, Vea tended to decrease with age and tympanogram width (TW) tended to increase with age. Relative to measures for females, males in the present study tended to have higher peak Ytm values, higher Vea values, and slightly lower TW values. Overall, our findings indicate a need to adopt criteria that account for age and gender effects in tympanometry protocols for older adults.

Aging and word recognition in competing message.

As part of an epidemiologic study of hearing disorders in older adults, word recognition performance (NU-6 word lists in quiet and in competing message) was evaluated for 3189 adults grouped by age (48-59 years, n = 1176; 60-69 years, n = 979; 70-79 years, n = 794; 80-92 years, n = 240). Overall, scores for all measures were worse for older age groups and worse for men than for women. Word recognition scores in competing message were poorer than word recognition scores in quiet for all subjects and age groups. Further, differences in scores across age groups and gender were greater for the word recognition test in competing message than for the word recognition test in quiet. Although degree of hearing loss accounted for the largest portion of variation in word recognition scores, the observed age and gender differences remained significant after adjusting for the degree of sensorineural hearing loss.

Recreational firearm use and hearing loss.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between recreational firearm use and high-frequency hearing loss in a population of older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, population-based cohort study. SETTING: The midwestern community of Beaver Dam, Wis. PARTICIPANTS: A population-based sample of 3753 participants (83% of those eligible), aged 48 to 92 years, participated in the baseline phase of the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime and past year self-reported firearm use during target shooting and hunting were assessed by interview. Hearing thresholds were measured by pure-tone audiometry. RESULTS: After age and other factors were adjusted for, men (n = 1538) who had ever regularly engaged in target shooting (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.19) or who had done so in the past year (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.46) were more likely to have a marked high-frequency hearing loss than those who had not. Risk of having a marked high-frequency hearing loss increased 7% for every 5 years the men had hunted (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.12). Thirty-eight percent of the target shooters and 95% of the hunters reported never wearing hearing protection while shooting in the past year. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that use of recreational firearms is associated with marked high-frequency hearing loss in men. There is a need for further education of users of recreational firearms regarding the risk of hearing impairment associated with firearm use and the availability and importance of appropriate hearing protection.

Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy, in older adults, of questions assessing hearing loss. Study participants (n=3,556), aged 48-92 years, were examined in a population-based study of age-related hearing loss in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Self-report data from the ten-question Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-screening Version (HHIE-S), and four additional questions were compared with hearing loss as measured by pure-tone air conduction audiometry. The single question, 'Do you feel you have a hearing loss?' was the most sensitive question (sensitivity=71 per cent); its overall and gender-specific prevalence estimates were within 3.2 per cent of prevalence measures derived audiometrically, although age-group specific estimates were not as accurate. Using an HHIE-S total score >8 resulted in low sensitivity (34 per cent) and inaccurate prevalence estimates. These results indicate that, for some applications, one simple question may be sufficient for prevalence surveys of hearing loss among older adults.

Cigarette smoking and hearing loss: the epidemiology of hearing loss study.

CONTEXT: Clinical studies have suggested that cigarette smoking may be associated with hearing loss, a common condition affecting older adults. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between smoking and hearing loss. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Community of Beaver Dam, Wis. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 48 to 92 years. Of 4541 eligible subjects, 3753 (83%) participated in the hearing study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The examination included otoscopy, screening tympanometry, and pure-tone air-conduction and bone-conduction audiometry. Smoking history was ascertained by self-report. Hearing loss was defined as a pure-tone average (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) greater than 25-dB hearing level in the worse ear. RESULTS: After adjusting for other factors, current smokers were 1.69 times as likely to have a hearing loss as nonsmokers (95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.17). This relationship remained for those without a history of occupational noise exposure and in analyses excluding those with non-age-related hearing loss. There was weak evidence of a dose-response effect. Nonsmoking participants who lived with a smoker were more likely to have a hearing loss than those who were not exposed to a household member who smoked (odds ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.74). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that environmental exposures may play a role in age-related hearing loss. If longitudinal studies confirm these findings, modification of smoking habits may prevent or delay age-related declines in hearing sensitivity.

Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study.

There are no recent population-based data on the prevalence of hearing loss in older adults using standard audiometric testing. The population-based Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study was designed to measure the prevalence of hearing loss in adults aged 48-92 years, residing in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Hearing thresholds were measured with standardized protocols using pure-tone air- and bone-conduction audiometry in sound-treated booths. The examination also included an otoscopic evaluation, screening tympanogram, and a questionnaire on hearing-related medical history, noise exposure, other potential risk factors, and self-perceived hearing handicap. Of the 4,541 eligible people, 3,753 (82.6%) participated in the hearing study (1993-1995). The average age of participants was 65.8 years, and 57.7% were women. The prevalence of hearing loss was 45.9%. The odds of hearing loss increased with age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.88 for 5 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-1.97) and were greater for men than women (OR = 4.42, 95% CI 3.73-5.24). The male excess of hearing loss remained statistically significant after adjusting for age, education, noise exposure, and occupation (OR = 3.65). These results demonstrate that hearing loss is a very common problem affecting older adults. Epidemiologic studies are needed to understand the genetic, environmental, and sex-related determinants of age-related hearing loss and to identify potential intervention strategies.