Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 211
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Epidemiol ; 2024 Jun 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944758

RESUMO

Evidence is limited regarding the effect of prenatal benzodiazepine and z-hypnotic exposure and long-term neurodevelopment in childhood. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of initiating benzodiazepine or z-hypnotic treatment in early, mid and late pregnancy on fifth-grade numeracy and literacy scholastic skills in children, by emulating three target trials. The trials are identical except for the timing of enrollment and the number of eligible individuals. Eligibility to the trials required a history of anxiety and/or depression prior to pregnancy. We used data from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study, linked to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, to emulate the trials. We adjusted for baseline covariates that were available at time 0 for each trial by inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score. The findings of this study did not show any effect of mothers' initiation of treatment with benzodiazepines or z-hypnotics in early, mid or late pregnancy on the children's 5th grade test scores in numeracy and literacy. The study results provide reassurance for patients in need of benzodiazepines and z-hypnotics during pregnancy; however, these findings need to be interpreted with caution due to low study power in some of the analyses.

2.
Cephalalgia ; 44(4): 3331024241248846, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Migraine is common in women of reproductive age. Migraine's episodic manifestation and acute and preventive pharmacological treatment options challenge studying drug safety for this condition during pregnancy. To improve such studies, we aimed to develop algorithms to identify and characterize migraines in electronic healthcare registries and to assess the level of care. METHODS: We linked four registries to detect pregnancies from 2009-2018 and used three algorithms for migraine identification: i) diagnostic codes, ii) triptans dispensed, and iii) a combination of both. We assessed migraine severity using dispensed drugs as proxies. ICD-10 diagnostic subcodes of migraine (G43) allowed the allocation of four subtypes: complicated and/or status migrainosus; with aura; without aura; other/unspecified. RESULTS: We included 535,089 pregnancies in 367,908 women with available one-year lookback. The prevalence of migraines identified was 2.9%-4.3% before, and 0.8%-1.5% during pregnancy, depending on algorithm used. Pregnant women with migraine were mostly managed in primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care data in combination with drug dispensation records were instrumental for identification of migraine in electronic healthcare registries. Data from secondary care and drug dispensations allow better characterization of migraines. Jointly, these algorithms may contribute to improved perinatal pharmacoepidemiological studies in this population by addressing confounding by maternal migraine indication.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Complicações na Gravidez , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Noruega/epidemiologia , Adulto , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Triptaminas/uso terapêutico , Algoritmos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 90(7): 1627-1636, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555909

RESUMO

AIMS: Norway and Sweden had different early pandemic responses that may have impacted mental health management. The aim was to assess the impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic on mental health-related care. METHODS: We used national registries in Norway and Sweden (1 January 2018-31 December 2020) to define 2 cohorts: (i) general adult population; and (ii) mental health adult population. Interrupted times series regression analyses evaluated step and slope changes compared to prepandemic levels for monthly rates of medications (antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics/sedatives, lithium, opioid analgesics, psychostimulants), hospitalizations (for anxiety, bipolar, depressive/mood, eating and schizophrenia/delusional disorders) and specialist outpatient visits. RESULTS: In Norway, immediate reductions occurred in the general population for medications (-12% antidepressants to -7% hypnotics/sedatives) except for antipsychotics; and hospitalizations (-33% anxiety disorders to -17% bipolar disorders). Increasing slope change occurred for all medications except psychostimulants (+1.1%/month hypnotics/sedatives to +1.7%/month antidepressants); and hospitalization for anxiety disorders (+5.5%/month), depressive/mood disorders (+1.7%/month) and schizophrenia/delusional disorders (+2%/month). In Sweden, immediate reductions occurred for antidepressants (-7%) and opioids (-10%) and depressive/mood disorder hospitalizations (-11%) only with increasing slope change in psychostimulant prescribing of (0.9%/month). In contrast to Norway, increasing slope changes occurred in specialist outpatient visits for depressive/mood disorders, eating disorders and schizophrenia/delusional disorders (+1.5, +1.9 and +2.3%/month, respectively). Similar changes occurred in the pre-existing mental health cohorts. CONCLUSION: Differences in early COVID-19 policy response may have contributed to differences in adult mental healthcare provision in Norway and Sweden.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitalização , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Suécia/epidemiologia , Noruega/epidemiologia , Adulto , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Jovem , SARS-CoV-2 , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico
4.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 2024 Jul 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39030897

RESUMO

AIMS: Sertraline is frequently prescribed for mental health conditions in both pregnant and breastfeeding women. According to the limited available data, only small amounts of sertraline are transferred into human milk, yet with a large amount of unexplained interindividual variability. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model to describe the pharmacokinetics of sertraline during the perinatal period and explain interindividual variability. METHODS: Pregnant women treated with sertraline were enrolled in the multicenter prospective cohort SSRI-Breast Milk study. A popPK model for sertraline maternal plasma and breast milk concentrations was developed and allowed estimating the milk-to-plasma ratio (MPR). An additional fetal compartment allowed cord blood concentrations to be described. Several covariates were tested for significance. Ultimately, model-based simulations allowed infant drug exposure through placenta and breast milk under various conditions to be predicted. RESULTS: Thirty-eight women treated with sertraline were included in the study and provided 89 maternal plasma, 29 cord blood and 107 breast milk samples. Sertraline clearance was reduced by 42% in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers compared to other phenotypes. Doubling milk fat content increased the MPR by 95%. Simulations suggested a median daily infant dosage of 6.9 µg kg-1 after a 50 mg maternal daily dose, representing 0.95% of the weight-adjusted maternal dose. Median cord blood concentrations could range from 3.29 to 33.23 ng mL-1 after maternal daily doses between 25 and 150 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Infant exposure to sertraline, influenced by CYP2C19 phenotype and breast milk fat content, remains low, providing reassurance regarding the use of sertraline during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299727

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected children and adolescents in several ways, including worsened mental health, improvement of asthma, and increases in diabetes ketoacidosis. Less is known about how medication use in children and adolescents has been affected by the pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To explore how the COVID-19 pandemic affected drug utilisation in children and adolescents in Norway, Sweden, and Italy, by child age. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal drug utilisation study among all children and adolescents (<18 years old) in Norway and Sweden and a nationwide paediatric database covering 3% of the paediatric population in Italy. We conducted an interrupted time-series analysis from January 2018 to December 2021, with March 2020 as the interruption point. Dispensing or prescription rates of antidepressants, anxiolytics, sleep medications, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications, insulin, and asthma medications were examined. RESULTS: The study population in January 2018 consisted of 3,455,521 children and adolescents (136,188 from Italy, 1,160,431 from Norway, and 2,158,902 from Sweden). For sleep medications and insulin, there were only minor changes in level or trend in some age groups after March 2020. For asthma medications, the pandemic was associated with an immediate decrease in dispensing in Norway and Sweden (range of change in level: -19.2 to -3.7 dispensings per 1000 person-months), and an increasing trend in all countries afterward (range of change in trend: 0.3-6.4 dispensings per 1000 person-months), especially for the youngest age groups. Among adolescents, the pandemic was associated with an increased trend for ADHD medications, antidepressants, and anxiolytics in Norway and Sweden, but not in Italy. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing trend of psychotropic medication dispensing, especially among adolescents after the start of the pandemic, is concerning and should be investigated further. Aside from a temporary effect on asthma medication dispensing, the pandemic did not greatly affect the dispensing of the medications investigated.

6.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 80(5): 707-716, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38347228

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted medication needs and prescribing practices, including those affecting pregnant women. Our goal was to investigate patterns of medication use among pregnant women with COVID-19, focusing on variations by trimester of infection and location. METHODS: We conducted an observational study using six electronic healthcare databases from six European regions (Aragon/Spain; France; Norway; Tuscany, Italy; Valencia/Spain; and Wales/UK). The prevalence of primary care prescribing or dispensing was compared in the 30-day periods before and after a positive COVID-19 test or diagnosis. RESULTS: The study included 294,126 pregnant women, of whom 8943 (3.0%) tested positive for, or were diagnosed with, COVID-19 during their pregnancy. A significantly higher use of antithrombotic medications was observed particularly after COVID-19 infection in the second and third trimesters. The highest increase was observed in the Valencia region where use of antithrombotic medications in the third trimester increased from 3.8% before COVID-19 to 61.9% after the infection. Increases in other countries were lower; for example, in Norway, the prevalence of antithrombotic medication use changed from around 1-2% before to around 6% after COVID-19 in the third trimester. Smaller and less consistent increases were observed in the use of other drug classes, such as antimicrobials and systemic corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the substantial impact of COVID-19 on primary care medication use among pregnant women, with a marked increase in the use of antithrombotic medications post-COVID-19. These results underscore the need for further research to understand the broader implications of these patterns on maternal and neonatal/fetal health outcomes.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Fibrinolíticos , Pandemias , Gestantes , Itália
7.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(5): 1560-1574, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36417423

RESUMO

AIM: The objective of this study was to describe the use of COVID-19-related medicines during pregnancy and their evolution between the early/late periods of the pandemic. METHODS: Pregnant women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from March 2020 to July 2021 were included using the COVI-PREG registry. Exposure to the following COVID-19-related medicines was recorded: antibiotics, antivirals, hydroxychloroquine, corticosteroids, anti-interleukin-6 and immunoglobulins. We described the prevalence of medicines used, by trimester of pregnancy, maternal COVID-19 severity level and early/late period of the pandemic (before and after 1 July 2020). FINDINGS: We included 1964 pregnant patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Overall, 10.4% (205/1964) received at least one COVID-19-related medicine including antibiotics (8.6%; 169/1694), corticosteroids (3.2%; 62/1964), antivirals (2.0%; 39/1964), hydroxychloroquine (1.4%; 27/1964) and anti-interleukin-6 (0.3%; 5/1964). The use of at least one COVID-19-related medicine was 3.1% (12/381) in asymptomatic individuals, 4.2% (52/1233) in outpatients, 19.7% (46/233) in inpatients without oxygen, 72.1% (44/61) in those requiring standard oxygen, 95.7% (22/23) in those requiring high flow oxygen, 96.2% (25/26) in patients who required intubation and 57.1% (4/7) among patients who died. The proportion who received medicines to treat COVID-19 was higher before than after July 2020 (16.7% vs. 7.7%). Antibiotics, antivirals and hydroxychloroquine had lower rates of use during the late period. CONCLUSION: Medicine use in pregnancy increased with disease severity. The trend towards increased use of corticosteroids seems to be aligned with changing guidelines. Evidence is still needed regarding the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19-related medicines in pregnancy.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Pacientes Internados , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia
8.
Epidemiol Rev ; 43(1): 130-146, 2022 01 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34100086

RESUMO

In many perinatal pharmacoepidemiologic studies, exposure to a medication is classified as "ever exposed" versus "never exposed" within each trimester or even over the entire pregnancy. This approach is often far from real-world exposure patterns, may lead to exposure misclassification, and does not to incorporate important aspects such as dosage, timing of exposure, and treatment duration. Alternative exposure modeling methods can better summarize complex, individual-level medication use trajectories or time-varying exposures from information on medication dosage, gestational timing of use, and frequency of use. We provide an overview of commonly used methods for more refined definitions of real-world exposure to medication use during pregnancy, focusing on the major strengths and limitations of the techniques, including the potential for method-specific biases. Unsupervised clustering methods, including k-means clustering, group-based trajectory models, and hierarchical cluster analysis, are of interest because they enable visual examination of medication use trajectories over time in pregnancy and complex individual-level exposures, as well as providing insight into comedication and drug-switching patterns. Analytical techniques for time-varying exposure methods, such as extended Cox models and Robins' generalized methods, are useful tools when medication exposure is not static during pregnancy. We propose that where appropriate, combining unsupervised clustering techniques with causal modeling approaches may be a powerful approach to understanding medication safety in pregnancy, and this framework can also be applied in other areas of epidemiology.


Assuntos
Farmacoepidemiologia , Análise por Conglomerados , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Trimestres da Gravidez
9.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 88(10): 4526-4539, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35483963

RESUMO

AIMS: The objective of this study was to describe ondansetron drug utilization patterns during pregnancy to treat nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP). Moreover, we aimed to describe the maternal factors associated with NVP and antiemetic use. METHODS: The data consist of pregnancies with a live birth(s) within an IMRD-UK registered GP practice. Descriptive statistics were used to investigate patterns of ondansetron use in pregnancy and to describe maternal characteristics associated with NVP and antiemetic drug utilization. We differentiate first- from second-line use during pregnancy using antiemetic prescription pathways. RESULTS: The dataset included 733 633 recorded complete pregnancies from 2005 to 2019. NVP diagnosis and ondansetron prescription prevalence increased from 2.7% and 0.1% in 2005 to 4.8% and 2.5% in 2019 respectively. Over the period 2015-2019, the most common oral daily dosages were 4 mg/d (8.5%), 8 mg/d (37.1%), 12 mg/d (37.5%) and between 16 and 24 mg/d (16.9%). Prescription of ondansetron was initiated during the first trimester of pregnancy in 40% of the cases and was moderately used as a first-line therapy (2.8%), but preferred choice of second-line therapy. Women with mental health disorders, asthma and/or prescribed folic acid were more likely to experience NVP and use antiemetics in pregnancy than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that ondansetron is increasingly used off-label to treat NVP during pregnancy, also in the first trimester and before other prescription antiemetics have been prescribed. Several maternal comorbidities and folic acid use were more common among women experiencing NVP and using antiemetics, including ondansetron.


Assuntos
Antieméticos , Medicina Geral , Complicações na Gravidez , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Ácido Fólico/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Náusea/tratamento farmacológico , Náusea/epidemiologia , Ondansetron/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Prescrições , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Vômito/tratamento farmacológico , Vômito/epidemiologia
10.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 36(2): 254-263, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34841537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mastitis is a common and distressing maternal postpartum condition, but the relationship between mastitis timing and antibiotic treatment and breastfeeding outcomes and postnatal mental health is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence of mastitis and treatment with antibiotics in first 6 months postpartum, and to investigate the impact of mastitis timing and antibiotic treatment on breastfeeding practices and postnatal mental health. METHODS: This study is based on 79,985 mother-infant dyads in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Women were classified according to self-reported mastitis within first month ('early') or 1-6 months ('later') postpartum and antibiotic treatment. Breastfeeding outcomes included predominant or any breastfeeding and abrupt breastfeeding cessation until 6 months postpartum. Maternal mental health was assessed by self-report at 6 months postpartum. RESULTS: The incidence of mastitis was 18.8%, with 36.8% reporting treatment with antibiotics. Women reporting early mastitis were less likely to report predominant breastfeeding (adjustedd relative risk [aRR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86, 0.99) and any breastfeeding for 6 months (aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96, 0.98) than women who did not report mastitis, and more likely to report abrupt breastfeeding cessation (aRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.23, 1.53). Late-onset mastitis was not associated with poorer breastfeeding outcomes. Among women reporting mastitis, the risk of abrupt breastfeeding cessation was higher in those also reporting antibiotic use. Mastitis was associated with an increased risk of mental health problems postpartum which was highest among those reporting no antibiotic use (aRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.18, 1.41), in contrast to those also reporting antibiotic use (aRR 1.08, 95% CI 0.96, 1.22). CONCLUSIONS: Lactational mastitis and its associated treatment with antibiotics are common. Early (<1 month postpartum) mastitis appears to be a modest risk factor for suboptimal breastfeeding outcomes. In addition, mastitis is associated with poorer mental health.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Mastite , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Estudos de Coortes , Pai , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Mastite/tratamento farmacológico , Mastite/epidemiologia , Mães/psicologia , Período Pós-Parto , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 31(2): 247-256, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34817916

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and antidepressant exposure during early-mid pregnancy, overall and according to antidepressant affinity to the histamine-1 (H1 ) receptor. METHODS: Data originate from the nation-wide, Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study conducted in 1999-2008, linked to the national Medical Birth Registry. The study included 6647 pregnancies within women with depressive/anxiety disorders during and/or 6 months prior to pregnancy. Pregnancies exposed in early-mid gestation to antidepressants having low (group 1, n = 814) or high (group 2, n = 77) affinity to the H1 receptor were compared to non-medicated (n = 5756). We fit crude and weighted modified Poisson regression models using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: Overall, 84 (1.3%) of the pregnancies developed GDM. Relative to non-medicated pregnancies, the risk of GDM was slightly lower in antidepressant group 1 exposed (1.3% vs 1.1%), but more elevated in those exposed to group 2 antidepressants (3.9%). In the weighted analysis, there was no evidence for an association between antidepressant group 1 exposure in early-mid pregnancy and risk of GDM [relative risk (RR): 0.69, 95% confidence interval: 0.31-1.51]. CONCLUSIONS: Gestational use of antidepressants with low H1 receptor affinity, mainly SSRIs and SNRIs, does not pose a substantial risk of GDM in women with depressive/anxiety disorders in pregnancy, compared to no use.


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Gestacional/induzido quimicamente , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Pai , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mães , Gravidez
12.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 101(3): 344-354, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35170756

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Antidepressant use is common in the perinatal period, but there are concerns that it can negatively impact on breastfeeding outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of perinatal antidepressant use on breastfeeding initiation and duration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 80 882 mother-infant dyads in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Women were first classified according to self-reported mental disorders and timing of antidepressant use before and/or after gestational week 28 (i.e., early-mid-gestation and/or late-gestation use). We subsequently classified women according to self-reported mental disorders and antidepressant use postpartum and whether antidepressants were continued from late gestation or were new/restarted. Breastfeeding outcomes included breastfeeding initiation as well as predominant or any breastfeeding and abrupt breastfeeding discontinuation until 6 months. RESULTS: Late-gestation antidepressant use was associated with a reduced likelihood of breastfeeding initiation (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.97) but not predominant (aRR 0.96; 95% CI 0.67-1.39) or any (aRR 1.00; 95% CI 0.93-1.07) breastfeeding at 6 months compared with unexposed women with mental disorders. When examined according to postnatal antidepressant use, no differences in predominant (aRR 0.94; 95% CI 0.60-1.48) or any breastfeeding (aRR 0.99; 95% CI 0.91-1.07) at 6 months were evident among women who continued antidepressant use from late gestation into the postpartum period compared with unexposed women with mental disorders. In contrast, new/restarted antidepressant use postpartum was associated with a reduced likelihood of predominant (aRR 0.37; 95% CI 0.22-0.61) and any (aRR 0.49; 95% CI 0.42-0.56) breastfeeding at 6 months, as well as increased risk of abrupt breastfeeding discontinuation (aRR 2.64; 95% CI 2.07-3.37) compared with the unexposed women with mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: A complex relation exists between depression, antidepressant use, and breastfeeding outcomes. Antidepressant use in late pregnancy was associated with a reduced likelihood of breastfeeding initiation but not breastfeeding duration or exclusivity. In contrast, initiating or restarting antidepressants postpartum was associated with poorer breastfeeding outcomes. Overall, women taking antidepressants and women with a mental disorder may benefit from additional education and support to improve breastfeeding rates and promote maternal and infant health and wellbeing.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Mães , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Pai , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Am J Epidemiol ; 190(11): 2487-2499, 2021 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34017981

RESUMO

Cancer is an important cause of childhood mortality, yet the etiology is largely unknown. A combination of pre- and postnatal factors is thought to be implicated, including maternal medication use. We aimed to provide: 1) a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications on associations between maternal medication use and childhood cancer, with a focus on study design and methodology; and 2) suggestions for how to increase transparency, limit potential biases, and improve comparability in studies on maternal medication use and childhood cancer. We conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to June 8, 2020. Altogether, 112 studies were identified. The reviewed studies were heterogeneous in study design, exposure, and outcome classification. In 21 studies (19%), the outcome was any childhood cancer. Of the 91 papers that reported on specific types of cancer, 62% did not report the cancer classification system. The most frequently investigated medication groups were sex hormones (46 studies, excluding fertility medications), and antiinfectives (37 studies). Suggestions for strengthening future pharmacoepidemiologic studies on maternal medication use and childhood cancer relate to choice of cancer classification system, exposure windows, and methods for identification of, and control for, potential confounders.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez
14.
Eur J Neurol ; 28(7): 2443-2455, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33852763

RESUMO

Many clinicians lack experience in managing trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) in pregnancy and lactation. In addition to cluster headache, TACs include hemicrania continua, paroxysmal hemicrania, and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing/autonomic symptoms (SUNCT/SUNA). Treating these rare, severe headache conditions often requires off-label drugs that have uncertain teratogenic potential. In the last few years, several new treatment options and safety documentation have emerged, but clinical guidelines are lacking. This narrative review aimed to provide an updated clinical guide and good clinical practice recommendations for the management of these debilitating headache disorders in pregnancy and lactation.


Assuntos
Cefaleia Histamínica , Síndrome SUNCT , Cefalalgias Autonômicas do Trigêmeo , Aleitamento Materno , Cefaleia Histamínica/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Histamínica/tratamento farmacológico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Cefalalgias Autonômicas do Trigêmeo/diagnóstico , Cefalalgias Autonômicas do Trigêmeo/tratamento farmacológico
15.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(10): 3890-3900, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33783857

RESUMO

AIMS: Maternal antithyroid drug (ATD) use during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of birth defects in offspring. Uncertainty remains on the size of this risk and how it compares to untreated hyperthyroidism due to methodological limitations of previous studies. METHODS: Systematic review of MEDLINE and EMBASE identifying observational studies examining ATD use during pregnancy and risk of birth defects by 28 August 2020. Data were extracted on study characteristics, effect estimates and comparator groups. Adjusted effect estimates were pooled using a random-effects generic inverse variance method and absolute risk calculated. RESULTS: Seven cohort studies and 1 case-control study involving 6 212 322 pregnancies and 388 976 birth defects were identified reporting regression effect estimates. Compared to an unexposed population comparison, the association between ATD use during pregnancy and birth defects in offspring was: adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.16 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.25 for propylthiouracil (PTU); aRR 1.28 95%CI 1.06-1.54 for methimazole/carbimazole (MMI/CMZ); aRR 1.51, 95%CI 1.16-1.97 for both MMI/CMZ and PTU; and aRR 1.15 95%CI 1.02-1.29 for untreated hyperthyroidism. The excess risk of any and major birth defects per 1000, respectively, was: 10.2 and 1.3 for PTU; 17.8 and 2.3 for MMI/CMZ; 32.5 and 4.1 for both MMI/CMZ and PTU; and 9.6 and 1.2 for untreated hyperthyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: When appropriately analysed the risk of birth defects associated with ATD use in pregnancy is attenuated. Although still elevated, the risk of birth defects is smallest with PTU compared to MMI/CMZ and may be similar to that of untreated hyperthyroidism.


Assuntos
Anormalidades Induzidas por Medicamentos , Hipertireoidismo , Complicações na Gravidez , Anormalidades Induzidas por Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Anormalidades Induzidas por Medicamentos/etiologia , Antitireóideos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertireoidismo/induzido quimicamente , Hipertireoidismo/epidemiologia , Metimazol , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Propiltiouracila/efeitos adversos
16.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 30(10): 1380-1390, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33866622

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To estimate the association between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children in preschool and primary school, and prenatal exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) by timing and duration. METHODS: This study was based on the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study linked to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD). NSAID exposure was identified by maternal self-report in pregnancy. Child diagnosis of ADHD was obtained from NPR and NorPD. Symptoms of ADHD at age 5 years were measured using Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised, where higher scores correspond to more symptoms. To account for time-varying exposure and confounders, marginal structural models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios and mean difference in z-scores. RESULTS: The analyses on ADHD diagnosis and ADHD symptoms included 56 340 and 34 961 children respectively. Children exposed to NSAIDs prenatally had no increased risk of ADHD diagnosis (first trimester: HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.86;1.45, second trimester: HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69;1.38, third trimester: HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.31; 1.46) or ADHD symptoms (first trimester: standardized mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.03;0.09, second trimester: standardized mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.04;0.11, third trimester: standardized mean difference 0.11, 95% CI -0.03; 0.25). There was no duration-response relationship for either outcome. CONCLUSION: Though non-differential misclassification of the exposure may have attenuated results, these findings are reassuring and suggest no substantially increased risk of ADHD diagnosis or symptoms in children prenatally exposed to NSAIDs, regardless of timing or duration.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Anti-Inflamatórios , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Pai , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Mães , Noruega/epidemiologia , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/epidemiologia
17.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 30(6): 716-726, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33314561

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Limited research has focused on the association between prenatal thyroid hormone replacement therapy (THRT) and motor function, communication skills, and behavior in preschool children. Here, we estimated the association between THRT during pregnancy and the first trimester and these developmental outcomes. METHODS: This study was based on the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and other national registries. We included mother-child pairs exposed to THRT during pregnancy (n = 663), after delivery (n = 728), or unexposed (n = 28 040). Exposure to THRT was defined according to filled prescriptions. Child outcomes, presented as T-score differences, were parent-reported using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and Child Behavior Checklist. RESULTS: Of 29 431 mother-child pairs, 2.3% were prenatally exposed to THRT. We found no difference between prenatally exposed and unexposed children in regards to gross motor function (ß: 0.17, 95% CI -1.19, 1.54), fine motor function (ß: -0.17, 95% CI -1.14, 0.80), communication (ß: -0.31, 95% CI -1.58, 0.96), externalizing (ß: -0.03, 95% CI -1.07, 1.01), internalizing (ß: 0.89, 95% CI -0.20, 1.97), or social behaviors (ß: -0.04, 95% CI -0.92, 0.84). Somatic complaints were higher in THRT-exposed children (ß: 0.98, 95% CI 0.08, 1.87), and children whose mothers were exposed after delivery had more sleep problems than unexposed children (ß: 0.99, 95% CI 0.24, 1.74). CONCLUSIONS: Children prenatally exposed to THRT have developmental outcomes as positive as unexposed children on motor function, communication, and behavior. The association with somatic complaints and sleep were not clinically relevant.


Assuntos
Mães , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Comunicação , Pai , Feminino , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/epidemiologia , Glândula Tireoide
18.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 100(7): 1219-1229, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33475148

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Evidence on perinatal mental health during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and its potential determinants is limited. Therefore, this multinational study aimed to assess the mental health status of pregnant and breastfeeding women during the pandemic, and to explore potential associations between depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress and women's sociodemographic, health, and reproductive characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, web-based study was performed in Ireland, Norway, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and the UK between 16 June and 14 July 2020. Pregnant and breastfeeding women up to 3 months postpartum who were older than 18 years of age were eligible. The online, anonymous survey was promoted through social media and hospital websites. The Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale (GAD-7), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) were used to assess mental health status. Regression model analysis was used to identify factors associated with poor mental health status. RESULTS: In total, 9041 women participated (including 3907 pregnant and 5134 breastfeeding women). The prevalence of major depressive symptoms (EDS ≥ 13) was 15% in the pregnancy cohort and and 13% the breastfeeding cohort. Moderate to severe generalized anxiety symptoms (GAD ≥ 10) were found among 11% and 10% of the pregnant and breastfeeding women. The mean (±SD) PSS scores for pregnant and breastfeeding women were 14.1 ± 6.6 and 13.7 ± 6.6, respectively. Risk factors associated with poor mental health included having a chronic mental illness, a chronic somatic illness in the postpartum period, smoking, having an unplanned pregnancy, professional status, and living in the UK or Ireland. CONCLUSIONS: This multinational study found high levels of depressive symptoms and generalized anxiety among pregnant and breastfeeding women during the COVID-19 outbreak. The study findings underline the importance of monitoring perinatal mental health during pandemics and other societal crises to safeguard maternal and infant mental health.


Assuntos
Ansiedade , Aleitamento Materno , COVID-19 , Depressão , Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perinatal , Estresse Psicológico , Adulto , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/etiologia , Aleitamento Materno/métodos , Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/psicologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiologia , Assistência Perinatal/métodos , Assistência Perinatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Periparto/psicologia , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/psicologia , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
19.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 34(3): 247-256, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31448449

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested an association between prenatal paracetamol exposure and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children. However, these findings may be confounded by unmeasured factors related to maternal use of paracetamol and child outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between duration and timing of prenatal paracetamol exposure on parent-reported communication skills, behaviour, and temperament in preschool-aged children, with focus on the role of unmeasured confounding. METHODS: We used data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Linear and generalised linear models with inverse probability weights and robust standard errors were used to quantify the association between prenatal paracetamol exposure and continuous and categorical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 32 934 children included in our study, 8374 (25.4%), 4961 (15.1%), and 1791 (5.4%) were prenatally exposed to paracetamol in one, two, and three trimesters, respectively. Children exposed to paracetamol in two trimesters scored lower on shyness compared with unexposed children (ß -0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.05, -0.19). Children exposed to paracetamol in three trimesters had a moderate increased risk of internalising behaviour problems (relative risk (RR) 1.36, 95% CI 1.02, 1.80) and borderline externalising behaviour problems (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.93, 1.60) compared with unexposed children. Children exposed to paracetamol in 2nd/3rd trimester scored lower on shyness (ß -0.32, 95% CI -0.66, 0.02) compared with unexposed children. Sensitivity analyses indicated that unmeasured confounders play an important role and may potentially bias the effect estimates away from the null. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of exposure and short-term use of paracetamol during pregnancy do not seem to pose any substantial risk of the outcomes examined. Although we found an association between paracetamol use in multiple trimesters and lower shyness and greater internalising behaviour in preschool-aged children, we cannot rule out chance or unmeasured confounding as possible explanations for these findings.


Assuntos
Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Transtornos do Comportamento Infantil , Comportamento Infantil , Duração da Terapia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Complicações na Gravidez , Trimestres da Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Transtornos do Comportamento Infantil/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Comportamento Infantil/epidemiologia , Desenvolvimento Infantil/efeitos dos fármacos , Pré-Escolar , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Noruega/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/epidemiologia , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/psicologia , Medição de Risco , Habilidades Sociais
20.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(9): 1111-1119, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748540

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the validity of dispensed prescription to classify exposure to medications used episodically during pregnancy, and to explore individual trajectories of episodic medication use across pregnancy, using triptans for migraine as the motivating example. METHODS: We compared self-reported triptan use during pregnancy in The Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) to dispensed prescriptions in The Norwegian Prescription Database and calculated Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), sensitivity, specificity and predictive values using MoBa as reference standard. We used group-based trajectory modeling to estimate exposure trajectories in MoBa according to probability of triptan use across pregnancy. RESULTS: We identified 6051 pregnancies where mothers filled at least one triptan prescription or reported migraine or triptan use in the 6 months before or during pregnancy. Sensitivity of prescribed triptans during pregnancy was low (39.1%), but specificity was quite high (95.4%). Agreement between the two data sources was fair (κ 0.36). We identified three trajectory groups in MoBa including constant-high, decreasing-medium and decreasing-low probability of triptan use across pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Using dispensed prescriptions rather than self-report to classify exposure to triptans during pregnancy is likely to result in substantial under-estimation of exposure. In this study, traditional definitions of ever-exposed vs never-exposed failed to capture variations in drug utilization during pregnancy.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Triptaminas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , Noruega , Farmacovigilância , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA