Acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to a cardiology vs non-cardiology service: variations in treatment & outcome.

BACKGROUND: Specialized cardiology services have contributed to reduced mortality in acute coronary syndromes (ACS).  We sought to evaluate the outcomes of ACS patients admitted to non-cardiology services in Southern Alberta. METHODS: Retrospective chart review performed on all troponin-positive patients in the Calgary Health Region identified those diagnosed with ACS by their attending team. Patients admitted to non-cardiology and cardiology services were compared, using linked data from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry and the Strategic Clinical Network for Cardiovascular Health and Stroke. RESULTS: From January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008, 2105 ACS patients were identified, with 1636 (77.7%) admitted to cardiology and 469 (22.3%) to non-cardiology services. Patients admitted to non-cardiology services were older, had more comorbidities, and rarely received cardiology consultation (5.1%). Cardiac catheterization was underutilized (5.1% vs 86.4% in cardiology patients (p < 0.0001)), as was evidence-based pharmacotherapy (p < 0.0001). Following adjustment for baseline comorbidities, 30-day through 4-year mortality was significantly higher on non-cardiology vs. cardiology services (49.1% vs. 11.0% respectively at 4-years, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In a large ACS population in the Calgary Health Region, 25% were admitted to non-cardiology services. These patients had worse outcomes, despite adjustment for baseline risk factor differences. Although many patients were appropriately admitted to non-cardiology services, the low use of investigations and secondary prevention medications may contribute to poorer patient outcome. Further research is required to identify process of care strategies to improve outcomes and lessen the burden of illness for patients and the health care system.

Strategic clinical networks in Alberta: Structures, processes, and early outcomes.

In June 2012, Alberta Health Services introduced Strategic Clinical Networks (SCNs) as engines of innovation. The SCNs are collaborative clinical teams, with a provincial strategic mandate and with goals of achieving best outcomes, seeking greatest value for money and engaging clinicians in all aspects of the work. The SCNs are led by clinicians, driven by clinical needs, based on measurement and best evidence, and supported by research expertise, infrastructure, quality improvement, and analytic resources. Eleven SCNs are operational, with five others planned. Early measurable value is demonstrable in each. Examples include improving care and outcomes following stroke, reducing use of anti-psychotics in Long-Term Care (LTC), and improving surgical safety through effective implementation of the Safe Surgery Checklist.

Outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in Chinese, South Asian and White patients with acute myocardial infarction: administrative data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on whether there are ethnic differences in outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We compared 30-day and long-term mortality, recurrent AMI, and congestive heart failure in South Asian, Chinese and White patients with AMI who underwent PCI and CABG. METHODS: Hospital administrative data in British Columbia (BC), Canada were linked to the BC Cardiac Registry to identify all patients with AMI who underwent PCI (n = 4729) or CABG (n = 1687) (1999-2003). Ethnicity was determined from validated surname algorithms. Logistic regression for 30-day mortality and Cox proportional-hazards models were adjusted for age, sex, socio-economic status, severity of coronary disease, comorbid conditions, time from AMI to a revascularization procedure and distance to the nearest hospital. RESULTS: Following PCI, Chinese had higher short-term mortality (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.36, 95% CI: 1.12-5.00; p = 0.02), and South Asians had a higher risk for recurrent AMI (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08-1.67, p = 0.007) and heart failure (OR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.00-3.29, p = 0.05) compared to White patients. Risk of heart failure was higher in South Asian patients who underwent CABG compared to White patients (OR (95% CI) = 2.06 (0.92-4.61), p = 0.08). There were no significant differences in mortality following CABG between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese and South Asian patients with AMI and PCI or CABG had worse outcomes compared to their White counterparts. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and investigate potential underlying causes.

How do hospital administrators perceive cardiac rehabilitation in a publicly-funded health care system?

BACKGROUND: Patient and provider-related factors affecting access to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) have been extensively studied, but health-system administration factors have not. The objectives of this study were to investigate hospital administrators' (HA) awareness and knowledge of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), perceptions regarding resources for and benefit of CR, and attitudes toward and implementation of inpatient transition planning for outpatient CR. METHODS: A cross-sectional and observational design was used. A survey was administered to 679 HAs through Canadian and Ontario databases. A descriptive examination was performed, and differences in HAs' perceptions by role, institution type and presence of within-institution CR were compared using t-tests. RESULTS: 195 (28.7%) Canadian HAs completed the survey. Respondents reported good knowledge of what CR entails (mean=3.42±1.15/5). Awareness of the closest site was lower among HAs working in community versus academic institutions (3.88±1.24 vs. 4.34±0.90/5 respectively; p=.01). HAs in non-executive roles (4.77±0.46/5) perceived greater CR importance for patients' care than executives (4.52±0.57; p=.001). HAs perceived CR programs should be situated in both hospitals and community settings (n=134, 71.7%). CONCLUSIONS: HAs value CR as part of patients' care, and are supportive of greater CR provision. Those working in community settings and executives may not be as aware of, or less-likely to value, CR services. CR leaders from academic institutions might consider liaising with community hospitals to raise awareness of CR benefits, and advocate for it with the executives in their home institutions.

Anticoagulation after subcutaneous enoxaparin is time sensitive in STEMI patients treated with tenecteplase.

The adequacy of anticoagulation with enoxaparin as an adjuvant to fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI is unclear and has implications for both efficacy and safety; especially in patients undergoing a pharmacoinvasive reperfusion strategy. A subset of fibrinolytic-treated patients in the WEST study was enrolled in a systematic anti-Xa substudy. All received ASA and subcutaneous (SQ) enoxaparin 1 mg/kg followed by TNK-tPA. Incremental IV dosing of enoxaparin (0.3-0.5 mg/kg) was allowed prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Anti-Xa blood samples were drawn prior and after angiography. Data are presented as percentages, medians and IQRs. Forty-five patients underwent angiography 2.8 h (2.5-14.6) after fibrinolytic. The pre-angiography median anti-Xa acquired 179 min (153-875) after SQ enoxaparin was 0.48 U/ml (0.42-0.65); a relationship between anti-Xa activity and time from administration was evident (r = 0.418, p < 0.007). Without supplemental IV enoxaparin the 2nd anti-Xa acquired 218 min (195-930) after SQ enoxaparin was 0.48 U/ml (0.41-0.80, n = 29). After supplemental IV enoxaparin, the 2nd anti-Xa was 0.92 U/ml (0.72-1.10, n = 16). An incremental IV enoxaparin dose and anti-Xa relationship was demonstrated (r = 0.59, p = 0.001) i.e. no IV 0.48 U/ml (0.41-0.80, n = 29), 0.3 mg/kg IV 0.81 U/ml (0.63-1.00, n = 12), and 0.5 mg/kg IV 1.34 U/ml (1.16-1.54, n = 4). Most fibrinolytic treated STEMI patients receiving weight-adjusted SQ enoxaparin (1 mg/kg) had subtherapeutic anti-Xa levels (<0.5 U/ml) after ~3 h. A strategy of supplemental 0.3 mg/kg IV enoxaparin at time of PCI reliably achieved anti-Xa ≥ 0.5 U/ml. Our findings provide a rational novel strategy for anti-thrombotic management in STEMI patients undergoing a pharmacoinvasive reperfusion strategy.

A Case of Electrical Right-Ventricular Infarction in the Absence of Clinical Right-Ventricular Failure.

In the setting of acute coronary syndrome, right-ventricular (RV) infarction, which has significant clinical implications, can occur in conjunction with inferior left-ventricular (LV) infarction. In rare cases, RV infarction is isolated. We describe a case of isolated RV infarction identified based on previously described electrocardiogram findings in the absence of hemodynamic or imaging evidence of RV dysfunction. This case highlights the fact that RV transmural ischemia can exist in the absence of the clinical syndrome associated with RV infarction, which we hypothesize is related to the proportion of RV myocardium involved in the infarct, or conversely, the amount of myocardium protected through various mechanisms.

Dans le cadre du syndrome coronarien aigu, l'infarctus du ventricule droit, qui a des répercussions cliniques importantes, peut survenir conjointement avec un infarctus inférieur du ventricule gauche. Dans de rares cas, l'infarctus du ventricule droit est isolé. Nous décrivons un cas d'infarctus du ventricule droit isolé décelé à l'aide des résultats précédemment décrits d'un électrocardiogramme faute de résultats hémodynamiques ou d'imagerie indiquant une dysfonction ventriculaire droite. Ce cas souligne le fait qu'une ischémie transmurale du ventricule droit peut survenir même sans syndrome clinique associé à l'infarctus du ventricule droit, ce qui s'explique, selon notre hypothèse, par la proportion de myocarde ventriculaire droit touché par l'infarctus ou, à l'inverse, la quantité de myocarde protégé par divers mécanismes.

Causes of Cardiovascular Hospitalization and Death in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy (from the Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial [ATTR-ACT]).

In the Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT), tafamidis significantly reduced mortality and cardiovascular (CV)-related hospitalizations compared with placebo in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). This analysis aimed to assess the causes of CV-related death and hospitalization in ATTR-ACT to provide further insight into the progression of ATTR-CM and efficacy of tafamidis. ATTR-ACT was an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized study. Patients with hereditary or wild-type ATTR-CM were randomized to tafamidis (n = 264) or placebo (n = 177) for 30 months. The independent Endpoint Adjudication Committee determined whether certain investigator-reported events met the definition of disease-related efficacy endpoints using predefined criteria. Cause-specific reasons for CV-related deaths (heart failure [HF], arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, sudden death, stroke, and other CV causes) and hospitalizations (HF, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack/stroke, and other CV causes) were assessed. Total CV-related deaths was 53 (20.1%) with tafamidis and 50 (28.2%) with placebo, with HF (15.5% tafamidis, 22.6% placebo), followed by sudden death (2.7% tafamidis, 5.1% placebo), the most common causes. The number of patients with a CV-related hospitalization was 138 (52.3%) with tafamidis and 107 (60.5%) with placebo; with HF the most common cause (43.2% tafamidis, 50.3% placebo). All predefined causes of CV-related death or hospitalization were less frequent with tafamidis than placebo. In conclusion, these data provide further insight into CV disease progression in patients with ATTR-CM, with HF the most common adjudicated cause of CV-related hospitalization or death in ATTR-ACT. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01994889.

Dietary Recommendations for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: an Evidence-Free Zone.

We have evaluated dietary recommendations for people diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), a genetic condition in which increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is associated with an increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). Recommendations for FH individuals have emphasised a low saturated fat, low cholesterol diet to reduce their LDL-C levels. The basis of this recommendation is the 'diet-heart hypothesis', which postulates that consumption of food rich in saturated fat increases serum cholesterol levels, which increases risk of CHD. We have challenged the rationale for FH dietary recommendations based on the absence of support for the diet-heart hypothesis, and the lack of evidence that a low saturated fat, low cholesterol diet reduces coronary events in FH individuals. As an alternative approach, we have summarised research which has shown that the subset of FH individuals that develop CHD exhibit risk factors associated with an insulin-resistant phenotype (elevated triglycerides, blood glucose, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), obesity, hyperinsulinaemia, high-sensitivity C reactive protein, hypertension) or increased susceptibility to develop coagulopathy. The insulin-resistant phenotype, also referred to as the metabolic syndrome, manifests as carbohydrate intolerance, which is most effectively managed by a low carbohydrate diet (LCD). Therefore, we propose that FH individuals with signs of insulin resistance should be made aware of the benefits of an LCD. Our assessment of the literature provides the rationale for clinical trials to be conducted to determine if an LCD would prove to be effective in reducing the incidence of coronary events in FH individuals which exhibit an insulin-resistant phenotype or hypercoagulation risk.

The ketogenic diet: Pros and cons.

Diets have been at the center of animated debates for decades and many claims have been made in one direction or the other by supporters of opposite camps, often with limited evidence. At times emphasis has been put on a single new aspect that the previous diets had overlooked and the new one was to embrace in order to improve weight loss and well-being. Unfortunately, very few randomized clinical trials involving diets have addressed the combined question of weight loss and cardiovascular outcomes. The recently introduced ketogenic diet requires a rigorous limitation of carbohydrates while allowing a liberal ingestion of fats (including saturated fats) and has generated a flurry of interest with many taking the pro position and as many taking the cons position. The ketogenic diet causes a rapid and sensible weight loss along with favourable biomarker changes, such as a reduction in serum hemoglobin A1c in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. However, it also causes a substantial rise in low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and many physicians are therefore hesitant to endorse it. In view of the popular uptake of the keto diet even among subjects not in need of weight loss, there is some preoccupation with the potential long-term consequences of a wide embrace of this diet by large segments of the population. On the contrary, numerous lines of evidence show that plant-based diets are associated with reduction in oncological and cardiovascular diseases and a prolonged life span. The debate reproduced in this article took place during a continuous medical education program between two cardiologists with largely differing views on the matter of effectiveness, sustainability, and safety of the ketogenic diet compared to alternative options.

Effect of low-carbohydrate diets on cardiometabolic risk, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: An obesity epidemic has resulted in increasing prevalence of insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, metabolic syndrome (MetS), and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The Diet-Heart Hypothesis posited that dietary fat is the culprit. Yet dietary fat reduction has contributed to the problem, not resolved it. The role of hyperinsulinemia, the genesis of its atherogenic dyslipidemia and systemic inflammation in CVD and its reversal is reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Overnutrition leads to weight gain and carbohydrate intolerance creating a vicious cycle of insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia inhibiting fat utilization and encouraging fat storage leading to an atherogenic dyslipidemia characterized by hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL, and small dense LDL. The carbohydrate-insulin model better accounts for the pathogenesis of obesity, MetS, and ultimately type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and CVD. Ketogenic Diets reduce visceral obesity, increase insulin sensitivity, reverse the atherogenic dyslipidemia and the inflammatory biomarkers of overnutrition. Recent trials show very high adherence to ketogenic diet for up to 2 years in individuals with T2DM, reversing their metabolic, inflammatory and dysglycemic biomarkers as well as the 10-year estimated atherosclerotic risk. Diabetes reversal occurred in over 50% and complete remission in nearly 8%. SUMMARY: Therapeutic carbohydrate-restricted can prevent or reverse the components of MetS and T2DM.

Low carbohydrate diet: are concerns with saturated fat, lipids, and cardiovascular disease risk justified?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is an extensive literature on the efficacy of the low carbohydrate diet (LCD) for weight loss, and in the improvement of markers of the insulin-resistant phenotype, including a reduction in inflammation, atherogenic dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia. However, critics have expressed concerns that the LCD promotes unrestricted consumption of saturated fat, which may increase low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels. In theory, the diet-induced increase in LDL-C increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The present review provides an assessment of concerns with the LCD, which have focused almost entirely on LDL-C, a poor marker of CVD risk. We discuss how critics of the LCD have ignored the literature demonstrating that the LCD improves the most reliable CVD risk factors. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple longitudinal clinical trials in recent years have extended the duration of observations on the safety and effectiveness of the LCD to 2-3 years, and in one study on epileptics, for 10 years. SUMMARY: The present review integrates a historical perspective on the LCD with a critical assessment of the persistent concerns that consumption of saturated fat, in the context of an LCD, will increase risk for CVD.

Simple Laboratory Test-Based Risk Scores in Coronary Catheterization: Development, Validation, and Comparison to Conventional Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: We developed and validated laboratory test-based risk scores (i.e., lab risk scores) to reclassify mortality risk among patients undergoing their first coronary catheterization. METHODS: Patients were catheterized between 2009 and 2015 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada (n = 14 135, derivation cohort), and in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (n = 12 143, validation cohort). Logistic regression with group LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) penalty was used to select quintiles of the last laboratory tests (red blood cell count, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, red cell distribution width, platelet count, total white blood cell count, plasma sodium, potassium, chloride, CO2, international normalized ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate) performed <30 days before catheterization and by age and sex that were significantly associated with death ≤60 and >60 days after catheterization. Follow-up was until 2016. Risk scores were developed from significant tests, internally validated in Calgary among bootstrap samples and externally validated in Edmonton after recalibration using coefficients developed in Calgary. Interaction tests were performed, and net reclassification improvement vs conventional demographic and clinical risk factors was determined. RESULTS: Lab risk scores were strongly associated with mortality (29-40× for top vs bottom quintile, P for trends <0.01), had good discrimination and were well calibrated in Calgary (C = 0.80-0.85, slope = 0.99-1.01) and Edmonton (C = 0.80-0.82; slope = 1.02-1.05)-similar to demographic and clinical risk factors alone. Associations were attenuated by several comorbidities; however, scores appropriately reclassified 11%-20% of deaths (both follow-up periods) and 6%-9% of survivors (>60 days) after catheterization vs demographic and clinical risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In 2 populations of patients undergoing their first coronary catheterization, risk scores based on simple laboratory tests were as powerful as a combination of demographic and clinical risk factors in predicting mortality. Lab risk scores should be used for patients undergoing coronary catheterization.

Relative and cumulative effects of lipid and blood pressure control in the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The relative contributions of on-treatment low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C, HDL-C), triglycerides, and blood pressure (BP) control on the risk of recurrent stroke or major cardiovascular events in patients with stroke is not well defined. METHODS: We randomized 4731 patients with recent stroke or transient ischemic attack and no known coronary heart disease to atorvastatin 80 mg per day or placebo. RESULTS: After 4.9 years, at each level of LDL-C reduction, subjects with HDL-C value above the median or systolic BP below the median had greater reductions in stroke and major cardiovascular events and those with a reduction in triglycerides above the median or diastolic BP below the median showed similar trends. There were no statistical interactions between on-treatment LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, and BP values. In a further exploratory analysis, optimal control was defined as LDL-C <70 mg per deciliter, HDL-C >50 mg per deciliter, triglycerides <150 mg per deciliter, and SBP/DBP <120/80 mm Hg. The risk of stroke decreased with as the level of control increased (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.98 [0.76 to 1.27], 0.78 [0.61 to 0.99], 0.62 [0.46 to 0.84], and 0.35 [0.13 to 0.96]) for those achieving optimal control of 1, 2, 3, or 4 factors as compared to none, respectively. Results were similar for major cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: We found a cumulative effect of achieving optimal levels of LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, and BP on the risk of recurrent stroke and major cardiovascular events. The protective effect of having a higher HDL-C was maintained at low levels of LDL-C.

Guideline adjudicated fibrinolytic failure: incidence, findings, and management in a contemporary clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is efficacious after clinical failure of fibrinolytic therapy and is recommended for those with persistent ischemia, hemodynamic, or electrical instability. We sought to describe the frequency of fibrinolytic failure (rescue eligibility) as well as the patient characteristics associated with rescue eligibility, rescue referral, and PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eligibility, indication, and referral for guideline-based rescue PCI were adjudicated in 221 patients enrolled in the WEST trial. WEST treated patients at earliest medical contact and used a tenectaplase/enoxaparin regimen. Ninety patients (41%) were adjudicated with acute myocardial infarction as rescue eligible of whom 68 were referred for rescue PCI. Baseline characteristics did not predict rescue eligibility or referral. Emergency angiography before PCI performed a median of 82 minutes (interquartile range 50-99) after rescue referral showed TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 in 34 (50%). Percutaneous coronary intervention was adjudicated as successful in 58 of 60 attempts. Procedures began approximately 45 minutes sooner in patients initially admitted to PCI-capable hospitals. Compared to those with clinically successful fibrinolytic therapy, rescue eligible patients demonstrated higher median peak creatine phosphokinase (1889 [1243-3746] vs 999 [440-2048], P < .01) and 30-day median NT-proBNP levels (748 [391-1916] vs 431 [153-1016], P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Rescue eligibility determined by guideline criteria is common after contemporary fibrinolysis and is not predicted by conventional baseline characteristics. Half of rescue-referred patients are patent at angiography: although contemporary PCI success rates are high, rescue eligibility is associated with larger infarctions.

Quality of Cardiac Care in Canada: Recommendations for Building a Sustainable Future.

Cardiovascular (CV) disease continues to present a significant disease and economic burden in Canada. To improve the quality of care and ensure sustainability of services, a national quality improvement initiative is required. The purpose of this analysis was to review the evidence for public reporting (PR) and external benchmarking (EB) to improve patient outcomes, and to recommend a strategy to improve CV care in Canada. To incorporate recent literature, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) commissioned the Institute of Health Economics to provide a rapid update on the literature of PR and EB. The review showed that EB is more likely to promote positive effects, such as improved mortality, morbidity, and evidence-based clinical practice, and to limit negative effects, such as access restrictions or unintended provider behaviour associated with some forms of "top-down" PR. On the basis of these findings, this we recommend the following: (1) secure funding for the provincial collection of CV quality indicators and the creation of annual National CV Quality Reports; (2) enhance the culture of using CV quality indicator data for continuous quality improvement and opportunities for national or regional EB and sharing best practices; and (3) implement ongoing evaluation and revision of CCS clinical practice guidelines incorporating key quality indicators. This is already under way to a limited extent by the CCS with its Quality Project, but intentional, sustained support needs to be secured to enhance this ongoing effort and improve the quality of CV care for all Canadians.

The Effect of Nurse Practitioner-Led Intervention in Diabetes Care for Patients Admitted to Cardiology Services.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefits of diabetes nurse practitioner (DNP) intervention on glycemic control, quality of life and diabetes treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) admitted to cardiology inpatient services at a tertiary centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to the cardiology service with T2DM who had suboptimal control (HbA1c >6.5%) were approached for the study. Diabetes care was optimized by the DNP through medication review, patient education and discharge care planning. Glycemic control was evaluated with 3-month post-intervention HbA1c. Secondary outcomes of lipid profiles, quality of life and treatment satisfaction were evaluated at baseline and at 3 months with fasting lipids, Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life questionnaires (ADDQoL) and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires (DTSQ) respectively. RESULTS: With almost 49% of patients admitted to the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute having HbA1c <6.5%, only 23 patients completed the study over a 12-month period. We found a significant decrease in HbA1c values at 3 months post-intervention from 8.0% (SD=1. 2) to 6.9% (SD=0.7), p=0.002. LDL showed a significant decrease at 3 months from 1.7 mmol/L (SD=0.7) to 1.1 mmol /L (SD=0.6), p=0.011. Overall median ADDQoL impact scores improved at follow up, from -1.4 to -0.4, p = 0.0003. Overall no significant changes in DTSQ scores were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term DNP intervention in T2DM patients admitted to the inpatient cardiology service was associated with benefits in areas of glycemic control and various domains of QoL. Our study provides support for the involvement of DNP in the care of cardiology inpatients at tertiary centres.

Hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the Alberta Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Invasive Treatment Strategies (COAPT) study.

BACKGROUND: We examined variation in hospital treatment and its relationship to clinical outcome in a large population-based cohort of ACS patients within a single payer-government funded health care system. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in 106 hospitals in Alberta, Canada with a primary diagnosis of ACS were included (July 1, 2010-March 31, 2013) with comparisons made across the three cardiac catheterization-capable hospitals (Sites A-C). Cox proportional-hazard regression models were used to examine the multivariable-adjusted association between site and 1-year death or repeat cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization (primary endpoint). RESULTS: Of 14,155 patients, 1938 (13.7%) were admitted to a community hospital without transfer to an invasive hospital (10.7% in-hospital death). The remaining were admitted (n=4514, 36.9%) or transferred (n=7703, 63.1%) to an invasive hospital (A:5480; B:3621; C:3116) where 11,247 (92.1%) underwent catheterization. Comorbidities and angiographic disease burden differed across sites. Variation in 30-day revascularization (PCI: 71.3%, 72.0%, 68.7%, p<0.001; CABG: 6.2%, 6.4%, 9.3%, p<0.001) and drug-eluting stent use for PCI (24.3%, 54.6%, 50.5%, p<0.001) were observed. After adjustment for patient demographics and comorbidities, variation in rates of 1-year death or CV hospitalization was observed among those with 30-day revascularization (p(interaction)<0.001; B versus A: HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.66-0.91; C versus A: HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.65-0.91; B versus C: HR 1.01, 95%CI 0.84-1.21). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a government funded health system, we have shown variation in hospital treatment exists. Following adjustment hospital site was associated with differences in clinical outcome within 1year. Hence, further efforts may be warranted to help address potential disparities in ACS care.

Improved prediction of early-onset coronary artery disease using APOE epsilon4, BChE-K, PPARgamma2 Pro12 and ENOS T-786C in a polygenic model.

OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is often polygenic due to multiple mutations that contribute small effects to susceptibility. Since most prior studies only evaluated the contribution of single candidate genes, we therefore looked at a combination of genes in predicting early-onset CAD [apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon4, butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) K, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma2 (PPARgamma2) Pro12Ala and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (ENOS) T-786C]. DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the frequencies, individually and in combination, of all four alleles among patients with early-onset CAD (n = 150; <50 years), late-onset CAD (n = 150; >65 years) and healthy controls (n = 150, age range 47-93 years). Differences in the proportion of subjects in each group with the given gene combination were assessed and likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated using logistic regression to combine the results of multiple genes. RESULTS: Early-onset CAD patients had increased, but non-significant, frequencies of PPARgamma2 Pro12/Pro12 (P = 0.39) and ENOS T-786C (P = 0.72), while BChE-K was only significantly higher in early-onset CAD patients compared to controls (P = 0.03). There were significantly more APOE epsilon4 alleles alone (P = 0.02) or in combination with BChE-K (P = 0.02) among early-onset CAD patients compared to late-onset CAD ones or controls. When combined, there was a higher prevalence of all four alleles in early-onset CAD (early-onset CAD patients: 10.7%, late-onset CAD patients: 3.3% and controls: 2.7%, P = 0.01). LR for early-onset CAD for a single allele was relatively small (1.08 for PPARgamma2 to 1.70 for APOE epsilon4). This increased to 2.78 (1.44-5.37) when combining all four alleles, therefore increasing the pre-test probability of CAD from 5% to a post-test probability of 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS: While any single mutation causes only a mildly increased LR (none > 1.7), in combination, the likelihood of early-onset CAD increased to 2.78 with four mutations. The genetics of early-onset CAD appear to be multifactorial, requiring polygenic models to elucidate risk.

Treating the right patient at the right time: Access to cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac surgery.

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society Access to Care Working Group was formed with a mandate to use the best science and information available to establish reasonable triage categories and safe wait times for common cardiovascular services and procedures through a series of commentaries. The present commentary discusses the rationale for access benchmarks for cardiac catheterization and revascularization procedures for patients with stable angina, and access benchmarks for cardiac catheterization and surgery for patients with valvular heart disease. Literature on standards of care, wait times and wait list management was reviewed. A survey of cardiac centres in Canada was performed to develop an inventory of current practices in identifying and triaging patients. The Working Group recommends the following medically acceptable wait times for access to cardiac catheterization: 14 days for symptomatic aortic stenosis and six weeks for patients with stable angina and other valvular disease. For percutaneous coronary intervention in stable patients with high-risk anatomy, immediate revascularization or a wait time of 14 days is recommended; six weeks is recommended for all other patients. The target for bypass surgery in those with high-risk anatomy or valve surgery in patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis is 14 days; for all others, the target is six weeks. All stakeholders must affirm the appropriateness of these standards and work continuously to achieve them. There is an ongoing need to continually reassess current risk stratification methods to limit adverse events in patients on waiting lists and assist clinicians in triaging patients for invasive therapies.