Value of repeat testing using Cepheid GeneXpert CT/NG for indeterminate PCR results when diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are the most sensitive method for diagnosing chlamydia and gonorrhoea. We use the COBAS 4800 CT/NG combined assay (Roche Molecular Diagnostics, CA, USA), and whilst the majority of samples yield definitive results, a small proportion are reported as indeterminate. In these instances, it is usual practice to request repeat samples which delays diagnosis. This audit was twofold: first to establish the proportion of indeterminate results with current NAAT testing requiring re-sampling. Second, to determine whether a second NAAT such as Cepheid GeneXpert CT/NG assay (Cepheid, CA, USA) could be used on initial indeterminate samples to resolve indeterminate results, therefore reducing need for repeat sampling. During 2012, 144/21,931 (0.66%) samples were indeterminate for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis or both, and a repeat sample was received in only 51.77% of patients with final results being delayed for more than 24 h. Over the next six months, there were 77/9472 (0.81%) indeterminate results. After an evaluation and introduction of the Cepheid assay, the number of indeterminate results fell to 9 (0.10%). Thus, use of the Cepheid assay significantly reduced indeterminate results, reduced reliance on a repeat sampling and significantly improved turnaround time, laboratory workflow and patient experience.

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis post extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and literature review.

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for reversible pulmonary failure in critically ill patients has increased over the last few decades. Nosocomial infections are a major complication of ECMO and fungi have been found to be a common cause. Herein, we describe a case of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis following ECMO, which was successfully treated with combination antifungal therapy and interferon-gamma.

Aggregatibacter aphrophilus in a patient with recurrent empyema: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Aggregatibacter aphrophilus (formerly Haemophilus aphrophilus and H. paraphrophilus) is classically associated with infective endocarditis. Other infections reported in the literature include brain abscess, bone and joint infections and endophthalmitis. There are only two cases of empyema ever reported due to this organism. We report the isolation of A. aphrophilus from pleural fluid on three separate hospital admissions in a patient with recurrent empyema. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old female patient of Caucasian origin presented with a three-week history of fever, shortness of breath and dry cough. She was found to have a pleural empyema so a chest drain was inserted and a sample of pus was sent to the microbiology laboratory. After overnight incubation, a chocolate blood agar plate incubated in 5% carbon dioxide showed a profuse growth of small, round, glistening colonies which were identified as Gram-negative coccobacilli. They were oxidase- and catalase-negative. Biochemical testing using RapID NH confirmed the identity of the organism as A. aphrophilus. It was susceptible to amoxicillin, levofloxacin and doxycycline. Our patient was treated with intravenous amoxicillin with clavulanic acid and clarithromycin followed by oral doxycycline, but was re-admitted twice over the next three months with recurrent empyema and the same organism was isolated. Each episode was managed with chest drainage and a six-week course of antibiotic--doxycycline for the second episode and amoxicillin for the third episode, after which she has remained well. CONCLUSION: This is the first case report of recurrent empyema due to A. aphrophilus. Our patient had no underlying condition to explain the recurrence. Although our isolate was doxycycline susceptible, our patient had recurrent infection after treatment with this antibiotic, suggesting that this antibiotic is ineffective in treatment of deep-seated A. aphrophilus infection. This organism can be difficult to identify in the laboratory because, unlike closely related Haemophilus spp., it is oxidase-negative, catalase-negative and X and V independent.