The spinal cord injury (SCI) peer support evaluation tool: the development of a tool to assess outcomes of peer support programs within SCI community-based organizations.

STUDY DESIGN: Guided by the 4-step process outlined in the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline, multiple methodologies were used: Delphi, literature reviews, ratings with consensus, think-aloud, and test-retest. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop and test a spinal cord injury (SCI) peer support evaluation tool that meets the needs of community-based SCI organizations in Canada. SETTING: Peer support programs for people with SCI delivered by community-based SCI organizations. METHODS: This research was co-constructed with executives and staff from SCI community-based organizations, people with SCI, researchers, and students. Given the multiple steps of this study, sample size and characteristics varied based on each step. Participants included people with SCI who received peer support (mentees) or provided peer support (mentors/supporters) and staff of community-based organizations. RESULTS: In step 1, the 20 most important outcomes for SCI peer support were identified. In step 2 and 3, the 97 items were identified to assess the outcomes and by using rating and multiple consensus methodologies 20 items, one to assess each outcome, were selected. In step 4, content and face validity and test-retest reliability were achieved. The resulting SCI Peer Support Evaluation Tool consists of 20 single-item questions to assess 20 outcomes of SCI peer support. CONCLUSION: Through a systematic process, the SCI Peer Support Evaluation Tool is now ready to be implemented to assess outcomes of SCI peer support programs delivered by community-based SCI organizations.

Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on homecare services among individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive repeated-cross sectional retrospective longitudinal cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on homecare services in individuals with traumatic or non-traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). SETTING: Health administrative database in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional study using linked health administrative databases from March 2015 to June 2022. Monthly homecare utilization was assessed in 3381 adults with SCI using Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models. RESULTS: Compared to pre-pandemic levels, between March 2020 to June 2022, the traumatic group experienced a decrease in personal and/or homemaking services, as well as an increase in nursing visits from April 2020-March 2022 and June 2022. Case management increased at various times for the traumatic group, however therapies decreased in May 2020 only. The non-traumatic group experienced a decrease in personal and/or homemaking services in July 2020, as well as an increase in nursing visits from March 2020 to February 2021 and sporadically throughout 2020. Case management also increased at certain points for the non-traumatic group, but therapies decreased in April 2020, July 2020, and September 2021. CONCLUSION: The traumatic group had decreases in personal and/or homemaking services. Both groups had increases in nursing services, increases in case management, and minimal decreases in therapies at varying times during the pandemic. Investigation is warranted to understand the root cause of these changes, and if they resulted in adverse outcomes.

Using Clinical Vignettes and a Modified Expert Delphi Panel to Determine Parameters for Identifying Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Health Administrative and Electronic Medical Record Databases.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain expert consensus on the parameters and etiologic conditions required to retrospectively identify cases of non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI) in health administrative and electronic medical record (EMR) databases based on the rating of clinical vignettes. DESIGN: A modified Delphi process included 2 survey rounds and 1 remote consensus panel. The surveys required the rating of clinical vignettes, developed after chart reviews and expert consultation. Experts who participated in survey rounds were invited to participate in the Delphi Consensus Panel. SETTING: An international collaboration using an online meeting platform. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one expert physicians and/or clinical researchers in the field of spinal cord injury (SCI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Agreement on clinical vignettes as NTSCI. Parameters to classify cases of NTSCI in health administrative and EMR databases. RESULTS: In health administrative and EMR databases, cauda equina syndromes should be considered SCI and classified as a NTSCI or TSCI based on the mechanism of injury. A traumatic event needs to be listed for injury to be considered TSCI. To be classified as NTSCI, neurologic sufficient impairments (motor, sensory, bowel, and bladder) are required, in addition to an etiology. It is possible to have both a NTSCI and a TSCI, as well as a recovered NTSCI. If information is unavailable or missing in health administrative and EMR databases, the case may be listed as "unclassifiable" depending on the purpose of the research study. CONCLUSION: The Delphi panel provided guidelines to appropriately classify cases of NTSCI in health administrative and EMR databases.

Computer International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) algorithms: a review.

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review and survey. OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of existing computerized International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) algorithms and to evaluate the use of the current algorithms in research and clinical care. SETTING: Not applicable. METHODS: Literature review according to three organizing concepts for evaluation of Health Information Products (reach, usefulness, and use) was conducted. RESULTS: While the use of computerized ISNCSCI algorithms has been around for many years, many were developed and used internally for specific projects or not maintained. Today the International SCI community has free access to algorithms from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) and the Praxis Spinal Cord Institute. Both algorithms have been validated in large datasets and are used in different SCI registries for quality control and education purposes. The use of the Praxis Institute algorithm by clinicians was highlighted through the Praxis User Survey (n = 76) which included participants from 27 countries. The survey found that over half of the participants using the algorithm (N = 69) did so on a regular basis (51%), with 54% having incorporated it into their regular workflow. CONCLUSIONS: Validated computerized ISNCSCI classification tools have evolved substantially and support education, clinical documentation, communication between clinicians and their patients, and ISNCSCI data quality around the world. They are not intended to replace well-trained clinicians, but allow for reclassification of ISNCSCI datasets with updated versions of the ISCNSCI, and support rapid classification of large datasets.

Multimorbidity in persons with non-traumatic spinal cord injury and its impact on healthcare utilization and health outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey in Canada. OBJECTIVES: To explore multimorbidity (the coexistence of two/more health conditions) in persons with non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI) and evaluate its impact on healthcare utilization (HCU) and health outcomes. SETTING: Community-dwelling persons. METHODS: Data from the Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey (SCICS) was used. A multimorbidity index (MMI) consisting of 30 secondary health conditions (SHCs), the 7-item HCU questionnaire, the Short Form-12 (SF-12), Life Satisfaction-11 first question, and single-item Quality of Life (QoL) measure were administered. Additionally, participants were grouped as "felt needed healthcare was received" (Group 1, n = 322) or "felt needed healthcare was not received" (Group 2, n = 89) using the HCU question. Associations among these variables were assessed using multivariable analysis. RESULTS: 408 of 412 (99%) participants with NTSCI reported multimorbidity. Constipation, spasticity, and fatigue were the most prevalent self-reported SHCs. Group 1 had a higher MMI score compared to Group 2 (p < 0.001). A higher MMI score correlated with the feeling of not receiving needed care (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.08-1.21), lower SF-12 (physical/mental component summary scores), being unsatisfied with life, and lower QoL (all p < 0.001). Additionally, Group 1 had more females (p < 0.001), non-Caucasians (p = 0.034), and lower personal annual income (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Persons with NTSCI have multimorbidity, and the MMI score was associated with increased HCU and worse health outcomes. This work emphasizes the critical need for improved healthcare and monitoring. Future work determining specific thresholds for the MMI could be helpful for triage screening to identify persons at higher risk of poor outcomes.

Construct validity of the international standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury (ISAFSCI) (1st edition).

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. OBJECTIVES: To assess the construct validity of the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI) (2012 1st Edition). SETTING: Two Canadian spinal cord injury (SCI) centers. METHODS: Data were collected between 2011-2014. Assessments included the ISAFSCI, standardized measures of autonomic function and a clinical examination. Construct validity of ISAFSCI was assessed by testing a priori hypotheses on expected ISAFSCI responses to standard measures (convergent hypotheses) and clinical variables (clinical hypotheses). RESULTS: Forty-nine participants with an average age of 45 ± 12 years were included, of which 42 (85.7%) were males, 37 (77.6%) had a neurological level of injury at or above T6, and 23 (46.9%) were assessed as having motor and sensory complete SCI. For the six General Autonomic Function component hypotheses, two hypotheses (1 clinical, 1 convergent) related to autonomic control of blood pressure and one clinical hypothesis for temperature regulation were statistically significant. In terms of the Lower Urinary Tract, Bowel and Sexual Function component of the ISAFSCI, all the hypotheses (5 convergent, 3 clinical) were statistically significant except for the hypotheses on female sexual items (2 convergent, 2 clinical), likely due to small sample size. CONCLUSION: The construct validity of ISAFSCI (2012 1st Edition) for the General Autonomic Function component was considered to be weak while it was much stronger for the Lower Urinary Tract, Bowel and Sexual Function component based on a priori hypotheses. These results can inform future psychometric studies of the ISAFSCI (2021 2nd Edition).

International spinal cord injury socio-demographic basic data set (version 1.0).

STUDY DESIGN: Consensus based on the literature. OBJECTIVE: Create an International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Socio-Demographic Basic Data Set (Version 1.0). SETTING: International. METHODS: The development included an iterative process where the authors reviewed existing variables containing socio-demographic variables and created a first dataset draft, which was followed by several revisions through email communications. In addition, the work was conducted in parallel with a similar endeavour within the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke SCI Common Data Elements project in the United States. Subsequently, harmonization between the two projects was sought. Following this, a review process was initiated, including The International SCI Data Sets Committee, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Board, and the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) Scientific and Executive Committees, and then by publishing on the respective websites for membership feedback. The draft was sent to about 40 national and international organizations and several interested individuals for feedback. All review comments were discussed in the working group and responded to before the final draft was developed, and finally approved by ASIA Board and the ISCoS Scientific and Executive committees. RESULTS: The final International SCI Socio-Demographic Basic Data Set includes the following variables: Date of data collection, Marital status, Household member count, Years of formal education, and Primary occupation. CONCLUSION: The International SCI Socio-Demographic Basic Data Set will facilitate uniform data collection and reporting of socio-demographic information at the time of injury as well as at post-injury follow-ups to facilitate the evaluation and comparisons across studies.

Examining the impact of COVID-19 on health care utilization among persons with chronic spinal cord injury/dysfunction: a population study.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective longitudinal cohort time-series analysis study. OBJECTIVES: To examine healthcare utilization and delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic in individuals with spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D). SETTING: Health administrative database in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: In 5754 individuals with SCI/D diagnosed from 2004-2014 and living in the community, healthcare utilization (physician visits, primary care visits, specialist visits, urologist visits, physiatrist visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital admissions) and delivery (total, in-person, virtual) were determined at the (1) pre-pandemic period (March 2015 to February 2020), (2) initial pandemic onset period (March 2020-May 2020), and (3) pandemic period (June 2020 to March 2022). Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modelling was conducted to determine the impact of the pandemic on monthly healthcare utilization and delivery. RESULTS: The initial pandemic onset period had a significant reduction of 24% in physicians (p = 0.0081), 35% in specialists (p < 0.0001), and 30% in urologist (p < 0.0001) visits, compared to pre-pandemic levels, with a partial recovery as the pandemic progressed. In April 2020, compared to the pre-pandemic period, a significant increase (p < 0.0001) in virtual visits for physicians, specialists, urologists, and primary care was found. The initial pandemic onset period had a 58% decrease in hospital admissions (p = 0.0011), compared to the pre-pandemic period. CONCLUSION: Healthcare utilization dropped in the initial pandemic onset period as physicians, specialists, and urologists, as well as hospitalization visits decreased significantly (p < 0.05) versus pre-pandemic levels. Virtual visit increases compensated for in-person visit decreases as the pandemic progressed to allow for total visits to partially recover.

Spinal Cord Stimulation Research in the Restoration of Motor, Sensory, and Autonomic Function for Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injuries: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the status of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) research for the improvement of motor, sensory, and autonomic function for individuals living with a spinal cord injury (SCI). DATA SOURCES: This scoping review identified original research published before March 31, 2021, via literature searches using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Sport Discus, and Web of Science, as well as a targeted search for well-known principal investigators. Search terms included permutations of "spinal cord stimulation," "epidural spinal cord stimulation," "transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation," "magnetic spinal cord stimulation," and "neuromodulation." STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they (1) were in English, (2) presented original research on humans living with a SCI, and (3) investigated at least 1 of the 3 forms of SCS. DATA EXTRACTION: Extracted data included authors, publication year, participant characteristics, purpose, study design, stimulation (device, location, parameters), primary outcomes, and adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: As a scoping review the extracted data were tabulated and presented descriptively. Themes and gaps in the literature were identified and reported. Of the 5754 articles screened, 103 articles were included (55 epidural, 36 transcutaneous, 12 magnetic). The primary research design was a case study or series with only a single randomized controlled trial. Motor recovery was the most common primary outcome for epidural and transcutaneous SCS studies, whereas bowel and bladder outcomes were most common for magnetic SCS studies. Seventy percent of the studies included 10 or fewer participants, and 18 articles documented at least 1 adverse event. Incomplete stimulation parameter descriptions were noted across many studies. No articles mentioned direct engagement of consumers or advocacy groups. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified a need for more robust study designs, larger sample sizes, comparative studies, improved reporting of stimulation parameters, adverse event data, and alignment of outcomes with the priorities of the community with SCI.

An international survey of the structure and process of care for traumatic spinal cord injury in acute and rehabilitation facilities: lessons learned from a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: To describe the key findings and lessons learned from an international pilot study that surveyed spinal cord injury programs in acute and rehabilitation facilities to understand the status of spinal cord injury care. METHODS: An online survey with two questionnaires, a 74-item for acute care and a 51-item for rehabilitation, was used. A subset of survey items relevant to the themes of specialized care, timeliness, patient-centeredness, and evidence-based care were operationalized as structure or process indicators. Percentages of facilities reporting the structure or process to be present, and percentages of indicators met by each facility were calculated and reported separately for facilities from high-income countries (HIC) and from low and middle-income countries (LMIC) to identify "hard to meet" indicators defined as those met by less than two-thirds of facilities and to describe performance level. RESULTS: A total of 26 acute and 26 rehabilitation facilities from 25 countries participated in the study. The comparison of the facilities based on the country income level revealed three general observations: 1) some indicators were met equally well by both HIC and LMIC, such as 24-hour access to CT scanners in acute care and out-patient services at rehabilitation facilities; 2) some indicators were hard to meet for LMIC but not for HIC, such as having a multidisciplinary team for both acute and rehabilitation settings; and 3) some indicators were hard to meet by both HIC and LMIC, including having peer counselling programs. Variability was also observed for the same indicator between acute and rehabilitation facilities, and a wide range in the total number of indicators met among HIC facilities (acute 59-100%; rehabilitation 36-100%) and among LMIC facilities (acute: 41-82%; rehabilitation: 36-93%) was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this international pilot study found that the participating acute and rehabilitation facilities on average adhered to 74% of the selected indicators, suggesting that the structure and processes to provide ideal traumatic spinal cord injury care were broadly available. Recruiting a representative sample of SCI facilities and incorporating regional attributes in future surveys will be helpful to examine factors affecting adherence to indicators.

A geospatial examination of specialist care accessibility and impact on health outcomes for patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury in New South Wales, Australia: a population record linkage study.

BACKGROUND: Timely treatment is essential for achieving optimal outcomes after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI), and expeditious transfer to a specialist spinal cord injury unit (SCIU) is recommended within 24 h from injury. Previous research in New South Wales (NSW) found only 57% of TSCI patients were admitted to SCIU for acute post-injury care; 73% transferred within 24 h from injury. We evaluated pre-hospital and inter-hospital transfer practices to better understand the post-injury care pathways impact on patient outcomes and highlight areas in the health service pathway that may benefit from improvement. METHODS: This record linkage study included administrative pre-hospital (Ambulance), admissions (Admitted Patients) and costs data obtained from the Centre for Health Record Linkage, NSW. All patients aged ≥16 years with incident TSCI in NSW (2013-2016) were included. We investigated impacts of geographical disparities on pre-hospital and inter-hospital transport decisions from injury location using geospatial methods. Outcomes assessed included time to SCIU, surgery and the impact of these variables on the experience of inpatient complications. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria identified 316 patients, geospatial analysis showed that over half (53%, n = 168) of all patients were injured within 60 min road travel of a SCIU, yet only 28.6% (n = 48) were directly transferred to a SCIU. Patients were more likely to experience direct transfer to a SCIU without comorbid trauma (p < 0.01) but higher ICISS (p < 0.001), cervical injury (p < 0.01), and transferred by air-ambulance (p < 0.01). Indirect transfer to SCIU was more likely with two or more additional traumatic injuries (p < 0.01) or incomplete injury (p < 0.01). Patients not admitted to SCIU at all were older (p = 0.05) with lower levels of injury (p < 0.01). Direct transfers received earlier operative intervention (median (IQR) 12.9(7.9) hours), compared with patients transferred indirectly to SCIU (median (IQR) 19.5(18.9) hours), and had lower risk of complications (OR 3.2 v 1.4, p < 0.001). Complications included pressure injury, deep vein thrombosis, urinary infection, among others. CONCLUSIONS: Getting patients with acute TSCI patients to the right place at the right time is dependent on numerous factors; some are still being triaged directly to non-trauma services which delays specialist and surgical care and increases complication risks. The higher rates of complication following delayed transfer to a SCIU should motivate health service policy makers to investigate reasons for this practice and consent to improvement strategies. More stringent adherence to recommended guidelines would prioritise direct SCIU transfer for patients injured within 60 min radius, enabling the benefits of specialised care.

Impact of neuropathic pain on participation: perspectives from the Canadian SCI community survey.

STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of an observational cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the perceived overall limitation of neuropathic pain on activities (NP limitation) covaries in 26 specific life activities in people with SCI, taking into account the severity of injury. SETTING: Community-based in Canada. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a cohort (N = 1481) was performed using questionnaires to rate NP frequency and limitation on activities as well as participation in 26 life activities. Relative risks (RR) analyses using Poisson regression were used to examine the data. RESULTS: Most participants (N = 1158; 78%) reported living with NP (from once a year to every day). When NP limitation was described as "not at all" or "very little" (N = 394; 34%), there was no statistically significant RR (p > 0.0019), suggesting no additional risk of not participating "as much as wanted" in any of activities compared to participants with no NP. When NP limitation was described as "to some extent" (N = 411; 35%), a significantly higher risk was observed for 5 of the 26 activities (1.34 < RR < 1.62), and for 23 activities with a large range (1.24 < RR < 3.20) when NP limitation was rated as "to a great extent or more" (N = 353; 31%). CONCLUSION: The variation of RR observed across the 26 activities suggests that the NP limitation may not be general but rather related to specific activity characteristics, which should be taken into account when evaluating NP limitations with a specific focus on the life activities being affected.

Patient perspective: diagnosis and prognosis of acute spinal cord injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to understand the patient perspective after diagnosis of an acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Discussing the diagnosis and prognosis of a tSCI with a patient can be a challenging experience for both the patient and the physician. As such, this paper attempts to better understand the patient experience to improve communication when discussing this life-altering injury. SETTING: Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: This study is a qualitative study utilizing grounded theory and semi-structured interviews. The interview transcripts were manually coded using manifest and latent content analysis. Major and minor codes were identified and discussed. RESULTS: In total, 17 interviews were conducted, fifteen individuals with tSCI who received acute care at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) and eleven family members were interviewed. Patient participants were interviewed individually or in a paired interview with a participating family member. Patient participants had varying spinal cord injuries from AIS A-D. Two major themes were identified from the interviews. The first major theme was physician demeanor (general approach and attitude towards patients) and the second major theme was delivery of information (content, timing, and source). CONCLUSIONS: This study summarizes the preferences of patients who sustained a tSCI discussions regarding their diagnosis and prognosis in the acute care setting. The goal of this study is to help guide physician interactions at this difficult and vulnerable time for patients with hopes to improve patient care through effective communication.

Development of priorities for a Canadian strategy to advance activity-based therapies after spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Participatory design. OBJECTIVES: Activity-based therapies (ABT) have physical and psychosocial benefits for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). A Canadian ABT summit was held to: (1) identify methods used in stroke rehabilitation that may be appropriate for SCI; (2) understand the current state of ABT activities in Canada; and (3) identify priorities for ABT research and care for the next five years. SETTING: Stakeholder-engaged meeting at a tertiary rehabilitation hospital. METHODS: Thirty-nine stakeholders, including individuals with SCI, frontline clinicians, healthcare administrators, researchers, funders and health policy experts, attended. Two participants were note-takers. Priority identification occurred through input from stakeholder groups, followed by individual voting. Conventional content analysis was used to synthesize the information in the meeting notes. RESULTS: The strengths of ABT in stroke rehabilitation included clear and clinically feasible definitions, measurements and interventions, and recognized requirements for implementation (e.g. behavior change, partnerships). Knowledge gaps concerning ABT activities in Canada were identified for acute and community settings, non-traumatic populations, and the interventions, equipment and standardized measures (i.e. upper limb, activity levels) used. Five priorities for ABT across the continuum of care were identified: (1) Identify current ABT activities; (2) Create a network to facilitate dialog; (3) Track engagement in ABT activities; (4) Develop and implement best practice recommendations; and (5) Study optimal timing, methods, and dose of ABT. Working groups were formed to address priorities 1-3. CONCLUSIONS: The priorities will guide SCI research and care activities in Canada over the next five years. SPONSORSHIP: Praxis Spinal Cord Institute.

Falls during inpatient rehabilitation in spinal cord injury, acquired brain injury, and neurologmusculoskeletal disease programs.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: To compare the proportion of fallers and the patient level and fall characteristics among inpatients who had experienced at least one fall in a spinal cord injury (SCI), an acquired brain injury (ABI), and a neuromusculoskeletal disease (NMS) rehabilitation program. SETTING: Tertiary rehabilitation hospital. SUBJECTS: Inpatients who had experienced at least one fall during rehabilitation. METHODS: Patient and fall level variables were extracted from electronic medical records over a 5-year period (January 1, 2011 to January 1, 2016): hospital program, age, sex, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, length of stay, number of medications, as well as fall date, time, location, cause, harm, fall risk assessment data, and whether the fall was witnessed. The impact of hospital program on fall was examined using bivariate and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-seven (16%) inpatients experienced at least one fall during the study period. Inpatients with SCI had the highest proportion of fallers (20%) and fell later after admission than inpatients in the other programs. Patients with ABI were more likely to sustain moderate-to-severe physical harm from falls. Taking >5 medications at time of fall and being earlier in one's rehabilitation course were associated with increased fall rate among fallers. CONCLUSIONS: Although the type of program was not a significant predictor of fall rate in the multivariable analysis, there were some important differences among the rehabilitation programs on patient and fall level characteristics. These results may be useful when developing and timing fall prevention interventions for inpatient rehabilitation.

The influence of neurological examination timing within hours after acute traumatic spinal cord injuries: an observational study.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. OBJECTIVES: It is widely accepted that the prediction of long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) can be done more accurately with neurological examinations conducted days to weeks post injury. However, modern clinical trials of neuroprotective interventions often require patients be examined and enrolled within hours. Our objective was to determine whether variability in timing of neurological examinations within 48 h after SCI is associated with differences in observations of follow-up neurologic recovery. SETTING: Level I trauma hospital. METHODS: An observational analysis testing for differences in AIS conversion rates and changes in total motor scores by neurological examination timing, controlling for potential confounders with multivariate stepwise regression. RESULTS: We included 85 patients, whose mean times from injury to baseline and follow-up examinations were 11.8 h (SD 9.8) and 208.2 days (SD 75.2), respectively. AIS conversion by 1+ grade was significantly more likely in patients examined at ≤4 h in comparison with later examination (78% versus 47%, RR = 1.66, p = 0.04), even after controlling for timing of surgery, age, and sex (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.1-10, p = 0.04). We failed to identify any statistically significant associations for total motor score recovery in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: AIS grade conversion was significantly more likely in those examined ≤4 h of injury; the effect of timing on motor scores remains uncertain. Variability in neurological examination timing within hours after acute traumatic SCI may influence observations of long-term neurological recovery, which could introduce bias or lead to errors in interpretation of studies of therapeutic interventions.

Correction: The influence of neurological examination timing within hours after acute traumatic spinal cord injuries: an observational study.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Impact of Trauma System Structure on Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of trauma systems in decreasing injury mortality and morbidity has been well demonstrated. However, little is known about which components contribute to their effectiveness. We aimed to systematically review the evidence of the impact of trauma system components on clinically important injury outcomes. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and BIOSIS/Web of Knowledge, gray literature and trauma association Web sites to identify studies evaluating the association between at least one trauma system component and injury outcome. We calculated pooled effect estimates using inverse-variance random-effects models. We evaluated quality of evidence using GRADE criteria. RESULTS: We screened 15,974 records, retaining 41 studies for qualitative synthesis and 19 for meta-analysis. Two recommended trauma system components were associated with reduced odds of mortality: inclusive design (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72 [0.65-0.80]) and helicopter transport (OR = 0.70 [0.55-0.88]). Pre-Hospital Advanced Trauma Life Support was associated with a significant reduction in hospital days (mean difference [MD] = 5.7 [4.4-7.0]) but a nonsignificant reduction in mortality (OR = 0.78 [0.44-1.39]). Population density of surgeons was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in mortality (MD = 0.58 [-0.22 to 1.39]). Trauma system maturity was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (OR = 0.76 [0.68-0.85]). Quality of evidence was low or very low for mortality and healthcare utilization. CONCLUSIONS: This review offers low-quality evidence for the effectiveness of an inclusive design and trauma system maturity and very-low-quality evidence for helicopter transport in reducing injury mortality. Further research should evaluate other recommended components of trauma systems and non-fatal outcomes and explore the impact of system component interactions.

Quality of Life and Adaptation in People With Spinal Cord Injury: Response Shift Effects From 1 to 5 Years Postinjury.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate response shift effects in spinal cord injury (SCI) over 5 years postinjury. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study observed at 1, 2, and 5 years post-SCI. SETTING: Specialized SCI centers. PARTICIPANTS: Sample included 1125, 760, and 219 participants at 1, 2, and 5 years post-SCI (N = 2104). The study sample was 79% men; 39% were motor/sensory complete (mean age, 44.6±18.3y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcomes included the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 and the Life Satisfaction-11 Questionnaire. Participant latent variable scores were adjusted for (1) potential attrition bias and (2) propensity scores reflecting risk of worse outcomes. The Oort structural equation modeling approach for detecting and accounting for response shift effects was used to test the hypothesis that people with SCI would undergo response shifts over follow-up. RESULTS: The study data comprised the time after FIM scores, an objective measure of motor and cognitive function, had improved and stabilized. Three latent variables (Physical, Mental, and Symptoms) were modeled over time. The response shift model indicated uniform recalibration and reconceptualization response shift effects over time. When adjusted for these response shift effects, Physical showed small true change improvements at 2- and 5-year follow-up, despite FIM stability. CONCLUSIONS: We detected recalibration and reconceptualization response shift effects in 1- to 5-year follow-up of people with SCI. Despite stable motor and cognitive function, people with SCI are adapting to their condition. This adaptation reflects a progressive disconnection between symptoms and physical or mental health, and a real improvement in the Physical latent variable.