HER2 gene status in primary breast cancers and matched distant metastases.

INTRODUCTION: The status of the gene encoding human EGF-like receptor 2 (HER2) is an important prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer. Only breast cancers with HER2 amplification respond to the targeted therapy with trastuzumab. It is controversial to what degree the primary tumour is representative of distant metastases in terms of HER2 status. Discrepancies in HER2 status between primary tumours and distant metastases have been described, but their reasons remain unclear. Here, we compared HER2 status on cytological specimens of distant metastases with the result from the primary carcinomas, and explored the prevalence of and the reasons for discrepant results. METHODS: HER2 status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. HER2 gene amplification was defined as a HER2/chromosome 17 signal ratio of 2 or more. HER2 results from cytological specimens of matched distant metastases were compared with the results from the corresponding primary tumours (n = 105 patients). In addition, lymph node metastases were analysed in 31 of these patients. RESULTS: HER2 amplification was found in 20% of distant metastases. HER2 status was discordant between the primary tumour and distant metastasis in 7.6% of the 105 patients. Re-evaluation revealed that in five patients (4.7%), discrepancies were due to interpretational difficulties. In two of these patients, focal amplification had initially been overlooked as a result of heterogeneity in the primary tumours or in the metastases, respectively. A further three patients had borderline amplification with a ratio close to 2. Discrepancy remained unexplained in three patients (2.9%). CONCLUSION: HER2 gene status remains highly conserved as breast cancers metastasise. However, discrepant results do occur because of interpretational difficulties and heterogeneity of HER2 amplification. Cytological specimens from distant metastases are well suited for HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis.

HER2, TOP2A, CCND1, EGFR and C-MYC oncogene amplification in colorectal cancer.

AIM: Recent studies had suggested substantial molecular differences between tumours from different ethnic groups. In this study, the molecular differences between the incidences of colorectal carcinoma in Saudi and Swiss populations are investigated. METHOD: 518 cases of colon cancer tumours (114 from Saudi Arabia and 404 from Switzerland) were analysed in a tissue microarray format. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was used to estimate frequencies of copy number changes of known oncogenes, including HER2, TOPO2A, CCND1, EGFR and C-MYC. RESULTS: Using FISH, amplifications were mostly low level (gene-to-centromere ratio 2 to 4), which is in contrast with other tumour types with more frequent gene amplifications. The amplifications were particularly frequent for MYC (Saudi 9% and Swiss 14.2%) but unrelated to clinical outcome and pathological information. Remarkably, there were four tumours exhibiting classic high-level gene amplification for HER2 (Swiss 1.3%), a pattern often accompanied by response to trastuzumab (Herceptin) in breast cancer. Occasional high-level amplifications were also observed for CCND1 (Saudi 1/106, 0.9%; Swiss 2/373, 0.5%) and EGFR (Swiss 2/355; 0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Rare high-level amplifications of therapeutic target genes were found in patients with colon cancer. Although no molecular differences were found between incidences of colon cancer cases in Swiss and Saudi populations, these observations emphasise the urgent need for clinical studies investigating the effect of targeted therapies.

Prognostic relevance of gene amplifications and coamplifications in breast cancer.

Multiple different oncogenes have been described previously to be amplified in breast cancer including HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2. Gene amplification results in oncogene overexpression but may also serve as an indicator of genomic instability. As such, presence of one or several gene amplifications may have prognostic significance. To assess the prognostic importance of amplifications and coamplifications of HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2 in breast cancer, we analyzed a breast cancer tissue microarray containing samples from 2197 cancers with follow-up information. Fluorescence in situ hybridizations revealed amplifications of CCND1 in 20.1%, HER2 in 17.3%, MDM2 in 5.7%, MYC in 5.3%, and EGFR in 0.8% of the tumors. All gene amplifications were significantly associated with high grade. HER2 (P < 0.001) and MYC amplification (P < 0.001) were also linked to shortened survival. In case of HER2, this was independent of grade, pT, and pN categories. MYC amplification was almost 3 times more frequent in medullary cancer (15.9%), than in the histologic subtype with the second highest frequency (ductal; 5.6%; P = 0.0046). HER2 and MYC amplification were associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity (P < 0.001) whereas CCND1 amplification was linked to estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positivity (P < 0.001). Coamplifications were more prevalent than expected based on the individual frequencies. Coamplifications of one or several other oncogenes occurred in 29.6% of CCND1, 43% of HER2, 55.7% of MDM2, 65% of MYC, and 72.8% of EGFR-amplified cancers. HER2/MYC-coamplified cancers had a worse prognosis than tumors with only one of these amplifications. Furthermore, a gradual decrease of survival was observed with increasing number of amplifications. In conclusion, these data support a major prognostic impact of genomic instability as determined by a broad gene amplification survey in breast cancer.

HER2 analysis in breast cancer: reduced immunoreactivity in FISH non-informative cancer biopsies.

Due to the central role in predicting response to herceptin and possibly also other anticancer drugs, accurate and reproducible detection of the HER2 status is important. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are the most commonly used methods for HER2 analysis. It is a disadvantage of FISH that a fraction of cases remain not interpretable probably due to suboptimal tissue handling before analysis. To investigate a possible influence of tissue damage on the results of HER2 IHC we compared the HER2 IHC results obtained in tumors with and without interpretable FISH in a breast cancer tissue microarray. The HER2 IHC results differed greatly between 1551 tumors with interpretable HER2 FISH signals and 405 breast cancers showing no FISH signals. FISH informative tumors had an IHC score of 3+ in 12.6%, 2+ in 3% and 1+ in 9.2% of cases. FISH non-informative tumors showed significantly lower IHC scores (p < 0.0001). They were IHC 3+ in 3.9%, 2+ in 3.7% and 1+ in 4.4% of cases. Overall, the data show that not only FISH but also IHC results are dependent on good tissue quality for successful analysis. Poor tissue quality can be easily identified in FISH analyses because of a lack of hybridization signals. Inappropriate tissue handling is more dangerous in IHC because an artificial lack of staining can be regarded as 'negative' result.

Close association between HER-2 amplification and overexpression in human tumors of non-breast origin.

The relationship between HER-2 overexpression and gene amplification is well evaluated in breast cancers but remains unclear or controversial in many other tumor entities. Therefore, we tested the HER-2 status in more than 120 different tumor entities. 5751 tumor samples were analyzed on TMAs by immunohistochemistry (Hercept-Test, DAKO) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (PathVysion, Abbott-Vysis) under highly standardized conditions. HER-2 overexpression (score 2/3+) and amplification occurred most often in breast cancers but was also seen in 18 other tumor entities including cancers of the urinary bladder (amplification in 14.3%, overexpression in 6.7%), stomach (8.3/4.9%), endometrium (6.6/6.8%), lung (2.8/3.1%) and ovary (2.3/1.2%). Remarkably, a strong association between overexpression and amplification was seen in all examined cancer entities. Trastuzumab therapy is highly efficient in HER-2 amplified breast cancer both in metastatic disease and as an adjuvant therapy. A variety of other tumor entities including frequent neoplasms and cancers with often limited therapeutic options have similar patterns of HER-2 alterations as observed in breast cancer (ie high overexpression due to high level gene amplification). Such tumor entities should be carefully evaluated for a possible utility of trastuzumab treatment.

Predominance of high-grade pathway in breast cancer development of Middle East women.

Recent data have suggested considerable molecular differences in cancers from various ethnical groups. As molecular features are increasingly used for predicting cancer prognosis and response to therapy, better knowledge of ethnic molecular features is important. To identify potential molecular differences between breast cancers in Europe and the Middle East, we analyzed consecutive breast cancer series from Switzerland (n=2197) and Saudi Arabia (n=204). Tissue microarrays were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2, CCND1, MYC, and EGFR amplification. The data revealed marked differences between Saudi and Swiss patients. Saudi breast cancers had a markedly higher frequency of HER2 (31 vs 17%; P<0.0001) and MYC (16 vs 5%; P<0.0001) amplifications than Swiss breast cancers. Remarkably, this was partly due to a much higher incidence of grade 3 cancers in the Saudi than in the Swiss population (65 vs 32%; P<0.0001). However, differences in amplification frequency hold also true within grade 3 cancers (HER2: 40 vs 30%, P<0.05; MYC: 22 vs 11%, P=0.002). Interestingly, in combination with known age standardized incidence rates of breast cancer in Saudi Arabia (21.6/100 000) and Switzerland (70.1/100 000), these data suggest that the incidence of high-grade breast cancer is comparable for Saudi and Swiss women, while the incidence of low-grade breast cancers is about 14 times lower in Saudi than for Swiss women. These observations suggest that a difference in genetic susceptibility and/or lifestyle between Saudi and Swiss women has a substantial and much higher than expected impact on the risk of low-grade breast cancer.