Hidden hernias hurt: a plea for early diagnosis and treatment of occult inguinal hernias.

INTRODUCTION: Hidden or occult inguinal hernias are symptomatic hernias that do not present with a bulge. For some surgeons, if a bulge is not present, then no hernia repair is contemplated. We report preoperative findings of patients with occult inguinal hernias and outcomes after repair to assist in early detection and treatment of this special population. METHODS: All patients who underwent inguinal hernia repairs, 2008-2019, were reviewed. Patients were classified as having occult inguinal hernias if they (a) complained of groin pain, (b) did not have bulging on exam, (c) had supportive imaging showing an inguinal hernia, and (d) were confirmed to have inguinal hernias that were repaired intraoperatively. Presentation and outcomes were compared with the non-occult group treated during the same time period. RESULTS: Of 485 patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repairs over 10 years, 212 (44%) had occult inguinal hernias. Patients in the occult group were significantly more likely to be female, younger, and with higher BMI compared to the non-occult group. They also had more preoperative pain for a significantly longer time. This was associated with higher incidence of pain medications usage, including opioids, in the occult group. On physical examination, those with occult hernias were twice as likely to have tenderness over the inguinal canal. Most hernia repairs (66%) were laparoscopic and 94% used mesh. Postoperatively, the occult group had 83% resolution of symptoms after hernia repair. CONCLUSION: Some surgeons hesitate recommending hernia repair to patients with occult inguinal hernias, as these patients do not fit the traditional definition of a hernia, i.e., a bulge. Our study challenges this perception by showing that discounting groin pain due to occult hernia prolongs patient's suffering and may risk increased opioid use, especially in females, although 83% cure can be achieved with hernia repair.

Sex-based differences in inguinal hernia factors.

BACKGROUND: Much of our knowledge about inguinal hernias is based on males. Meanwhile, it is established that women have worse outcomes after inguinal hernia repair, with more chronic pain and higher recurrences. Pediatric literature shows inguinal hernias in females are more likely to be bilateral, incarcerated, and carry a stronger genetic predisposition than males. We aimed to evaluate sex-based differences in inguinal hernia factors in adults, to help supplement the paucity of literature in the adult population. METHODS: An institutional database of patients undergoing repair of primary inguinal hernias was queried with focus on preoperative risk factors and operative characteristics. Multivariate analysis was performed looking for independent variables associated with a greater number of hernia defects found intraoperatively. RESULTS: Among 494 patients, 202 (40.9%) were female. Number of risk factors among females was significantly higher than males (1.53 vs 1.2, p = 0.003). Females had significantly more constipation, GERD, and asthma and lower BMI than males. Family history of hernias was similar between both sexes. As expected, females had significantly less direct hernias (12.9% vs 32.9%, p < 0.001) and more femoral hernias (38.5% vs 12.2%, p < 0.001) than males. Bilaterality was similar. Females undergoing inguinal hernia repair averaged 1.23 prior deliveries. Regression analysis showed age, sex, BMI, and number of deliveries were not correlated with the number of defects. CONCLUSIONS: Females undergoing primary inguinal hernia repair had more preoperative risk factors for inguinal hernia than males. In our population, there was no higher incidence of bilaterality or significant genetic predisposition in females as noted by family history of hernias. Age, sex, BMI and number of deliveries did not correlate with the number of hernia defects found. Our study promotes awareness of inguinal hernias in females and presents new data to quantify sex-based differences and predispositions to inguinal hernias.

New Traditional Chinese Medicine Supplement Reduces Pain Faster than Conventional Pain Pills Alone: A Phase I/II Prospective, Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: The opioid crisis demands novel solutions for postoperative pain control. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has used herbs for the treatment of pain for thousands of years. We studied whether a synergistic multimodal TCM supplement could reduce the need for conventional pain pills for low risk surgical procedures. METHODS: In a Phase I/II, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial (PRCT), 93 patients were randomized to either TCM supplement or placebo oral medication for low-risk outpatient surgical procedures. Study medications began 3 days preoperatively and continued for 5 days postoperatively. Conventional pain pill use was not restricted. Patients were monitored postoperatively for all forms of pain pill use (Pain Pill Scoring Sheet) and subjective pain ratings (Brief Pain Inventory Short Form). Primary outcomes included type and number of pain pills used and subjective pain ratings. Secondary outcomes included an assessment of mood, general activity, sleep, and enjoyment of life. RESULTS: TCM use well tolerated. Conventional pain pill use was similar between groups. Linear regression analysis revealed that TCM reduced postoperative pain 3 times faster than placebo (P < .0001) with a 4-fold greater magnitude of relief by postoperative day 5 (P = .008). TCM also significantly improved sleep habits (P = .049) during the postoperative period. TCM effect was independent of type of surgery or amount of preoperative pain. DISCUSSION: This PRCT is the first to show that a multimodal, synergistic TCM supplement is safe and can effectively reduce acute postoperative pain more rapidly, and to a lower level, than conventional pain pills alone.