Relationship between sacral-abdominal wall distance, movement performance, and spinal alignment in osteoporosis: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Aging is associated with muscle atrophy, as typified by sarcopenia. Loss of abdominal muscle strength can cause abdominal wall laxity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the sacral vertebra-abdominal wall distance (SAD) and movement performance using a simple lateral spine X-ray image for measuring the SAD. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included women aged ≥ 65 years who were attending the outpatient clinic for osteoporosis at our hospital. A total of 287 patients (mean age ± SD, 76.8 ± 7.1 years) with measured SAD were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into two groups based on SAD cutoff (160 mm) and age (75 years), respectively. The patients were examined using the two-foot 20 cm rise test, 3 m Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, two-step test, open-eyed one-leg standing time, and spinal alignment. Normally distributed data are expressed as means (standard deviations) and non-normally distributed data as medians (interquartile range), depending on the results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Student's t-test and χ2 test were used for between-group comparisons. Regression analysis was performed with SAD as the objective variable. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The shorter SAD group performed better in the two-step test, TUG test, and open-eyed one-leg standing time (p < 0.001) as well as in the two-foot 20 cm rise test (p < 0.01) compared to the longer SAD group. Spinal alignment was better in the shorter SAD group than in the longer SAD group, with a shorter sagittal vertical axis (p < 0.001), smaller pelvic tilt (p < 0.001), and greater sacral slope (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SAD was associated with posterior pelvic tilt and movement performance parameters. In addition to testing for osteoporosis, movement performance parameters should be evaluated in women with osteoporosis who are aged ≥ 65 and have greater SAD (≥ 160 mm in this study). The SAD is a new assessment method, and further research is required to verify its validity and reproducibility. This is the first attempt to determine how age and SAD affect movement performance in older adults.

Long-term outcomes of Kudo type-5 unlinked surface-replacing total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: a 15-year average follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been used for various conditions including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While the Kudo TEA has been associated with favorable short-term outcomes, there is limited information on the longer term outcomes of this device. The aim of this study was to investigate the average 15-year outcome of Kudo type-5 TEA in patients with RA. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 29 elbows in 28 patients (Larsen grade III, n = 8; IV, n = 19; V, n = 2) with RA who underwent Kudo type-5 TEA between 1999 and 2010. The patients were followed up for a mean of 15 (range: 10-21) years. We investigated the survival with setting revision/removal as the endpoints. The risk factors for revision/loosening were assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in elbow flexion after Kudo TEA. Preoperative and postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved significantly from 60.3 to 94.7. Complications included intraoperative medial humeral epicondyle fracture (n = 2), postoperative dislocations (n = 4), deep infections (n = 1), and persistent ulnar nerve neuropathy (n = 1). Aseptic loosening was observed in 7 elbows (24.1%; humerus, n = 3; ulna, n = 3; both sides, n = 1). The causes of the 5 revisions were postoperative dislocation (n = 1), deep infection (n = 1), aseptic loosening of the humerus (n = 2), and aseptic loosening of the ulna (n = 1). All 5 elbows underwent revision of the ulnar component (n = 2) or the linked TEA (n = 3). The survival rate was 81% at 15 years after surgery with setting revision/removal as the endpoints. A deviation of ulnar component insertion angle of over 5° in any plane was associated with more revision compared to those with accurately placed implants. CONCLUSION: The Kudo type-5 elbow showed good results for up to 15 years of follow-up. However, excessive deviation of insertion angle of the ulnar component (over 5°) was associated with more revision. Due to the small sample size, robust statistical analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications or revision could not be performed, and further research is warranted to resolve this limitation.

MRI-based vertebral bone quality score compared to quantitative computed tomography bone mineral density in patients undergoing cervical spinal surgery.

PURPOSE: The vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was introduced as a bone quality marker in the lumbar spine. Prior studies showed that it could be utilized as a predictor of osteoporotic fracture or complications after instrumented spine surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between VBQ scores and bone mineral density (BMD) measured by quantitative computer tomography (QCT) in the cervical spine. METHODS: Preoperative cervical CT and sagittal T1-weighted MRIs from patients undergoing ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and included. The VBQ score in each cervical level was calculated by dividing the signal intensity of the vertebral body by the signal intensity of the cerebrospinal fluid on midsagittal T1-weighted MRI images and correlated with QCT measurements of the C2-T1 vertebral bodies. A total of 102 patients (37.3% female) were included. RESULTS: VBQ values of C2-T1 vertebrae strongly correlated with each other. C2 showed the highest VBQ value [Median (range) 2.33 (1.33, 4.23)] and T1 showed the lowest VBQ value [Median (range) 1.64 (0.81, 3.88)]. There was significant weak to moderate negative correlations between and VBQ Scores for all levels [C2: p < 0.001; C3: p < 0.001; C4: p < 0.001; C5: p < 0.004; C6: p < 0.001; C7: p < 0.025; T1: p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that cervical VBQ scores may be insufficient in the estimation of BMDs, which might limit their clinical application. Additional studies are recommended to determine the utility of VBQ and QCT BMD to evaluate their potential use as bone status markers.

The anatomical positioning change of retroperitoneal organs in prone and lateral position: an assessment for single-prone position lateral lumbar surgery.

PURPOSE: There are reports that performing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in a prone, single position (single-prone LLIF) can be done safely in the prone position because the retroperitoneal organs reflect anteriorly with gravity. However, only a few study has investigated the safety of single-prone LLIF and retroperitoneal organ positioning in the prone position. We aimed to investigate the positioning of retroperitoneal organs in the prone position and evaluate the safety of single-prone LLIF surgery. METHODS: A total of 94 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The anatomical positioning of the retroperitoneal organs was evaluated by CT in the preoperative supine and intraoperative prone position. The distances from the centre line of the intervertebral body to the organs including aorta, inferior vena cava, ascending and descending colons, and bilateral kidneys were measured for the lumbar spine. An "at risk" zone was defined as distance less than 10 mm anterior from the centre line of the intervertebral body. RESULTS: Compared to supine preoperative CTs, bilateral kidneys at the L2/3 level as well as the bilateral colons at the L3/4 level had statistically significant ventral shift with prone positioning. The proportion of retroperitoneal organs within the at-risk zone ranged from 29.6 to 88.6% in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: The retroperitoneal organs shifted ventrally with prone positioning. However, the amount of shift was not large enough to avoid risk for organ injuries and substantial proportion of patients had organs within the cage insertion corridor. Careful preoperative planning is warranted when considering single-prone LLIF.

Distal junctional failure after corrective surgery without pelvic fixation for thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis due to osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis (TLJK) due to osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) negatively impacts patients' quality of life. The necessity of pelvic fixation in corrective surgery for TLJK due to OVF remains controversial. This study aimed to: 1) evaluate the surgical outcomes of major corrective surgery for thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis due to osteoporotic vertebral fracture, and 2) identify the risk factors for distal junctional failure to identify potential candidates for pelvic fixation. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical correction (fixed TLJK>40°, OVF located at T11-L2, the lowermost instrumented vertebra at or above L5) were included. Sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (L1-S1), local kyphosis, and lower lumbar lordosis (L4-S1) were assessed. Proximal and distal junctional kyphosis (P/DJK) and failures (P/DJF) were evaluated. Pre/postoperative spinopelvic parameters were compared between DJF and non-DJF patients. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (mean age: 72.3 ± 7.9 years) were included. PJK was observed in five patients (16.1%), while DJK in 11 (35.5%). Twelve cases (38.7%) were categorized as failure. Among the patients with PJK, there was only one patient (20%) categorized as PJF and required an additional surgery. Contrary, all of eleven patients with DJK were categorized as DJF, among whom six (54.5%) required additional surgery for pelvic fixation. In comparisons between DJF and non-DJF patients, there was no significant difference in pre/postoperative LK (pre/post, p = 0.725, p = 0.950). However, statistically significant differences were observed in the following preoperative alignment parameters: SVA (p = 0.014), LL (p = 0.001), LLL (p = 0.006), PT (p = 0.003), and PI-LL (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Spinopelvic parameters, which represent the compensatory function of lumbar hyperlordosis and pelvic retroversion, have notable impacts on surgical outcomes in correction surgery for TLJK due to OVF. Surgeons should consider each patient's compensatory function when choosing a surgical approach.

Atypical femoral fracture mimicking lumbar radiculopathy in two patients taking bisphosphonate long-term: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Atypical femoral fracture (AFF) is a rare complication in patients with osteoporosis undergoing long-term bisphosphonate therapy. The most common symptom of incomplete AFF is nonspecific thigh pain, which is often difficult to distinguish from other causes. CASE PRESENTATION: We present two cases of AFF misdiagnosed as lumbar radiculopathy. Both patients visited our hospital for thigh pain, and in both cases the findings of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging showed substantial nerve compression. These patients had been treated for lumbar radiculopathy, but localized symptoms became conspicuous and femoral radiographs revealed complete AFF. The initial radiographs were reviewed retrospectively and revealed slight lateral cortical thickening in the affected femur, denoting a missed incomplete AFF. Internal fixation with intramedullary nails was performed. CONCLUSIONS: AFF may mimic lumbar radiculopathy. Therefore, clinicians should consider AFF as a differential diagnosis in older patients with lumbar canal stenosis who are undergoing long-term bisphosphonate therapy and present with thigh pain.

Comparison of pedicle screw placement accuracy between two types of imaging support (Artis Zeego versus two-dimensional fluoroscopy): a cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND: The pedicle screw system is widely used in spine surgery, and it provides rigid fixation and leads to successful subsequent deformity correction and bony fusion. The standard imaging technique for pedicle screw insertion is two-dimensional images obtained from C-arm-type X-ray fluoroscopy. Artis Zeego is an emerging intraoperative imaging technique that can provide conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopic images and rapid three-dimensional fluoroscopic computed tomography reconstruction imaging. The aim of this study is to compare the insertion accuracies of PS placement using Artis Zeego and conventional 2D X-ray fluoroscopy. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the postoperative images of thoracolumbar fusion patients who underwent surgery using pedicle screws between 2013 and 2018. Pedicle screw malplacement was assessed using a four-grade classification by Rao et al. Misplacement rates were compared between pedicle screws assisted with Artis Zeego and two-dimensional fluoroscopy. RESULTS: A total of 1107 pedicle screws in 153 patients were inserted using Artis Zeego, and 427 pedicle screws in 80 patients were inserted using fluoroscopy. The overall perforation rate was 4.2% (46 perforations of 1106 pedicle screws) in the Artis Zeego group and 7.7% (33 perforations of 427 pedicle screws) in the fluoroscopy group. In the Artis Zeego group, 43 (3.9%) screws were classified as grade 1, and three (0.3%) screws were classified as grade 2. In the fluoroscopy group, 21 (4.9%) screws were classified as grade 1, 10 (2.3%) screws were classified as grade 2, and 2 (0.5%) screws were classified as grade 3. The use of Artis Zeego was associated with a significantly lower screw malplacement rate than was the use of fluoroscopy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that pedicle screw placement with Artis Zeego was associated with a lower malplacement rate than was conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopy. No severe malplacement was observed in the Artis Zeego group. Thus, Artis Zeego could be a good option for improving pedicle screw accuracy.

Radiological features of cervical spine in dropped head syndrome: a matched case-control study.

PURPOSE: Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is presumably caused by focal myopathy in the cervical posterior muscles; however, distinguishable radiological features of the cervical spine in DHS remain unidentified. This study investigated the radiological features of the cervical spine in dropped head syndrome. METHODS: The records of DHS patients and age- and sex-matched cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients were reviewed. Cervical spinal parameters (C2-7, C2-4, and C5-7 angles) were assessed on lateral cervical spine radiographs. Quantitative radiographic evaluation of cervical spine degeneration was performed using the cervical degenerative index (CDI), which consists of four elements: disk space narrowing (DSN), endplate sclerosis, osteophyte formation, and listhesis. RESULTS: Forty-one DHS patients were included. Statistically significant differences were noted between the upper and lower cervical spine in the sagittal angle parameters on the neutral, flexion, and extension radiographs in DHS group, whereas no significant differences were observed in CSM group. CDI comparison showed significantly higher scores of DSN in C3/4, C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7; sclerosis in C5/6 and C6/7; and osteophyte formation in C4/5, C5/6, and C6/7 in DHS group than in CSM group. Comparison of listhesis scores revealed significant differences in the upper levels of the cervical spine (C2/3, C3/4, and C4/5) between two groups. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that the characteristic radiological features in the cervical spine of DHS include lower-level dominant severe degenerative change and upper-level dominant spondylolisthesis. These findings suggest that degenerative changes in the cervical spine may also play a role in the onset and progression of DHS.

Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the early subsidence rate (6-12 months) of standalone novel 3D-printed titanium (Ti) versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cages after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). METHOD: A retrospective study of 113 patients (186 levels) who underwent LLIF surgery with Ti or PEEK cages was conducted. Early subsidence was measured in each treated level using the Marchi et al. classification in radiographs or CT scans acquired at 6-12 months follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analyses with generalized mixed models, setting subsidence as the outcome variable and including cage type (Ti vs PEEK) as well as significant and trending variables (p < 0.10) in univariate analyses, were conducted. RESULTS: In total, 51 female and 62 male patients were analyzed. The median [IQR] age at surgery was 60.0 [51.0-70.0] years. Of the 186 levels, 119 levels were treated using PEEK and 67 levels with Ti cages. The overall subsidence rate for Grades I-III was significantly less in the Ti versus the PEEK group (p = 0.003). For high-grade subsidence (Grade II or III), Ti cages also demonstrated a subsidence rate (3.0%) that was significantly less compared to PEEK cages (18.5%) (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that patients treated with Ti cages were less likely to develop severe subsidence compared to those treated with PEEK (OR = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01, 0.30) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that 3D-printed novel Ti cages had a significantly lower early subsidence rate compared to PEEK cages in standalone LLIF patients.

The association of transversus abdominis plane block with length of stay, pain and opioid consumption after anterior or lateral lumbar fusion: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Anterior (ALIF) and lateral (LLIF) lumbar interbody fusion is associated with significant postoperative pain, opioid consumption and length of stay. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks improve these outcomes in other surgical subtypes but have not been applied to spine surgery. A retrospective study of 250 patients was performed to describe associations between TAP block and outcomes after ALIF/LLIF. METHODS: The electronic medical records of 129 patients who underwent ALIF or LLIF with TAP block were compared to 121 patients who did not. All patients were cared for under a standardized perioperative care pathway with comprehensive multimodal analgesia. Differences in patent demographics, surgical factors, length of stay (LOS), opioid consumption, opioid-related side effects and pain scores were compared in bivariable and multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: In bivariable analyses, TAP block was associated with a significantly shorter LOS, less postoperative nausea/vomiting and lower opioid consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). In multivariable analyses, TAP block was associated with significantly shorter LOS (ß - 12 h, 95% CI (- 22, - 2 h); p = 0.021). Preoperative opioid use was a strong predictive factor for higher opioid consumption in the PACU, opioid use in the first 24 h after surgery and longer LOS. We did not find significant differences in pain scores at any times between the groups. CONCLUSION: TAP block may represent an effective addition to pain management and opioid-reducing strategies and improve outcomes after ALIF/LLIF. Prospective trials are warranted to further explore these associations.

The effect of obesity, diabetes, and epidural steroid injection on regional volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography in the lumbosacral spine.

PURPOSE: High body mass index (BMI) is positively correlated with bone mineral density (BMD) in healthy adults; however, the effect of BMI on regional segmental BMDs in the axial skeleton is unclear. In addition, obese patients often have glucose intolerance and patients with lumbar spine pathology commonly have a history of epidural steroid injections (ESIs). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of these patient factors on regional differences in BMD measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in a lumbar fusion patient cohort. METHODS: The data were obtained from a database comprised of clinical and preoperative CT data from 296 patients who underwent primary posterior lumbar spinal fusion from 2014 to 2017. QCT-vBMDs of L1 to L5, S1 body, and sacral alae were measured. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed with setting vBMDs as the response variables. As explanatory variables, age, sex, race, current smoking, categorized BMI, diabetes, and ESI were chosen a priori. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients were included in the final analysis. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that obese and morbidly obese patients had significantly higher vBMD in the sacral alae (SA). Diabetes showed independent positive associations with vBMDs in L1, L2, and the SA. Additionally, patients with an ESI history demonstrated significantly lower vBMD in the SA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that obesity, diabetes, and epidural steroids affected vBMD differently by lumbosacral spine region. The vBMD of the SA appeared to be more sensitive to various patient factors than other lumbar regions.

Orthotopic Implantation Achieves Better Engraftment and Faster Growth Than Subcutaneous Implantation in Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX) is now accepted as a murine model that better mimics human cancer when compared to a conventional cancer cell-line inoculation model. Some claim the advantage of orthotopic site implantation of patient tumor (OS) over ectopic implantation into the subcutaneous space (SQ); however, there has been no study that describes a head-to-head comparison of oncological differences between these two models to date. We hypothesize that OS tumors re-transplant and grow better than SQ tumors and are therefore a better model to evaluate tumor aggressiveness. Breast cancer PDXs were generated using the tumors derived from 11 patients into NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice. We used six ER(+)HER2(-) tumors and five triple negative (TN) tumors for a total of 11 tumors. Five PDX lines grew for an overall engraftment rate of 45%. We present our OS implantation method in detail. The re-transplantation rate of TN tumors in each transplant site was significantly higher in OS when compared to SQ tumors (70.1% vs. 32.1%, p < 0.01). OS tumors grow significantly faster than SQ tumors. Similarly, OS tumors demonstrated significantly more mitotic figures and Ki-67 positive cells than SQ tumors. The tumor re-transplantation rate significantly increased by the second and third generations with the OS method. The time from implantation to development of a palpable tumor dramatically decreased after the first passage. PDX of ER(+) tumors demonstrated significantly lower engraftment rates and slower tumor growth than TN tumors, which remarkably improved by the first passage. Orthotopically implanted PDX tumors showed better re-transplantation rates, greater tumor size, and more significant growth compared to the subcutaneously implanted model.

Controlling nutritional status score predicts postoperative complications after hip fracture surgery.

BACKGROUND: Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is calculated using laboratory values, including serum albumin, total cholesterol concentration, and total lymphocyte count; it is reportedly valuable for making nutritional assessments. One advantage of CONUT score over other nutritional assessments is that it can be calculated retrospectively using only objective laboratory values. Studies demonstrated that CONUT score was a useful tool for predicting prognosis and complications in various surgical conditions. Nevertheless, few studies utilized the score as a potential predictive marker for postoperative complications among hip fracture patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between CONUT score and postoperative complications in hip fracture patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 211 elderly patients who underwent hip fracture surgery at a single institution from 2013 to 2018. CONUT score was calculated using preoperative routine laboratory tests for serum albumin, total cholesterol concentration, and total lymphocyte count. As potential confounders, we extracted data such as patient age, sex, fracture type, and general conditions/comorbidities, as defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Postoperative complications were defined as a Clavien-Dindo classification of 1 or more. Simple and multivaribale logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the incidence of postoperative complications as the outcome measures. RESULTS: The mean age [IQR] was 86 [80-90], and 80.1% of the reviewed patients were female. Based on the CONUT scores, 78.7% of hip fracture patients were classified as malnourished; 18% experienced postoperative complications. Simple analyses revealed significant risk factors for postoperative complications, including age, the ASA-PS, the CCI, and the CONUT score. Multivariable analysis found that CONUT score was the independent risk factor for postoperative complications (odd ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.45, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CONUT scores are independently associated with the incidence of postoperative complications. CONUT score can be used for risk assessment in hip fracture patients to predict early postoperative complications.

Hyoid position as a novel predictive marker for postoperative dysphagia and dysphonia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the predictive value of the hyoid horizontal positional change on the severity of dysphagia and dysphonia (PDD) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) comparing pre-vertebral soft-tissue thickness (PVST). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study with prospectively collected data at a single academic institution. ACDF patients between 2015 to 2018 who had complete self-reported PDD surveys and pre- and postoperative lateral cervical radiographs were included in the analysis. PDD was assessed utilizing the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI). The hyoid-vertebral distance (HVD) and PVST (the averages of C2 to C7 levels (PVSTC2-7) and all operating levels (PVSTOP)) were assessed preoperatively and upon discharge. The associations among postoperative changes of HVD, PVSTs, and the 4-week HSS-DDI score were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 268 patients with a HSS-DDI score assessment, 209 patients had complete data. In univariate analyses, HVD and PVSTC2-7 changes demonstrated significant correlations with HSS-DDI, whereas PVSTOP showed no significant association. After adjusting with sex and operating level, the changes in HVD (p = 0.019) and PVSTC2-7 (p = 0.009) showed significant associations with the HSS-DDI score and PVSTOP showed no significant association. PVSTC2-7 could not be evaluated in 12% of patients due to measurement difficulties of PVST at lower levels. CONCLUSION: We introduce a novel potential predictive marker for PDD after ACDF. Our results suggest that HVD can be utilized for the risk assessment of PDD, especially in PVST unmeasurable cases, which accounts for over 10% of ACDF patients.

Endplate volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography as a novel predictive measure of severe cage subsidence after standalone lateral lumbar fusion.

PURPOSE: Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is an alternate imaging method to dual X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density (BMD). One advantage of QCT is that it allows site-specific volumetric BMD (vBMD) measurements in a small region. In this study, we utilized site-specific, endplate vBMD (EP-vBMD) as a potential predictive marker of severe cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF) patients and conducted a retrospective comparative study between EP-vBMD and trabecular vBMDs (Tb-vBMD) in the vertebrae. METHODS: Patients undergoing SA-LLIF from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. EP-vBMD was defined as the average of the upper and lower endplate volumetric BMDs measured in cortical and trabecular bone included in a 5-mm area of interest beneath the cage contact surfaces. We compared Tb-vBMDs and EP-vBMDs between disk levels that had severe cage subsidence and levels with no severe subsidence. RESULTS: Both EP-vBMD and Tb-vBMD could be measured in 210 levels of 96 patients. Severe cage subsidence was observed in 58 levels in 38 patients. Median (IQR) Tb-vBMD was 120.5 mg/cm3 (100.8-153.7) in the non-severe subsidence group and 117.9 mg/cm3 (90.6-149.5) in the severe subsidence group (p = 0.393), whereas EP-vBMD was significantly lower in the severe subsidence group than the non-severe subsidence group (non-severe subsidence 257.4 mg/cm3 (216.3-299.4), severe subsidence 233.5 mg/cm3 (193.4-273.3), p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: We introduced a novel site-specific vBMD measurement for cage subsidence risk assessment. Our results showed that EP-vBMD was a reproducible measurement and appeared more predictive for severe cage subsidence after SA-LLIF than Tb-vBMD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Minimum Clinically Important Differences of the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory and Other Dysphagia Measurements in Patients Undergoing ACDF.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative dysphagia is a common complication after anterior cervical surgery, and it can be measured using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) is a condition-specific PROM to evaluate dysphagia and dysphonia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the HSS-DDI has not, to our knowledge, been established. Other PROMs have been used to assess dysphagia (SWAL-QOL and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory [MDADI]) in ACDF. Currently, few studies have addressed the MCIDs of these PROMs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To determine (1) the minimum detectable changes (MDC) of the HSS-DDI, SWAL-QOL, and MDADI using a distribution-based approach, and (2) the MCID of the HSS-DDI, SWAL-QOL, and MDADI, using an anchor-based approach. METHODS: We used a longitudinally maintained database that was originally established for the HSS-DDI development and validation study. In all, 323 patients who underwent elective ACDF were assessed for enrollment eligibility; 83% (268 of 323) met the inclusion criteria and completed the HSS-DDI Week 4 survey. We set six outcomes: distribution-based MDCs for the (1) HSS-DDI, (2) SWAL-QOL, (3) MDADI, in addition to anchor-based MCIDs for the (4) HSS-DDI, (5) SWAL-QOL, and (6) MDADI. The HSS-DDI consists of 31 questions and ranges 0 (worst) to 100 (normal). We used the focused SWAL-QOL, which consists of 14 selected items from the original SWAL-QOL and ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (normal). The MDADI is a 20-item survey and ranges from 20 (worst) to 100 (normal). A distribution-based approach is used to calculate values defined as the smallest difference above the measurement error. An anchor-based approach is used to determine the MCIDs based on an external scale, called an anchor, which indicates the minimal symptom change that is considered clinically important. All 268 patients were used for the distribution-based (0.5 SD) HSS-DDI MDC analysis. The first 16% (44 of 268) of patients completed retesting of the HSS-DDI via a telephone interview and were used for another distribution-based (standard error of measurement: SEM) MDC analysis. The number of patients for the test-retest group was determined based on the previously reported minimum required sample size of reliability studies. The first 63% (169 of 268, SWAL-QOL and 168 of 268, MDADI) of patients completed two other surveys for the external validation of the HSS-DDI, and were used for the SWAL-QOL and MDADI 0.5 SD analyses. Among the patients, 86% (230 of 268) completed the Week 8 HSS-DDI survey that was used for the anchor-based HSS-DDI MCID analysis, and 56% (SWAL-QOL, 150 of 268 and MDADI, 151 of 268) of patients completed the Week 8 surveys that were used for the SWAL-QOL and MDADI MCID analyses. Subjective improvement grades from the previous assessment were used as the anchor. The MCIDs were calculated as the mean score changes among those who reported little better or greater in the improvement assessment and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. We adopted the higher value of these two as the MCID for each PROM. RESULTS: The distribution-based MDCs for the HSS-DDI total score, SWAL-QOL, and MDADI were 11 of 100, 9 of 100, and 8 of 80 points, respectively, using the 0.5 SD method. Using the SEM-based method, the MDC for the HSS-DDI total score was 9 of 100 points. Regarding the anchor-based MCIDs, the values calculated with the mean score change method were consistently higher than those of ROC analysis and were adopted as the MCIDs. The MCIDs were 10 for the total HSS-DDI total score, 8 for the SWAL-QOL, and 6 for the MDADI. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements of less than 10 points for the HSS-DDI score, 9 points for the SWAL-QOL, and 6 points for the MDADI are unlikely to be perceived by patients to be clinically important. Future studies on dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery should report between-group differences in light of this, rather than focusing on p values and statistical significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Chronic dysphagia caused by Laryngo-vertebral Synostosis after anterior fusion for cervical spine trauma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical spine surgery is often associated with postoperative dysphagia, but chronic dysphagia caused by laryngo-vertebral synostosis is extremely rare. We report a case of chronic dysphagia caused by synostosis between the cricoid cartilage and cervical spine after anterior surgery for cervical spine trauma. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We present a case of a 39-year-old man who had sustained complex spine trauma at C5-6 associated with complete spinal cord injury at the age of 22; the patient presented with a 5-year history of chronic dysphagia. Computed tomography demonstrated posterior shift of the esophagus as well as calcification of the cricoid cartilage and its fusion to the right anterior tubercle of the C5 vertebra. A barium swallow study demonstrated significant barium aspiration into the airway and no laryngeal elevation. The patient underwent resection of the bony bridge and omohyoid muscle flap insertion. His symptoms ameliorated after surgery. CONCLUSION: Synostosis between the cricoid cartilage and cervical spine may occur associated with cervical spine trauma and causes chronic dysphagia. Resection of the fused part can improve dysphagia caused by this rare condition and omohyoid muscle flap might be a good option to prevent recurrence.

Impact of Spinopelvic sagittal alignment on the surgical outcomes of dropped head syndrome: a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Most of the previous studies about the surgical treatment of dropped head syndrome (DHS) are small case series, and their primary outcome measures were cervical alignment parameters. Therefore, little is known about the associations between pre- and postoperative global sagittal alignment in the whole spine and the clinical outcomes of the surgical treatment of DHS. In this study, we investigated the surgical outcomes of DHS, including correction of cervical and global spinal sagittal alignment. METHODS: This study was a retrospective observational study. Fifteen patients with DHS who had undergone correction surgery were enrolled. Surgical outcomes, including complications and implant failures, were investigated. We assessed cervical alignment parameters as well as spinopelvic global alignment parameters, including pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), and C7-sacral sagittal vertical axis (SVA). We examined the changes in these parameters using pre- and posoperative whole spine lateral radiographs. The parameters were compared between the failure and nonfailure groups. RESULTS: Recurrence of sagittal imbalance and horizontal gaze difficulty was observed in 6 cases (40%). In all, 3 cases (20%) exhibited a distal junctional failure and required multiple surgeries with extension of fusion. Of all the radiographic parameters compared between the failure and nonfailure groups, significant differences were only observed in pre and postoperative SVA and PI-LL. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the global sagittal alignment parameters, including PI-LL and SVA, were different between the patients with failure and non failure, and these parameters might have notable impacts on surgical outcomes. Surgeons should consider PI-LL and SVA while determining the surgical course for patients with DHS.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of revision interbody fusion surgery between lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with propensity score (PS) adjustments and to investigate the efficacy of indirect decompression with LLIF in previously decompressed segments on the basis of radiological assessment. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent revision surgery for recurrence of neurological symptoms after posterior decompression surgery was performed. Postoperative complications and operative factors were evaluated and compared between LLIF and PLIF/TLIF. Moreover, postoperative improvement in cross-sectional areas (CSAs) in the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen was evaluated in LLIF cases. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (21 and 35 cases of LLIF and PLIF/TLIF, respectively) were included. In the univariate analysis, the LLIF group had significantly more endplate injuries (p = 0.03) and neurological deficits (p = 0.042), whereas the PLIF/TLIF group demonstrated significantly more dural tears (p < 0.001), surgical site infections (SSIs) (p = 0.02), and estimated blood loss (EBL) (p < 0.001). After PS adjustments, the LLIF group still showed significantly more endplate injuries (p = 0.03), and the PLIF/TLIF group demonstrated significantly more dural tears (p < 0.001), EBL (p < 0.001), and operating time (p = 0.04). The PLIF/TLIF group showed a trend toward a higher incidence of SSI (p = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference regarding improvement in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores between the 2 surgical procedures (p = 0.77). The CSAs in the spinal canal and foramen were both significantly improved (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LLIF is a safe, effective, and less invasive procedure with acceptable complication rates for revision surgery for previously decompressed segments. Therefore, LLIF can be an alternative to PLIF/TLIF for restenosis after posterior decompression surgery.