WHITE CEREBELLUM SIGN AS A DARK PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR OF CEREBRAL INJURY: A CASE REPORT.

Introduction: The white cerebellum sign (WCS) is a classical but rare radiological finding usually associated with irreversible diffuse hypoxic-ischemic cerebral injury. Very few cases exist in the literature globally, especially from the West African region, as a potential hallmark of poor prognostic outcome. We describe the white cerebellum sign in a Nigerian pediatric patient, managed for severe head injury. Case Presentation: A fourteen-year old boy presented to our emergency department with loss of consciousness following a pedestrian road traffic accident. Physical examination revealed a critically ill boy with fever, hypotension, tachycardia, gasping respiration, GCS 3, bilateral dilated unreactive pupils, absent corneal, gag and oculocephalic reflexes. He was thus diagnosed of severe traumatic brain injury and brainstem dysfunction. He had endotracheal intubation, ventilatory and inotropic support. Cranial computerized tomography scan of the patient showed radiological features in keeping with the WCS. His clinical status remained poor until he suffered a cardiac arrest about twelve hours after admission. Conclusion: WCS has been reported in relation to child abuse, anoxic-ischemic brain injury, inflammatory and metabolic brain disorders and trauma. It is a classical radiological description of diffuse cerebral edema alongside relatively normal cerebellar hemispheres and brainstem. Management of this pathology is symptomatic, and aims to ameliorate the associated raised intracranial pressure, control seizures and prevent cerebral infarction. The index patient, who presented 24 hours after severe head injury with associated early post-traumatic seizures, respiratory failure and brainstem dysfunction, had an unfavourable outcome consistent with previous reports of WCS. We have reported the rare but classical white cerebellum sign. It remains a grave prognosticator of cerebral injury and should be sought for in the neuroimaging of patients with acute brain insults.

The Management of Persistent Distal Occlusions after Mechanical Thrombectomy and Thrombolysis: An Inter- and Intrarater Agreement Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The best management of patients with persistent distal occlusion after mechanical thrombectomy with or without IV thrombolysis remains unknown. We sought to evaluate the variability and agreement in decision-making for persistent distal occlusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A portfolio of 60 cases was sent to clinicians with varying backgrounds and experience. Responders were asked whether they considered conservative management or rescue therapy (stent retriever, aspiration, or intra-arterial thrombolytics) a treatment option as well as their willingness to enroll patients in a randomized trial. Agreement was assessed using κ statistics. RESULTS: The electronic survey was answered by 31 physicians (8 vascular neurologists and 23 interventional neuroradiologists). Decisions for rescue therapies were more frequent (n = 1116/1860, 60%) than for conservative management (n = 744/1860, 40%; P < .001). Interrater agreement regarding the final management decision was "slight" (κ = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09-0.14) and did not improve when subgroups of clinicians were studied according to background, experience, and specialty or when cases were grouped according to the level of occlusion. On delayed re-questioning, 23 of 29 respondents (79.3%) disagreed with themselves on at least 20% of cases. Respondents were willing to offer trial participation in 1295 of 1860 (69.6%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals did not agree regarding the best management of patients with persistent distal occlusion after mechanical thrombectomy and IV thrombolysis. There is sufficient uncertainty to justify a dedicated randomized trial.

Evaluation of a rapid test kit for detection of HBsAg/eAg in whole blood: a possible method for pre-donation testing.

In many developing countries where hepatitis B is endemic, positivity rate for HBsAg in donor blood is high, and in some places, up to 20% of donated blood has to be discarded for being HBsAg positive. This degree of wastage may be financially crippling for some developing countries. Pre-donation testing may be useful, so that donors who test HBsAg positive are deferred and wastage of costly blood bags is reduced. The study is to evaluate the suitability of the AMRAD kit, for pre-donation testing for HBsAg. One hundred and one (101) healthy blood donors were screened for HBsAg/eAg using the test kit. The same specimens were screened using Monolisa (ELISA) kits for HBsAg and eAg as the standard. True positive (TrP), False negative (FN), True negative (TrN) and, false positive (FP) values were then found, from which, sensitivity and specificity, were derived. The AMRAD test kit detected 93 specimens as negative and 8 specimens as positive for HBsAg as against 94 negatives (TrN) and 7 positives (TrP) by monolisa. Thus, one false positive (FP) result was found in using the kit while no false negative (FN) occurred. The findings in this preliminary study suggest that AMRAD kit may be a useful predonation screening test for HBsAg.

Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and motivations towards blood donations among blood donors in Lagos, Nigeria.

Summary. interviewed with questionnaires on their knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and motivations about blood donations. It was found that a large number of them (92.9%) donated because of the benefits they will obtain from the hospital. Such benefits include antenatal registration (67.1%) and saving the lives of relations (25.8%). Even though many of the donors are educated (98.9%), majority of whom have university degrees (36.1%) and have heard about blood donation before, 52.4% of them believe they can contact human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis infection from blood donation. A good number (47.0%) are afraid of what they regard as side effects, such as weight loss (23.8%), sexual failure (5.9%), high blood pressure (5.2%), sudden death (3.3%), and convulsion (1.47%). About 41.0% prefers certificates as an incentive for donation, whereas 13.6% prefers money; less than 3% will like their names announced or published on the media and 2.58% will donate for nothing. It is recommended that an intensive blood donation campaign should be maintained. This will allow people to be well informed, turning the positive attitude of saving life through blood donation to a regular practice.