Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 27, 2024 Jan 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214795

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Τhe adherence of p-fimbriated Escherichia coli (E. coli) to urothelial cells leading to recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) may be prevented by proanthocyanidins (PACs) contained in American cranberries. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical trial was to assess the clinical utility of prophylactic use of high-dose PACs daily in women with a history of rUTIs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 172 adult women with a history of rUTIs, defined as ≥ 2 within a 6-month period or ≥ 3 within a 12-month period were enrolled and randomized in two groups to receive either Cysticlean™ 240 mg or placebo for a 12-month period. Urine samples, vaginal and rectal swabs were collected at initial and quarterly study visits. The primary study endpoints were the number of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and changes in Quality of Life (QoL), assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. RESULTS: 160 adult women of median age 40 years old (range 19-82) were finally analyzed in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. In response to intervention, the number of UTIs was significantly lower (Incidence rate ratio IRR 0.49, p < 0.001) and QoL was slightly improved. The numbers of E. coli isolates detected in vaginal (IRR 0.71, p value < 0.001) and in rectal swabs (IRR 0.87, p value < 0.001) were also significantly decreased. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The daily use of Cysticlean™ 240 mg was associated with a reduction of UTIs and a prolongation of UTI-free survival compared to placebo treatment, supporting its use as prophylaxis in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03032003.


Assuntos
Cistite , Infecções Urinárias , Vaccinium macrocarpon , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Escherichia coli , Qualidade de Vida , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Cistite/prevenção & controle
2.
World J Crit Care Med ; 13(2): 92458, 2024 Jun 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38855267

RESUMO

Extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) has made remarkable progress over the last few years. Renal replacement therapy, introduced a few decades ago, was the first available application of ECOS. The subsequent evolution of ECOS enabled the enhanced support to many other organs, including the heart [veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), slow continuous ultrafiltration], the lungs (veno-venous ECMO, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal), and the liver (blood purification techniques for the detoxification of liver toxins). Moreover, additional indications of these methods, including the suppression of excessive inflammatory response occurring in severe disorders such as sepsis, coronavirus disease 2019, pancreatitis, and trauma (blood purification techniques for the removal of exotoxins, endotoxins, or cytokines), have arisen. Multiple organ support therapy is crucial since a vast majority of critically ill patients present not with a single but with multiple organ failure (MOF), whereas, traditional therapeutic approaches (mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure, antibiotics for sepsis, and inotropes for cardiac dysfunction) have reached the maximum efficacy and cannot be improved further. However, several issues remain to be clarified, such as the complexity and cost of ECOS systems, standardization of indications, therapeutic protocols and initiation time, choice of the patients who will benefit most from these interventions, while evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting their use is still limited. Nevertheless, these methods are currently a part of routine clinical practice in intensive care units. This editorial presents the past, present, and future considerations, as well as perspectives regarding these therapies. Our better understanding of these methods, the pathophysiology of MOF, the crosstalk between native organs resulting in MOF, and the crosstalk between native organs and artificial organ support systems when applied sequentially or simultaneously, will lead to the multiplication of their effects and the minimization of complications arising from their use.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA