Mumps epidemiology in the mid-west of Ireland 2004-2008: increasing disease burden in the university/college setting.

Mumps is a contagious vaccine-preventable viral disease that is experiencing a revival in students attending second and third level colleges. Large mumps outbreaks have been reported in several countries despite the presence of childhood immunisation programmes over many years, including measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination. In 2008, 1,377 cases of mumps were notified in Ireland and 1,734 in the first three months of 2009 (provisional data). This paper reviews the recent epidemiology of mumps in the Mid-West region of Ireland and highlights preventive measures. A substantial proportion of cases were not laboratory-confirmed and it is important that doctors continue to notify suspected cases. In the Irish Mid-West, data from enhanced surveillance shows a high proportion of mumps in the age group 15-24 years. Complications were uncommon and rarely severe. Where data were available, over half of the cases did not recall having received two doses of MMR, but most recalled one dose. Parents should continue to ensure children receive both MMR vaccinations so that uptake is optimal for protection. Steps were taken to increase awareness of the disease in the school, college and university settings. Preventive measures implemented to limit mumps transmission in the school/college setting over recent years included vaccination of close contacts, isolation for five days and hand hygiene.

Sarcoidosis presenting as an intramedullary spinal cord lesion.

OBJECTIVES: Sarcoidosis affects the spinal cord in only 0.43% of patients with sarcoidosis. Usually there is systemic involvement prior to the development of cord lesions. We present a case of sarcoid isolated to the intramedullary spinal cord, which was a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We review the case and then present a review of the literature with an emphasis on presentation, diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We have reviewed a patient who presented with an isolated sarcoid granuloma affecting the cervical spinal cord. All pertinent history and physical information was extracted from the patient's chart and through patient interview. Laboratory, radiographic and pathological investigations are presented. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Fourteen patients have been reported with isolated intramedullary spinal cord sarcoidosis. Current practice supports the role of surgery for biopsy; mainstay of treatment is corticosteroids.

A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization.

BACKGROUND: Nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents are used frequently because they are believed to be safer than ionic, high-osmolality agents, but they are also more expensive. We conducted a randomized trial to compare the incidence of adverse events after the administration of ionic, high-osmolality and of non-ionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents during cardiac angiography. METHODS: We compared the need to treat patients for adverse reactions and the frequency and severity of specific hemodynamic, systemic, and symptomatic side effects in two groups of patients randomly assigned to receive either ionic, high-osmolality or nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast material, and also in 366 patients who could not be randomized. RESULTS: Treatment for adverse events was required in 213 of 737 patients who received high-osmolality contrast agents (29 percent) but in only 69 of 753 patients who received nonionic agents (9 percent) (95 percent confidence interval for the percent difference, 15.9 to 23.6 percent). Hemodynamic deterioration and symptoms also occurred more often in the high-osmolality group, as did severe or prolonged reactions (2.9 percent, as compared with 0.8 percent in the nonionic group; P = 0.035). The severe reactions were largely confined to patients with severe cardiac disease. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of severe coronary disease and unstable angina were predictors of clinically important adverse reactions. If all the patients in our randomized trial had been given nonionic contrast material, the incremental cost per procedure would have been $89. CONCLUSIONS: Nonionic, low-osmolality contrast material is better tolerated during cardiac angiography than ionic, high-osmolality contrast material. Since cost constraints may prevent the universal use of nonionic contrast material, its selective use in patients with severe cardiac disease could be considered.

Preoperative radiotherapy is effective in the treatment of fibromatosis.

The use of preoperative radiation is well-established for soft tissue sarcoma, but its use in fibromatosis is not well-characterized. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of preoperative radiotherapy on the local control of fibromatosis and to assess treatment-related morbidity in this setting. In particular we assessed complication rates in comparison with soft tissue sarcoma treatment. All patients with fibromatosis referred to this unit who received preoperative radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions) from 1988 to 2000 and who had at least 2 years of followup were included in this study. The rate of recurrence in this group was ascertained. Similarly constructed datasets from all patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities who received preoperative radiation from 1986 to 1997 also were analyzed. The rates of complications in the two groups were compared. Fifty-eight patients were treated with preoperative radiation for fibromatosis and the median followup was 69 months. There were 11 local recurrences (19%). Major wound complications manifested in two patients (3.4%). Wound-related complications arose in 89 of 265 patients with soft tissue sarcomas (33.5%). There was a significant difference in the rate of major wound complications observed in the two groups. The use of radiotherapy before surgery is effective in the combined treatment of fibromatosis.

Contrast nephropathy in patients with impaired renal function: high versus low osmolar media.

Prescription of low osmolar contrast to prevent nephrotoxicity in subjects with pre-existing renal impairment is costly and has not been clearly shown to be effective. We entered 249 subjects with a pre-contrast serum creatinine greater than 120 mumol/liter (1.35 mg/dl) having cardiac catheterization or intravenous contrast into a randomized controlled trial comparing high and low osmolar contrast. The outcome assessed was a rise in serum creatinine repeated 48 to 72 hours after contrast. A further 117 patients entered the non-randomized prospective arm of the study. In the randomized study the serum creatinine rose by at least 25% after contrast in 8 of 117 (6.8%) given high and in 5 of 132 (3.8%) given low osmolar contrast (P greater than 0.05, one-tailed 95% confidence interval for the difference 3 to 7.8%). More severe renal failure (greater than 50% increase in serum creatinine) after contrast was uncommon (3.4% with high and 1.5% with low osmolar contrast). A rise in serum creatinine after contrast was significantly associated with the severity of the pre-contrast renal impairment and the presence of diabetes mellitus, but not with type of contrast. Diabetics with a serum creatinine greater than 200 mumol/liter (2.25 mg/dl) pre-contrast had a highest risk of deterioration in renal function after contrast. We conclude that in patients with pre-existing renal impairment the incidence of contrast nephropathy was not significantly different comparing high osmolar and nonionic contrast. The potential benefit of nonionic contrast in moderate renal impairment is likely to be small, but trials in diabetics with severe renal impairment should be undertaken urgently.