Parental Enrollment Decision-Making for a Neonatal Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the parental experience of recruitment and assess differences between parents who participated and those who declined to enroll in a neonatal clinical trial. STUDY DESIGN: This was a survey conducted at 12 US neonatal intensive care units of parents of infants who enrolled in the High-dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and encephaLopathy (HEAL) trial or who were eligible but declined enrollment. Questions assessed 6 factors of the parental experience of recruitment: (1) interactions with research staff; (2) the consent experience; (3) perceptions of the study; (4) decisional conflict; (5) reasons for/against participation; and (6) timing of making the enrollment decision. RESULTS: In total, 269 of 387 eligible parents, including 183 of 242 (75.6%) of those who enrolled their children in HEAL and 86 of 145 (59.3%) parents who declined to enroll their children in HEAL, were included in analysis. Parents who declined to enroll more preferred to be approached by clinical team members rather than by research team members (72.9% vs 49.2%, P = .005). Enrolled parents more frequently reported positive initial impressions (54.9% vs 10.5%, P < .001). Many parents in both groups made their decision early in the recruitment process. Considerations of reasons for/against participation differed by enrollment status. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how parents experience recruitment, and how this differs by enrollment status, may help researchers improve recruitment processes for families and increase enrollment. The parental experience of recruitment varied by enrollment status. These findings can guide future work aiming to inform optimal recruitment strategies for neonatal clinical trials.

Serial plasma biomarkers of brain injury in infants with neonatal encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is a major cause of long-term neurodevelopmental disability in neonates. We evaluated the ability of serially measured biomarkers of brain injury to predict adverse neurological outcomes in this population. METHODS: Circulating brain injury biomarkers including BDNF, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, VEGF, Tau, GFAP, and NRGN were measured at 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h of cooling from 103 infants with NE undergoing TH. The biomarkers' individual and combinative ability to predict death or severe brain injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes beyond 1 year of age was assessed. RESULTS: Early measurements of inflammatory cytokines IL-6, 8, and 10 within 24 HOL (AUC = 0.826) and late measurements of Tau from 72 to 96 HOL (AUC = 0.883, OR 4.37) were accurate in predicting severe brain injury seen on MRI. Late measurements of Tau were predictive of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes (AUC = 0.81, OR 2.59). CONCLUSIONS: Tau was consistently a predictive marker for brain injury in neonates with NE. However, in the first 24 HOL, IL-6, 8, and 10 in combination were most predictive of death or severe brain injury. The results of this study support the use of a serial biomarker panel to assess brain injury over the time course of disease in NE. IMPACT: While recent studies have evaluated candidate brain injury biomarkers, no biomarker is in current clinical use. This study supports the use of a serial biomarker panel for ongoing assessment of brain injury neonates with NE. In combination, IL6, IL8, and IL10 in the first 24 h of cooling were more predictive of brain injury by MRI than each cytokine alone. Individually, Tau was overall most consistently predictive of adverse neurological outcomes, particularly when measured at or after rewarming.

Parental Factors Associated With the Decision to Participate in a Neonatal Clinical Trial.

Importance: It remains poorly understood how parents decide whether to enroll a child in a neonatal clinical trial. This is particularly true for parents from racial or ethnic minority populations. Understanding factors associated with enrollment decisions may improve recruitment processes for families, increase enrollment rates, and decrease disparities in research participation. Objective: To assess differences in parental factors between parents who enrolled their infant and those who declined enrollment for a neonatal randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study conducted from July 2017 to October 2019 in 12 US level 3 and 4 neonatal intensive care units included parents of infants who enrolled in the High-dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) trial or who were eligible but declined enrollment. Data were analyzed October 2019 through July 2020. Exposure: Parental choice of enrollment in neonatal clinical trial. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentages and odds ratios (ORs) of parent participation as categorized by demographic characteristics, self-assessment of child's medical condition, study comprehension, and trust in medical researchers. Survey questions were based on the hypothesis that parents who enrolled their infant in HEAL differ from those who declined enrollment across 4 categories: (1) infant characteristics and parental demographic characteristics, (2) perception of infant's illness, (3) study comprehension, and (4) trust in clinicians and researchers. Results: Of a total 387 eligible parents, 269 (69.5%) completed the survey and were included in analysis. This included 183 of 242 (75.6%) of HEAL-enrolled and 86 of 145 (59.3%) of HEAL-declined parents. Parents who enrolled their infant had lower rates of Medicaid participation (74 [41.1%] vs 47 [55.3%]; P = .04) and higher rates of annual income greater than $55 000 (94 [52.8%] vs 30 [37.5%]; P = .03) compared with those who declined. Black parents had lower enrollment rates compared with White parents (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.73). Parents who reported their infant's medical condition as more serious had higher enrollment rates (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.0-16.3). Parents who enrolled their infant reported higher trust in medical researchers compared with parents who declined (mean [SD] difference, 5.3 [0.3-10.3]). There was no association between study comprehension and enrollment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the following factors were associated with neonatal clinical trial enrollment: demographic characteristics (ie, race/ethnicity, Medicaid status, and reported income), perception of illness, and trust in medical researchers. Future work to confirm these findings and explore the reasons behind them may lead to strategies for better engaging underrepresented groups in neonatal clinical research to reduce enrollment disparities.