Sternotomy Wound Infiltration With Liposomal Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Elective Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Poor pain control after cardiac surgery can be associated with postoperative complications, longer recovery, and development of chronic pain. The authors hypothesized that adding liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to plain bupivacaine (PB) will provide better and long-lasting analgesia when used for wound infiltration in median sternotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Single institution, tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery through median sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: A single surgeon performed wound infiltration of LB plus PB or PB into the sternotomy wound, chest, and mediastinal tube sites. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were followed up for 72 hours for pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse events. Sixty patients completed the study for analysis (LB group [n = 29], PB group [n = 31]). Patient characteristics, procedural variables, and pain scores measured at specific intervals from 4 hours until 72 hours postoperatively did not reveal any significant differences between the groups. Mixed-model regression showed that the trend of mean pain scores at movement in the LB group was significantly (p = 0.01) lower compared with the PB group. Opioid consumption over 72 hours was not significantly different between the 2 groups (oral morphine equivalents; median [interquartile range], 139 [73, 212] mg in LB v 105 [54, 188] mg in PB, p = 0.29). Recovery characteristics and adverse events were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: LB added to PB for sternotomy wound infiltration during elective cardiac surgery did not significantly improve the quality of postoperative analgesia.

Obstetric pain management for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: A qualitative and quantitative comparison of patient and provider perspectives (QUEST study).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) may experience inadequate pain management especially during childbirth. This study assessed and compared patient and provider perspectives on analgesia during and after delivery in women with OUD. DESIGN: Prospective cohort, mixed method design including semi-structured interviews and structured surveys with pregnant or recently pregnant patients (n = 17) and provider (n = 15) groups. SETTING: Prenatal clinics and hospital postpartum units. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were pregnant women with OUD currently treated with methadone (n = 1) or buprenorphine (n = 16). Providers were obstetricians (n = 5), obstetric nurses (n = 5) and anesthesiologists (n = 5). MEASUREMENTS: Validated questionnaires were completed by both groups; patient interviews were conducted during the third trimester and at 5 days post-delivery. Patient topics included pain management preferences, analgesia satisfaction and attitudes toward pain. Provider topics included labor and postpartum pain management perspectives. Interviews were independently coded and qualitatively analyzed for major themes. FINDINGS: Five major themes emerged from patient interviews: (1) neuraxial blockade was endorsed for labor pain; (2) otherwise, limited pain control options were perceived; (3) no consensus around use of opioids for pain; (4) non-opioid options should be available; and (5) provider communication and health-care system issues act as barriers to adequate pain management. Provider perspective themes included the following: (1) unique challenges in pain management for patients with OUD; (2) confusion on how to plan for and make perinatal adjustments to medication for OUD; (3) discrepant views on use of opioids for pain management; (4) endorsement of non-pharmacological and non-opioid options; and (5) need for improved provider collaboration in developing pain management plans. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with opioid use disorder and health-care providers prioritize pain management during and after childbirth, but have discrepant views on use of opioids and other pain management options. Inadequate care coordination and discrepancies in opinions need to be addressed both within care teams and between patients and providers. Clinicians would benefit from better evidence to guide clinical care of patients with OUD for patient-centered pain management.

NSS-Bridge Device for Post-Cesarean Delivery Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Percutaneous auricular nerve stimulation has been used for the treatment of symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal, including abdominal pain, nausea, and general discomfort. However, its potential utility for pain management and opioid minimization after surgery has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of a trial protocol designed to assess the effectiveness of the NSS2-Bridge device as a non-pharmacologic alternative to opioids after cesarean delivery. Methods: In a randomized control design, healthy women receiving cesarean delivery were randomized to receive the active device, placebo device, or no device. Devices were placed on the ear following cesarean delivery and left in place for 5 days. Feasibility and acceptability of the device was assessed by patient reports of device tolerability (rated on a 100mm visual analog scale where 0 is not tolerable at all and 100 is the most tolerable) as well as qualitative reporting. Additional outcomes assessed included proportion of patients not using opioids in hospital, as well as pain at rest, pain with movement, and total opioid consumption in the hospital and for the first 5 days after surgery. Results: There were 60 patients included in the final analysis. Device tolerability was rated highly, with an average daily score of >75 mm on the visual analog scale. The trial retention rate was 89.7% with most exclusions (42.9%) occurring due to unanticipated development of care complexity (e.g., hemorrhage and additional surgical procedures), with only 1 exclusion (14.3%) due to device discomfort. The active device group achieved the highest proportion of opioid-free hospitalizations (40%) compared to placebo (20%) and no device groups (30%). Pain at rest and with movement was similar between treatment groups. Conclusions: This trial protocol designed to test the efficacy of NSS2-Bridge device for post-cesarean pain management is feasible and acceptable. Larger proportions of patients not using opioids in the active device group justifies additional investigation on device effectiveness in pregnant and postpartum people at highest risk for pain.