RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rhinovirus (RV) infections trigger wheeze episodes in children. Thus, understanding of the lung inflammatory response to RV in children with wheeze is important. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the associations of RV on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) granulocyte patterns and biomarkers of inflammation with age in children with treatment-refractory, recurrent wheeze (n = 616). METHODS: Children underwent BAL to examine viral nucleic acid sequences, bacterial cultures, granulocyte counts, and phlebotomy for both general and type-2 inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Despite the absence of cold symptoms, RV was the most common pathogen detected (30%), and when present, was accompanied by BAL granulocytosis in 75% of children. Compared to children with no BAL pathogens (n = 341), those with RV alone (n = 127) had greater (P < .05) isolated neutrophilia (43% vs 16%), mixed eosinophils and neutrophils (26% vs 11%), and less pauci-granulocytic (27% vs 61%) BAL. Children with RV alone furthermore had biomarkers of active infection with higher total blood neutrophils and serum C-reactive protein, but no differences in blood eosinophils or total IgE. With advancing age, the log odds of BAL RV alone were lower, 0.82 (5th-95th percentile CI: 0.76-0.88; P < .001), but higher, 1.58 (5th-95th percentile CI: 1.01-2.51; P = .04), with high-dose daily corticosteroid treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Children with severe recurrent wheeze often (22%) have a silent syndrome of lung RV infection with granulocytic bronchoalveolitis and elevated systemic markers of inflammation. The syndrome is less prevalent by school age and is not informed by markers of type-2 inflammation. The investigators speculate that dysregulated mucosal innate antiviral immunity is a responsible mechanism.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare presenting symptoms, comorbidities, disease, and treatment characteristics of a black pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) group to a non-black pediatric EoE group. METHODS: A retrospective chart review consisting of pediatric patients diagnosed with EoE between the years of 2010 and 2018 at a single urban pediatric hospital system comprising 143 black pediatric patients compared with 142 non-black pediatric patients with similar distribution of age and sex. RESULTS: Both groups were majority male, and the median age of diagnosis between the black and non-black group was 5.1 and 6.7 years old, respectively. Comorbidities more commonly seen in the black group included food allergies, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and allergic rhinitis. Black patients were more likely to present with failure to thrive (FTT)/poor growth, whereas non-black patients were more likely to present with abdominal pain. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in achieving remission using current therapies. The black group had higher rates of nonadherence to medical therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date comparing a black versus non-black pediatric EoE population. The black population had more atopic comorbidities and FTT at presentation and had significantly more issues with nonadherence. This new knowledge describing EoE in a minority population will hopefully improve awareness, diagnosis, and management of EoE in this population.
Assuntos
Esofagite Eosinofílica , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Rinite Alérgica , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagite Eosinofílica/epidemiologia , Esofagite Eosinofílica/terapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/complicações , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) control before and during the first year after secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in children. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of children who received secondary IOL implantation. We analyzed IOP and antiglaucoma medications before and after implantation. The latest exam with IOP measurement found within the 2-15 month period after IOL implantation was used for the postoperative data. Failure to maintain IOP control was defined as either the addition of antiglaucoma medication(s) or a rise in IOP > 4 mm Hg. Statistical analyses were performed to assess risk factors for failure to control IOP after surgery, namely age at IOL implantation, preoperative glaucoma status, and IOL fixation location. RESULTS: A total of 100 eyes were included. The mean duration of follow-up was 7.74 months (SD = 3.11). Twenty-three of one hundred eyes failed to maintain IOP control according to our definition. Eyes with a history of having had a traumatic cataract (n = 3) had a more than threefold increased risk of failure (P = 0.015). Although not statistically significant, very young age at initial cataract surgery (<2 months old) had a twofold increased risk of failure compared to an older age (>12 months old) (P = 0.213). No other risk factors were found to have statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Secondary IOL implantation carries a modest risk of worsening IOP control in the first year after implantation, for which, a history of ocular trauma or young age at initial cataract surgery seems to present the highest risk.