RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare hydroxocobalamin and methylene blue for the treatment of vasopressor-refractory vasoplegic syndrome (VS) after adult cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: A retrospective, propensity-matched, cohort study was performed. The primary endpoints were the percentage change in vasopressor use at 30, 60, and 120 minutes, characterized as both norepinephrine equivalents and vasoactive inotropic score. Eligible patients who received methylene blue were matched 3:1 with patients who received hydroxocobalamin based on sequential organ failure assessment score, preoperative mechanical circulatory support, CPB duration, and use of pre-CPB vasopressors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or beta-blockers. SETTING: A quaternary care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB from July 2013 to June 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were included who received either hydroxocobalamin (5,000 mg) or methylene blue (median 1.2 mg/kg) for VS in the operating room during the index surgery or in the intensive care unit up to 24 hours after CPB separation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 142 included patients, 120 received methylene blue and 22 received hydroxocobalamin. After matching, 66 patients in the methylene blue group were included in the analysis. Baseline demographics, surgical characteristics, and vasoactive medications were similar between groups. There were no significant between-group differences in percentage change in norepinephrine equivalents or vasoactive inotropic score at each timepoint. CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery using CPB with VS, the ability to reduce vasopressor use was similar with hydroxocobalamin compared with methylene blue.
Assuntos
Vasoplegia , Adulto , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Hidroxocobalamina , Azul de Metileno , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vasoplegia/diagnóstico , Vasoplegia/tratamento farmacológico , Vasoplegia/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is commonly used in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The utility of quetiapine as a sedative adjunct has not yet been evaluated, but has been described previously in studies evaluating quetiapine for delirium or delirium prophylaxis. OBJECTIVE: To determine if adjunctive use of quetiapine reduces sedative dosage requirements among mechanically ventilated adults without delirium. METHODS: This retrospective intrapatient comparator study included all mechanically ventilated adults admitted to a medical ICU who received quetiapine between July 1, 2013, and July 1, 2018. The primary outcome was the change in sedative dosage requirements over 24 hours following quetiapine initiation. Secondary outcomes included change in sedative dosage requirements 48 hours postquetiapine initiation, opioid dosage requirements 24 hours postquetiapine initiation, percent time at goal for both pain and sedation scores, depth of sedation, and QTc. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were included in the study cohort. There was no significant difference in 24-hour cumulative doses of propofol (P = 0.10), dexmedetomidine (P = 0.14), or benzodiazepines (P = 0.14). During the 48-hour treatment period, there was a significant increase in dexmedetomidine requirements (P = 0.03). There were no differences in 24-hour opioid dosage requirements, percent time at goal pain or sedation scores, depth of sedation, or QTc following quetiapine initiation. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Adjunctive use of quetiapine was not associated with a significant reduction in sedative dosage requirements 24 or 48 hours following initiation among mechanically ventilated adults without delirium.
Assuntos
Adjuvantes Farmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapêutico , Respiração Artificial , Adjuvantes Farmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/administração & dosagem , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Delírio , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Propofol/uso terapêutico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
We report a case of pharmacologic management of pediatric paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) in a patient who experienced symptomatic resolution with dexmedetomidine and propranolol. Following a blunt traumatic subdural hematoma and diffuse axonal injury, an 8-year-old male developed PSH on approximately day 5 of the hospitalization. PSH symptoms identified in this patient were hyperthermia, tachycardia, posturing, and hypertension with associated elevations in intracranial pressure. Episodes of PSH continued to be observed despite appropriate titration of opiates, sedatives, and traditional blood pressure management. Dexmedetomidine and propranolol were subsequently initiated to attenuate acute episodes of PSH. A reduction in sedative requirements and improvement in symptoms followed, which facilitated successful extubation. The combination of propranolol and dexmedetomidine was followed by a decrease in the frequency and severity of acute episodes of PSH. After utilization of multiple treatment modalities to control PSH episodes in our patient, propranolol and dexmedetomidine may have helped attenuate PSH signs and symptoms.