Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Surg ; 149(11): 1169-75, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25251601

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Many hospitals have undertaken initiatives to improve care during the end of life, recognizing that some individuals have unique needs that are often not met in acute inpatient care settings. Studies of surgical patients have shown this population to receive palliative care at reduced rates in comparison with medical patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in the use of palliative care and hospice between surgical and medical patients in an integrated health care system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) enrollment data and administrative data sets were used to identify 191,280 VHA patients who died between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2012, and who had an acute inpatient episode in the VHA system in the last year of life. Patients were categorized as surgical if at any time during the year preceding death they underwent a surgical procedure (n = 42,143) or medical (n = 149,137) if the patient did not receive surgical treatment in the last year of life. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Receipt of palliative or hospice care and the number of days from palliative or hospice initiation to death were determined using VHA administrative inpatient, outpatient, and fee-based encounter-level data files. RESULTS: Surgical patients were significantly less likely than medical patients to receive either hospice or palliative care (odds ratio = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.94; P < .001). When adjusting for demographics and medical comorbidities, this difference was even more pronounced (odds ratio = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.86). Yet, among patients who received hospice or palliative care, surgical patients lived significantly longer than their medical counterparts (a median of 26 vs 23 days, respectively; P < .001) yet had similar relative use of these services after risk adjustment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the VHA population, surgical patients are less likely to receive either hospice or palliative care in the year prior to death compared with medical patients, yet surgical patients have a longer length of time in these services. Determining criteria for higher-risk medical and surgical patients may help with increasing the relative use of these services. Potential barriers and differences may exist among surgical and medical services that could impact the use of palliative care or hospice in the last year of life.


Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Cancer ; 116(9): 2090-8, 2010 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20198707

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether it is appropriate to transfer the follow-up care of breast cancer (BrCa) survivors from cancer specialists to primary care physicians (PCPs). This contemporary study compared physician specialty and documented the long-term surveillance of survivors who underwent surgery at an American academic center. METHODS: Women in this institutional review board-approved study underwent breast surgery between 1996 and 2006. Data were collected for 270 patients with stage I to III BrCa (mean follow-up, 6 years). Charts were reviewed based on American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines for recommended surveillance frequency and care. RESULTS: The majority of patients (90%; n = 242) were followed by specialists with 10% (n = 28) followed by PCPs. Patients with advanced disease and a greater risk of disease recurrence more often received specialist care. Patients followed by specialists were more often seen at ASCO-recommended intervals (eg, 89% vs 69% of patients followed by a PCP at follow-up Year 6; P < .01); however, many patients were followed inconsistently. Breast disease was often not the focus of PCP visits or mentioned in clinic notes (18% patients). Women seen by specialists were more likely to have documented clinical examinations of the breast (93% vs 44% at Year 6), axilla (94% vs 52%), or annual mammograms (74% vs 48%; P = .001-.02). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent compliance with surveillance guidelines and chart documentation needs improvement among all providers; however, specialists more consistently met ASCO guidelines. If transfer of care to a PCP occurs, it should be formalized and include follow-up recommendations and defined physician responsibilities. Providers and patients should be educated regarding surveillance care and current guidelines incorporated into standard clinical practice.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Oncologia , Sobreviventes , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Mamografia , Médicos de Família , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA