How useful is the machine perfusion in liver transplantation? An answer from a national survey.

Machine perfusion (MP) has been shown worldwide to offer many advantages in liver transplantation, but it still has some gray areas. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the donor risk factors of grafts, perfused with any MP, that might predict an ineffective MP setting and those would trigger post-transplant early allograft dysfunction (EAD). Data from donors of all MP-perfused grafts at six liver transplant centers have been analyzed, whether implanted or discarded after perfusion. The first endpoint was the negative events after perfusion (NegE), which is the number of grafts discarded plus those that were implanted but lost after the transplant. A risk factor analysis for NegE was performed and marginal grafts for MP were identified. Finally, the risk of EAD was analyzed, considering only implanted grafts. From 2015 to September 2019, 158 grafts were perfused with MP: 151 grafts were implanted and 7 were discarded after the MP phase because they did not reach viability criteria. Of 151, 15 grafts were lost after transplant, so the NegE group consisted of 22 donors. In univariate analysis, the donor risk index >1.7, the presence of hypertension in the medical history, static cold ischemia time, and the moderate or severe macrovesicular steatosis were the significant factors for NegE. Multivariate analysis confirmed that macrosteatosis >30% was an independent risk factor for NegE (odd ratio 5.643, p = 0.023, 95% confidence interval, 1.27-24.98). Of 151 transplanted patients, 34% experienced EAD and had worse 1- and 3-year-survival, compared with those who did not face EAD (NoEAD), 96% and 96% for EAD vs. 89% and 71% for NoEAD, respectively (p = 0.03). None of the donor/graft characteristics was associated with EAD even if the graft was moderately steatotic or fibrotic or from an aged donor. For the first time, this study shows that macrovesicular steatosis >30% might be a warning factor involved in the risk of graft loss or a cause of graft discard after the MP treatment. On the other hand, the MP seems to be useful in reducing the donor and graft weight in the development of EAD.

Incidental Intra-Hepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocholangiocarcinoma in Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy of the biliary tract that is a challenging issue for the medical community, with increasing incidence. Risk factors for CCA are similar to those known for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), such as cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B and C, obesity, diabetes, and alcohol. We describe the outcome and the management of patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) with an incidental diagnosis of intrahepatic (iCCA) or hepatocholangiocarcinoma (CHC). METHODS: From 2000 to May 2015, 655 LT were performed LT at the Liver Transplant Center in Modena, Italy. We retrospectively reviewed the pathological data of the explanted livers, finding 5 cases of iCCA or CHC. The pathological examination of the explanted livers showed 1 case of iCCA; 1 case of multifocal HCC associated with a nodule of iCCA; 2 cases of CHC associated with nodules of HCC; and 1 case of CHC associated with iCCA. Mean disease-free survival (DFS) was 15.49 months (1.55-42.04) and mean overall survival (OS) was 24.76 months (3.91-75.49). All patients died of recurrent tumor progression. RESULTS: iCCA incidental finding after LT affects patient outcomes, massively causing OS and DFS reduction. We stress the necessity of a more accurate selection of the candidates whenever an augmented risk of iCCA or CHC is present. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations are required to better understand the role of LT in these patients and to define the best management for them once they have been transplanted and the histological examination reveals the presence of iCCA or CHC.

Pilot scale evaluation of the BABIU process--upgrading of landfill gas or biogas with the use of MSWI bottom ash.

Biogas or landfill gas can be converted to a high-grade gas rich in methane with the use of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash as a reactant for fixation of CO2 and H2S. In order to verify results previously obtained at a laboratory scale with 65-90 kg of bottom ash (BA), several test runs were performed at a pilot scale, using 500-1000 kg of bottom ash and up to 9.2 Nm(3)/h real landfill gas from a landfill in the Tuscany region (Italy). The input flow rate was altered. The best process performance was observed at a input flow rate of 3.7 Nm(3)/(htBA). At this flow rate, the removal efficiencies for H2S were approximately 99.5-99%.