Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr ; 221: 207-214, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32446483

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the interobserver agreement of history and physical examination findings in children undergoing evaluation in the emergency department (ED) for headaches. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study of children aged 2-17 years evaluated at 3 tertiary-care pediatric EDs for non-traumatic headaches. Two clinicians independently completed a standardized assessment of each child and documented the presence or absence of history and physical examination variables. Unweighted κ statistics were determined for 68 history and 24 physical examination variables. RESULTS: We analyzed 191 paired observations; median age was 12 years, with 19 (9.9%) children younger than 7 years. Interrater reliability was at least moderate (κ ≥ 0.41) for 41 (60.3%) patient history variables. Eleven (61.1%) of 18 physical examination variables for which κ statistics could be calculated had a κ that was at least moderate. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of history and physical examination findings demonstrated at least moderate κ statistic values when assessed in children with headaches in the ED. These variables may be generalizable across different types of clinicians for evaluation of children with headaches. If also found to predict the presence or absence of emergent intracranial abnormalities, the more reliable clinical findings may be helpful in the development of clinical prediction rules or risk stratification models that could be used across settings for children with headaches.


Assuntos
Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Anamnese/normas , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Exame Físico/normas , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Medicina de Emergência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pediatria , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Cephalalgia ; 39(2): 185-196, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29874930

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinicians appear to obtain emergent neuroimaging for children with headaches based on the presence of red flag findings. However, little data exists regarding the prevalence of these findings in emergency department populations, and whether the identification of red flag findings is associated with potentially unnecessary emergency department neuroimaging. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the prevalence of red flag findings and their association with neuroimaging in otherwise healthy children presenting with headaches to the emergency department. Our secondary aim was to determine the prevalence of emergent intracranial abnormalities in this population. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of otherwise healthy children 2-17 years of age presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department with non-traumatic headaches was undertaken. Emergency department physicians completed a standardized form to document headache descriptors and characteristics, associated symptoms, and physical and neurological exam findings. Children who did not receive emergency department neuroimaging received 4-month telephone follow-up. Outcomes included emergency department neuroimaging and the presence of emergent intracranial abnormalities. RESULTS: We enrolled 224 patients; 197 (87.9%) had at least one red flag finding on history. Several red flag findings were reported by more than a third of children, including: Headache waking from sleep (34.8%); headache present with or soon after waking (39.7%); or headaches increasing in frequency, duration and severity (40%, 33.1%, and 46.3%). Thirty-three percent of children received emergency department neuroimaging. The prevalence of emergent intracranial abnormalities was 1% (95% CI 0.1, 3.6). Abnormal neurological exam, extreme pain intensity of presenting headache, vomiting, and positional symptoms were independently associated with emergency department neuroimaging. CONCLUSIONS: Red flag findings are common in children presenting with headaches to the emergency department. The presence of red flag findings is associated with emergency department neuroimaging, although the risk of emergent intracranial abnormalities is low. Many children with headaches may be receiving unnecessary neuroimaging due to the high prevalence of non-specific red flag findings.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Cefaleia/diagnóstico por imagem , Neuroimagem , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Neuroimagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Avaliação de Sintomas/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 42(8): 698-704, 2023 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37171971

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the frequency of bacteremia, septic shock and bacterial meningitis in pediatric liver transplant recipients (pLTRs) in the outpatient setting and to identify clinical factors associated with bacteremia. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of pLTRs evaluated in the emergency department or outpatient clinic between 2010 and 2018 for suspected infection, defined as fever ≥38 °C or a blood culture obtained. We excluded patients with nontransplant immunodeficiency, multiorgan transplants or intestinal failure. The primary outcome was bacteremia; secondary outcomes included fluid-refractory septic shock, bacterial meningitis and antibiotic resistance. The unit of analysis was the encounter. RESULTS: A total of 151 children had 336 encounters for infection evaluation within 2 years of transplant. Of 307 (91.4%) encounters with blood cultures, 17 (5.5%) had bacteremia, with 10 (58.8%) occurring within 3 months of transplant. Fluid-refractory septic shock and bacterial meningitis occurred in 7 of 307 (2.8%) and 0 of 307 encounters, respectively. Factors associated with bacteremia included closer proximity to transplant (<3 months) [odds ratio (OR): 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-9.8; P = 0 .01], shorter duration of illness (OR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.5-12.0; P < 0.01) and the presence of a central venous catheter (CVC) (OR: 12.7; 95% CI: 4.4-36.6; P < 0.01). However, 5 (29.4%) encounters with bacteremia had none of these factors. Among Gram-positive pathogens, 1 of 7 (14.2%) isolates were resistant to vancomycin. Among Gram-negative pathogens, 3 of 13 (23.1%) isolates were resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporins. CONCLUSIONS: Bacteremia was an important cause of infection within 2 years of pLTR. Clinical factors increased the risk of bacteremia. Further, large sample studies should derive multivariable models to identify those at high and low risk of bacteremia to optimize antibiotic use.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Transplante de Fígado , Meningites Bacterianas , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Criança , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Meningites Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Meningites Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Transplantados
4.
Acad Emerg Med ; 29(3): 326-333, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34665891

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) appears highly accurate to identify urinary tract infections (UTIs) when obtained via catheterization. Our primary aim was to determine the agreement in uNGAL levels between paired catheter and bag urine specimens. Our secondary aim was to compare the diagnostic test characteristics of quantitative uNGAL, dipstick uNGAL (a potential point-of-care test), and urinalysis (UA). METHODS: This was a prospective study of febrile children < 24 months evaluated for UTIs. We evaluated quantitative uNGAL at a previously identified threshold of 39.1 ng/mL, dipstick uNGAL at its built-in threshold of >50 ng/mL, and UA at standard thresholds for leukocyte esterase (LE). A positive urine culture was defined as >100,000 CFUs/mL of a pathogen. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients were included (10% with positive urine cultures); 116 had paired catheterized and bagged samples. The agreement between catheterized and bagged samples at a quantitative uNGAL cutoff of ≥39.1 ng/mL was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67 to 0.83) and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.84) at a uNGAL dipstick threshold of >50 ng/mL. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for uNGAL from a catheterized sample was 0.96 (95% CI = 0.89 to 1.00) compared to 0.93 (95% CI = 0.87 to -0.99) from a bagged sample. The sensitivities of catheterized sample quantitative and dipstick uNGAL (90.5%) were higher than UA at a LE threshold of ≥1+ (57.1%). Bagged-sample uNGAL had lower quantitative and dipstick specificities (both 73.8%) than from catheterized samples (94.3% and 95.3% respectively), similar to UA. CONCLUSIONS: uNGAL from bagged and catheterized samples showed insufficient agreement to be used interchangeably. The low specificity of uNGAL from bagged samples suggests that sampling technique affects uNGAL levels.


Assuntos
Infecções Urinárias , Biomarcadores , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Imediatos , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Urinálise , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/urina
5.
Pediatrics ; 146(3)2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32527752

RESUMO

In this case series, we describe the clinical course and outcomes of 7 febrile infants aged ≤60 days with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. No infant had severe outcomes, including the need for mechanical ventilation or ICU level of care. Two infants had concurrent urinary tract infections, which were treated with antibiotics. Although a small sample, our data suggest that febrile infants with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection often have mild illness.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Febre de Causa Desconhecida/etiologia , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Fatores Etários , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Febre de Causa Desconhecida/diagnóstico , Seguimentos , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Respiratórias/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA