Vonoprazan vs lansoprazole for the treatment of artificial gastric ulcer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Vonoprazan is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion and may have better response than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the treatment of endoscopic submucosal dissection induced artificial ulcers. However, reported outcomes remain controversial. In this study, we conducted a prospective, randomized comparative trial to evaluate healing effects of vonoprazan and lansoprazole on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers. We enrolled 216 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms. They were randomly divided into vonoprazan (20 mg/day) and lansoprazole (30 mg/day) groups. The primary endpoint was the reduction rate of ulcer and complete healing (scar) ratio of ESD-induced ulcers at 4 and 8 weeks. Finally, 101 patients of the vonoprazan group and 95 patients of the lansoprazole group were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the reduction rate between the vonoprazan and lansoprazole groups at either timepoint (4 weeks, 94.0 vs 93.4%; 8 weeks, 99.8 vs 99.9%, respectively). The complete healing ratio at 4 and 8 weeks did not differ significantly between the vonoprazan and lansoprazole groups (4 weeks, 11.9 vs 12.6%; 8 weeks, 87.1 vs 86.3%, respectively). In the anti-H. pylori-antibody negative or positive patients, there were no significant differences in the reduction rate and complete healing ratio between the vonoprazan and lansoprazole groups. Regardless of treatment choice, the overall complete healing ratio at 8 weeks was significantly higher in the anti-H. pylori-antibody negative patients than the positive patients (p = 0.006). The healing effects of vonoprazan on ESD-induced ulcers were comparative to those of lansoprazole.

Safety and efficacy of low-power pure-cut hot snare polypectomy for small nonpedunculated colorectal polyps compared with conventional resection methods: A propensity score matching analysis.

Objectives: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is widely performed for small colorectal polyps. However, small colorectal polyps sometimes include high-grade adenomas or carcinomas that require endoscopic resection with electrocautery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel resection technique, hot snare polypectomy with low-power pure-cut current (LPPC-HSP) for small colorectal polyps, compared with CSP and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Methods: Records of patients who underwent CSP, EMR, or LPPC-HSP for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps less than 10 mm between April 2021 and March 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. We analyzed and compared the treatment outcomes of CSP and EMR with those of LPPC-HSP using propensity score matching. Results: After propensity score matching of 396 pairs, an analysis of CSP and LPPC-HSP indicated that LPPC-HSP had a significantly higher R0 resection rate (84% vs. 68%; p < 0.01). Delayed bleeding was observed in only two cases treated with CSP before matching. Perforation was not observed with either treatment. After propensity score matching of 176 pairs, an analysis of EMR and LPPC-HSP indicated that their en bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different (99.4% vs. 100%, p = 1.00; 79% vs. 81%, p = 0.79). Delayed bleeding and perforation were not observed with either treatment. Conclusions: The safety of LPPC-HSP was comparable to that of CSP. The treatment outcomes of LPPC-HSP were comparable to those of conventional EMR for small polyps. These results suggest that this technique is a safe and effective treatment for nonpedunculated polyps less than 10 mm.